Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andrew Tawse-Smith is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andrew Tawse-Smith.


Lasers in Medical Science | 2014

The use of laser therapy for dental implant surface decontamination: a narrative review of in vitro studies.

Marina Salah Kamel; Amardeep Khosa; Andrew Tawse-Smith; Jonathan W. Leichter

The aim of this narrative review was to critically evaluate in vitro studies assessing the efficacy of lasers in the bacterial decontamination of titanium implant surfaces. The MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge and Embase electronic databases were used to search for articles relating to the use of lasers in the bacterial decontamination of titanium specimen surfaces using predetermined search statements. Clinical studies, case reports, case series, review articles and animal models were excluded. Study selection was carried out independently and then cross-checked by two authors through abstract viewing. Eighteen articles were selected for full-text analysis. Erbium-doped yttrium–aluminium–garnet lasers had a wide range of powers capable of inducing bacterial decontamination. While carbon dioxide and gallium–aluminium–arsenide diode lasers demonstrated the ability to produce bacterial decontamination, the bacterial sensitivity to each varied depending on the species involved. There is no concensus on the laser type or settings that are optimal for bacterial decontamination of titanium implant surfaces as studies employ various test specimens, contamination methodologies, irradiation settings and protocols, and outcome measures resulting in limited study comparability. More investigations are required to provide guidelines for the use of laser therapy in the decontamination of implant surfaces.


Journal of Periodontal Research | 2016

Xenogeneic collagen matrix for periodontal plastic surgery procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Momen A. Atieh; Nabeel H.M. Alsabeeha; Andrew Tawse-Smith; Alan G. T. Payne

Several clinical trials describe the effectiveness of xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) as an alternative option to surgical mucogingival procedures for the treatment of marginal tissue recession and augmentation of insufficient zones of keratinized tissue (KT). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical and patient-centred outcomes of XCM compared to other mucogingival procedures. Applying guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta analyses statement, randomized controlled trials were searched for in electronic databases and complemented by hand searching. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaborations Risk of Bias tool and data were analysed using statistical software. A total of 645 studies were identified, of which, six trials were included with 487 mucogingival defects in 170 participants. Overall meta-analysis showed that connective tissue graft (CTG) in conjunction with the coronally advanced flap (CAF) had a significantly higher percentage of complete/mean root coverage and mean recession reduction than XCM. Insufficient evidence was found to determine any significant differences in width of KT between XCM and CTG. The XCM had a significantly higher mean root coverage, recession reduction and gain in KT compared to CAF alone. No significant differences in patients aesthetic satisfaction were found between XCM and CTG, except for postoperative morbidity in favour of XCM. Operating time was significantly reduced with the use of XCM compared with CTG but not with CAF alone. There is no evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of XCM in achieving greater root coverage, recession reduction and gain in KT compared to CTG plus CAF. Superior short-term results in treating root coverage compared with CAF alone are possible. There is limited evidence that XCM may improve aesthetic satisfaction, reduce postoperative morbidity and shorten the operating time. Further long-term randomized controlled trials are required to endorse the supposed advantages of XCM.


International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants | 2015

Piezoelectric surgery vs rotary instruments for lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intra- and postoperative complications.

Momen A. Atieh; Nabeel H.M. Alsabeeha; Andrew Tawse-Smith; Clovis Mariano Faggion; Warwick Duncan

PURPOSE Lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation (LMSFE) is a predictable preprosthetic surgical procedure that is used to overcome the limitations of the atrophied alveolar ridge for the placement of oral implants. Techniques using piezoelectric devices (PEDs) and conventional rotary instruments have been described for LMSFE in the literature, with little information regarding their efficiency in terms of membrane perforation, operating time, and implant outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the intra- and postoperative events associated with the use of PEDs and conventional rotary instruments for LMSFE. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review was prepared according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The literature was searched for studies comparing the use of PEDs with conventional rotary instruments for LMSFE. The Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool was used to assess the studies selected, and meta-analyses were performed using statistical software. RESULTS A total of 124 citations were identified. Of these, four studies with 178 LMSFEs in 120 participants were included. The pooled estimates for the risk of sinus membrane perforation did not show any significant difference between the two surgical techniques (risk ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.91; P = .73). Similarly, no significant difference in implant failure was found after 1 year of functional loading. The overall meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference in the operating time between the two techniques with more time required for PED. CONCLUSION The intra- and postoperative events associated with the use of PEDs and conventional rotary instruments for LMSFE are comparable.


Brazilian Oral Research | 2011

Effect of a cordless retraction paste material on implant surfaces: an in vitro study

Yin-Szu Chang; Vincent Bennani; Andrew Tawse-Smith; Liz Girvan

Cordless retraction paste material for gingival retraction in implant dentistry has recently become of interest to the clinician. However, few studies have been conducted on the use of retraction pastes and their possible interaction with implant surfaces. This in vitro study evaluated the effect of a cordless retraction paste material, Expasyl® (Acteon), on TiUnite® (Nobel Biocare) implant surfaces. Three areas of the fixtures were evaluated before and after contact with the retraction paste using scanning electron microscopy to evaluate changes in surface topography and energy-dispersive spectroscopy to identify any surface chemistry modifications. Alteration of the initial surface after exposure to Expasyl® was identified, with the implant collar showing the most changes.


Journal of Periodontology | 2015

Quantifying the Association Between Self-Reported Diabetes and Periodontitis in the New Zealand Population

Ellie T. Knight; Jonathan W. Leichter; Andrew Tawse-Smith; W. Murray Thomson

BACKGROUND This study aims to investigate the association between diabetes and periodontitis in the New Zealand (NZ) adult population. METHODS Data from two NZ national surveys (N = 2,048) were analyzed to compare estimates of the strength of the association between diabetes and periodontitis using two multivariate epidemiologic approaches (cohort and matched case-control studies). This was possible because the first survey provided participants for the second survey. Periodontitis cases were identified using 14 case definitions, including six severe definitions. The cohort study identified those with diabetes in 2006/07 and those with periodontitis in 2009 to determine the patients with diabetes odds of having periodontitis, using logistic regression modeling (adjusting for smoking status, sociodemographic, and dental characteristics). The matched case-control study identified cases of severe periodontitis in 2009 and compared their 2006/07 diabetic status with that of controls (individually matched on age group, sex, and socioeconomic status). Conditional logistic regression modeling was used for the case-control study, adjusting for ethnicity, smoking status, and dental characteristics. RESULTS Overall, 3.6% of the periodontally examined adults reported having diabetes. There was no sex difference in diabetes prevalence, but it was greater in older age groups. Depending on the definition of periodontitis used, there were different estimates of risk for periodontitis, with odds ratios ranging from 1.91 (P = 0.01) to 3.51 (P = 0.22) using the cohort study approach. Diabetes was associated with a greater risk of having periodontitis using only two of the 14 periodontitis case definitions. No association was observed using the matched case-control study. CONCLUSIONS The diabetes-periodontitis association in the NZ population remains unclear. This study demonstrates that the determination of the strength of a putative association is method dependent.


Journal of Periodontology | 2017

The One Abutment–One Time Protocol: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Momen A. Atieh; Andrew Tawse-Smith; Nabeel H.M. Alsabeeha; Sunyoung Ma; Warwick Duncan

BACKGROUND The use of definitive abutments (DAs) at time of implant placement has been introduced to overcome limitations of dis/reconnection of healing/provisional abutments (PAs). With little and inconsistent information in the literature regarding the effectiveness of using DAs, the aim of this systematic review is to examine marginal bone and soft tissue level changes, technical and biologic complications, and implant failure rate associated with use of DAs and PAs. METHODS This systematic review was prepared according to guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and online trial registers were searched for studies comparing use of DAs and PAs. The Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool was used to assess selected studies, and meta-analyses were performed using statistical software. RESULTS A total of 1,124 citations were identified. Of these, seven trials with 363 dental implants in 262 participants were included in the analysis. Pooled estimates for marginal bone level changes showed significant differences between the two prosthetic techniques in favor of using DAs. No significant differences were found in soft tissue level changes, technical and biologic complications, or implant failure rate. CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of this review, DAs appear to be a viable alternative to PAs at time of implant placement. However, favorable changes in peri-implant marginal bone level associated with use of DAs should be viewed with caution as its clinical significance is still uncertain.


Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research | 2016

Maxillary Three-Implant Overdentures Opposing Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: 10-Year Surgical Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sunyoung Ma; Andrew Tawse-Smith; Rohana K. De Silva; Momen A. Atieh; Nabeel H.M. Alsabeeha; Alan G. T. Payne

Background The surgical placement of four maxillary implants for overdentures may not be obligatory when opposing mandibular two-implant overdentures. Purpose To determine 10-year surgical outcomes and implant success of three narrow diameter implants in edentulous maxillae with conventional loading. Materials and Methods Forty participants with mandibular two-implant overdentures were randomly allocated for surgery for maxillary overdentures. Using osteotomes, three implants of similar systems were placed with a one-stage procedure and 12-week loading with splinted and unsplinted prosthodontic designs. Marginal bone and stability measurements were done at surgery, 12 weeks, 1-, 2-, 5-, 7-, 10 years. Results One hundred seventeen implants were placed in 39 participants, with 35 being seen at 1 year; 29 at 2 years; 28 at 5 years; 26 at 7 years; and 23 (59%) at 10 years. Marginal bone loss was 1.35 mm between surgery and 12 weeks; 0.36 mm between 12 weeks and 1 year; 0.48 mm between 1 and 5 years; and 0.22 mm between 5 and 10 years. Implant stability quotients were 56.05, 57.54, 60.88, 58.80, 61.17 at surgery, 12 weeks, 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years. Four-field tables by implant showed success rates of 82% at 1 year; 69.2% at 2 years; 66.7% at 5 years; 61.5% at 7 years; 51.3% at 10 years. Data showed no differences between surgical technique, systems, or prosthodontic designs. Conclusions Surgical placement with osteotomes of three narrow diameter implants for maxillary overdentures, opposing mandibular two-implant overdentures, is an acceptable approach, subject to strict patient selection. Implant success is independent of prosthodontic design.BACKGROUND The surgical placement of four maxillary implants for overdentures may not be obligatory when opposing mandibular two-implant overdentures. PURPOSE To determine 10-year surgical outcomes and implant success of three narrow diameter implants in edentulous maxillae with conventional loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty participants with mandibular two-implant overdentures were randomly allocated for surgery for maxillary overdentures. Using osteotomes, three implants of similar systems were placed with a one-stage procedure and 12-week loading with splinted and unsplinted prosthodontic designs. Marginal bone and stability measurements were done at surgery, 12 weeks, 1-, 2-, 5-, 7-, 10 years. RESULTS One hundred seventeen implants were placed in 39 participants, with 35 being seen at 1 year; 29 at 2 years; 28 at 5 years; 26 at 7 years; and 23 (59%) at 10 years. Marginal bone loss was 1.35 mm between surgery and 12 weeks; 0.36 mm between 12 weeks and 1 year; 0.48 mm between 1 and 5 years; and 0.22 mm between 5 and 10 years. Implant stability quotients were 56.05, 57.54, 60.88, 58.80, 61.17 at surgery, 12 weeks, 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years. Four-field tables by implant showed success rates of 82% at 1 year; 69.2% at 2 years; 66.7% at 5 years; 61.5% at 7 years; 51.3% at 10 years. Data showed no differences between surgical technique, systems, or prosthodontic designs. CONCLUSIONS Surgical placement with osteotomes of three narrow diameter implants for maxillary overdentures, opposing mandibular two-implant overdentures, is an acceptable approach, subject to strict patient selection. Implant success is independent of prosthodontic design.


Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research | 2018

Piezoelectric versus conventional implant site preparation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Momen A. Atieh; Nabeel H.M. Alsabeeha; Andrew Tawse-Smith; Warwick Duncan

BACKGROUND The use of a piezoelectric device (PED) for implant site preparation (ISP) has been introduced to overcome the limitations of using conventional drills (CDs). With little and inconsistent information in the literature regarding their efficiency for preparing implant osteotomies, the objective of this systematic review was to compare the use of CDs to PEDs for ISP with regard to implant stability values, marginal bone level changes, operating time, and dental implant failure rate. METHODS The systematic review was prepared according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The literature was searched for studies that assessed the use of CDs and PEDs for ISP. The Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the selected studies and meta-analyses were performed using statistical software. RESULTS A total of 755 citations were identified. Of these, 4 studies with 178 implant osteotomies in 80 participants were included. The pooled estimates for the implant stability showed significant differences between the 2 surgical techniques in favor of PEDs at baseline, 8 and 12 weeks. A statistically significant difference in the operating time was also shown between the 2 techniques with more time required using PED. The differences in marginal bone level changes or implant failure rate were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS With the limitations of this review in mind, PEDs appear to be a viable alternative to traditional drilling techniques for ISP. With the exception of prolonged operating time associated with the use of PEDs, both techniques were comparable in terms of the marginal bone level changes and the risk of implant failure. The favorable influence of the implant stability pattern related to the use of PEDs on the predictability of immediate and early loading protocols need to be confirmed in future studies.


International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants | 2017

Implications of Wear at the Titanium-Zirconia Implant- Abutment Interface on the Health of Peri-implant Tissues

Andrew Tawse-Smith; Sunyoung Ma; Warwick Duncan; Andrew Gray; Malcolm R. Reid; Alison M. Rich

PURPOSE To investigate the presence of metallic particles in the peri-implant mucosa around titanium dental implants after 5 years of loading using single-implant crowns with respect to clinical signs of peri-implant inflammation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixteen participants from an ongoing, prospective, single-arm clinical trial who had received titanium dental implants restored with single maxillary crowns veneered to zirconia abutments were available for the study. Exfoliative cytology samples were obtained from the peri-implant tissues and contralateral tooth sites using microbrushes and were evaluated by means of light microscopy (LM), scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). Trace elemental analysis was also carried out on the microbrushes using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Peri-implant and periodontal parameters (plaque, bleeding, attachment level, radiographic bone levels) were recorded. RESULTS Titanium particles were found in both the single-implant crown and contralateral natural tooth sites. LM and EDS analyses showed significantly higher numbers of Ti particles at the implant-abutment interfaces (mean = 14.168; SD = 2.36) and in the internal aspects of peri-implant mucosa in contact with the prostheses (mean = 4.438; SD = 2.22) when compared with other test and control areas. Mean probing depths were ≤ 3 mm, and no differences were found in plaque or bleeding on probing between implant and tooth sites. Median bone levels were within the normal range for both implant (mesial: 0.5 mm; distal: 0.8 mm) and tooth (mesial: 1.5 mm; distal: 1.8 mm) sites. CONCLUSION Loading of single-implant zirconia crowns can cause the release of Ti particles because of functional wear at the implant-abutment level. The presence of these metal particles in the peri-implant area did not appear to affect peri-implant health in this patient group.


Brazilian Oral Research | 2007

Compliance & dexterity, factors to consider in home care and maintenance procedures

Victoria Criado; Andrew Tawse-Smith

Mechanical plaque control appears to be the primary means of controlling supragingival dental plaque build-up. Although daily oral hygiene practices and periodic professional care are considered the basis for any program aimed at the prevention and treatment of oral diseases, these procedures are technically demanding, time consuming and can be affected by the compliance and manual dexterity of the patient. Individual skills and acquired behavior patterns determine effectiveness of a preventive program and oral hygiene practice. Successful preventive programs and home care procedures clearly depend on the interaction and commitment between the dental professional and the patient. Identifying the capacity of the individual to comply with the professional recommendations and evaluating the dexterity of the patient to remove supragingival dental plaque will permit the implementation of an adequate preventive program and can help on the selection of adjunctive antimicrobial agents and devices needed to reach an effective oral care routine.

Collaboration


Dive into the Andrew Tawse-Smith's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Wismeijer

Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge