Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andrew J. Bishop is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andrew J. Bishop.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016

Ablative Radiotherapy Doses Lead to a Substantial Prolongation of Survival in Patients With Inoperable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Retrospective Dose Response Analysis

Randa Tao; Sunil Krishnan; Priya Bhosale; Milind Javle; Thomas A. Aloia; Rachna T. Shroff; Ahmed Kaseb; Andrew J. Bishop; Cameron W. Swanick; Eugene J. Koay; Howard D. Thames; Theodore S. Hong; Prajnan Das; Christopher H. Crane

PURPOSE Standard therapies for localized inoperable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) are ineffective. Advances in radiotherapy (RT) techniques and image guidance have enabled ablative doses to be delivered to large liver tumors. This study evaluated the effects of RT dose escalation in the treatment of IHCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-nine consecutive patients with inoperable IHCC were identified and treated with definitive RT from 2002 to 2014. At diagnosis, the median tumor size was 7.9 cm (range, 2.2 to 17 cm). Seventy patients (89%) received systemic chemotherapy before RT. RT doses were 35 to 100 Gy (median, 58.05 Gy) in three to 30 fractions for a median biologic equivalent dose (BED) of 80.5 Gy (range, 43.75 to 180 Gy). RESULTS Median follow-up time for patients alive at time of analysis was 33 months (range, 11 to 93 months). Median overall survival (OS) time after diagnosis was 30 months; 3-year OS rate was 44%. Radiation dose was the single most important prognostic factor; higher doses correlated with an improved local control (LC) rate and OS. The 3-year OS rate for patients receiving BED greater than 80.5 Gy was 73% versus 38% for those receiving lower doses (P = .017); 3-year LC rate was significantly higher (78%) after a BED greater than 80.5 Gy than after lower doses (45%, P = .04). BED as a continuous variable significantly affected LC (P = .009) and OS (P = .004). There were no significant treatment-related toxicities. CONCLUSION Delivery of higher doses of RT improves LC and OS in inoperable IHCC. A BED greater than 80.5 Gy seems to be an ablative dose of RT for large IHCCs, with long-term survival rates that compare favorably with resection.


Journal of Neurosurgery | 2016

Single-fraction versus multifraction spinal stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases from renal cell carcinoma: secondary analysis of Phase I/II trials.

Amol J. Ghia; Eric L. Chang; Andrew J. Bishop; Hubert Y. Pan; Nicholas S. Boehling; Behrang Amini; Pamela K. Allen; Jing Li; Laurence D. Rhines; Nizar M. Tannir; Claudio E. Tatsui; Paul D. Brown; James N. Yang

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare fractionation schemes and outcomes of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated in institutional prospective spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) trials who did not previously undergo radiation treatment at the site of the SSRS. METHODS Patients enrolled in 2 separate institutional prospective protocols and treated with SSRS between 2002 and 2011 were included. A secondary analysis was performed on patients with previously nonirradiated RCC spinal metastases treated with either single-fraction (SF) or multifraction (MF) SSRS. RESULTS SSRS was performed in 47 spinal sites on 43 patients. The median age of the patients was 62 years (range 38-75 years). The most common histological subtype was clear cell (n = 30). Fifteen sites underwent surgery prior to the SSRS, with laminectomy the most common procedure performed (n = 10). All SF SSRS was delivered to a dose of 24 Gy (n = 21) while MF regiments were either 27 Gy in 3 fractions (n = 20) or 30 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 6). The median overall survival duration for the entire cohort was 22.8 months. The median local control (LC) for the entire cohort was 80.6 months with 1-year and 2-year actuarial LC rates of 82% and 68%, respectively. Single-fraction SSRS correlated with improved 1- and 2-year actuarial LC relative to MF SSRS (95% vs 71% and 86% vs 55%, respectively; p = 0.009). On competing risk analysis, SF SSRS showed superior LC to MF SSRS (subhazard ratio [SHR] 6.57, p = 0.014). On multivariate analysis for LC with tumor volume (p = 0.272), number of treated levels (p = 0.819), gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage (p = 0.225), and GTV minimum point dose (p = 0.97) as covariates, MF SSRS remained inferior to SF SSRS (SHR 5.26, p = 0.033) CONCLUSIONS SSRS offers durable LC for spinal metastases from RCC. Single-fraction SSRS is associated with improved LC over MF SSRS for previously nonirradiated RCC spinal metastases.


