Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andrew R Stevens is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andrew R Stevens.


Fluids and Barriers of the CNS | 2015

DESH negative normal pressure hydrocephalus: can patients still benefit from shunt insertion?

Tarek Mostafa; Claudia Craven; Neekhil A Patel; Edward W Dyson; Samir A Matloob; Aswin Chari; Patricia Haylock-Vize; Simon D Thompson; Syed N Shah; Andrew R Stevens; Huan Wee Chan; Jinendra Ekanayake; Ahmed K. Toma; Laurence D. Watkins

Selecting probable idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) patients for shunt insertion presents a challenge because of coexisting comorbidities and other conditions that could mimic NPH. The characteristic appearance of DESH (Disproportionately Enlarged Subarachnoid Space Hydrocephalus) on brain imaging has been shown to have a high positive predictive value in identifying shunt responsive INPH patients (SINPHONI trial). However, the negative predictive value of this radiological sign was not clearly demonstrated.


Fluids and Barriers of the CNS | 2015

Three-hundred cases of Spiegelberg ICP monitoring for hydrocephalus and CSF disorders: the Queen Square experience

Aswin Chari; Edward W Dyson; Andrew R Stevens; Simon D Thompson; Claudia Craven; Samir A Matloob; Huan Wee Chan; Syed N Shah; Tarek Mostafa; Neekhil A Patel; Jinendra Ekanayake; Patricia Haylock-Vize; Ahmed K. Toma; Laurence D. Watkins

Results ICPM was undertaken for a number of different conditions including undiagnosed headache (20.4%), IIH (28.7%), NPH (5.3%), high-pressure hydrocephalus (eg congenital/ post-traumatic/post-SAH) (17.2%) and Chiari malformations/syringomyelia (13.6%). Indications for ICPM included headache (74.0%), visual disturbance (6.2%), gait disturbance (6.2%) and cognitive disturbance (5.0%). Mean monitoring time was 37.3 hrs (range 12-154 hrs). Monitoring was conducted in the presence of a CSF shunt (50.6%), venous stent (3.7%) and previous cranial decompression (6.5%). Dynamic monitoring (eg with different shunt settings or pre/post venous stent insertion) was undertaken in 12.4%. Outcomes from ICPM included insertion of new CSF shunt (21.0%), revision of CSF shunt (13.0%), insertion of venous stent (6.5%), insertion of and lumbar drains for infusion studies (3.6%); importantly, non-operative treatment was pursued in a number of cases including shunt valve adjustment (7.7%) and conservative management (29.9%). Complications included superficial infection (4 patients, 1.2%), symptomatic intracerebral haematoma (1 patient, 0.3%) and misplacement (3 patients, 0.9%); importantly, there were no cases of deep intracranial infection and the only case of seizures was in the patient with the intracerebral haematoma. Conclusion This is the largest known series of ICPM for CSF disorders. It shows that ICP monitoring is a safe procedure and may be undertaken as part of routine protocol in the management of complex hydrocephalus patients. The number of cases that were subsequently managed conservatively or with a simple valve adjustment (37.6%) indicates the utility in terms of reducing operative interventions. Further evaluation of positive and negative predictive values based on the results of ICP monitoring and health-economic analyses will push the case for routine ICP monitoring prior to definitive management of all hydrocephalus patients.


Fluids and Barriers of the CNS | 2015

Comorbidites in NPH - local introspective - ‘Shunt them all’!.

Patricia Haylock-Vize; Eleanor Carter; Syed N Shah; Claudia Craven; Aswin Chari; Simon D Thompson; Edward W Dyson; Samir A Matloob; Andrew R Stevens; Huan Wee Chan; Jinendra Ekanayake; Ahmed K. Toma; Michelle Leemans; Laurence D. Watkins

In response to the 2013 ISH-CSF task force review on comorbidities in NPH we assessed 73 patients who were diagnosed with NPH and underwent shunt surgery at our tertiary neurosurgical unit between August 2008 and August 2012.


Fluids and Barriers of the CNS | 2015

Intracranial pressure and venous sinus pressure gradients: what happens 3 months after stenting?

Hasan Asif; Claudia Craven; Syed N Shah; Simon D Thompson; Aswin Chari; Samir A Matloob; Neekhil A Patel; Edward W Dyson; Patricia Haylock-Vize; Andrew R Stevens; Huan Wee Chan; Jinendra Ekanayake; Tarek Mostafa; Ahmed K. Toma; Laurence D. Watkins

Benign Intracranial hypertension (BIH) is commonly associated with venous sinus stenosis. Increasingly, this is treated endovascularly with stent insertion. However, this treatment modality is still controversial. Clinical improvement post stent insertion has been described. Little is known about long-term control of intracranial pressure (ICP). In our unit, catheter cerebral venogram with pressure measurements is routinely performed 3 months post stent insertion in BIH patients. We aim to quantify the degree of venous pressure changes in stenosis patients treated with sinus stenting and how the changes correlate with radiographic improvements.


