Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andrew R. Mayer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andrew R. Mayer.


Nature Neuroscience | 2001

The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing.

Stephen M. Rao; Andrew R. Mayer; Deborah L. Harrington

Timing is crucial to many aspects of human performance. To better understand its neural underpinnings, we used event-related fMRI to examine the time course of activation associated with different components of a time perception task. We distinguished systems associated with encoding time intervals from those related to comparing intervals and implementing a response. Activation in the basal ganglia occurred early, and was uniquely associated with encoding time intervals, whereas cerebellar activation unfolded late, suggesting an involvement in processes other than explicit timing. Early cortical activation associated with encoding of time intervals was observed in the right inferior parietal cortex and bilateral premotor cortex, implicating these systems in attention and temporary maintenance of intervals. Late activation in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex emerged during comparison of time intervals. Our results illustrate a dynamic network of cortical-subcortical activation associated with different components of temporal information processing.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2001

Can medial temporal lobe regions distinguish true from false? An event-related functional MRI study of veridical and illusory recognition memory

Roberto Cabeza; Stephen M. Rao; Anthony D. Wagner; Andrew R. Mayer; Daniel L. Schacter

To investigate the types of memory traces recovered by the medial temporal lobe (MTL), neural activity during veridical and illusory recognition was measured with the use of functional MRI (fMRI). Twelve healthy young adults watched a videotape segment in which two speakers alternatively presented lists of associated words, and then the subjects performed a recognition test including words presented in the study lists (True items), new words closely related to studied words (False items), and new unrelated words (New items). The main finding was a dissociation between two MTL regions: whereas the hippocampus was similarly activated for True and False items, suggesting the recovery of semantic information, the parahippocampal gyrus was more activated for True than for False items, suggesting the recovery of perceptual information. The study also yielded a dissociation between two prefrontal cortex (PFC) regions: whereas bilateral dorsolateral PFC was more activated for True and False items than for New items, possibly reflecting monitoring of retrieved information, left ventrolateral PFC was more activated for New than for True and False items, possibly reflecting semantic processing. Precuneus and lateral parietal regions were more activated for True and False than for New items. Orbitofrontal cortex and cerebellar regions were more activated for False than for True items. In conclusion, the results suggest that activity in anterior MTL regions does not distinguish True from False, whereas activity in posterior MTL regions does.


Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience | 2000

Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention: Object-Based Selection of a Region in Space

Catherine M. Arrington; Thomas H. Carr; Andrew R. Mayer; Stephen M. Rao

Objects play an important role in guiding spatial attention through a cluttered visual environment. We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (ER-fMRI) to measure brain activity during cued discrimination tasks requiring subjects to orient attention either to a region bounded by an object (object-based spatial attention) or to an unbounded region of space (location-based spatial attention) in anticipation of an upcoming target. Comparison between the two tasks revealed greater activation when attention selected a region bounded by an object. This activation was strongly lateralized to the left hemisphere and formed a widely distributed network including (a) attentional structures in parietal and temporal cortex and thalamus, (b) ventral-stream object processing structures in occipital, inferior-temporal, and parahippocampal cortex, and (c) control structures in medial-and dorsolateral-prefrontal cortex. These results suggest that object-based spatial selection is achieved by imposing additional constraints over and above those processes already operating to achieve selection of an unbounded region. In addition, ER-fMRI methodology allowed a comparison of validly versus invalidly cued trials, thereby delineating brain structures involved in the reorientation of attention after its initial deployment proved incorrect. All areas of activation that differentiated between these two trial types resulted from greater activity during the invalid trials. This outcome suggests that all brain areas involved in attentional orienting and task performance in response to valid cues are also involved on invalid trials. During invalid trials, additional brain regions are recruited when a perceiver recovers from invalid cueing and reorients attention to a target appearing at an uncued location. Activated brain areas specific to attentional reorientation were strongly right-lateralized and included posterior temporal and inferior parietal regions previously implicated in visual attention processes, as well as prefrontal regions that likely subserve control processes, particularly related to inhibition of inappropriate responding.


Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience | 2000

Specialized Neural Systems Underlying Representations of Sequential Movements

Deborah L. Harrington; Stephen M. Rao; Kathleen Y. Haaland; Julie A. Bobholz; Andrew R. Mayer; Jeffrey R. Binder; Robert W. Cox

The ease by which movements are combined into skilled actions depends on many factors, including the complexity of movement sequences. Complexity can be defined by the surface structure of a sequence, including motoric properties such as the types of effectors, and by the abstract or sequence-specific structure, which is apparent in the relations amongst movements, such as repetitions. It is not known whether different neural systems support the cognitive and the sensorimotor processes underlying different structural properties of sequential actions. We investigated this question using whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in healthy adults as they performed sequences of five key presses involving up to three fingers. The structure of sequences was defined by two factors that independently lengthen the time to plan sequences before movement: the number of different fingers (1-3; surface structure) and the number of finger transitions (0-4; sequence-specific structure). The results showed that systems involved in visual processing (extrastriate cortex) and the preparation of sensory aspects of movement (rostral inferior parietal and ventral premotor cortex (PMv)) correlated with both properties of sequence structure. The number of different fingers positively correlated with activation intensity in the cerebellum and superior parietal cortex (anterior), systems associated with sensorimotor, and kinematic representations of movement, respectively. The number of finger transitions correlated with activation in systems previously associated with sequence-specific processing, including the inferior parietal and the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd), and in interconnecting superior temporal-middle frontal gyrus networks. Different patterns of activation in the left and right inferior parietal cortex were associated with different sequences, consistent with the speculation that sequences are encoded using different mnemonics, depending on the sequence-specific structure. In contrast, PMd activation correlated positively with increases in the number of transitions, consistent with the role of this area in the retrieval or preparation of abstract action plans. These findings suggest that the surface and the sequence-specific structure of sequential movements can be distinguished by distinct distributed systems that support their underlying mental operations.


Journal of The International Neuropsychological Society | 2002

Neural basis of the Stroop interference task: response competition or selective attention?

Larissa A. Mead; Andrew R. Mayer; Julie A. Bobholz; Scott J. Woodley; Joseph M. Cunningham; Thomas A. Hammeke; Stephen M. Rao

Previous neuroimaging studies of the Stroop task have postulated that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) plays a critical role in resolution of the Stroop interference condition. However, activation of the ACC is not invariably seen and appears to depend on a variety of methodological factors, including the degree of response conflict and response expectancies. The present functional MRI study was designed to identify those brain areas critically involved in the interference condition. Healthy subjects underwent a blocked-trial design fMRI experiment while responding to 1 of 3 stimulus conditions: (1) incongruent color words, (2) congruent color words, and (3) color-neutral words. Subjects responded to the printed color of the word via a manual response. Compared to the congruent and neutral conditions, the incongruent condition produced significant activation within the left inferior precentral sulcus (IpreCS) located on the border between the inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis (BA 44) and the ventral premotor region (BA 6). Significant deactivations in the rostral component of the ACC and the posterior cingulate gyrus were also observed. Selective activation of the left IpreCS is compatible with findings from previous neuroimaging, lesion, electrophysiological, and behavioral studies and is presumably related to the mediation of competing articulatory demands during the interference condition.


