Andrey A. Gontcharov
Russian Academy of Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andrey A. Gontcharov.
Journal of Molecular Evolution | 2008
V. B. Itskovich; Andrey A. Gontcharov; Yoshiki Masuda; Tsutomu Nohno; Sergey I. Belikov; Sofia Efremova; Martin Meixner; Dorte Janussen
Freshwater sponges include six extant families which belong to the suborder Spongillina (Porifera). The taxonomy of freshwater sponges is problematic and their phylogeny and evolution are not well understood. Sequences of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) of 11 species from the family Lubomirskiidae, 13 species from the family Spongillidae, and 1 species from the family Potamolepidae were obtained to study the phylogenetic relationships between endemic and cosmopolitan freshwater sponges and the evolution of sponges in Lake Baikal. The present study is the first one where ITS1 sequences were successfully aligned using verified secondary structure models and, in combination with ITS2, used to infer relationships between the freshwater sponges. Phylogenetic trees inferred using maximum likelihood, neighbor-joining, and parsimony methods and Bayesian inference revealed that the endemic family Lubomirskiidae was monophyletic. Our results do not support the monophyly of Spongillidae because Lubomirskiidae formed a robust clade with E. muelleri, and Trochospongilla latouchiana formed a robust clade with the outgroup Echinospongilla brichardi (Potamolepidae). Within the cosmopolitan family Spongillidae the genera Radiospongilla and Eunapius were found to be monophyletic, while Ephydatiamuelleri was basal to the family Lubomirskiidae. The genetic distances between Lubomirskiidae species being much lower than those between Spongillidae species are indicative of their relatively recent radiation from a common ancestor. These results indicated that rDNA spacers sequences can be useful in the study of phylogenetic relationships of and the identification of species of freshwater sponges.
Zoological Science | 2015
Dmitry A. Sidorov; Andrey A. Gontcharov
To analyze the phylogenetic relationships of the genus Pseudocrangonyx within the superfamily Crangonyctoidea, we sequenced a partial LSU rDNA gene from four species (six specimens). The monophyly of Pseudocrangonyx and its affinity to Crymostygius were strongly supported by four reconstruction methods: neighbor-joining, minimum evolution, maximum-likelihood, and Bayesian inference. Current geographical distributions of the taxa studied and their phylogenetic relationships established in our study suggest that members of Pseudocrangonyctidae and Crymostygius diverged from a common Crangonyx-like ancestor in the Arctic Basin region of the northern hemisphere.
Journal of Systematics and Evolution | 2013
M. M. Kozyrenko; Svetlana B. Gontcharova; Andrey A. Gontcharov
Nuclear ribosomal ITS and four cpDNA intergenic spacer sequences were used to assess how the patterns of molecular differentiation are related to taxonomic boundaries and geographic distribution in polymorphic and taxonomically complex Orostachys subsection Orostachys (Crassulaceae). Two major cpDNA lineages were identified in a set of Orostachys populations, lineage A, comprising 13 closely related haplotypes found in 11 populations of monocarpic O. malacophylla var. malacophylla, O. maximowiczii, and O. gorovoii and lineage B that included 9 out of 10 divergent haplotypes found in five populations of O. paradoxa, distinct in perennial stoloniferous habit. Our data suggest that the current concepts of O. malacophylla var. malacophylla, O. maximowiczii, and O. gorovoii are incompatible with the differentiation at the cpDNA level. Neither of these taxa could be allied to a particular haplotype or haplotype clade. The pattern of relationships between 7 ITS ribotypes found in 17 populations supported neither the morphology‐based taxonomic subdivision in the subsection Orostachys nor grouping according to geographical origin of the populations or lineages recovered with cpDNA data. A high level of similarity of ITS rDNA sequences between the subsection members suggests their relatively recent and rapid divergence from a common ancestor.
Journal of Natural History | 2018
Dmitry A. Sidorov; Steven J. Taylor; Svetlana Sharina; Andrey A. Gontcharov
ABSTRACT Previous phylogenetic analysis based on combined mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences detected paraphyly of the Typhlogammaridae. To test this hypothesis a portion of large subunit (LSU-rDNA) gene sequences were obtained for typhlogammarid species from Caucasus. The Bayesian approach to LSU-rDNA sequences provided evidence for an independent origin of the Dinaric and Caucasus ‘typhlogammarid’ clades. A new family, Zenkevitchiidae fam. nov., is proposed to reconcile the observed phylogeny with the concept of monophyly. Using light microscopy, two mouthpart morphotypes of the Zenkevitchiidae fam. nov. species with quite different setae are identified. Taking into account these two morphotypes, a new classification is proposed – Adaugammarus revazi comb. nov., and Adaugammarus sandroruffoi comb. nov. Additionally, two new stygobiont zenkevitchiid amphipod species – Adaugammarus kasiani sp. nov. and Kruberia relicta sp. nov. – are described from Krubera Cave in Abkhazia. A distribution map and an identification key for the Zenkevitchiidae fam. nov. species of Transcaucasia are provided. http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:90177B0C-BED0-4601-8CFC-3F774B22065C
Biotechnology Journal | 2006
Victor P. Bulgakov; K. V. Kiselev; Konstantin Yakovlev; Yuri N. Zhuravlev; Andrey A. Gontcharov; Nelly A. Odintsova
Flora | 2009
Svetlana B. Gontcharova; Andrey A. Gontcharov; Valentin V. Yakubov; Katsuhiko Kondo
Chromosome science | 2003
Yoshikazu Hoshi; Katsuhiko Kondo; Alexandr A. Korobkov; Irina V. Tatarenko; Pavel V. Kulikov; Valentina P. Verkholat; Andrey A. Gontcharov; Hisakazu Ogura; Tsuneo Funamoto; Goro Kokubugata; Rie Suzuki; Hideyuki Matoba
Flora | 2011
M. M. Kozyrenko; Svetlana B. Gontcharova; Andrey A. Gontcharov
Flora | 2016
Vyacheslav Yu. Nikulin; Svetlana B. Gontcharova; Ray Stephenson; Andrey A. Gontcharov
Subterranean biology | 2015
Dmitry A. Sidorov; Andrey A. Gontcharov; Dmitry M. Palatov; Steven J. Taylor; Alexander A. Semenchenko