Journal of Neurosurgery | 2015

Factors affecting survival in 37 consecutive patients undergoing de novo stereotactic radiosurgery for contiguous sites of vertebral body metastasis from renal cell carcinoma

Jonathan N. Sellin; William Reichardt; Andrew J. Bishop; Dima Suki; Laurence D. Rhines; S.H. Settle; Paul D. Brown; Jing Li; Ganesh Rao; Eric L. Chang; Claudio E. Tatsui

OBJECT Palliative resection of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) spinal metastasis is indicated in cases of neurological compromise or mechanical instability, whereas conventional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is commonly used for pain control. Recently, spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a safe alternative, delivering higher therapeutic doses of radiation to spinal metastases. To better understand factors affecting survival in patients undergoing spinal SRS for metastatic RCC, the authors performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of cases at a tertiary cancer center. METHODS Patients harboring contiguous sites of vertebral body involvement from metastatic RCC who received upfront spinal SRS treatment at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2005 and 2012 were identified. Demographic data, pain scores, radiographic data, overall survival, complications, status of systemic disease, neurological and functional status, and time between primary diagnosis and diagnosis of metastasis (systemic and spinal) were analyzed to determine their influence on survival. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients receiving treatment for 40 distinct, contiguous sites of disease were included. The median overall survival after spinal SRS was 16.3 months (range 7.4-25.3 months). Univariate analysis revealed several factors significantly associated with improved overall survival. Local progression after spinal SRS was associated with worse overall survival compared with sustained local control (HR 3.4, 95% CI 1.6-7.4, p = 0.002). Median survival in patients with a Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≥ 70 was longer than in patients with a KPS score < 70 (HR 4.7, 95% CI 2.1-10.7, p < 0.001). Patients with neurological deficits at the time of spinal SRS had a shorter median survival than those without (HR 4.2, 95% CI 1.4-12.0, p = 0.008). Individuals with nonprogressive systemic disease at the time of spinal SRS had a longer median survival than those with systemic progression at the time of treatment (HR 8.3, 95% CI 3.3-20.7, p < 0.001). Median survival in patients experiencing any metastasis < 12 months after primary RCC diagnosis was shorter than in patients experiencing any metastasis > 12 months after primary diagnosis, a difference that approached but did not attain significance (HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.90-4.1, p = 0.09). On multivariate analysis, local progression of disease after spinal SRS, metastasis < 12 months after primary, KPS score ≤ 70, and progression of systemic disease at time of spinal SRS all remained significant factors influencing survival (respectively, HR 3.7, p = 0.002; HR 2.6, p = 0.026; HR 4.0, p = 0.002; and HR 13.2, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS We identified several factors associated with survival after spinal SRS for RCC metastases, including local progression, time between first metastasis and primary RCC diagnosis, KPS score, presence of neurological deficits, and progressive metastatic disease. These factors should be taken into consideration when considering a patient for spinal SRS for RCC metastases.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2015

Creation of a Prognostic Index for Spine Metastasis to Stratify Survival in Patients Treated With Spinal Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Secondary Analysis of Mature Prospective Trials.

Chad Tang; Kenneth R. Hess; Andrew J. Bishop; Hubert Y. Pan; Eva N. Christensen; James N. Yang; Nizar M. Tannir; Behrang Amini; Claudio E. Tatsui; Laurence D. Rhines; Paul D. Brown; Amol J. Ghia

PURPOSE There exists uncertainty in the prognosis of patients following spinal metastasis treatment. We sought to create a scoring system that stratifies patients based on overall survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients enrolled in 2 prospective trials investigating stereotactic spine radiation surgery (SSRS) for spinal metastasis with ≥ 3-year follow-up were analyzed. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to create a survival model. Pretreatment variables included were race, sex, age, performance status, tumor histology, extent of vertebrae involvement, previous therapy at the SSRS site, disease burden, and timing of diagnosis and metastasis. Four survival groups were generated based on the model-derived survival score. RESULTS Median follow-up in the 206 patients included in this analysis was 70 months (range: 37-133 months). Seven variables were selected: female sex (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.7, P=.02), Karnofsky performance score (HR = 0.8 per 10-point increase above 60, P = .007), previous surgery at the SSRS site (HR = 0.7, P=.02), previous radiation at the SSRS site (HR = 1.8, P=.001), the SSRS site as the only site of metastatic disease (HR = 0.5, P=.01), number of organ systems involved outside of bone (HR = 1.4 per involved system, P<.001), and >5 year interval from initial diagnosis to detection of spine metastasis (HR = 0.5, P < .001). The median survival among all patients was 25.5 months and was significantly different among survival groups (in group 1 [excellent prognosis], median survival was not reached; group 2 reached 32.4 months; group 3 reached 22.2 months; and group 4 [poor prognosis] reached 9.1 months; P < .001). Pretreatment symptom burden was significantly higher in the patient group with poor survival than in the group with excellent survival (all metrics, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS We developed the prognostic index for spinal metastases (PRISM) model, a new model that identified patient subgroups with poor and excellent prognoses.


Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2016

Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Favorable outcomes with radiotherapy

Andrew J. Bishop; Adam S. Garden; G. Brandon Gunn; David I. Rosenthal; Beth M. Beadle; Clifton D. Fuller; Lawrence B. Levy; Ann M. Gillenwater; Merrill S. Kies; Bita Esmaeli; Steven J. Frank; Jack Phan; William H. Morrison

The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) of the head and neck using a radiation‐based treatment approach.


Journal of Neurosurgery | 2017

Patterns of recurrence and survival in sporadic, neurofibromatosis Type 1-associated, and radiation-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors

Kelsey L. Watson; Ghadah A. Al Sannaa; Christine M. Kivlin; Davis R. Ingram; Sharon M. Landers; Christina L. Roland; Janice N. Cormier; Kelly K. Hunt; Barry W. Feig; B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Andrew J. Bishop; Wei Lien Wang; John M. Slopis; Ian E. McCutcheon; Alexandar J. Lazar; Keila E. Torres

OBJECTIVE Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are an aggressive group of soft tissue sarcomas that can arise sporadically, in the context of neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) or at a site of prior irradiation. Large series profiling the features and outcomes of sporadic, NF1-associated, and radiation-associated MPNSTs are limited. The goal of this study was to elucidate differences between MPNST etiologies in a large single-institution retrospective study. METHODS Patients (n = 317) were identified through the tumor registry of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Clinicopathological features were retrospectively collected. Features were compared among MPNST subtypes for patients who had sufficient clinical history (n = 289), and clinicopathological features were used to identify adverse predictors of recurrence and survival outcomes. RESULTS Five-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) estimates were 56.6%, 49.6%, and 53.6%, respectively, for the high-grade MPNST cohort. Five-year DSS was lower in NF1-associated and radiation-associated MPNST than in sporadic MPNST (52%, 47%, and 67%, respectively, p = 0.140). Patients with radiation-associated MPNST had worse 5-year LRFS than those with the sporadic and NF1-associated subtypes (RT-associated vs sporadic, p = 0.010; RT-associated vs NF1-associated, p = 0.232). Truncally located tumors, positive surgical margins, local recurrence, and metastasis were predictors of adverse DSS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Radiation-associated MPNSTs are associated with poorer local recurrence-free and disease-specific survival than sporadic and NF1-associated tumors. NF1-associated MPNSTs may have worse survival outcomes owing to large tumor size, compromising truncal location, and lower rate of negative resection margins compared with sporadic tumors.


Cancer | 2015

Prognosis for patients with metastatic breast cancer who achieve a no-evidence-of-disease status after systemic or local therapy.

Andrew J. Bishop; Joe Ensor; Stacy L. Moulder; Simona F. Shaitelman; Mark A. Edson; Gary J. Whitman; Sandra Whaley Bishnoi; Karen E. Hoffman; Michael C. Stauder; Vicente Valero; Thomas A. Buchholz; Naoto T. Ueno; Gildy Babiera; Wendy A. Woodward

This study sought to determine outcomes for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with no evidence of disease (NED) after treatment and to identify factors predictive of outcomes once the status of NED was attained.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2015

Combined modality management of retroperitoneal sarcomas: A single-institution series of 121 patients

Andrew J. Bishop; Gunar K. Zagars; Keila E. Torres; Kelly K. Hunt; Janice N. Cormier; Barry W. Feig; B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate local control, survival outcomes, and complication rates of patients treated with aggressive surgery and radiation therapy (RT) for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). METHODS AND MATERIALS We reviewed the medical records of 121 consecutive patients treated for RPS with surgery and RT between 1965 and 2012. The most common histology was liposarcoma (n = 42; 35%). The median follow-up was 100 months (range: 20-467 months). Eighty-six patients (71%) were treated for initial presentation of RPS, and 35 patients (29%) presented with and were treated for RPS recurrence. RT was preoperative in 88 patients (73%; median dose: 50.4 Gy) and postoperative in 33 patients (27%; median dose: 55 Gy). RESULTS Five-year local control and overall survival rates were 56% and 57%, respectively. Two factors were associated with higher risk of any intra-abdominal recurrence at 5 years: positive or uncertain margins (58% vs 30% for negative margins, P < .001; hazard ratio [HR]: 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-4.8) and disease recurrence after previous resection (76% vs 31% for de novo RPS, P < .001; HR: 4.4; 95% CI: 2.5-7.5). The 10-year complication rate was 5%, and RT-related complications were associated with postoperative RT (P < .001) and RT dose of ≥ 60 Gy (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Intra-abdominal RPS recurrence continues to be a significant challenge despite the use of aggressive surgery and radiation therapy. Given the complications associated with postoperative radiation therapy, we recommend that preoperative radiation therapy is the preferred strategy when combined modality therapy is recommended.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2015

Relationship between low hemoglobin levels and outcomes after treatment with radiation or chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer: has the impact of anemia been overstated?

Andrew J. Bishop; Pamela K. Allen; Ann H. Klopp; Larissa A. Meyer; Patricia J. Eifel

PURPOSE Previous reports have suggested that anemia increases rates of recurrence after radiation therapy for cervical cancer. However, these studies may not have fully corrected for confounding risk factors. Using a well-characterized cohort of cervical cancer patients, we examined the association between anemia and outcomes before and after the introduction of chemoradiation as standard of care. METHODS AND MATERIALS We reviewed the records of 2454 patients who underwent definitive radiation therapy from 1980 through 2011. Minimum hemoglobin level (Hgbmin) was recorded for 2359 patients (96%). Endpoints included freedom from central recurrence (FFCR), freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM), and disease-specific survival (DSS). RESULTS For the entire cohort, hemoglobin concentrations of 9, 10, and 12 g/dL before and during radiation were all significantly associated with FFCR, FFDM, and DSS (all P<.001) on univariate analysis. However, on multivariate analysis, only Hgbmin less than 10 g/dL during RT (RT-Hgb<10) remained significant, and it was correlated with lower DSS (P=.02, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.28) and FFDM (P=.03, HR = 1.33) but not with FFCR. In a subset analysis of patients receiving chemoradiation (n=678), RT-Hgb<10 was associated only with DSS (P=.008, HR = 1.49), not with FFCR or FFDM. In this subgroup, despite an association between RT-Hgb<10 and DSS, the use of transfusion was not correlated with benefit. CONCLUSIONS No evidence was found supporting anemia as an independent predictor of central recurrence in patients treated with definitive radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. Less emphasis on correcting anemia in cervical cancer patients may be warranted.


American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015

Soft Tissue Solitary Fibrous Tumor: Combined Surgery and Radiation Therapy Results in Excellent Local Control

Andrew J. Bishop; Gunar K. Zagars; Elizabeth G. Demicco; Wei Lien Wang; Barry W. Feig; B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo

Purpose: To report survival outcomes and local control in patients with solitary fibrous tumors (SFT) treated using surgery and radiation therapy (RT). Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 31 consecutive patients definitively treated for SFT with surgery and RT between 1982 and 2012. The median age was 51 years (range, 23 to 88 y) and tumors were evenly distributed between the head and neck (n=9, 29%), trunk (n=10, 32%), and lower extremities (n=9, 29%). The majority of tumors were large (>5 cm) (n=23, 72%). Specimens had a median of 2 mitoses/10 HPF (range, 0 to 8). Nearly half the cases were treated with postoperative RT (n=14, 45%; median dose, 58 Gy) and the other 17 patients (55%) received preoperative RT (median dose, 50 Gy). Results: Median follow-up time was 59 months (range, 18 to 349 mo). The 5-year rates of local control, overall survival, and distant metastatic-free survival were 100%, 95%, and 92%, respectively. There were no local or nodal relapses and the 10-year complication rate was 6% (n=2). Conclusions: Treatment of soft tissue SFT using combined surgery and RT results in excellent local control.

Collaboration


Dive into the Andrew J. Bishop's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amol J. Ghia

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pamela K. Allen

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Claudio E. Tatsui

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laurence D. Rhines

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Behrang Amini

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jing Li

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Randa Tao

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric L. Chang

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge