Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andrew J. Elliott is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andrew J. Elliott.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2010

Plantar pressures in patients with and without lateral foot pain after lateral column lengthening.

Scott J. Ellis; Joseph C. Yu; A Holly Johnson; Andrew J. Elliott; Martin OʼMalley; Jonathan T. Deland

BACKGROUND Lateral column lengthening, a commonly used adjuvant for the reconstruction of adult flatfoot deformity, can lead to postoperative complaints of lateral plantar pain or discomfort. We hypothesized that patients with such symptoms would have increased lateral plantar pressures when compared with matched controls without these symptoms. METHODS Ten subjects who had undergone lateral column lengthening and were experiencing pain or discomfort in the plantar-lateral aspect of the foot were selected. Controls who had undergone lateral column lengthening but who were not experiencing such symptoms were matched for age, sex, accessory reconstructive procedures, and time from surgery. At the time of the present study, the patients had been followed for at least two years after the reconstruction and had had removal of hardware. Radiographs of each foot were assessed before and after surgery. The patients completed the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score surveys, and standing plantar pressure measurements were obtained. Average mean pressure, peak pressure, and maximum force were assessed at twelve anatomic regions and the two groups were compared. RESULTS There were no significant preoperative differences between the two groups in terms of radiographic parameters. Patients with pain had significantly lower SF-36 Physical Health Summary scores (p < 0.05), SF-36 Physical Function Subscale scores (p < 0.05), and average Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (p < 0.05). Patients with pain had significantly higher lateral midfoot average mean pressure (p < 0.05), peak pressure (p < 0.05), and maximum force (p < 0.05). No differences were found in the hindfoot or forefoot regions. CONCLUSIONS Patients who have undergone lateral column lengthening and who experience lateral plantar pain have increased plantar pressure values in the lateral aspect of the midfoot. The increased pressures in this area cannot be accounted for solely by radiographic or demographic factors.


Foot & Ankle International | 2013

Achilles tendon rupture in women.

J. Turner Vosseller; Scott J. Ellis; David S. Levine; John G. Kennedy; Andrew J. Elliott; Jonathan T. Deland; Matthew M. Roberts; Martin J. O’Malley

Background: The incidence of Achilles rupture appears to be less in women, although this notion has not been specifically investigated in the literature. Methods: The medical records of 7 foot-and-ankle orthopaedic surgeons at 1 institution were reviewed by Current Procedural Terminology (code 27650) and International Classification of Diseases–9 (code 727.67) to establish all Achilles tendon ruptures seen and/or treated by these surgeons. Sex, age, side, and mechanism of injury were recorded. Whether the patient had an acute Achilles tendon rupture or nonacute Achilles pathology was also noted. Results: A total of 468 patients were identified, of whom 358 had acute ruptures: 302 male and 56 female (5.39:1). Patients with acute ruptures were significantly younger than those with nonacute pathology (43.8 vs 55.1, P < .001). For acute ruptures, the mean age was not significantly different between men and women (43.9 vs 43.2; P = .780). Athletic activity was causative in 243 of 302 men (80.5%) and in 40 of 56 women (71.4%). This difference was not statistically significant (P = .130). Six men (2.0%) and 6 women (10.7%) had comorbidities that were thought to increase their risk of rupture (P = .005). Conclusion: Achilles tendon rupture is more common in men than women. Previous studies using the aforementioned codes to identify patients without chart review may have overestimated the number of women with acute Achilles tendon rupture. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series.


Foot & Ankle International | 2008

Functional Outcome After Surgical Reconstruction of Posterior Tibial Tendon Insufficiency in Patients Under 50 Years

Nazzar Tellisi; M. Lobo; Martin J. O'Malley; John G. Kennedy; Andrew J. Elliott; Jonathan T. Deland

Background: Procedures utilized to address the flatfoot in this study included medializing calcaneal osteotomy, posterior tibial tendon reconstruction with flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer, and in patients with more severe deformity, lateral column lengthening. We evaluated patients age 50 and less at the time of surgery, who underwent surgical reconstruction for Stage 2 posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Pre- and postoperative activity levels were evaluated to assess the effect of surgical reconstruction in the younger patient. Materials and Method: Thirty-four feet in 30 patients (11 male, 19 female) with an average age of 41.2 (range, 17 to 50) years had surgery between 1997 and 2004. All feet were examined at an average followup of 44.5 (range, 24 to 65) months and were evaluated with the American-Orthopaedic-Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Hindfoot-Score and SF-36 score. Results: The average preoperative AOFAS-Score was 53.1 ± 14.5 points and 83.2 ± 12.2 points at final postoperative followup. The mean improvement was 29.5. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative AOFAS score was significant (p < 0.0001) using a two-tailed t-test. The difference in the AOFAS pain and alignment subscales was also significant (p < 0.0001). The function subscale improvement was also significant (p = 0.018). The mean physical function component of the postoperative SF-36 score was 79.2. A correlation was found between the SF-36 physical component score and the post operative AOFAS score (r 2 = 0.754). Conclusion: While some lateral discomfort or pain occurred in patients with or without a lateral column lengthening, the posterior tibial tendon reconstruction utilizing medial calcaneal displacement osteotomy with flexor digitorum longus transfer and a lateral column lengthening with more deformity was successful in the higher-functioning, younger patients.


Foot & Ankle International | 2016

Return to Sports and Physical Activities After Primary Partial Arthrodesis for Lisfranc Injuries in Young Patients

Aoife MacMahon; Paul Kim; David S. Levine; Jayme C. Burket; Matthew M. Roberts; Mark C. Drakos; Jonathan T. Deland; Andrew J. Elliott; Scott J. Ellis

Background: Research regarding outcomes in sports and physical activities after primary partial arthrodesis for Lisfranc injuries has been sparse. The purposes of this study were to assess various sports and physical activities in young patients following primary partial arthrodesis for Lisfranc injuries and to compare these with clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients who underwent primary partial arthrodesis for a Lisfranc injury were identified by a retrospective registry review. Thirty-eight of 46 eligible patients (83%) responded for follow-up at a mean of 5.2 (range, 1.0 to 9.3) years with a mean age at surgery of 31.8 (range, 16.8 to 50.3) years. Physical activity participation was assessed with a new sports-specific, patient-administered questionnaire. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Results: Patients participated in 29 different and 155 total physical activities preoperatively, and 27 different and 145 total physical activities postoperatively. Preoperatively, 47.1% were high impact, and postoperatively, 44.8% were high impact. The most common activities were walking, bicycling, running, and weightlifting. Compared to preoperatively, difficulty was the same in 66% and increased in 34% of physical activities. Participation levels were improved in 11%, the same in 64%, and impaired in 25% of physical activities. Patients spent on average 4.2 (range, 0.0 to 19.8) hours per week exercising postoperatively. In regard to return to physical activity, 97% of respondents were satisfied with their operative outcome. Mean postoperative FAOS subscores were significantly worse for patients who had increased physical activity difficulty. Conclusion: Most patients were able to return to their previous physical activities following primary partial arthrodesis for a Lisfranc injury, many of which were high-impact. However, the decreased participation or increase in difficulty of some activities suggests that some patients experienced postoperative limitations in exercise. Future studies could compare sports outcomes between primary partial arthrodesis and open reduction internal fixation for Lisfranc injuries. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.


Foot & Ankle International | 2016

Functional Outcomes Following First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis

Bridget DeSandis; Alejandro E Pino; David S. Levine; Matthew M. Roberts; Jonathan T. Deland; Martin J. O’Malley; Andrew J. Elliott

Background: First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis is a common procedure for treatment of arthritis of the first MTP joint. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of a series of patients of multiple surgeons undergoing first MTP joint arthrodesis, emphasizing the functional gains with respect to daily activity that can be expected after this procedure. Methods: A retrospective review of 53 patients who underwent successful isolated first MTP joint arthrodesis with either a plate and screw or independent screw construct was performed at our institution over a 6-year period. Successful fusion was defined as no lucency at the first MTP joint and bridging of 2 or more cortices on the anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiographic views at final follow-up. Demographic information and radiographs were evaluated for all patients. Preoperative and postoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Short Form Health Status Survey (SF) 36/12 functional outcome scores, as well as responses from an activity- and footwear-specific questionnaire, were evaluated and compared between the 2 fixation methods. Fifty-three patients (56 feet) had radiographs showing successful fusions after being treated for advanced degenerative arthritis of the first MTP joint with arthrodesis. Average time to union was 5.4 months. Results: There was a significant reduction in difficulty in performing daily activities, with all subscales of the FAOS and the SF-12v2 significantly improving postoperatively (P < .05). The majority of patients stated that their foot looked and felt better and were satisfied with the procedure. Five patients experienced painful hardware, which required removal. Conclusion: First MTP joint arthrodesis was successful in improving patient-reported outcomes, particularly the ability to perform daily activities. Most patients had little to no functional limitation and were satisfied with their outcome. The greatest functional improvements were seen in patients’ ability to walk distances and perform low-impact sport activity. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.


HSS Journal | 2013

Autograft and allograft unite similarly in lateral column lengthening for adult acquired flatfoot deformity.

J. Turner Vosseller; Scott J. Ellis; Martin J. O’Malley; Andrew J. Elliott; David S. Levine; Jonathan T. Deland; Matthew M. Roberts

BackgroundLateral column lengthening (LCL) is used to address the forefoot abduction associated with the adult acquired flatfoot. This opening wedge osteotomy can be filled with either allograft or autograft bone.Questions/PurposesThe investigators sought to determine union rates and any loss of correction in patients undergoing LCL with autograft versus allograft.MethodsOver a 3-year period, 126 LCLs performed by five surgeons in 120 patients were reviewed. Autograft was used in 51 patients, allograft in 75 patients. Times to clinical and radiographic union were established for these patients. Any loss of correction of forefoot abduction as manifested by talonavicular uncoverage was recorded for those grafts that healed. Failure was defined as nonunion or loss of 50% or greater correction. The size of the implanted graft was assessed as a risk factor for failure.ResultsThere were 20 total failures: seven in patients with autograft and 13 in patients with allograft (p = 0.63). The size of the implanted graft was larger in those patients that did fail (p = 0.04).ConclusionsThe rate of nonunion and loss of correction for LCL was not significantly different between allograft and autograft. The overall rate of nonunion may be higher than has previously been reported.


Foot & Ankle International | 2008

Gastrocnemius Apneourosis Recession: A Modified Technique:

Nazzar Tellisi; Andrew J. Elliott

Level of Evidence: V, Expert Opinion


Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery | 2006

Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair Using the Achillon Repair System

Andrew J. Elliott; John G. Kennedy; Martin J. O'Malley

ABSTRACT Repair of the Achilles tendon ruptures is becoming a more accepted means of treatment over casting. However, wound problems are still a problematic complication. Minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair using the Achillon® device is presented and discussed as a treatment method that combines the benefits of surgical repair with less wound complications caused by a smaller surgical approach. Cadaveric studies have shown this repair to be stronger than the traditional modified Krackow suture technique.


Foot & Ankle International | 2016

Return to Sports and Physical Activities After the Modified Lapidus Procedure for Hallux Valgus in Young Patients

Aoife MacMahon; John Karbassi; Jayme C. Burket; Andrew J. Elliott; David S. Levine; Matthew M. Roberts; Jonathan T. Deland; Martin J. O’Malley; Jeanne Yu; Carol A. Mancuso; Scott J. Ellis

Background: The modified Lapidus procedure has successfully relieved pain and corrected deformity in patients with hallux valgus, but its effect on participation in specific sports and physical activities remains unclear. Our goals were to assess sports and physical activities in young patients following the modified Lapidus procedure and to compare these with clinical outcomes. Methods: Fifty-eight eligible patients were identified from a retrospective registry review. Of these, 48 (83%) were reached for follow-up at a mean of 2.8 (range, 1.0 to 6.1) years and had a mean age at surgery of 37.3 (range, 14.1 to 49.3) years. Physical activity participation was evaluated with a new sports-specific, patient-administered questionnaire. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and compared to sports outcomes. Results: Patients participated in 26 different physical activities, consisting of 212 total physical activities preoperatively and 209 total postoperatively. The most common were walking, running, bicycling, and swimming. Compared to preoperatively, patients rated 29% of activities as less difficult, 52% as the same, and 19% as more difficult and rated participation levels as improved in 40%, the same in 41%, and impaired in 19%. Eighty-one percent of patients were satisfied with their operative outcome in regard to return to physical activity. Changes in the FAOS Pain subscore were significantly associated with improvements in physical activity difficulty (P < .05), and changes in the Pain, Sports, and QOL subscores were significantly associated with changes in physical activity participation levels (P < .05). Conclusion: Four in 5 patients were able to participate in previous sports and physical activities, including high-impact activities, at their preoperative participation level or better after the modified Lapidus procedure, and were satisfied with surgery in regard to return to previous activity. However, several patients had increased difficulty and impaired participation in physical activity postoperatively. Altogether, this suggests that the procedure is a viable treatment option for hallux valgus in young, active patients. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.


Foot & Ankle International | 2015

Comparison of Rates of Union and Hardware Removal Between Large and Small Cannulated Screws for Calcaneal Osteotomy

Stephanie C. Sayres; Yang Gu; Samuel Kiernan; Bridget DeSandis; Andrew J. Elliott; Martin J. O’Malley

Background: The calcaneal osteotomy is a common procedure to correct hindfoot malalignment. Reported union rates are high, utilizing fixation methods including staples, plates, and most commonly cannulated screws. We began our practice using 6.5 mm and 7.3 mm cannulated screws, but complaints of postoperative posterior heel pain led to hardware removal in many patients. A switch to smaller 4.5 mm cannulated screws resulted in fewer symptoms, thus we hypothesized that using a smaller screw would decrease screw removal while maintaining an equally high union rate. Methods: The records of patients who underwent a calcaneal osteotomy by 2 surgeons between January 1996 and April 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The rates of hardware removal and union were compared between osteotomies held with two 7.3 mm, 6.5 mm, and 4.5 mm cannulated screws. Results: There were 272 feet that met the inclusion criteria. The hardware removal rate for 130 osteotomies held with two 7.3 mm screws was 29.2% and the removal rate for 115 osteotomies held with 4.5 mm screws was 13.0%, which was significantly different (P < .05). The removal rate for 27 osteotomies with 6.5 mm screws was 33.3%. The union rate for all groups was 100%. Conclusion: Fixation of calcaneal osteotomies with two 4.5 mm screws is advantageous over larger screws with respect to future hardware removal. There was no loss of position from the smaller screws and we feel that the 4.5mm cannulated screw provides sufficient compression and achieves a high rate of union equal to that of the larger screws. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Collaboration


Dive into the Andrew J. Elliott's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan T. Deland

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott J. Ellis

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin J. O’Malley

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew M. Roberts

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John G. Kennedy

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin J. O'Malley

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Turner Vosseller

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aoife MacMahon

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bridget DeSandis

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge