Andrew J. Stagg

Modulation of human dendritic cell phenotype and function by probiotic bacteria

Background: “Probiotic” bacteria are effective in treating some inflammatory bowel diseases. However which bacteria confer benefit and mechanisms of action remain poorly defined. Dendritic cells, which are pivotal in early bacterial recognition, tolerance induction, and shaping of T cell responses, may be central in mediating the effects of these bacteria. Aims: To assess effects of different probiotic bacteria on dendritic cell function. Methods: Human intestinal lamina propria mononuclear cells, whole blood, or an enriched blood dendritic cell population were cultured with cell wall components of the eight bacterial strains in the probiotic preparation VSL#3 (four lactobacilli, three bifidobacteria, and one streptococcal strains). Dendritic cells were identified and changes in dendritic cell maturation/costimulatory markers and cytokine production in response to probiotic bacteria were analysed by multicolour flow cytometry, in addition to subsequent effects on T cell polarisation. Results: VSL#3 was a potent inducer of IL-10 by dendritic cells from blood and intestinal tissue, and inhibited generation of Th1 cells. Individual strains within VSL#3 displayed distinct immunomodulatory effects on dendritic cells; the most marked anti-inflammatory effects were produced by bifidobacteria strains which upregulated IL-10 production by dendritic cells, decreased expression of the costimulatory molecule CD80, and decreased interferon-γ production by T cells. VSL#3 diminished proinflammatory effects of LPS by decreasing LPS induced production of IL-12 while maintaining IL-10 production. Conclusions: Probiotic bacteria differ in their immunomodulatory activity and influence polarisation of immune responses at the earliest stage of antigen presentation by dendritic cells.

Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics : Recent Advances

&NA; The intestinal microbiota plays a fundamental role in maintaining immune homeostasis. In controlled clinical trials probiotic bacteria have demonstrated a benefit in treating gastrointestinal diseases, including infectious diarrhea in children, recurrent Clostridium difficile‐induced infection, and some inflammatory bowel diseases. This evidence has led to the proof of principle that probiotic bacteria can be used as a therapeutic strategy to ameliorate human diseases. The precise mechanisms influencing the crosstalk between the microbe and the host remain unclear but there is growing evidence to suggest that the functioning of the immune system at both a systemic and a mucosal level can be modulated by bacteria in the gut. Recent compelling evidence has demonstrated that manipulating the microbiota can influence the host. Several new mechanisms by which probiotics exert their beneficial effects have been identified and it is now clear that significant differences exist between different probiotic bacterial species and strains; organisms need to be selected in a more rational manner to treat disease. Mechanisms contributing to altered immune function in vivo induced by probiotic bacteria may include modulation of the microbiota itself, improved barrier function with consequent reduction in immune exposure to microbiota, and direct effects of bacteria on different epithelial and immune cell types. These effects are discussed with an emphasis on those organisms that have been used to treat human inflammatory bowel diseases in controlled clinical trials.

Intestinal dendritic cells increase T cell expression of α4β7 integrin

The integrin α4β7 binds to MAdCAM‐1 and contributes to homing of lymphocytes to gut and other mucosal tissues. In humans, the α4β7hi subset of circulating memory cellsappears to have been primed in mucosal tissues. The factors that determine whether α4β7lo naive cells become α4βhi or α4β7– cells upon differentiation are poorly understood but could include an influence of the activating antigen‐presenting cell. To address this point, the induction of α4β7 following activation of mouse cells with theAPC‐dependent stimulus soluble anti‐CD3 has been examined. Almost all mouse T cells freshly isolated from mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) and peripheral (PLN; axillary, brachial and inguinal) lymph nodes stained only weakly for α4β7 but a subpopulation became α4β7hi upon activation with anti‐CD3 in a cell cycle‐ and accessory cell‐dependent manner. A small proportion (approximately 1.5 %) of the starting cells gave rise to α4β7hi cells after culture. A higher proportion of α4β7hi cells were generated in MLN than PLN cultures. Peyers patch cultures gave intermediate values. In crossover experiments, MLN dendritic cells (DC) induced higher proportions and numbers of α4β7hi cells than PLN DC irrespective of the source of T cells. Therefore, in addition to their other immunoregulatory roles, DC have the potential to shape immune responses by influencing the homing of the lymphocytes they activate.

Clinical, microbiological, and immunological effects of fructo-oligosaccharide in patients with Crohn’s disease

Background and aims: The intestinal microbiota play a pivotal role in the inflammation associated with Crohn’s disease through their interaction with the mucosal immune system. Some bifidobacteria species are immunoregulatory and induce increased dendritic cell interleukin 10 (IL-10) release in vitro. Fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) increase faecal and mucosal bifidobacteria in healthy volunteers. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of FOS administration on disease activity, bifidobacteria concentrations, and mucosal dendritic cell function in patients with moderately active Crohn’s disease. Patients and methods: Ten patients with active ileocolonic Crohn’s disease received 15 g of FOS for three weeks. Disease activity was measured using the Harvey Bradshaw index. Faecal and mucosal bifidobacteria were quantified by fluorescence in situ hybridisation, and mucosal dendritic cell IL-10 and Toll-like receptor (TLR) expression were assessed by flow cytometry of dissociated rectal biopsies. Results: FOS induced a significant reduction in the Harvey Bradshaw index from 9.8 (SD 3.1) to 6.9 (3.4) (p<0.01). There was a significant increase in faecal bifidobacteria concentration from 8.8 (0.9) log10 to 9.4 (0.9) log10 cells/g dry faeces (p<0.001). The percentage of IL-10 positive dendritic cells increased from 30 (12)% to 53 (10)% (p = 0.06). Finally, the percentage of dendritic cells expressing TLR2 and TLR4 increased from 1.7 (1.7)% to 36.8 (15.9)% (p = 0.08) and from 3.6 (3.6)% to 75.4 (3.4)% (p<0.001), respectively. Conclusions: FOS supplementation increases faecal bifidobacteria concentrations and modifies mucosal dendritic cell function. This novel therapeutic strategy appears to decrease Crohn’s disease activity in a small open label trial and therefore warrants further investigation.

The dendritic cell: its role in intestinal inflammation and relationship with gut bacteria

Dendritic cells are antigen presenting cells that are likely to be pivotal in the balance between tolerance and active immunity to commensal microorganisms that is fundamental to inflammatory conditions, including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Interactions between dendritic cells and microbial products are discussed and how they contribute to regulation of immune responses. The concept that interactions between dendritic cells and commensal organisms may be responsible for maintaining intestinal immune homeostasis is also explored.

Migration and Maturation of Human Colonic Dendritic Cells

Dendritic cells (DC) in the colon may regulate intestinal immunity but remain poorly characterized. In this study a CD11c+HLA-DR+lin− (CD3−CD14−CD16−CD19−CD34−) population has been identified by flow cytometry in cells obtained by rapid collagenase digestion of human colonic and rectal biopsies. These day 0 (d0) CD11c+HLA-DR+lin− cells comprised ∼0.6% of the mononuclear cells obtained from the lamina propria, were endocytically active, and had the phenotype of immature DC; they were CD40+ and expressed low levels of CD83 and CD86, but little or no CD80 or CD25. Similar d0 DC populations were isolated from the colonic mucosa of healthy controls and from both inflamed and noninflamed tissue from patients with Crohn’s disease. The lamina propria also contained a population of cells capable of migrating out of biopsies during an overnight culture and differentiating into mature DC with lower levels of endocytic activity and high cell surface expression of CD40, CD80, CD86, CD83, and CD25. This mature DC population was a potent stimulator of an allogeneic mixed leukocyte (MLR). Overnight culture of cells isolated by enzymatic digestion on d0 yielded DC with a phenotype intermediate between that of the d0 cells and that of the cells migrating out overnight. Overnight culture of colonic cells in which DC and HLA-DR+lin+ cells were differentially labeled with FITC-dextran suggested that some of the maturing DC might differentiate from HLA-DR+lin+ progenitors. This study presents the first analysis of the phenotype, maturational status, and migratory activity of human gut DC.

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fructo-oligosaccharides in active Crohn's disease