Fluids and Barriers of the CNS | 2015

Differential compartment overdrainage syndrome

Claudia Craven; Neekhil A Patel; Samir A Matloob; Edward W Dyson; Aswin Chari; Tarek Mostafa; Simon D Thompson; Patricia Haylock-Vize; Syed N Shah; Andrew R Stevens; Huan Wee Chan; Jinendra Ekanayake; Ahmed K. Toma; Laurence D. Watkins

We describe a consistently similar clinical presentation of patients with complex hydrocephalus and encysted fourth ventricle separately drained by infratentorial shunt insertion.


Fluids and Barriers of the CNS | 2015

Cerebral venous sinus stent insertion as a primary versus secondary procedure in the treatment of intracranial hypertension.

Syed N Shah; Aswin Chari; Simon D Thompson; Patricia Haylock-Vize; Jinendra Ekanayake; Edward W Dyson; Andrew R Stevens; Claudia Craven; Huan W Chan; Tarek Mostafa; Neekhil A Patel; Samir A Matloob; Ahmed Toma; Laurence D. Watkins

Venous sinus stent insertion is being increasingly used as a primary treatment for intracranial hypertension patients (BIH). However, the value of this treatment modality is still controversial. This study looks into the difference in effectiveness of stents inserted as a primary procedure and those inserted in patients who already had cerebrospinal fluid diverting shunt in place i.e. as a secondary procedure.


Fluids and Barriers of the CNS | 2015

Shunt assistant device deception due to pseudovertical posturing

Claudia Craven; Neekhil A Patel; Hasan Asif; Aswin Chari; Edward W Dyson; Samir A Matloob; Patricia Haylock-Vize; Simon D Thompson; Syed N Shah; Andrew R Stevens; Tarek Mostafa; Huan Wee Chan; Jinendra Ekanayake; Ahmed K. Toma; Laurence D. Watkins

The ever present need to balance over drainage with under drainage in hydrocephalus has required innovations including adjustable valves with antigravity devices. These are activated in the vertical position to prevent siphoning. We describe a group of patients who presented with unexplained under drainage caused by activation of antigravity shunt components produced by peculiar head/body position.


Fluids and Barriers of the CNS | 2015

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus with temporary response to shunt insertion

Huan Wee Chan; Patricia Haylock-Vize; Edward W Dyson; Aswin Chari; Claudia Craven; Samir A Matloob; Neekhil A Patel; Simon D Thompson; Syed N Shah; Andrew R Stevens; Jinendra Ekanayake; Ahmed K. Toma; Laurence D. Watkins

Obstruction to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) results in reduced CSF total tau (t-tau) and amyloid-β 42 (Aβ42) protein concentrations [1]. Restoration of normal CSF flow dynamics with ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt allows these biomarkers to clear from extracellular fluid into the CSF(1). CSF biomarkers in iNPH have been an interesting subject with initials results suggestive of reduced t-tau and amyloid-β. A subgroup of probable iNPH patients responds favorably to VP shunt insertion but for a brief period (temporary responders). In our unit, these patients are further investigated with assessment of the effect of shunt tapping on walking speed. A large proportion underwent shunt revision. In this population, CSF biomarkers were studied over a prolonged period of time.


Fluids and Barriers of the CNS | 2015

NPH: are we giving up on patients with temporary improvement post shunt?

Simon D Thompson; Claudia Craven; Patricia Haylock-Vize; Edward W Dyson; Aswin Chari; Samir A Matloob; Neekhil A Patel; Syed N Shah; Andrew R Stevens; Huan Wee Chan; Jinendra Ekanayake; Ahmed K. Toma; Lewis Thorne; Laurence D. Watkins

Normal pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) is predominantly treated with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) resulting in improvement in the Hakim triad (mobility, cognitive function, urinary continence). There are a population of patients who experience an improvement in symptoms post shunt insertion followed by a subsequent deterioration in their condition in the proceeding months / years. At our institution, a large volume (min 40ml) CSF withdrawal is made via the shunt reservoir in these patients, measuring pre/post mobility and cognitive function. Comparison is then made between pre/post results and if a clear improvement is seen, VP shunt surgical revision is offered.


Fluids and Barriers of the CNS | 2015

Intracranial pressure guided management of patients with Chiari malformations presenting with headache: a paradigm shift?

Edward W Dyson; Aswin Chari; Andrew R Stevens; Simon D Thompson; Claudia Craven; Patricia Haylock-Vize; Samir A Matloob; Syed N Shah; Huan Wee Chan; Neekhil A Patel; Tarek Mostafa; Jinendra Ekanayake; Ahmed K. Toma; Lewis Thorne; Laurence D. Watkins

Chiari malformation (CM) describes cerebellar tonsillar descent below the level of the foramen magnum. It is commonly associated with syringomyelia and often presents with headache (1). The conventional surgical treatment for symptomatic patients is foramen magnum decompression (FMD) (2) which carries a significant burden of operative morbidity (3). Altered cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics have been demonstrated in CM patients and CSF diversion has been used as an alternative treatment modality. Patients with chronic headache and radiological evidence of CM represent a therapeutic challenge. In our unit, these are primarily investigated with intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring aiming to detect objective evaluation of CSF dynamics prior to surgical intervention.

Collaboration


Dive into the Andrew R Stevens's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward W Dyson

University College Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Samir A Matloob

University College Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Syed N Shah

University College Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ahmed K. Toma

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aswin Chari

University College Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neekhil A Patel

University College Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge