Andrew S. Marks
University of California, Los Angeles
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andrew S. Marks.
Journal of the American Mathematical Society | 2016
Andrew S. Marks
We introduce a new method, involving infinite games and Borel determinacy, which we use to answer several well-known questions in Borel combinatorics.
arXiv: Logic | 2016
Andrew S. Marks; Theodore A. Slaman; John R. Steel
Introduction. There is a fascinating interplay and overlap between recursion theory and descriptive set theory. A particularly beautiful source of such interaction has been Martins conjecture on Turing invariant functions. This longstanding open problem in recursion theory has connected to many problems in descriptive set theory, particularly in the theory of countable Borel equivalence relations. In this paper, we shall give an overview of some work that has been done on Martins conjecture, and applications that it has had in descriptive set theory. We will present a long unpublished result of Slaman and Steel that arithmetic equivalence is a universal countable Borel equivalence relation. This theorem has interesting corollaries for the theory of universal countable Borel equivalence relations in general. We end with some open problems, and directions for future research. Martins conjecture. Martins conjecture on Turing invariant functions is one of the oldest and deepest open problems on the global structure of the Turing degrees. Inspired by Sacks’ question on the existence of a degree-invariant solution to Posts problem [Sac66], Martin made a sweeping conjecture that says in essence, the only nontrivial definable Turing invariant functions are the Turing jump and its iterates through the transfinite. Our basic references for descriptive set theory and effective descriptive set theory are the books of Kechris [Kec95] and Sacks [Sac90]. Let ≤T be Turing reducibility on the Cantor space ^ω2, and let ≡T be Turing equivalence. Given x ∈^ω2, let x′ be the Turing jump of x. The Turing degree of a real x∈^ω2 is the ≡T equivalence class of x. A Turing invariant function is a function such that for all reals x, y ∈ ^ω2, if x ≡T y, then f(x) ≡T f(y). The Turing invariant functions are those which induce functions on the Turing degrees. With the axiom of choice, we can construct many pathological Turing invariant functions. Martins conjecture is set in the context of ZF+DC+AD, where AD is the axiom of determinacy. We assume ZF+DC+AD for the rest of this section. The results we will discuss all “localize” so that the assumption of AD essentially amounts to studying definable functions assuming definable determinacy, for instance, Borel functions using Borel determinacy.
arXiv: Logic | 2016
Clinton T. Conley; Andrew S. Marks; Robin D. Tucker-Drob
We generalize Brookss theorem to show that if
Advances in Mathematics | 2016
Andrew S. Marks; Spencer Unger
G
Communications in Algebra | 2007
Christopher Dodd; Andrew S. Marks; Victor Meyerson; Ben Richert
is a Borel graph on a standard Borel space
Journal of Mathematical Logic | 2017
Andrew S. Marks
X
Mathematische Annalen | 2018
Clinton T. Conley; Steve Jackson; David Kerr; Andrew S. Marks; Brandon Seward; Robin D. Tucker-Drob
of degree bounded by
Journal of Symbolic Logic | 2018
Adam R. Day; Andrew S. Marks
d \geq 3
Annals of Mathematics | 2017
Andrew S. Marks; Spencer Unger
which contains no
arXiv: Dynamical Systems | 2016
Andrew S. Marks
(d+1)