Introduction The commensal intestinal microbiota drive the inflammation associated with Crohns disease. However, bacteria such as bifidobacteria and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii appear to be immunoregulatory. In healthy subjects the intestinal microbiota are influenced by prebiotic carbohydrates such as fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS). Preliminary data suggest that FOS increase faecal bifidobacteria, induce immunoregulatory dendritic cell (DC) responses and reduce disease activity in patients with Crohns disease. Aims and methods To assess the impact of FOS in patients with active Crohns disease using an adequately powered randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial with predefined clinical, microbiological and immunological end points. Patients with active Crohns disease were randomised to 15 g/day FOS or non-prebiotic placebo for 4 weeks. The primary end point was clinical response at week 4 (fall in Crohns Disease Activity Index of ≥70 points) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Results 103 patients were randomised to receive FOS (n=54) or placebo (n=49). More patients receiving FOS (14 (26%) vs 4 (8%); p=0.018) withdrew before the 4-week end point. There was no significant difference in the number of patients achieving a clinical response between the FOS and placebo groups in the ITT analysis (12 (22%) vs 19 (39%), p=0.067). Patients receiving FOS had reduced proportions of interleukin (IL)-6-positive lamina propria DC and increased DC staining of IL-10 (p<0.05) but no change in IL-12p40 production. There were no significant differences in the faecal concentration of bifidobacteria and F prausnitzii between the groups at baseline or after the 4-week intervention. Conclusion An adequately powered placebo-controlled trial of FOS showed no clinical benefit in patients with active Crohns disease, despite impacting on DC function. ISRCTN50422530.

Murine dendritic cells internalize Leishmania major promastigotes, produce IL-12 p40 and stimulate primary T cell proliferation in vitro

Metacyclic Leishmania promastigotes (PM), transmitted by sand‐fly bite, are likely to interact initially with cells of the dendritic cell (DC) lineage(s) in the epidermis or dermis. Epidermal Langerhans cells internalize L. major amastigotes (AM) and transport them to draining lymphnodes (Moll, H., Fuchs, H., Blank, C. and Röllinghoff, M., Eur. J. Immunol. 1993. 23: 1595) but little is known about the interaction of DC with PM. The present study demonstrates that DC are able to internalize PM and that the fate of the parasites within DC differs from that within macrophages (Mϕ). DC took up small numbers of PM which did not differentiate into AM but appeared to be degraded; Mϕ internalized large numbers of PM into parasitophorous vacuoles where they differentiated into AM. In response to direct stimulation with PM, DC from both C3H (“resistant” to L. major infection) and BALB/c (“susceptible”) up‐regulated production of IL‐12 p40. In contrast, IL‐12 production by Mϕ was not detected. DC exposed to either metacyclic PM or PM culture supernatants were also able to stimulate proliferative responses in lymph node T cells from naive mice. These data indicate that DC have the capacity to promote protective Th1 immune responses in Leishmania infection and suggest that DC exposed to PM may be useful in immunotherapy and vaccination.

Use of probiotics in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

The gut flora plays a fundamental role in maintaining normal intestinal function. A disturbance of this flora, or the host response to this flora, has been clearly demonstrated to play a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This has led to attempts to modify the bacterial flora with “live non-pathogenic organisms that confer health benefits by improving the microbial balance,” otherwise known as probiotics. Recent attention has focused on this potential strategy to treat or prevent IBD. The potential therapeutic benefit is enhanced by the natural and apparently safe approach that probiotics offer. Animal models of colitis have provided the proof of principle that probiotics can prevent and treat established intestinal inflammation. Controlled clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of probiotics in the maintenance of remission of pouchitis, prophylaxis of pouchitis after the formation of an ileoanal reservoir, maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis, and treatment of Crohns disease. However, large controlled trials are needed to definitively establish the place for probiotics in the treatment of IBD and resolve issues such as the dose, duration, frequency of treatment, and use of single or multiple strains. Research is focusing on establishing the mechanism of action, so that treatments with individually tailored properties are developed and innovative approaches are explored.

The role of the gut flora in health and disease, and its modification as therapy.

The gut flora is a vast interior ecosystem whose nature is only beginning to be unravelled, due to the emergence of sophisticated molecular tools. Techniques such as 16S ribosomal RNA analysis, polymerase chain reaction amplification and the use of DNA microarrays now facilitate rapid identification and characterization of species resistant to conventional culture and possibly unknown species. Life‐long cross‐talk between the host and the gut flora determines whether health is maintained or disease intervenes. An understanding of these bacteria–bacteria and bacteria–host immune and epithelial cell interactions is likely to lead to a greater insight into disease pathogenesis. Studies of single organism–epithelial interactions have revealed the large range of metabolic processes that gut bacteria may influence. In inflammatory bowel diseases, bacteria drive the inflammatory process, and genetic predisposition to disease identified to date, such as the recently described NOD2/CARD15 gene variants, may relate to altered bacterial recognition. Extra‐intestinal disorders, such as atopy and arthritis, may also have an altered gut milieu as their basis. Clinical evidence is emerging that the modification of this internal environment, using either antibiotics or probiotic bacteria, is beneficial in preventing and treating disease. This natural and apparently safe approach holds great appeal.