Andrew N. Feldt
University of Oklahoma
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andrew N. Feldt.
Journal of Physics B | 2009
Hao Feng; Weiguo Sun; Michael A. Morrison; Andrew N. Feldt
Elastic and inelastic differential and integral cross sections for low-energy vibrational excitation of N2 by electron impact are calculated by solving vibrationally coupled scattering equations. Unlike previous calculations of this type, which used model-exchange potentials, the present formulation incorporates exchange effects rigorously. The resulting coupled integrodifferential equations are solved using a combination of linear-algebraic and R-matrix-propagator techniques. Theoretical differential cross sections for both resonant and non-resonant scattering are compared to recent absolute measurements by Allan (2005 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38 3655), with special attention given to the region of the 2Πg shape resonance near 2.4 eV and to disagreements between theory and experiment at non-resonant energies above this region.
Journal of Physics B | 1982
Andrew N. Feldt; Michael A. Morrison
The validity of the adiabatic-nuclear-rotation theory of electron-molecule scattering is assessed for near-threshold rotational excitation of H2. Integrated and differential cross sections calculated using this theory are compared with those determined using the more accurate laboratory frame close-coupling theory. A recently proposed energy-modified adiabatic theory is tested and shown to lead to marked improvement in the approximate integrated (but not differential) cross sections.
American Journal of Physics | 2007
Michael A. Morrison; Andrew N. Feldt
Four ambiguities are inherent in time-independent quantum-mechanical scattering theory: two in the normalization of continuum functions, and two in the relation between various scattering matrices. These ambiguities allow the use of different conventions in scattering theory. This freedom has led to inconsistencies among textbooks, monographs, review articles, and research papers. We identify these ambiguities, indicate their context and origin in scattering theory, give the key equations of scattering theory in a form that can by adapted to any convention, and show interrelations between these equations that can lead to confusion and error. We also give several diagnostic approaches for determining the conventions used in a particular source, and reference conventions adopted in widely used books on scattering theory.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific | 1980
Andrew N. Feldt; Guido Chincarini
The period variation (k) and orbital elements, such as the epoch period and radial velocity, are computed for the two spectroscopic noneclipsing binaries using data published by Walker and Chincarini (1968), and Smak (1969) for the SS Cygni and data from Chincarini and Walker (1980), and Joy (1954) for the AE Aquarii. The SS Cygni k value is significant to about a 5 standard deviation, while the AE Aquarii k value is significant to about 0.5 standard deviation. The various data are compared and the main characteristics of both binary systems are summarized.
Physical Review A | 1984
Michael A. Morrison; Andrew N. Feldt; David Austin
Physical Review A | 1984
Michael A. Morrison; Andrew N. Feldt; Bidhan C. Saha
Physical Review A | 1984
Andrew N. Feldt; Michael A. Morrison
Physical Review A | 1988
Andrew N. Feldt
Physical Review A | 2008
Andrew N. Feldt; Michael A. Morrison
Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science | 1979
Andrew N. Feldt