Andrew P. Cuthbert
Brunel University London
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andrew P. Cuthbert.
Nature Genetics | 1998
Zhiqing Zhu; Jianbo Yao; Timothy Johns; Katherine Fu; Isabelle De Bie; Carol Macmillan; Andrew P. Cuthbert; Robert F. Newbold; Jia-chi Wang; Mario Chevrette; Garry K. Brown; Ruth M. Brown; A Eric Shoubridge.
Leigh Syndrome (LS) is a severe neurological disorder characterized by bilaterally symmetrical necrotic lesions in subcortical brain regions that is commonly associated with systemic cytochrome c oxidase (COX) deficiency. COX deficiency is an autosomal recessive trait and most patients belong to a single genetic complementation group. DNA sequence analysis of the genes encoding the structural subunits of the COX complex has failed to identify a pathogenic mutation. Using microcell-mediated chromosome transfer, we mapped the gene defect in this disorder to chromosome 9q34 by complementation of the respiratory chain deficiency in patient fibroblasts. Analysis of a candidate gene (SURF1) of unknown function revealed several mutations, all of which predict a truncated protein. These data suggest a role for SURF1 in the biogenesis of the COX complex and define a new class of gene defects causing human neurodegenerative disease.
Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer | 2000
Tomoyuki Mashimo; Goodarz Goodarzi; Andrew P. Cuthbert; Robert F. Newbold; Sudha K. Pai; Shigeru Hirota; Sadahiro Hosobe; Kunio Miura; Sucharita Bandyopadhyay; Steven C. Gross; Kounosuke Watabe
Much of the lethality of malignant neoplasms is attributable directly to their ability to develop secondary growths in organs at a distance from the primary tumor mass, whereas few patients die from their primary neoplasm. Little is known about the molecular mechanism of tumor metastasis, however, which is controlled by a variety of positive and negative factors. In the search for metastasis suppressor genes, we have used the microcell‐mediated chromosome transfer method and a rat prostate tumor model in SCID mice. When human chromosome 2 was introduced into the highly metastatic rat prostatic tumor cell, AT6.1, the metastatic ability of this cell was significantly (>99%) decreased in animals. An STS‐based PCR analysis for 8 hybrid clones indicates that the suppressor activity is located in the p25–22 region of the chromosome. Furthermore, the AT6.1 cell with human chromosome 2 showed a reduced ability to invade Matrigel, suggesting that the suppressor activity is involved in the step of tumor invasion during the progression of prostate cancer. We have also examined the status of the suppressor region on chromosome 2 in human prostate cancer specimens and found that this region was often lost in high‐grade tumors. These results suggest that the putative suppressor gene on chromosome 2 is functionally involved in the progression of human prostate cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 28:285–293, 2000.
Mutation Research-dna Repair | 1996
Wim Jongmans; Gerald W.C.T Verhaegh; Nicolaas G. J. Jaspers; Peter Demant; A.T. Natarajan; Yosef Shiloh; Mitsuo Oshimura; Eric J. Stanbridge; Raghbir S. Athwal; Andrew P. Cuthbert; Robert F. Newbold; P.H.M. Lohman; Małgorzata Z. Zdzienicka
X-ray sensitive Chinese hamster V79 cells mutants, V-C4, V-E5 and V-G8, show an abnormal response to X-ray-induced DNA damage. Like ataxia telangiectasia (AT) cells, they display increased cell killing, chromosomal instability and a diminished inhibition of DNA synthesis following ionizing radiation. To localize the defective hamster gene (XRCC8) on the human genome, human chromosomes were introduced into the AT-like hamster mutants, by microcell mediated chromosome transfer. Although, none of the human chromosomes corrected the defect in these mutants, the defect was corrected by a single mouse chromosome, derived from the A9 microcell donor cell line. In four independent X-ray-resistant microcell hybrid clones of V-E5, the presence of the mouse chromosome was determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization, using a mouse cot-1 probe. By PCR analysis with primers specific for different mouse chromosomes and Southern blot analysis with the mouse Ldlr probe, the mouse chromosome 9, was identified in all four X-ray-resistant hybrid clones. Segregation of the mouse chromosome 9 from these hamster-mouse microcell hybrids led to the loss of the regained X-ray-resistance, confirming that mouse chromosome 9 is responsible for complementation of the defect in V-E5 cells. The assignment of the mouse homolog of the ATM gene to mouse chromosome 9, and the presence of this mouse chromosome only in the radioresistant hamster cell hybrids suggest that the hamster AT-like mutant are homologous to AT, although they are not complemented by hamster chromosome 11.
Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics | 2003
Peter Wilson; Andrew P. Cuthbert; Anna Marsh; Jeremy Arnold; James Flanagan; Christine Mulford; Deborah A. Trott; Elizabeth Baker; David M. Purdie; Robert F. Newbold; Georgia Chenevix-Trench
Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the short arm of chromosome 8 occurs frequently in breast tumors. Fine mapping of the smallest regions of overlap of the deletions indicates that multiple tumor suppressor genes may be located in this region. We have performed microcell-mediated chromosome transfer of chromosome 8 into two breast cancer cell lines, 21MT-1 and T-47D. Twenty-two of the resulting hybrids were characterized extensively with chromosome 8 microsatellite markers and a subset were assayed for growth in vitro and soft agar clonicity. There was no evidence in any of the hybrids for suppression of growth or clonicity that could be attributed to the presence of particular regions of chromosome 8; however, none of the 22 hybrids examined had taken up all of the donor chromosome 8, and in fact there were three regions that contained only one allele of the markers genotyped in all 22 hybrids. These results are consistent with the presence of suppressor genes on the short arm of chromosome 8 causing strong growth suppression that is incompatible with growth in vitro; that is, multiple suppressor genes may exist on the short arm of chromosome 8.
Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer | 2001
Goodarz Goodarzi; Tomoyuki Mashimo; Andrew P. Cuthbert; Robert F. Newbold; Sudha K. Pai; Shigeru Hirota; Sadahiro Hosobe; Kunio Miura; Sucharita Bandyopadhyay; Steven C. Gross; K.C. Balaji; Kounosuke Watabe
Acquisition of metastatic ability by prostate cancer cells is the hallmark of their lethal trait and outcome. However, the genetic alterations underlying the clinical progression and pathogenesis of prostate cancer are not well understood. Several studies involving loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and comparative genomic hybridization analysis have identified distinctively altered regions on various human chromosomes, and genomic imbalance of chromosome 20 was implicated in progression and recurrence of prostate tumors. To examine the role of chromosome 20 in prostate neoplasms, we introduced this chromosome into highly metastatic rat prostate cancer cells using the microcell‐mediated chromosome transfer technique. Introduction of the chromosome resulted in significant suppression of the metastatic ability of the hybrid cells, by as much as 98%, without any interference with the in vivo growth rate or tumorigenicity of primary tumor in SCID mice. Our STS‐PCR analysis on 10 hybrid clones indicates that the suppressor activity of chromosome 20 is located in the p11.23‐12 region. Further examination of the hybrid clones by experimental metastasis assay and histologic analysis as well as Matrigel invasion assay suggests the involvement of the suppressor region at an early stage of invasion and extravasation. We also investigated the status of the chromosome 20 suppressor region in pathology specimens from human prostate cancer patients and detected the frequent loss of this region in high‐grade tumors. These results suggest the presence of a putative suppressor gene on human chromosome 20 that is functionally involved in development of prostate cancer metastases.
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis | 1999
Stefan Vermeulen; Philip R. Debruyne; Giancarlo Marra; Frank Speleman; Petra Boukamp; Josef Jiricny; Andrew P. Cuthbert; Robert F. Newbold; Friedel Nollet; Frans van Roy; Marc Mareel
Transition from an epithelioid (E) to a round (R) morphotype, in the human colon cancer cell line HCT-8, is associated with loss or truncation of αE-catenin and acquisition of invasiveness in organ culture. In E clones, like in parental HCT-8 cells, one allele of the αE-catenin gene (CTNNA1) is mutated. HCT-8 cells have also a “Microsatelite Instability-High” (MSI-H) phenotype presumably due to a mutated hMSH6 gene. Fusion of E type cells doubles the wild type CTNNA1 alleles and prevents the loss of αE-catenin. Introduction of an extra chromosome 2, carrying a wild type hMSH6 gene, restores post-replicative mismatch repair and also prevents the frequent inactivation of the remaining wild type CTNNA1 allele.
Molecular Carcinogenesis | 2004
Mohamed H. Lareef; Quivo Tahin; Joon Song; Irma H. Russo; Dana Mihaila; Carolyn M. Slater; Binaifer R. Balsara; Joseph R. Testa; Dominique Broccoli; Jennifer V. Grobelny; Gil Mor; Andrew P. Cuthbert; Jose Russo
Transformation of the human breast epithelial cells (HBEC) MCF‐10F with the carcinogen benz(a)pyrene (BP) into BP1‐E cells resulted in the loss of the chromosome 17 p13.2 locus (D17S796 marker) and formation of colonies in agar‐methocel (colony efficiency (CE)), loss of ductulogenic capacity in collagen matrix, and resistance to anti‐Fas monoclonal antibody (Mab)‐induced apoptosis. For testing the role of that specific region of chromosome 17 in the expression of transformation phenotypes, we transferred chromosome 17 from mouse fibroblast donors to BP1‐E cells. Chromosome 11 was used as negative control. After G418 selection, nine clones each were randomly selected from BP1‐E‐11neo and BP1‐E‐17neo hybrids, respectively, and tested for the presence of the donor chromosomes by fluorescent in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction‐based restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR‐RFLP) analyses. Sensitivity to Fas Mab–induced apoptosis and evaluation of transformation phenotype expression were tested in MCF‐10F, BP1‐E, and nine BP1‐E‐11neo and BP1‐E‐17neo clones each. Six BP1‐E‐17neo clones exhibited a reversion of transformation phenotypes and a dose dependent sensitivity to Fas Mab‐induced apoptosis, behaving similarly to MCF‐10F cells. All BP1‐E‐11neo, and three BP1‐E‐17neo cell clones, like BP1‐E cells, retained a high CE, loss of ductulogenic capacity, and were resistant to all Fas Mab doses tested. Genomic analysis revealed that those six BP1‐E‐17neo clones that were Fas‐sensitive and reverted their transformed phenotypes had retained the 17p13.2 (D17S796 marker) region, whereas it was absent in all resistant clones, indicating that the expression of transformation phenotypes and the sensitivity of the cells to Fas‐mediated apoptosis were under the control of genes located in this region.
Cancer Research | 2001
Joanne M. McIlrath; Simon Bouffler; Enrique Samper; Andrew P. Cuthbert; Andrzej Wojcik; Irena Szumiel; Peter E. Bryant; Andrew Riches; Alastair M. Thompson; Maria A. Blasco; Robert F. Newbold; Predrag Slijepcevic
Cytogenetic and Genome Research | 1995
Andrew P. Cuthbert; Deborah A. Trott; R.M. Ekong; S. Jezzard; N.L. England; M Themis; Christopher M. Todd; Robert F. Newbold
Cancer Research | 1999
Christopher N. Parris; Julian D. Harris; Darren K. Griffin; Andrew P. Cuthbert; Andrew J. R. Silver; Robert F. Newbold