Andrew Westbrook
Monash University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andrew Westbrook.
Heart Lung and Circulation | 2009
Andrew Westbrook; Jodi Olsen; Michael Bailey; John Bates; Michael Scully; Robert F. Salamonsen
BACKGROUND Allogenic blood transfusion may affect clinical outcomes negatively. Up to 20% of blood transfusions in the United States are associated with cardiac surgery and so strategies to conserve usage are of importance. This study compares administration according to physicians choice based on laboratory coagulation tests with application of a strict protocol based on the thromboelastograph (TEG). METHODS Sixty-nine patients presenting for cardiac surgery were randomised to either study or control groups. In the study group a strict protocol was followed covering usage of all blood products according to TEG patterns. In the control group, the physician directed product administration with reference to activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), international normalised ratio (INR), fibrinogen and platelet count. Bleeding, re-sternotomy, minimum haemoglobin, intubation time, and ICU stay were documented. RESULTS TEG-based management reduced total product usage by 58.8% in the study group but this was not statistically significant. This was associated with a statistically insignificant trend towards better short-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study suggests that a strict protocol for blood product replacement based on the TEG might be highly effective in reducing usage without impairing short-term outcome.
Critical Care | 2011
Carol L. Hodgson; David V. Tuxen; Andrew Ross Davies; Michael Bailey; Alisa Higgins; Anne E. Holland; Jenny Keating; David Pilcher; Andrew Westbrook; David James Cooper; Alistair Nichol
IntroductionTidal volume and plateau pressure minimisation are the standard components of a protective lung ventilation strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Open lung strategies, including higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment manoeuvres to date have not proven efficacious. This study examines the effectiveness and safety of a novel open lung strategy, which includes permissive hypercapnia, staircase recruitment manoeuvres (SRM) and low airway pressure with PEEP titration.MethodTwenty ARDS patients were randomised to treatment or ARDSnet control ventilation strategies. The treatment group received SRM with decremental PEEP titration and targeted plateau pressure < 30 cm H2O. Gas exchange and lung compliance were measured daily for 7 days and plasma cytokines in the first 24 hours and on days 1, 3, 5 and 7 (mean ± SE). Duration of ventilation, ICU stay and hospital stay (median and interquartile range) and hospital survival were determined.ResultsThere were significant overall differences between groups when considering plasma IL-8 and TNF-α. For plasma IL-8, the control group was 41% higher than the treatment group over the seven-day period (ratio 1.41 (1.11 to 1.79), P = 0.01), while for TNF-α the control group was 20% higher over the seven-day period (ratio 1.20 (1.01 to 1.42) P = 0.05). PaO2/FIO2 (204 ± 9 versus 165 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.005) and static lung compliance (49.1 ± 2.9 versus 33.7 ± 2.7 mls/cm H2O, P < 0.001) were higher in the treatment group than the control group over seven days. There was no difference in duration of ventilation (180 (87 to 298) versus 341 (131 to 351) hrs, P = 0.13), duration of ICU stay (9.9 (5.6 to 14.8) versus 16.0 (8.1 to 19.3) days, P = 0.19) and duration of hospital stay (17.9 (13.7 to 34.5) versus 24.7 (20.5 to 39.8) days, P = 0.16) between the treatment and control groups.ConclusionsThis open lung strategy was associated with greater amelioration in some systemic cytokines, improved oxygenation and lung compliance over seven days. A larger trial powered to examine clinically-meaningful outcomes is warranted.Trial registrationACTRN12607000465459
Critical Care | 2011
Ville Pettilä; Andrew Westbrook; Alistair Nichol; Michael Bailey; Erica M. Wood; Gillian Syres; Louise Phillips; Alison Street; Craig French; Lynnette Murray; Neil Orford; John D. Santamaria; Rinaldo Bellomo; David James Cooper
IntroductionIn critically ill patients, it is uncertain whether exposure to older red blood cells (RBCs) may contribute to mortality. We therefore aimed to evaluate the association between the age of RBCs and outcome in a large unselected cohort of critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand. We hypothesized that exposure to even a single unit of older RBCs may be associated with an increased risk of death.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, multicenter observational study in 47 ICUs during a 5-week period between August 2008 and September 2008. We included 757 critically ill adult patients receiving at least one unit of RBCs. To test our hypothesis we compared hospital mortality according to quartiles of exposure to maximum age of RBCs without and with adjustment for possible confounding factors.ResultsCompared with other quartiles (mean maximum red cell age 22.7 days; mortality 121/568 (21.3%)), patients treated with exposure to the lowest quartile of oldest RBCs (mean maximum red cell age 7.7 days; hospital mortality 25/189 (13.2%)) had an unadjusted absolute risk reduction in hospital mortality of 8.1% (95% confidence interval = 2.2 to 14.0%). After adjustment for Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, other blood component transfusions, number of RBC transfusions, pretransfusion hemoglobin concentration, and cardiac surgery, the odds ratio for hospital mortality for patients exposed to the older three quartiles compared with the lowest quartile was 2.01 (95% confidence interval = 1.07 to 3.77).ConclusionsIn critically ill patients, in Australia and New Zealand, exposure to older RBCs is independently associated with an increased risk of death.
Intensive Care Medicine | 2010
Andrew Westbrook; Ville Pettilä; Alistair Nichol; Michael Bailey; Gillian Syres; Lynnette Murray; Rinaldo Bellomo; Elisa Wood; Louise Phillips; Alison Street; Craig French; Neil Orford; John D. Santamaria; David A. Cooper
Intensive Care Medicine | 2004
Alan Lane; Andrew Westbrook; Deirdre Grady; Rory O’Connor; Timothy J. Counihan; Brian Marsh; John G. Laffey
Critical Care and Resuscitation | 2012
Adrian J Praeger; Andrew Westbrook; Alistair Nichol; Ruwan Wijemunige; Andrew Davies; Stuart Lyon; Judy Wills; Michael Bailey; Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld; Cooper Dj
Critical Care Medicine | 2008
Alistair Nichol; Andrew Westbrook; Rinaldo Bellomo; David James Cooper
american thoracic society international conference | 2010
Carol L. Hodgson; Jeffrey Glassroth; Alistair Nichol; David V. Tuxen; David James Cooper; Michael Bailey; Jennifer L. Keating; Anne E. Holland; David Pilcher; Andrew Westbrook; Andrew Davies; Andrew Hilton
Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured | 2009
Andrew Westbrook; Alistair Nichol; H. Kavnoudias; Andrew Davies; A. Preovolas; Stuart Lyon; R. Salamonsen; David James Cooper
Australian Physiotherapy Association Conference | 2009
Carol L. Hodgson; Rob Herbert; Alistair Nichol; David V. Tuxen; Michael Bailey; Anne E. Holland; Jennifer L. Keating; David Pilcher; Andrew Davies; Andrew Westbrook; Andrew Hilton; David James Cooper