Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andrew M. Hopkins is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andrew M. Hopkins.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2011

Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): survey diagnostics and core data release

Simon P. Driver; D. T. Hill; Lee S. Kelvin; Aaron S. G. Robotham; J. Liske; Peder Norberg; Ivan K. Baldry; Steven P. Bamford; Andrew M. Hopkins; J. Loveday; J. A. Peacock; E. Andrae; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; S. Brough; Michael J. I. Brown; Ewan Cameron; J. H. Y. Ching; Matthew Colless; Christopher J. Conselice; Scott M. Croom; N. J. G. Cross; R. De Propris; S. Dye; Michael J. Drinkwater; S. Ellis; Alister W. Graham; M. W. Grootes; M. L. P. Gunawardhana; D. H. Jones; E. van Kampen

The Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey has been operating since 2008 February on the 3.9-m Anglo-Australian Telescope using the AAOmega fibre-fed spectrograph facility to acquire spectra with a resolution of R ≈ 1300 for 120 862 Sloan Digital Sky Survey selected galaxies. The target catalogue constitutes three contiguous equatorial regions centred at 9h (G09), 12h (G12) and 14.5h (G15) each of 12 × 4 deg2 to limiting fluxes of rpet < 19.4, rpet < 19.8 and rpet <19.4 mag, respectively (and additional limits at other wavelengths). Spectra and reliable redshifts have been acquired for over 98 per cent of the galaxies within these limits. Here we present the survey footprint, progression, data reduction, redshifting, re-redshifting, an assessment of data quality after 3 yr, additional image analysis products (including ugrizYJHK photometry, S´ersic profiles and photometric redshifts), observing mask and construction of our core survey catalogue (GamaCore). From this we create three science-ready catalogues: GamaCoreDR1 for public release, which includes data acquired during year 1 of operations within specified magnitude limits (2008 February to April); GamaCoreMainSurvey containing all data above our survey limits for use by the GAMA Team and collaborators; and GamaCore-AtlasSV containing year 1, 2 and 3 data matched to Herschel-ATLAS science demonstration data. These catalogues along with the associated spectra, stamps and profiles can be accessed via the GAMA website: http://www.gama-survey.org/


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2012

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The galaxy stellar mass function at z < 0.06.

Ivan K. Baldry; Simon P. Driver; J. Loveday; Edward N. Taylor; Lee S. Kelvin; J. Liske; Peder Norberg; Aaron S. G. Robotham; Sarah Brough; Andrew M. Hopkins; Steven P. Bamford; J. A. Peacock; J. Bland-Hawthorn; Christopher J. Conselice; Scott M. Croom; D. H. Jones; H. R. Parkinson; Cristina Popescu; M. Prescott; Rob Sharp; Richard J. Tuffs

We determine the low-redshift field galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF) using an area of 143 deg 2 from the first three years of the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. The magnitude limits of this redshift survey are r < 19.4 mag over two-thirds and 19.8 mag over one-third of the area. The GSMF is determined from a sample of 5210 galaxies using a densitycorrected maximum volume method. This efficiently overcomes the issue of fluctuations in the number density versus redshift. With H0 = 70 km s −1 Mpc −1 , the GSMF is well described


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2011

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): stellar mass estimates

Edward N. Taylor; Andrew M. Hopkins; Ivan K. Baldry; Michael J. I. Brown; Simon P. Driver; Lee S. Kelvin; D. T. Hill; Aaron S. G. Robotham; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; D. H. Jones; Rob Sharp; Daniel Thomas; J. Liske; Jon Loveday; Peder Norberg; J. A. Peacock; Steven P. Bamford; Sarah Brough; Matthew Colless; Ewan Cameron; Chistopher J Conselice; Scott M. Croom; Carlos S. Frenk; M. L. P. Gunawardhana; Konrad Kuijken; Robert C. Nichol; H. R. Parkinson; S. Phillipps; Kevin A. Pimbblet; Cristina Popescu

This paper describes the first catalogue of photometrically derived stellar mass estimates for intermediate-redshift (z < 0.65; median z= 0.2) galaxies in the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) spectroscopic redshift survey. These masses, as well as the full set of ancillary stellar population parameters, will be made public as part of GAMA data release 2. Although the GAMA database does include near-infrared (NIR) photometry, we show that the quality of our stellar population synthesis fits is significantly poorer when these NIR data are included. Further, for a large fraction of galaxies, the stellar population parameters inferred from the optical-plus-NIR photometry are formally inconsistent with those inferred from the optical data alone. This may indicate problems in our stellar population library, or NIR data issues, or both; these issues will be addressed for future versions of the catalogue. For now, we have chosen to base our stellar mass estimates on optical photometry only. In light of our decision to ignore the available NIR data, we examine how well stellar mass can be constrained based on optical data alone. We use generic properties of stellar population synthesis models to demonstrate that restframe colour alone is in principle a very good estimator of stellar mass-to-light ratio, M*/Li. Further, we use the observed relation between restframe (g−i) and M*/Li for real GAMA galaxies to argue that, modulo uncertainties in the stellar evolution models themselves, (g−i) colour can in practice be used to estimate M*/Li to an accuracy of ≲0.1 dex (1σ). This ‘empirically calibrated’ (g−i)–M*/Li relation offers a simple and transparent means for estimating galaxies’ stellar masses based on minimal data, and so provides a solid basis for other surveys to compare their results to z≲0.4 measurements from GAMA.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2012

The Sydney‐AAO Multi‐object Integral field spectrograph

Scott M. Croom; Jon Lawrence; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; Julia J. Bryant; L. M. R. Fogarty; Samuel Richards; Michael Goodwin; Tony Farrell; Stan Miziarski; Ron Heald; D. Heath Jones; Steve Lee; Matthew Colless; Sarah Brough; Andrew M. Hopkins; Amanda E. Bauer; Michael N. Birchall; Simon C. Ellis; Anthony Horton; Sergio G. Leon-Saval; Geraint F. Lewis; A. R. Lopez-Sanchez; Seong-sik Min; Christopher Trinh; Holly E. Trowland

We demonstrate a novel technology that combines the power of the multi-object spectrograph with the spatial multiplex advantage of an integral field spectrograph (IFS). The SydneyAAO (Australian Astronomical Observatory) Multi-object IFS (SAMI) is a prototype widefield system at the Anglo-Australian Telescope (AAT) that allows 13 imaging fibre bundles (‘hexabundles’) to be deployed over a 1-degree diameter field of view. Each hexabundle comprises 61 lightly fused multi-mode fibres with reduced cladding and yields a 75 per cent filling factor. Each fibre core diameter subtends 1.6 arcsec on the sky and each hexabundle has a field of view of 15 arcsec diameter. The fibres are fed to the flexible AAOmega double-beam spectrograph, which can be used at a range of spectral resolutions (R = λ/δλ ≈ 1700–13 000) over the optical spectrum (3700–9500 A). We present the first spectroscopic results obtained with SAMI for a sample of galaxies at z ≈ 0.05. We discuss the prospects of implementing hexabundles at a much higher multiplex over wider fields of view in order to carry out spatially resolved spectroscopic surveys of 10 4 –10 5 galaxies.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2010

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The input catalogue and star-galaxy separation

Ivan K. Baldry; Aaron S. G. Robotham; D. T. Hill; Simon P. Driver; J. Liske; Peder Norberg; Steven P. Bamford; Andrew M. Hopkins; Jon Loveday; J. A. Peacock; Ewan Cameron; Scott M. Croom; N. J. G. Cross; I. F. Doyle; S. Dye; Carlos S. Frenk; D. H. Jones; E. van Kampen; Lee S. Kelvin; Robert C. Nichol; H. R. Parkinson; Cristina Popescu; M. Prescott; Rob Sharp; W. Sutherland; Daniel Thomas; Richard J. Tuffs

We describe the spectroscopic target selection for the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. The input catalogue is drawn from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS). The initial aim is to measure redshifts for galaxies in three 4 ◦ × 12 ◦ regions at 9, 12 and 14.5 h, on the celestial equator, with magnitude selections r< 19.4, z< 18.2 and K AB < 17.6 over all three regions, and r< 19.8 in the 12-h region. The target density is 1080 deg −2 in the 12-h region and 720 deg −2 in the other regions. The average GAMA target density and area are compared with completed and ongoing galaxy redshift surveys. The GAMA survey implements a highly complete star–galaxy separation that jointly uses an intensity-profile separator (� sg = r psf − r model as per the SDSS) and a


The Astrophysical Journal | 2009

The Star Formation Rate in the Reionization Era as Indicated by Gamma-Ray Bursts

Matthew D. Kistler; Hasan Yuksel; John F. Beacom; Andrew M. Hopkins; J. Stuart B. Wyithe

High-redshift gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) offer an extraordinary opportunity to study aspects of the early universe, including the cosmic star formation rate (SFR). Motivated by the two recent highest-z GRBs, GRB 080913 at z 6.7 and GRB 090423 at z 8.1, and more than four years of Swift observations, we first confirm that the GRB rate does not trace the SFR in an unbiased way. Correcting for this, we find that the implied SFR to beyond z = 8 is consistent with Lyman Break Galaxy-based measurements after accounting for unseen galaxies at the faint end of the UV luminosity function. We show that this provides support for the integrated star formation in the range 6 z 8 to have been alone sufficient to reionize the universe.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2015

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): end of survey report and data release 2

J. Liske; Ivan K. Baldry; Simon P. Driver; Richard J. Tuffs; Mehmet Alpaslan; E. Andrae; Sarah Brough; Michelle E. Cluver; M. W. Grootes; M. L. P. Gunawardhana; Lee S. Kelvin; J. Loveday; Aaron S. G. Robotham; Edward N. Taylor; Steven P. Bamford; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; Michael J. I. Brown; Michael J. Drinkwater; Andrew M. Hopkins; Martin Meyer; Peder Norberg; J. A. Peacock; Nicola K. Agius; Stephen K. Andrews; Amanda E. Bauer; J. H. Y. Ching; Matthew Colless; Christopher J. Conselice; Scott M. Croom; Luke J. M. Davies

The Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey is one of the largest contemporary spectroscopic surveys of low redshift galaxies. Covering an area of ∼286 deg2 (split among five survey regions) down to a limiting magnitude of r < 19.8 mag, we have collected spectra and reliable redshifts for 238 000 objects using the AAOmega spectrograph on the Anglo-Australian Telescope. In addition, we have assembled imaging data from a number of independent surveys in order to generate photometry spanning the wavelength range 1 nm–1 m. Here, we report on the recently completed spectroscopic survey and present a series of diagnostics to assess its final state and the quality of the redshift data. We also describe a number of survey aspects and procedures, or updates thereof, including changes to the input catalogue, redshifting and re-redshifting, and the derivation of ultraviolet, optical and near-infrared photometry. Finally, we present the second public release of GAMA data. In this release, we provide input catalogue and targeting information, spectra, redshifts, ultraviolet, optical and near-infrared photometry, single-component Sersic fits, stellar masses, Hα-derived star formation rates, environment information, and group properties for all galaxies with r < 19.0 mag in two of our survey regions, and for all galaxies with r < 19.4 mag in a third region (72 225 objects in total). The data base serving these data is available at http://www.gama-survey.org/.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2012

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Structural Investigation of Galaxies via Model Analysis

Lee S. Kelvin; Simon P. Driver; Aaron S. G. Robotham; D. T. Hill; Mehmet Alpaslan; Ivan K. Baldry; Steven P. Bamford; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; Sarah Brough; Alister W. Graham; Boris Häussler; Andrew M. Hopkins; J. Liske; Jon Loveday; Peder Norberg; Steven Phillipps; Cristina Popescu; M. Prescott; Edward N. Taylor; Richard J. Tuffs

We present single-Sersic two-dimensional (2D) model fits to 167 600 galaxies modelled independently in the ugrizYJHK bandpasses using reprocessed Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release Seven (SDSS DR7) and UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey Large Area Survey imaging data available from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) data base. In order to facilitate this study we developed Structural Investigation of Galaxies via Model Analysis (sigma), an r wrapper around several contemporary astronomy software packages including source extractor, psf extractor and galfit 3. sigma produces realistic 2D model fits to galaxies, employing automatic adaptive background subtraction and empirical point spread function measurements on the fly for each galaxy in GAMA. Using these results, we define a common coverage area across the three GAMA regions containing 138 269 galaxies. We provide Sersic magnitudes truncated at 10re which show good agreement with SDSS Petrosian and GAMA photometry for low Sersic index systems (n 4), recovering as much as Δm= 0.5 mag in the r band. We employ a K-band Sersic index/u−r colour relation to delineate the massive (n > ∼2) early-type galaxies (ETGs) from the late-type galaxies (LTGs). The mean Sersic index of these ETGs shows a smooth variation with wavelength, increasing by 30 per cent from g through K. LTGs exhibit a more extreme change in Sersic index, increasing by 52 per cent across the same range. In addition, ETGs and LTGs exhibit a 38 and 25 per cent decrease, respectively, in half-light radius from g through K. These trends are shown to arise due to the effects of dust attenuation and stellar population/metallicity gradients within galaxy populations.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2015

The SAMI Galaxy Survey: instrument specification and target selection

Julia J. Bryant; Matt S. Owers; Aaron S. G. Robotham; Scott M. Croom; Simon P. Driver; Michael J. Drinkwater; Nuria P. F. Lorente; Luca Cortese; Nicholas Scott; Matthew Colless; Adam L. Schaefer; Edward N. Taylor; I. S. Konstantopoulos; J. T. Allen; Ivan K. Baldry; Luke A. Barnes; Amanda E. Bauer; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; J. V. Bloom; Alyson M. Brooks; Sarah Brough; Gerald Cecil; Warrick J. Couch; Darren J. Croton; Roger L. Davies; Simon C. Ellis; L. M. R. Fogarty; Caroline Foster; Karl Glazebrook; Michael Goodwin

The SAMI Galaxy Survey will observe 3400 galaxies with the Sydney-AAO Multi- object Integral-field spectrograph (SAMI) on the Anglo-Australian Telescope (AAT) in a 3-year survey which began in 2013. We present the throughput of the SAMI system, the science basis and specifications for the target selection, the survey observation plan and the combined properties of the selected galaxies. The survey includes four volume-limited galaxy samples based on cuts in a proxy for stellar mass, along with low-stellar-mass dwarf galaxies all selected from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. The GAMA regions were selected because of the vast array of ancillary data available, including ultraviolet through to radio bands. These fields are on the celestial equator at 9, 12, and 14.5 hours, and cover a total of 144 square degrees (in GAMA-I). Higher density environments are also included with the addition of eight clusters. The clusters have spectroscopy from 2dFGRS and SDSS and photometry in regions covered by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and/or VLT Survey Telescope/ATLAS. The aim is to cover a broad range in stellar mass and environment, and therefore the primary survey targets cover redshifts 0.004 < z < 0.095, magnitudes rpet < 19.4, stellar masses 107– 1012M⊙, and environments from isolated field galaxies through groups to clusters of _ 1015M⊙.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2011

Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): The GAMA Galaxy Group Catalogue (G3Cv1)

Aaron S. G. Robotham; Peder Norberg; Simon P. Driver; Ivan K. Baldry; Steven P. Bamford; Andrew M. Hopkins; J. Liske; J. Loveday; Alex Merson; J. A. Peacock; Sarah Brough; Ewan Cameron; Christopher J. Conselice; Scott M. Croom; Carlos S. Frenk; M. L. P. Gunawardhana; D. T. Hill; D. H. Jones; Lee S. Kelvin; K. Kuijken; Robert C. Nichol; H. R. Parkinson; Kevin A. Pimbblet; S. Phillipps; Cristina Popescu; M. Prescott; Rob Sharp; W. Sutherland; Edward N. Taylor; Daniel Thomas

Using the complete Galaxy and Mass Assembly I (GAMA-I) survey covering ∼142 deg2 to rAB= 19.4, of which ∼47 deg2 is to rAB= 19.8, we create the GAMA-I galaxy group catalogue (G3Cv1), generated using a friends-of-friends (FoF) based grouping algorithm. Our algorithm has been tested extensively on one family of mock GAMA lightcones, constructed from Λ cold dark matter N-body simulations populated with semi-analytic galaxies. Recovered group properties are robust to the effects of interlopers and are median unbiased in the most important respects. G3Cv1 contains 14 388 galaxy groups (with multiplicity ≥2), including 44 186 galaxies out of a possible 110 192 galaxies, implying ∼40 per cent of all galaxies are assigned to a group. The similarities of the mock group catalogues and G3Cv1 are multiple: global characteristics are in general well recovered. However, we do find a noticeable deficit in the number of high multiplicity groups in GAMA compared to the mocks. Additionally, despite exceptionally good local spatial completeness, G3Cv1 contains significantly fewer compact groups with five or more members, this effect becoming most evident for high multiplicity systems. These two differences are most likely due to limitations in the physics included of the current GAMA lightcone mock. Further studies using a variety of galaxy formation models are required to confirm their exact origin. The G3Cv1 catalogue will be made publicly available as and when the relevant GAMA redshifts are made available at http://www.gama-survey.org.

Collaboration


Dive into the Andrew M. Hopkins's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Simon P. Driver

University of Western Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ivan K. Baldry

Liverpool John Moores University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah Brough

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aaron S. G. Robotham

University of Western Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lee S. Kelvin

Liverpool John Moores University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Liske

European Southern Observatory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge