Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andrew M. Hanby is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andrew M. Hanby.


Histopathology | 2006

Specific morphological features predictive for the basal phenotype in grade 3 invasive ductal carcinoma of breast

Laura G. Fulford; Doug Easton; Jorge S. Reis-Filho; A Sofronis; Cheryl Gillett; Sunil R. Lakhani; Andrew M. Hanby

Aims : Cytokeratin (CK) 14, a myoepithelial marker, is also expressed in a proportion of breast carcinomas. There is evidence that these tumours show a differing metastatic pattern and clinical outcome from other invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs) and may need different management. Currently, they are not identified in routine practice and no morphological guidelines exist to aid their identification. The aim of this study was to analyse the histological features of CK14+ IDC.


The Journal of Pathology | 2003

Reduced expression of oestrogen receptor β in invasive breast cancer and its re-expression using DNA methyl transferase inhibitors in a cell line model

George Skliris; Kailas Munot; Sandra M. Bell; Pauline J Carder; Sally Lane; Kieran Horgan; Mark Lansdown; Alicia T Parkes; Andrew M. Hanby; Alexander F. Markham; Valerie Speirs

To gain insights into the possible role of oestrogen receptor (ER) β in breast carcinogenesis, immunohistochemical analysis of ER β was performed on 512 breast specimens encompassing normal (n = 138), pure ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 16), invasive cancers (n = 319), lymph node metastases (n = 31), and recurrences (n = 8). Real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to investigate the methylation status of the ER β gene in the ER β negative breast cancer cell lines SkBr3 and MDA‐MB‐435. A gradual reduction in, but not a complete loss of, ER β expression was observed during the transition from normal and pre‐invasive lesions to invasive cancers, where ER β was lost in 21% of cases. This was more pronounced in invasive ductal than in lobular carcinomas, a significantly higher proportion of which were ER β‐positive (74% compared with 91%, respectively, p = 0.0004). Examination of paired primary cancers with their axillary lymph node metastases showed that if ER β was present in the primary tumour, it persisted in the metastasis. Treatment of ER β‐negative cell lines with DNA methyl transferase inhibitors restored ER β expression, providing experimental evidence that silencing of ER β in breast carcinomas could be due to promoter hypermethylation. These results suggest that loss of ER β expression is one of the hallmarks of breast carcinogenesis and that it may be a reversible process involving methylation. Copyright


Lancet Oncology | 2004

Oestrogen receptor β: what it means for patients with breast cancer

Valerie Speirs; Pauline J Carder; Sally Lane; D. Dodwell; Mark Lansdown; Andrew M. Hanby

Summary Oestrogen receptor (ER)α is a well established prognostic marker in breast cancer, and all patients who are ER α positive receive tamoxifen as adjuvant endocrine therapy. Although ERα predicts a favourable disease outcome, the usefulness of ERβ as a clinical prognostic marker remains to be defined. Here, we outline the history of both ERs and discuss the implications ERβ has to patients with breast cancer.


British Journal of Cancer | 1995

Level of expression of E-cadherin mRNA in colorectal cancer correlates with clinical outcome.

S. Dorudi; Andrew M. Hanby; Richard Poulsom; J. Northover; Ian R. Hart

A series of colorectal carcinomas (n = 49) resected from patients with known clinical outcomes were analysed for E-cadherin expression using in situ hybridisation to measure mRNA. Patients surviving 5 years or longer (n = 31) exhibited significantly higher levels of E-cadherin mRNA than those surviving less than 5 years (n = 18, P = 0.003). These preliminary results from this small sample suggest that E-cadherin expression may be a useful prognostic marker in colorectal cancer patients.


Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2011

Relationship of Extreme Chromosomal Instability with Long-term Survival in a Retrospective Analysis of Primary Breast Cancer

Rebecca Roylance; David Endesfelder; Patricia Gorman; Rebecca A. Burrell; Jil Sander; Ian Tomlinson; Andrew M. Hanby; Valerie Speirs; Andrea L. Richardson; Nicolai Juul Birkbak; Aron Charles Eklund; Julian Downward; Maik Kschischo; Zoltan Szallasi; Charles Swanton

Background: Chromosomal instability (CIN) is thought to be associated with poor prognosis in solid tumors; however, evidence from preclinical and mouse tumor models suggest that CIN may paradoxically enhance or impair cancer cell fitness. Breast cancer prognostic expression signature sets, which reflect tumor CIN status, efficiently delineate outcome in estrogen receptor ER-positive breast cancer in contrast to ER-negative breast cancer, suggesting that the relationship of CIN with prognosis differs in these two breast cancer subtypes. Methods: Direct assessment of CIN requires single-cell analysis methods, such as centromeric FISH, aimed at determining the variation around the modal number of two or more chromosomes within individual tumor nuclei. Here, we document the frequency of tumor CIN by dual centromeric FISH analysis in a retrospective primary breast cancer cohort of 246 patients with survival outcome. Results: There was increased CIN and clonal heterogeneity in ER-negative compared with ER-positive breast cancer. Consistent with a negative impact of CIN on cellular fitness, extreme CIN in ER-negative breast cancer was an independent variable associated with improved long-term survival in multivariate analysis. In contrast, a linear relationship of increasing CIN with poorer prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer was observed, using three independent measures of CIN. Conclusions: The paradoxical relationship between extreme CIN and cancer outcome in the ER-negative cohorts may explain why prognostic expression signatures, reflecting tumor CIN status, fail to predict outcome in this subgroup. Impact: Assessment of tumor CIN status may support risk stratification in ER-negative breast cancer and requires prospective validation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(10); 2183–94. ©2011 AACR.


Gut | 2002

Molecular characteristics of serrated adenomas of the colorectum

Elinor Sawyer; A Cerar; Andrew M. Hanby; Patricia Gorman; Mark J. Arends; I. C. Talbot; Ian Tomlinson

Background: Serrated adenomas (SAs) of the colorectum combine architectural features of hyperplastic polyps and cytological features of classical adenomas. Molecular studies comparing SAs and classical adenomas suggest that each may be a distinct entity; in particular, it has been proposed that microsatellite instability (MSI) distinguishes SAs from classical adenomas and that SAs and the colorectal cancers arising from them develop along a pathway driven by low level microsatellite instability (MSI-L). Aims: To define the molecular characteristics of SAs of the colorectum. Materials and methods: We analysed 39 SAs from 27 patients, including eight SAs from patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). We screened these polyps for selected molecular changes, including loss of heterozygosity (LOH) close to APC (5q21) and CRAC1 (15q13-q22), MSI, and mutations of K-ras, APC, p53, and β-catenin. Expression patterns of β-catenin, p53, MLH1, MSH2, E-cadherin, and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Comparative genomic hybridisation was performed on several polyps. Results: MSI was rare (<5% cases) and there was no loss of expression of mismatch repair proteins. Wnt pathway abnormalities (APC mutation/LOH, β-catenin mutation/nuclear expression) occurred in 11 SAs, including 6/31 (19%) non-FAP tumours. CRAC1 LOH occurred in 23% of tumours. K-ras mutations and p53 mutations/overexpression were found in 15% and 8% of SAs, respectively. Loss of MGMT expression occurred in 18% of polyps and showed a borderline association with K-ras mutations. Aberrant E-cadherin expression was found in seven polyps. Comparative genomic hybridisation detected no gains or deletions of chromosomal material. Conclusions: The serrated pathway of colorectal tumorigenesis appears to be heterogeneous. In common with classical adenomas, some SAs develop along pathways involving changes in APC/β-catenin. SAs rarely show MSI or any evidence of chromosomal-scale genetic instability. K-ras mutations may however be less common in SAs than in classical adenomas. Some SAs may harbour changes in the CRAC1 gene. Changes in known genes do not account for the growth of the majority of SAs.


Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2015

Updated UK Recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer.

Emad A. Rakha; Sarah Pinder; John M. S. Bartlett; Merdol Ibrahim; Jane Starczynski; P J Carder; Elena Provenzano; Andrew M. Hanby; Sally Hales; Andrew H S Lee; Ian O. Ellis

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is present in approximately 15% of early invasive breast cancers, and is an important predictive and prognostic marker. The substantial benefits achieved with anti-HER2 targeted therapies in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have emphasised the need for accurate assessment of HER2 status. Current data indicate that HER2 test accuracy improved following previous publication of guidelines and the implementation of an external quality assessment scheme with a decline in false-positive and false-negative rates. This paper provides an update of the guidelines for HER2 testing in the UK. The aim is to further improve the analytical validity and clinical utility of HER2 testing by providing guidelines of test performance parameters, and recommendations on the postanalytical interpretation of test results. HER2 status should be determined in all newly diagnosed and recurrent breast cancers. Testing involves immunohistochemistry with >10% complete strong membrane staining defining a positive status. In situ hybridisation, either fluorescent or bright field chromogenic, is used either upfront or in immunohistochemistry borderline cases to detect the presence of HER2 gene amplification. Situations where repeat HER2 testing is advised are outlined and the impact of genetic heterogeneity is discussed. Strict quality control and external quality assurance of validated assays are essential. Testing laboratories should perform ongoing competency assessment and proficiency tests and ensure the reliability and accuracy of the assay. Pathologists, oncologists and surgeons involved in test interpretation and clinical use should adhere to published guidelines and maintain accurate performance and consistent interpretation of test results.


