Andrew McCullough

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of postoperative nightly sildenafil citrate for the prevention of erectile dysfunction after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

Four weeks after bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy, men with normal erectile function before surgery were randomized to double-blind sildenafil (50 or 100 mg) or placebo nightly for 36 weeks, followed by an 8-week drug-free period before assessment of erectile function. Enrollment was prematurely ceased and only 76 men completed because, assuming a placebo response rate similar to the published literature (for example, 34% in meta-analysis), the 25% response at blinded interim review suggested a lack of treatment effect. On the contrary, spontaneous erectile function (a combined score of ⩾8 for questions 3 and 4 of the International Index of Erectile Function and a positive response to ‘Were erections good enough for satisfactory sexual activity?’) occurred in only 4% of the placebo group (n=1 of 25) versus 27% (n=14 of 51, P=0.0156, Fishers exact test) of the sildenafil group. Nightly sildenafil administration for 36 weeks after surgery markedly increased the return of normal spontaneous erections.

Achieving treatment optimization with sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in patients with erectile dysfunction.

Since its approval in 1998, sildenafil citrate (Viagra) has been shown to be efficacious in >100 clinical trials involving >8000 men with erectile dysfunction (ED). In clinical practice, however, many men do not continue long-term use of sildenafil for a variety of reasons; thus, 6 different aspects of optimizing treatment with sildenafil are described here. (1) Intercourse success rates, considered a reflection of real-world effectiveness, were assessed in 1276 patients with ED. Results indicated that the cumulative probability of achieving intercourse success with sildenafil increased with the number of attempts, reaching a plateau after approximately 8 attempts. (2) A comprehensive disease management approach that included a medical history, physical examination, educational material about ED, modifications of risk factors/lifestyle changes, and counseling resulted in successful intercourse in 74% of 111 patients taking sildenafil. (3) A survey conducted among primary care physicians revealed that almost 50% did not routinely question their patients about ED symptoms, although it is known that most patients would prefer their physician to take the initiative. (4) Overall, 55% of 137 men who were previously not successful with sildenafil became successful after reeducation and counseling, which included information on patient and partner expectations, how to properly take the drug, titration to maximum dose, and a minimum trial of 8 attempts for efficacy assessment. (5) Many men with ED have underlying comorbidities or take multiple medications that are risk factors for ED. Controlling these risk factors in 521 men from a multispecialty clinic led to an overall intercourse success rate of 82%; patients with multiple risk factors were less likely to have intercourse success than men with only 1 risk factor. (6) Finally, treatment satisfaction is a pivotal factor in maintaining long-term ED therapy. In an open-label trial, 82% of 443 subjects reported treatment satisfaction with sildenafil. In summary, these findings highlight how important it is for physicians to take a more comprehensive, proactive approach when treating men with ED, including control of risk factors, instructions on how to properly take the drug, partner involvement, and follow-up visits. Using these recommended measures, most men with ED, including those whose treatment was previously unsuccessful, can be treated successfully with sildenafil.

Single-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Intralesional Interferon α-2b for Minimally Invasive Treatment for Peyronie’s Disease

PURPOSE We investigated the efficacy and safety of intralesional interferon alpha-2b for the treatment of Peyronies disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 117 consecutive patients with a mean age of 55.1 years who had Peyronies disease were enrolled in a single-blind, multicenter, placebo controlled, parallel study to determine the efficacy and safety of intralesional interferon alpha-2b therapy (Schering, Kenilworth, New Jersey), including 62 who received placebo and 55 who received interferon alpha-2b. Saline (10 ml) in controls and interferon alpha-2b (5 x 10(6) U) were administered biweekly for 12 weeks. Each patient was evaluated for penile curvature, plaque size and density, penile pain, erectile function and penile hemodynamics before and after study completion. Improvement in these parameters was statistically compared between the groups. RESULTS A total of 53 patients in the control arm and 50 in the interferon alpha-2b arm completed the study. Improvement in penile curvature, plaque size and density, and pain resolution was significantly greater in patients treated with interferon alpha-2b vs placebo. The increase in mean International Index of Erectile Function scores was not significantly different between the groups. Penile blood flow improvement was observed in interferon alpha-2b treated patients but not in those who received placebo. The decrease in the number of penile vascular pathologies was significantly higher in interferon alpha-2b cases. Side effects, mostly flu-like symptoms, which were frequently noted in patients on interferon alpha-2b, were mild to moderate in degree and of short duration. CONCLUSIONS This single-blind, multicenter, placebo controlled, parallel study demonstrates that intralesional interferon alpha-2b at a dose of 5 x 10(6) units biweekly for 12 weeks is effective and safe as minimally invasive therapy for Peyronies disease.

Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors in Postprostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction: A Critical Analysis of the Basic Science Rationale and Clinical Application

CONTEXT Erectile dysfunction (ED) after radical prostatectomy (RP) has a significant negative impact on a patients health-related quality of life. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) have recently been utilized not only as a treatment of ED in this population but also as a preventive strategy in penile rehabilitation programs. OBJECTIVE To elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms of post-RP ED, to assess the need for rehabilitation following surgery, and to analyze the basic scientific evidence and clinical applications of PDE5-Is for the prevention and treatment of ED. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of the literature using Medline, Cancerlit, and the Cochrane Library was conducted for the period between January 1997 and June 2008 using the keywords erectile dysfunction, radical prostatectomy, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Efficacy and safety of PDE5-Is in the randomized, placebo-controlled trials are evaluated in this review, and the limitations of the remaining studies are also discussed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Post-RP ED has many factors. Cavernosal nerve injury induces pro-apoptotic factors (ie, loss of smooth muscle) and pro-fibrotic factors (ie, an increase in collagen) within the corpora cavernosa. Cavernosal changes may also be attributed to poor oxygenation due to hemodynamic changes. Experimental data support the concept of cavernosal damage and suggest a protective role for daily dosage of a PDE5-I; however, similar data have not yet been replicated in humans. Penile rehabilitation programs are common in clinical practice, but there is no definitive evidence to support their use or the best treatment strategy. PDE5-Is are efficacious and safe in young patients with normal preoperative erectile function who have undergone bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. On-demand use of a PDE5-I may be at least as efficacious as daily use. PDE5-I use in penile rehabilitation programs is not supported by rigorous level 1 evidence-based medicine. CONCLUSIONS PDE5-Is are an efficacious and safe treatment for post-RP ED in properly selected patients. The experimental results on the protective role of daily dosages of PDE5-Is, while robust, have not been replicated in humans. With current human data, the role of a PDE5-I alone as a rehabilitation strategy is unclear and deserves further investigation.

Erectile Function Rehabilitation in the Radical Prostatectomy Patient

INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer is common and is being diagnosed in younger men now compared with two decades ago. Long-term functional outcomes are of significant importance to patient and impact upon the patient decision-making process regarding choice of therapy. Erectile function preservation (rehabilitation) has gained significant traction worldwide despite the absence of definitive evidence in its favor. AIM To define the role of rehabilitation in the prostate cancer patient who has undergone radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS A committee of five experts in the field from three countries was convened, and using a thorough analysis of the literature and the Delphi approach to expert opinion, recommendations were arrived at for clinicians treating men with prostate cancer before and after definitive surgical management. RESULTS Recommendations arrived at included: that clinicians should discuss prevalence rates, the pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction after RP and the predictors of erectile function recovery, that validated instruments should be used using the published cut-offs for normalcy, that rehabilitation be discussed with patients, and that they be informed that significant potential benefits may be associated with rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS The International Consensus of Sexual Medicine (ICSM) 2001 committee on rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy recommended that a discussion occur regarding rehabilitation in all patients undergoing or who have undergone RP. However, the committee recognized the absence of definitive data to date and could not comment on the optimal approach to rehabilitation at this time.

Recovery of Erectile Function After Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy and Penile Rehabilitation With Nightly Intraurethral Alprostadil Versus Sildenafil Citrate

PURPOSE To our knowledge we report the first large, randomized, prospective penile rehabilitation clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of nightly intraurethral alprostadil vs sildenafil citrate after nerve sparing prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a prospective, randomized, open label, multicenter American study in men with normal erectile function who underwent bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. The International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain was the primary end point. Subjects initiated nightly treatment within 1 month of surgery with intraurethral alprostadil or oral sildenafil citrate (50 mg) for 9 months. After 1-month washout and before sexual activity subjects self-administered sildenafil citrate (100 mg) for a total of 6 attempts in 1 month. Secondary end points were the global assessment question, sexual encounter profile, Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction and measured stretched penile length. RESULTS Of 139 men who started intraurethral alprostadil and 73 who started sildenafil citrate, 97 and 59, respectively, completed the trial. There were no statistically significant differences in International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain and intercourse success rates to intraurethral alprostadil. The global assessment question was significantly better only at 6 months for intraurethral alprostadil (p <0.028). At completion there were no differences between treatments for any of the end points. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to directly compare the ability of alprostadil and a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor to enhance penile recovery subsequent to bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. The use of nightly subtherapeutic intraurethral alprostadil is well tolerated after radical prostatectomy. The benefit to return of erectile function of nightly sildenafil citrate and subtherapeutic intraurethral alprostadil appears to be comparable within the first year of surgery.

The International Society for Sexual Medicine's Process of Care for the Assessment and Management of Testosterone Deficiency in Adult Men

INTRODUCTION In 2014, the International Society for Sexual Medicine (ISSM) convened a panel of experts to develop an evidence-based process of care for the diagnosis and management of testosterone deficiency (TD) in adult men. The panel considered the definition, epidemiology, etiology, physiologic effects, diagnosis, assessment and treatment of TD. It also considered the treatment of TD in special populations and commented on contemporary controversies about testosterone replacement therapy, cardiovascular risk and prostate cancer. AIM The aim was to develop clearly worded, practical, evidenced-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of diagnosis and management of TD for clinicians without expertise in endocrinology, such as physicians in family medicine and general urology practice. METHOD A comprehensive literature review was performed, followed by a structured, 3-day panel meeting and 6-month panel consultation process using electronic communication. The final guideline was compiled from reports by individual panel members on areas reflecting their special expertise, and then agreed by all through an iterative process. RESULTS This article contains the report of the ISSM TD Process of Care Committee. It offers a definition of TD and recommendations for assessment and treatment in different populations. Finally, best practice treatment recommendations are presented to guide clinicians, both familiar and unfamiliar with TD. CONCLUSION Development of a process of care is an evolutionary process that continually reviews data and incorporates the best new research. We expect that ongoing research will lead to new insights into the pathophysiology of TD, as well as new, efficacious and safe treatments. We recommend that this process of care be reevaluated and updated by the ISSM in 4 years.

A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Avanafil in Subjects with Erectile Dysfunction

INTRODUCTION Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors have become standard treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). AIM To prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of avanafil, a novel PDE5 inhibitor, in men with mild to severe ED. METHODS In this multicenter, double-blind, Phase 3 trial, 646 subjects were randomized to receive avanafil (50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg) or placebo throughout a 12-week treatment period. Subjects were instructed to take study drug 30 minutes prior to initiation of sexual activity. At least a 12-hour separation time between doses was required; no restrictions were placed on food or alcohol intake. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Improvement in erectile function (EF) was measured by Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2 and 3 (SEP2 and SEP3) and by the EF domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. RESULTS Mean change in percentage of successful sexual attempts (SEP2 and SEP3) and IIEF-EF domain score significantly favored all doses of avanafil over placebo (P ≤ 0.001). Secondary analyses demonstrated achievement of successful intercourse by subjects within 15 minutes of dosing. Of the 300 sexual attempts made during this interval, 64% to 71% were successful in avanafil-treated subjects compared with 27% in placebo-treated subjects. Successful intercourse was also demonstrated >6 hours post dosing, with 59% to 83% of the 80 sexual attempts successful in avanafil-treated subjects compared with 25% of placebo-treated subjects. The most commonly reported adverse events in subjects taking avanafil included headache, flushing, and nasal congestion; there were no drug-related serious adverse events. CONCLUSION Following 12 weeks of avanafil treatment without food or alcohol restrictions, significant improvements in sexual function were observed with all 3 doses of avanafil compared with placebo. Successful intercourse was observed as early as 15 minutes and >6 hours after dosing in some subjects. Avanafil was generally well tolerated for the treatment of ED.

Enhancement or initiation of testicular sperm motility by in vitro culture of testicular tissue

OBJECTIVE To describe different techniques of testicular tissue culture and their effect on sperm motility, mainly in cases of totally immotile spermatozoa, and to compare the effect of in vitro culture with that of motility stimulants. DESIGN Prospective study. SETTING University teaching hospital. PATIENT(S) Ten patients undergoing testicular biopsy for diagnostic purposes or for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. INTERVENTION(S) Dissected testicular biopsy samples and tissue blocks were cultured at 37 degrees C for up to 96 hours. Immediately after dissection, immotile testicular spermatozoa were incubated for 30 minutes in pentoxifylline and 2-deoxyadenosine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Sperm motility and vitality. RESULT(S) Overall, dissected samples showed improved sperm motility, which peaked within 48 hours of culture. Unlike motility, vitality declined linearly, from 56.3%+/-19% at initial assessment to 18.8%+/-11% at 96 hours. Five samples had initially immotile spermatozoa, of which four acquired motility at 48 hours. In vitro culture showed results comparable with those of incubation with pentoxifylline and 2-deoxyadenosine. Culture of tissue blocks did not improve motility or vitality compared with dissected tissue. CONCLUSION(S) The motility of testicular spermatozoa was enhanced or initiated after in vitro culture. Testicular biopsy culture may be an alternative to the use of motility stimulants to obtain motile spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection, particularly when oocytes are not immediately available.

A Multi‐Institutional Observational Study of Testosterone Levels after Testosterone Pellet (Testopel®) Insertion

INTRODUCTION Implantable testosterone pellets were approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1972 for the treatment of testosterone deficiency syndrome (TDS). Clinical use of this testosterone delivery modality has been limited until its recent reintroduction (Testopel(®) , Slate Pharmaceuticals, Durham, NC, USA). Six academic institutions collaborated and combined their databases to more fully characterize serum testosterone levels after the pellet implantations. AIMS To assess the time-dependent serum testosterone levels after subcutaneous testosterone pellets in clinical practice for the treatment of TDS. METHODS Data were retrospectively pooled and analyzed from data in six academic institutions. Variables included patient age, total testosterone concentrations before and after implantation, the number of testosterone pellets implanted, and the time from implantation to measurement of serum testosterone concentrations. Three hundred eighty men undergoing 702 insertions were included for analysis using JMP (version 4.0.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Main outcome measures were postimplantation total testosterone levels and investigator-reported adverse events. Testosterone levels as a function of the number of pellets implanted and time from implantation were assessed. RESULTS Implantation of six to ≥10 testosterone pellets (450 to ≥750 mg) increased total testosterone into the therapeutic range at 1 month postimplantation and sustained therapeutic levels (>300) for 4-6 months. Higher pellet numbers (10-12 pellets) were associated with higher, more consistent, and longer maintenance of testosterone levels within the therapeutic range. Four extrusions and three hematomas were reported early in our experience; other investigator-reported adverse events were generally mild to moderate in nature and transient in duration. No subjects required analgesics. CONCLUSIONS Testosterone pellets (Testopel(®) , Slate Pharmaceuticals) provide sustained levels of testosterone for at least 4 months and up to 6 months in men with TDS. Implantation of ≥8 pellets achieved optimal results with respect to peak mean testosterone level and duration of effect. Testosterone pellets were generally well tolerated.