Neuropsychology (journal) | 1999

Mapping of semantic, phonological, and orthographic verbal working memory in normal adults with functional magnetic resonance imaging

Bruce Crosson; Stephen M. Rao; Scott J. Woodley; Allyson Rosen; Julie A. Bobholz; Andrew R. Mayer; Joseph M. Cunningham; Thomas A. Hammeke; Scott A. Fuller; Jeffrey R. Binder; Robert W. Cox; Elliot A. Stein

Twelve neurologically normal participants (4 men and 8 women) performed semantic, phonological, and orthographic working memory tasks and a control task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Divergent regions of the posterior left hemisphere used for decoding and storage of information emerged in each working memory versus control task comparison. These regions were consistent with previous literature on processing mechanisms for semantic, phonological, and orthographic information. Further, working memory versus control task differences extended into the left frontal lobe, including premotor cortex, and even into subcortical structures. Findings were consistent with R. C. Martin and C. Romanis (1994) contention that different forms of verbal working memory exist and further suggest that a reconceptualization of premotor cortex functions is needed.


Journal of Neuroimaging | 2004

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Working Memory among Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Lawrence H. Sweet; Stephen M. Rao; Margaret Primeau; Andrew R. Mayer; Ronald A. Cohen

Background and Purpose. Verbal working memory (VWM) deficits have been a well‐replicated finding among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) studies have described a VWM system in healthy samples; however, functional neuroimaging of this system among MS patients is just beginning to appear. Methods. Fifteen MS patients and 15 sex‐, age‐, education‐, and IQ‐matched healthy control (HC) participants completed a 2‐Back VWM task as whole‐brain FMRI was conducted. Results. Each group exhibited increased brain activity compared to the 0‐Back control task in regions associated with the 2‐Back in previous neuroimaging studies. These included Brocas area, supplementary motor area (SMA), premotor cortices (PMC), and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (DLPFC). MS patients exhibited greater cortical activity than did HC participants in left primary motor and somatosensory cortices, PMC, DLPFC, anterior cingulate, and bilateral SMA. MS patients exhibited relatively less activation in Brocas area, bilateral cerebellum, and other regions not typically associated with the 2‐Back (eg, right fusiform gyrus, left lingual gyrus, right hippocampus). Performance accuracy and reaction time did not differ between groups. Conclusions. Normal performance of a challenging VWM task among high‐functioning MS patients is associated with a shift toward greater activity in regions related to sensorimotor functions and anterior attentional/executive components of the VWM system. Posterior memory storage systems appeared unaffected, while portions of the visual processing and subvocal rehearsal systems were less active. Although a shift in neural activity was noted relative toHC participants, deviation from regions normally involved in VWM function was not observed in this patient sample.


Neuroreport | 2001

Somatotopic organization of the medial wall of the cerebral hemispheres: a 3 Tesla fMRI study.

Andrew R. Mayer; Janice L. Zimbelman; Yoshimasa Watanabe; Stephen M. Rao

Somatotopic organization of the human medial wall of the cerebral hemispheres was studied using functional MRI conducted at high field strength (3 T) with fine spatial resolution (∼2 mm). Healthy subjects performed paced, repetitive movements of the fingers and toes. Within the supplementary motor area (SMA), two regions were identified: finger movements activated a region rostral and superior to that for toe movements. Two activation foci were also identified in the cingulate motor area: toe movements activated a region rostral and ventral to that activated by finger movements. All foci were located between the anterior and posterior commissures. Our results confirm previous human and non-human primate studies regarding the rostral–caudal organization of the SMA and CMA. The dorsal–ventral organization of the CMA, however, appears to be divergent from results derived from cortical stimulation studies conducted in non-human primates.


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2000

Neural Systems Underlying the Recognition of Familiar and Newly Learned Faces

Catherine L. Leveroni; Michael Seidenberg; Andrew R. Mayer; Larissa A. Mead; Jeffrey R. Binder; Stephen M. Rao


NeuroImage | 2000

Neural systems for reorienting visual attention when targets appear in unexpected locations

Stephen M. Rao; Catherine M. Arrington; Andrew R. Mayer; Thomas H. Carr

Collaboration


Dive into the Andrew R. Mayer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey R. Binder

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julie A. Bobholz

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Larissa A. Mead

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joseph M. Cunningham

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert W. Cox

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott J. Woodley

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas A. Hammeke

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge