Andrew R Clamp

Quantifying Antivascular Effects of Monoclonal Antibodies to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor: Insights from Imaging

Purpose: Little is known concerning the onset, duration, and magnitude of direct therapeutic effects of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies. Such knowledge would help guide the rational development of targeted therapeutics from bench to bedside and optimize use of imaging technologies that quantify tumor function in early-phase clinical trials. Experimental Design: Preclinical studies were done using ex vivo microcomputed tomography and in vivo ultrasound imaging to characterize tumor vasculature in a human HM-7 colorectal xenograft model treated with the anti-VEGF antibody G6-31. Clinical evaluation was by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in 10 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab. Results: Microcomputed tomography experiments showed reduction in perfused vessels within 24 to 48 h of G6-31 drug administration (P ≤ 0.005). Ultrasound imaging confirmed reduced tumor blood volume within the same time frame (P = 0.048). Consistent with the preclinical results, reductions in enhancing fraction and fractional plasma volume were detected in patient colorectal cancer metastases within 48 h after a single dose of bevacizumab that persisted throughout one cycle of therapy. These effects were followed by resolution of edema (P = 0.0023) and tumor shrinkage in 9 of 26 tumors at day 12. Conclusion: These data suggest that VEGF-specific inhibition induces rapid structural and functional effects with downstream significant antitumor activity within one cycle of therapy. This finding has important implications for the design of early-phase clinical trials that incorporate physiologic imaging. The study shows how animal data help interpret clinical imaging data, an important step toward the validation of image biomarkers of tumor structure and function. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(21):6674–82)Purpose Little is known concerning the onset, duration and magnitude of direct therapeutic effects of anti-VEGF therapies. Such knowledge would help guide the rational development of targeted therapeutics from bench to bedside and optimize use of imaging technologies that quantify tumor function in early phase clinical trials.

DCE-MRI biomarkers of tumour heterogeneity predict CRC liver metastasis shrinkage following bevacizumab and FOLFOX-6

Background:There is limited evidence that imaging biomarkers can predict subsequent response to therapy. Such prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers would facilitate development of personalised medicine. We hypothesised that pre-treatment measurement of the heterogeneity of tumour vascular enhancement could predict clinical outcome following combination anti-angiogenic and cytotoxic chemotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases.Methods:Ten patients with 26 CRC liver metastases had two dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) examinations before starting first-line bevacizumab and FOLFOX-6. Pre-treatment biomarkers of tumour microvasculature were computed and a regression analysis was performed against the post-treatment change in tumour volume after five cycles of therapy. The ability of the resulting linear model to predict tumour shrinkage was evaluated using leave-one-out validation. Robustness to inter-visit variation was investigated using data from a second baseline scan.Results:In all, 86% of the variance in post-treatment tumour shrinkage was explained by the median extravascular extracellular volume (ve), tumour enhancing fraction (EF), and microvascular uniformity (assessed with the fractal measure box dimension, d0) (R2=0.86, P<0.00005). Other variables, including baseline volume were not statistically significant. Median prediction error was 12%. Equivalent results were obtained from the second scan.Conclusion:Traditional image analyses may over-simplify tumour biology. Measuring microvascular heterogeneity may yield important prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers.

Randomized Phase II Study of Temozolomide Given Every 8 Hours or Daily With Either Interferon Alfa-2b or Thalidomide in Metastatic Malignant Melanoma

PURPOSE Temozolomide is an imidazotetrazine with a mechanism of action similar to dacarbazine and equivalent activity in melanoma. It is well tolerated and is a candidate for combination chemotherapy and schedule manipulation. In this study, we combined temozolomide with interferon alfa-2b and, separately, with thalidomide, and we administered temozolomide alone in a compressed schedule. The objectives of this randomized phase II, two-center study were to determine response rates, overall survival, and tolerability of the regimens in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred eighty-one patients with metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to receive up to six 4-weekly cycles consisting of temozolomide 200 mg/m2 every 8 hours for five doses, or temozolomide 200 mg/m2 daily for days 1 to 5 plus interferon alfa-2b 5 MU (million International Units) subcutaneously three times a week, or temozolomide 150 mg/m2 (increased after one cycle to 200 mg/m2) daily on days 1 to 5 plus thalidomide 100 mg daily days 1 to 28. RESULTS The treatment arms were well balanced for known prognostic factors. Median survival was 5.3 months for 8-hourly temozolomide, 7.7 months for temozolomide/interferon, and 7.3 months for temozolomide/thalidomide; and 1-year survivals were 18%, 26%, and 24%, respectively. Response or disease stabilization occurred in 20% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 33%) given 8-hourly temozolomide, 21% (95% CI, 12% to 33%) given temozolomide/interferon, and 25% (95% CI, 15% to 38%) given temozolomide/thalidomide. Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicities were similar in each arm except for infection, which was more frequent with 8-hourly temozolomide. There were fewer instances of grade 3 or 4 myelotoxicity with temozolomide/thalidomide. CONCLUSION Of the three regimens tested, the combination of temozolomide and thalidomide seems the most promising for future study.

Antiangiogenic drugs in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in women. Antiangiogenic treatments have emerged as a promising strategy to treat ovarian cancer. This article reviews the rationale supporting the use of antiangiogenic treatments in ovarian cancer, the clinical development of this group of drugs and the toxicities specific to this modality of treatment.

A review of the latest clinical compounds to inhibit VEGF in pathological angiogenesis

Angiogenesis plays an important role in the formation of new blood vessels and is crucial for tumour development and progression. Imbalance between pro- and antiangiogenesis factors regulates the biological process of angiogenesis. The best characterised of the proangiogenic factors and the most potent is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The binding of VEGF to one of its transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptors, which are predominantly found on endothelial cells, results in receptor dimerisation, activation and autophosphorylation of the tyrosine kinase domain. This triggers a cascade of complex downstream signalling pathways. Several strategies targeting the VEGF signalling pathway have been developed. These include neutralising antibodies to VEGF (bevacizumab) or VEGF receptors (VEGFRs) (DC101), soluble VEGFR/VEGFR hybrids (VEGF-Trap), and tyrosine kinase inhibitors of VEGFRs (BAY43-9006, SU11248, ZD6474, AZD2171, PTK/ZK and others). Several of these agents are now being investigated in clinical trials.

Assessment of therapeutic response in patients with metastatic bone disease

Metastatic bone disease is common in cancer patients and causes substantial disease-related morbidity and mortality. However, several effective treatments are available for the management of these patients. Bisphosphonates, which inhibit osteoclast-mediated resorption of bone matrix, are especially important because they decrease the incidence of skeletal-related events in many tumour types and can complement antineoplastic therapies. At present, assessment of treatment for bone metastases is hindered by a lack of effective, rapid methods to measure disease response. We discuss the difficulties of current measures of response assessment and describe the development of new radiological and biochemical markers of bone metastases. Assays that detect type I collagen telopeptides as markers of bone resorption seem to be most promising at present.

Heparin Octasaccharides Inhibit Angiogenesis In vivo

Background: In previous experiments, we showed that heparin oligosaccharides inhibit the angiogenic cytokine fibroblast growth factor-2. Here, we present the first in vivo study of size-fractionated heparin oligosaccharides in four models of angiogenesis that are progressively less dependent on fibroblast growth factor-2. Experimental Design: Heparin oligosaccharides were prepared using size-exclusion gel filtration chromatography and characterized through depolymerization and strong anion exchange high-performance liquid chromatography. Size-defined oligosaccharides (20 mg/kg/d) were given to mice bearing s.c. sponges that were injected with fibroblast growth factor-2 (100 ng/d). After 14 days, octasaccharides and decasaccharides reduced the microvessel density to levels below control. In a second experiment, HEC-FGF2 human endometrial cancer cells that overexpress fibroblast growth factor-2 were implanted in a hollow fiber placed s.c. in vivo. Oligosaccharides were given at 20 mg/kg/d for 2 weeks and the data again showed that octasaccharides significantly reduced microvessel density around the fiber (P = 0.03). In a more complex model, where angiogenesis was induced by a broad spectrum of growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor, we implanted H460 lung carcinoma cells in hollow fibers and treated the animals with oligosaccharides at 20 mg/kg/d over 3 weeks. Octasaccharides reduced the microvessel density to that of control. Preliminary investigation of 6-O-desulfated heparins showed that these also had antiangiogenic activity. Results: Finally, we examined the inhibitory potential of hexasaccharides and octasaccharides given at 20 mg/kg/d and these inhibited the growth of H460 lung carcinoma in vivo. At clinically attainable concentrations, significant anticoagulation (activated partial thromboplastin time, anti–factor Xa, and anti–factor IIa) was not observed in vitro unless species containing ≥16 saccharide residues were investigated. Conclusions: Thus, our preclinical data show that heparin octasaccharides represent novel antiangiogenic compounds that can be given without the anticoagulant effects of low molecular weight heparin.

Inhibition of FGFR2 and FGFR1 increases cisplatin sensitivity in ovarian cancer

Fibroblast Growth Factors (FGFs) have been implicated in malignant transformation, tumour mitogenesis, angiogenesis and chemoresistance. The aim of this study was to determine which FGFs and FGFRs play functional roles in epithelial ovarian cancer. Restriction enzyme analysis of mRNA revealed that transformation was associated with a switch in FGFR2 and FGFR3, from the IIIc to the IIIb isoform. There was widespread expression of FGFs, including FGF7, in all tissues but, FGF3 and FGF19 were expressed by malignant cell lines and cancer tissue but were not present in normal tissue. Using FGFR-specific shRNAi we demonstrated that reductions in FGFR2 inhibited proliferation of ovarian cancer cell lines in vitro (>50%, p < 0.006), and reduced cisplatin IC50 (>60%, p < 0.0001). Cell cycle analysis revealed increased cisplatin sensitivity was associated with increased G2/M arrest and increased apoptosis. FGFR2 shRNAi reduced growth rates of ovarian tumour xenografts by 20% (p<0.006) and when combined with cisplatin caused a 40% reduction in proliferation rates (p<0.007). In contrast, RNAi-induced reductions in FGFR1 increased SKOV3 cell numbers, with associated changes in cell cycle but had no effect on ES2 cells. However, the cisplatin IC50 was reduced (>50%, p < 0.0001) by FGFR1 shRNAi in both cell lines and there was increased apoptosis (46-50%) compared with control cells (35%) (p < 0.004). Together our data suggest that combining FGFR2 inhibitors with platinum-containing cytotoxic agents for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer may yield increased anti-tumour activity. However, data on the inhibition of FGFR1 suggest that broad spectrum FGFR inhibitors may have unexpected effects on proliferation.

The clinical potential of antiangiogenic fragments of extracellular matrix proteins

Neovasculature development is a crucial step in the natural history of a cancer. While much emphasis has been placed on proangiogenic growth factors such as VEGF, it is clear that endogenous angiogenesis inhibitors also have critical roles in the regulation of this process. Recent research has identified several cryptic fragments of extracellular matrix/vascular basement membrane proteins that have potent antiangiogenic properties in vivo. It has become apparent that many of these fragments signal via interactions with endothelial integrins, although multiple downstream effector pathways have been implicated and endostatin, the first non-collagenous domain of collagen XVIII, influences an intricate signalling network. The activity of these molecules in animal models suggests that they may have significant clinical activity; however, results of phase I/II trials with endostatin were disappointing. Many possible reasons can be found for the failure of these studies. Weaknesses in trial design, endostatin administration regimen and patient selection are identifiable, and importantly the lack of a clearly defined antiangiogenic mechanism for endostatin hindered assessment of biologically effective dose. Additionally, in vivo immunological and proteolytic function-neutralising mechanisms may have negated endostatins actions. Lessons learned from these studies will aid the future clinical development of other antiangiogenic extracellular matrix protein fragments.

Phase II trial of tamoxifen and goserelin in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Endocrine therapy is a recognised option in the treatment of chemo-resistant ovarian cancer. We conducted a nonrandomised phase II evaluation of combination endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and goserelin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer that had recurred following chemotherapy. In total, 26 patients entered the study, of which 17 had platinum-resistant disease. The median age was 63 years and enrolled patients had received a median of three chemotherapy regimens prior to trial entry. Patients were given oral tamoxifen 20 mg twice daily on a continuous basis and subcutaneous goserelin 3.6 mg once a month until disease progression. Using the definition of endocrine response that included patients with stable disease (SD) of 6 months or greater, the overall response rate (clinical benefit rate) was 50%. This included one complete response (CR) (3.8%), two partial responses (PR) (7.7%) and 10 patients with SD (38.5%). The median progression-free interval (PFI) was 4 months (95% CI 2.4–9.6) while the median overall survival (OS) was 13.6 months (95% CI 5.5–30.6). Four patients received treatment for more than 2 years (range 1–31) and one of them is still on treatment. In none of the four patients was there any evidence of recurrent or cumulative treatment related toxicity. Treatment-limiting toxicity was not seen in any of the study population. Endocrine data demonstrated a marked suppression of luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) to less than 4% of baseline values. No consistent correlation could be established between LH/FSH suppression and tumour response. Likewise no relationship was observed between Inhibin A/B and pro-alpha C levels and tumour response. Inhibin is unlikely to be a useful surrogate marker for response in locally advanced or metastatic ovarian cancer. Combination endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and goserelin is an active regimen in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients. Hormonal therapy is advantageous in its relative lack of toxicity, ease of administration and tolerability, thus making it suitable for patients with heavily pretreated disease, compromised bone marrow function and other comorbid conditions that contraindicate cytotoxic therapy as well as in patients with indolent disease.