British Journal of Cancer | 2009

Combined analysis of eIF4E and 4E-binding protein expression predicts breast cancer survival and estimates eIF4E activity

L J Coleman; Mark B. Peter; T J Teall; R A Brannan; Andrew M. Hanby; H Honarpisheh; Abeer M. Shaaban; Laura Smith; Valerie Speirs; Eldo Verghese; Jim N. McElwaine; Thomas A. Hughes

Increased eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) expression occurs in many cancers, and makes fundamental contributions to carcinogenesis by stimulating the expression of cancer-related genes at post-transcriptional levels. This key role is highlighted by the facts that eIF4E levels can predict prognosis, and that eIF4E is an established therapeutic target. However, eIF4E activity is a complex function of expression levels and phosphorylation statuses of eIF4E and eIF4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs). Our hypothesis was that the combined analyses of these pathway components would allow insights into eIF4E activity and its influence on cancer. We have determined expression levels of eIF4E, 4E-BP1, 4E-BP2 and phosphorylated 4E-BP1 within 424 breast tumours, and have carried out analyses to combine these and relate the product to patient survival, in order to estimate eIF4E activity. We show that this analysis gives greater prognostic insights than that of eIF4E alone. We show that eIF4E and 4E-BP expression are positively associated, and that 4E-BP2 has a stronger influence on cancer behaviour than 4E-BP1. Finally, we examine eIF4E, estimated eIF4E activity, and phosphorylated 4E-BP1 as potential predictive biomarkers for eIF4E-targeted therapies, and show that each determines selection of different patient groups. We conclude that eIF4Es influence on cancer survival is modulated substantially by 4E-BPs, and that combined pathway analyses can estimate functional eIF4E.


Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2006

Impact of a national external quality assessment scheme for breast pathology in the UK

I.O. Ellis; Derek Coleman; Claire M. Wells; S Kodikara; E M Paish; S Moss; S Al-sam; N Anderson; L Bobrow; I D Buley; C E Connolly; N S Dallimore; Sally Hales; Andrew M. Hanby; S Humphreys; F Knox; J Lowe; J Macartney; R Nash; David M. Parham; J Patnick; Sarah Pinder; Cecily Quinn; A J Robertson; J Shrimankar; Rosemary A. Walker; R Winder

Background: This article presents the results and observed effects of the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) external quality assurance scheme in breast histopathology. Aims/Methods: The major objectives were to monitor and improve the consistency of diagnoses made by pathologists and the quality of prognostic information in pathology reports. The scheme is based on a twice yearly circulation of 12 cases to over 600 registered participants. The level of agreement was generally measured using κ statistics. Results: Four main situations were encountered with respect to diagnostic consistency, namely: (1) where consistency is naturally very high—this included diagnosing in situ and invasive carcinomas (and certain distinctive subtypes) and uncomplicated benign lesions; (2) where the level of consistency was low but could be improved by making guidelines more detailed and explicit—this included histological grading; (3) where consistency could be improved but only by changing the system of classification—this included classification of ductal carcinoma in situ; and (4) where no improvement in consistency could be achieved—this included diagnosing atypical hyperplasia and reporting vascular invasion. Size measurements were more consistent for invasive than in situ carcinomas. Even in cases where there is a high level of agreement on tumour size, a few widely outlying measurements were encountered, for which no explanation is readily forthcoming. Conclusions: These results broadly confirm the robustness of the systems of breast disease diagnosis and classification adopted by the NHSBSP, and also identify areas where improvement or new approaches are required.


The Journal of Pathology | 2008

Small is beautiful: microRNAs and breast cancer-where are we now?

Eldo Verghese; Andrew M. Hanby; Valerie Speirs; Thomas A. Hughes

MicroRNAs are a recently discovered class of small regulatory RNAs that influence the stability and translational efficiency of target mRNAs. They have been implicated in an increasing number of biological processes, including neoplasia. Recent studies have shown an involvement for these regulatory molecules in breast cancer. For example, miRNA profiling studies have identified microRNAs that are deregulated in breast cancer. Furthermore, functional studies have uncovered their roles in breast cancer as both tumour suppressor genes (eg miR‐335) and oncogenes (eg miR‐21). miRNAs deregulated in breast cancer influence the translational regulation of well‐established regulatory molecules, such as oestrogen receptor‐α, which is regulated by miR‐206, and novel cancer‐related molecules whose functions are not yet fully understood.. Here we present an overview of our current understanding of miRNA in breast cancer. Copyright

Collaboration


Dive into the Andrew M. Hanby's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kieran Horgan

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Abeer M. Shaaban

Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ian Tomlinson

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge