Andrey Gourine

Cardioprotection evoked by remote ischaemic preconditioning is critically dependent on the activity of vagal pre-ganglionic neurones

Aims Innate mechanisms of inter-organ protection underlie the phenomenon of remote ischaemic preconditioning (RPc) in which episode(s) of ischaemia and reperfusion in tissues remote from the heart reduce myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury. The uncertainty surrounding the mechanism(s) underlying RPc centres on whether humoral factor(s) produced during ischaemia/reperfusion of remote tissue and released into the systemic circulation mediate RPc, or whether a neural signal is required. While these two hypotheses may not be incompatible, one approach to clarify the potential role of a neural pathway requires targeted disruption or activation of discrete central nervous substrate(s). Methods and results Using a rat model of myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury in combination with viral gene transfer, pharmaco-, and optogenetics, we tested the hypothesis that RPc cardioprotection depends on the activity of vagal pre-ganglionic neurones and consequently an intact parasympathetic drive. For cell-specific silencing or activation, neurones of the brainstem dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve (DVMN) were targeted using viral vectors to express a Drosophila allatostatin receptor (AlstR) or light-sensitive fast channelrhodopsin variant (ChIEF), respectively. RPc cardioprotection, elicited by ischaemia/reperfusion of the limbs, was abolished when DVMN neurones transduced to express AlstR were silenced by selective ligand allatostatin or in conditions of systemic muscarinic receptor blockade with atropine. In the absence of remote ischaemia/reperfusion, optogenetic activation of DVMN neurones transduced to express ChIEF reduced infarct size, mimicking the effect of RPc. Conclusion These data indicate a crucial dependence of RPc cardioprotection against ischaemia/reperfusion injury upon the activity of a distinct population of vagal pre-ganglionic neurones.

Remote ischaemic pre- and delayed postconditioning - similar degree of cardioprotection but distinct mechanisms.

Myocardial ischaemia–reperfusion injury can be significantly reduced by an episode(s) of ischaemia–reperfusion applied prior to or during myocardial ischaemia (MI) to peripheral tissue located at a distance from the heart; this phenomenon is called remote ischaemic conditioning (RIc). Here, we compared the efficacy of RIc in protecting the heart when the RIc stimulus is applied prior to, during and at different time points after MI. A rat model of myocardial ischaemia–reperfusion injury involved 30 min of left coronary artery occlusion followed by 120 min of reperfusion. Remote ischaemic conditioning was induced by 15 min occlusion of femoral arteries and conferred a similar degree of cardioprotection when applied 25 min prior to MI, 10 or 25 min after the onset of MI, or starting 10 min after the onset of reperfusion. These RIc stimuli reduced infarct size by 54, 56, 56 and 48% (all P < 0.001), respectively. Remote ischaemic conditioning applied 30 min into the reperfusion period was ineffective. Activation of sensory nerves by application of capsaicin was effective in establishing cardioprotection only when elicited prior to MI. Vagotomy or denervation of the peripheral ischaemic tissue both completely abolished cardioprotection induced by RIc applied prior to MI. Cardioprotection conferred by delayed remote postconditioning was not affected by either vagotomy or peripheral denervation. These results indicate that RIc confers potent cardioprotection even if applied with a significant delay after the onset of myocardial reperfusion. Cardioprotection by remote preconditioning is critically dependent on afferent innervation of the remote organ and intact parasympathetic activity, while delayed remote postconditioning appears to rely on a different signalling pathway(s).

Cardioprotective effect induced by brief exposure to nitric oxide before myocardial ischemia–reperfusion in vivo

Administration of nitric oxide (NO) donors during ischemia and reperfusion protects from myocardial injury. However, whether administration of an NO donor during a brief period prior to ischemia protects the myocardium and the endothelium against ischemia-reperfusion injury in vivo is unknown. To study this possibility anesthetized pigs were subjected to 45-min ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) followed by 4h of reperfusion. In initial dose-finding experiments, vehicle or three different doses of the NO donor S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D,L-penicillamin (SNAP; 0.1; 0.5; 2.5 micromol) were infused into the LAD for 3 min starting 13 min during ischemia. Only the 0.5 micromol dose of SNAP reduced infarct size (from 85+/-3% of the area at risk in the vehicle group to 63+/-3% in the SNAP-treated group; p<0.01). There were no significant differences in hemodynamics in the vehicle and SNAP groups during ischemia-reperfusion. Endothelium-dependent dilatation of coronary microvasculature induced by substance P was larger in the SNAP group than in the vehicle group. Myeloperoxidase activity was lower in the ischemic/reperfused myocardial area of pigs given SNAP (4.97+/-0.61 U/g) than in vehicle-treated pigs (8.45+/-0.25 U/g; p<0.05). It is concluded that intracoronary administration of the NO donor SNAP for a brief period before ischemia reduces infarct size, attenuates neutrophil accumulation, and improves endothelial function. These results suggest that NO exerts a classic preconditioning-like protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury in vivo in a narrow concentration range.

Limitation of infarct size and attenuation of myeloperoxidase activity by an endothelin A receptor antagonist following ischaemia and reperfusion

Abstract It has previously been shown that endothelin (ET) receptor antagonists limit myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. The mechanism behind this effect is still unclear. The aim of this study was to elucidate the possible relationship between cardioprotection by an ETA receptor antagonist and inhibition of neutrophil accumulation or activation in the myocardium determined as myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity during I/R. Anaesthetised pigs were subjected to 45 min ischaemia by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) followed by 4 h of reperfusion. Infiltration of MPO-containing cells, presumably neutrophils, into the ischaemic area was confirmed with an immunohistochemical technique using antibodies against porcine MPO. Vehicle (n = 7) or the selective ETA receptor antagonist LU 135252 (LU; n = 7) were given into the LAD during the last 10 min of ischaemia and the first 5 min of reperfusion. There were no significant differences in LAD flow, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, or rate pressure product between the groups during I/R. The area at risk was similar in the two groups. LU reduced the final infarct size to 40 ± 6 % of the area at risk compared to 80 ± 6 % in the vehicle group (P < 0.001). Endothelin-like immunoreactivity increased 2-fold in the ischaemic area in the vehicle group (P < 0.01), but not in the group given LU. MPO activity was higher (2.5x) in the ischaemic than in the non-ischaemic myocardium of the vehicle group. The MPO activity in the ischaemic myocardium was significantly lower in the group given LU (7.0 ± 1.2 units g−1) than in the vehicle group (14.2 ± 1.9 units g−1; P < 0.01). There was a significant correlation between the infarct size and MPO activity (P < 0.01, r = 0.68). In conclusion, local administration of the selective ETA receptor antagonist LU during the last period of ischaemia and early reperfusion reduces the extent of myocardial necrosis and MPO activity. This suggests that LU may exert its cardioprotective effect by inhibiting neutrophil-mediated injury.

Cardioprotection from ischemia and reperfusion injury by an endothelin A-receptor antagonist in relation to nitric oxide production.

It has previously been shown that endothelin (ET)-receptor antagonists protect the myocardium from ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury. The mechanism behind this effect is unclear. The aim of this study was to elucidate the possible interaction between ET(A)-receptor antagonism and nitric oxide (NO) during I/R. Anesthetized pigs were subjected to 45-min ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) followed by 4 h of reperfusion. Vehicle (n = 7), the ET(A)-receptor antagonist LU 135252 (LU; 0.1 mg/kg, n = 7), the combination of LU and the NO precursor L-arginine (15 mg/kg, n = 7; LU + L-arg), the NO synthase inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA; 0.2 mg/kg, n = 6), or the combination of LU and L-NMMA (LU + L-NMMA; n = 6) were injected into the LAD during the last 10 min of ischemia and the first 5 min of reperfusion. There were no significant differences in coronary flow, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, mean arterial pressure, or heart rate between the groups before ischemia or at the end of reperfusion. The area at risk was similar in all five groups. The infarct size of the vehicle group was 79 +/- 6% of the area at risk. LU and LU + L-arginine (L-arg) reduced the infarct size to 39 +/- 6% and 35 +/- 8%, respectively (p < 0.001 vs. vehicle). L-NMMA completely prevented the infarct-limiting effect of LU. Thus the infarct size in the LU + L-NMMA group was 83 +/- 4% (p < 0.001 vs. LU alone); L-NMMA did not affect infarct size per se (79 +/- 4%). ET immunoreactivity increased threefold in the I/R myocardium of the vehicle group. The increase in ET immunoreactivity was significantly attenuated in the LU and LU + L-arg groups (p < 0.001), but not in the groups given L-NMMA or LU + L-NMMA. In conclusion, ET(A)-receptor blockade results in cardioprotection and attenuation of the increase in myocardial ET levels after I/R. Both effects were inhibited by NO synthase blockade, suggesting that they are dependent on maintained production of NO.

Identifying the Source of a Humoral Factor of Remote (Pre)Conditioning Cardioprotection.

Signalling pathways underlying the phenomenon of remote ischaemic preconditioning (RPc) cardioprotection are not completely understood. The existing evidence agrees that intact sensory innervation of the remote tissue/organ is required for the release into the systemic circulation of preconditioning factor(s) capable of protecting a transplanted or isolated heart. However, the source and molecular identities of these factors remain unknown. Since the efficacy of RPc cardioprotection is critically dependent upon vagal activity and muscarinic mechanisms, we hypothesized that the humoral RPc factor is produced by the internal organ(s), which receive rich parasympathetic innervation. In a rat model of myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury we determined the efficacy of limb RPc in establishing cardioprotection after denervation of various visceral organs by sectioning celiac, hepatic, anterior and posterior gastric branches of the vagus nerve. Electrical stimulation was applied to individually sectioned branches to determine whether enhanced vagal input to a particular target area is sufficient to establish cardioprotection. It was found that RPc cardioprotection is abolished in conditions of either total subdiaphragmatic vagotomy, gastric vagotomy or sectioning of the posterior gastric branch. The efficacy of RPc cardioprotection was preserved when hepatic, celiac or anterior gastric vagal branches were cut. In the absence of remote ischaemia/reperfusion, electrical stimulation of the posterior gastric branch reduced infarct size, mimicking the effect of RPc. These data suggest that the circulating factor (or factors) of RPc are produced and released into the systemic circulation by the visceral organ(s) innervated by the posterior gastric branch of the vagus nerve.

Neural Mechanisms of Cardioprotection

This review highlights the importance of neural mechanisms capable of protecting the heart against lethal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Increased parasympathetic (vagal) activity limits myocardial infarction, and recent data suggest that activation of autonomic reflex pathways contributes to powerful innate mechanisms of cardioprotection underlying the remote ischemic conditioning phenomena.

Calcium antagonist clevidipine reduces myocardial reperfusion injury by a mechanism related to bradykinin and nitric oxide.

Certain calcium antagonists, in addition to their classic actions, can increase blood flow during ischemia via bradykinin- and nitric oxide (NO)-dependent mechanisms and protect the ischemic myocardium against reperfusion injury by enhancing NO bioavailability. The current study aimed to investigate the possible involvement of bradykinin and NO in the cardioprotective action of the short-acting calcium antagonist clevidipine during late ischemia and reperfusion. Anesthetized pigs were subjected to 45-min ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) followed by 4 h of reperfusion. Four groups were given vehicle, clevidipine, clevidipine in combination with the bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist HOE 140 or clevidipine in combination with HOE 140 and the NO donor S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D,L-penicillamine (SNAP) into the LAD during the last 10 min of ischemia and the first 5 min of reperfusion. There were no significant differences in hemodynamics among the groups before ischemia or during ischemia–reperfusion. The infarct size (IS) was 87% ± 2% of the area at risk in the vehicle group. Clevidipine reduced the IS to 60% ± 3% (p < 0.001 vs vehicle). When clevidipine was administered together with HOE 140, the protective effect of clevidipine was abolished (IS, 80% ± 3%; p < 0.001 vs clevidipine), whereas addition of SNAP restored cardioprotection (IS, 62% ± 5%; p < 0.001 vs vehicle). The increase in LAD blood flow by endothelium-dependent dilator substance P was significantly larger in the clevidipine group than in the other groups. The results suggest that the cardioprotective effect of clevidipine during late ischemia and early reperfusion is mediated via bradykinin- and NO-related mechanisms.

Short-acting calcium antagonist clevidipine protects against reperfusion injury via local nitric oxide-related mechanisms in the jeopardised myocardium

BACKGROUND Calcium antagonists may, in addition to their classical actions, release nitric oxide (NO) from coronary arteries. The aim of this study was to elucidate the possible interaction between the cardioprotective effect of a short-acting calcium antagonist and NO during myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion. METHODS Anaesthetised pigs were subjected to 45 min ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) followed by 4 h of reperfusion. Five groups were given vehicle (n=9), clevidipine (n=8), the NO synthase inhibitor L-NMMA (n=6), clevidipine in combination with L-NMMA (n=6) or clevidipine in combination with L-NMMA and NO precursor L-arginine (n=6) into the LAD during the last 10 min of ischaemia and the first 5 min of reperfusion. RESULTS There were no significant differences in LAD blood flow, mean arterial pressure, rate-pressure product or dP/dt between the groups before ischaemia or during reperfusion. The infarct size (IS) was 86+/-2% of the area at risk in the vehicle group. Clevidipine reduced the IS to 59+/-3% (P<0.001). When clevidipine was administered together with L-NMMA, the protective effect of clevidipine was abolished (IS, 87+/-3%; P<0.001 vs. clevidipine), whereas addition of L-arginine restored its cardioprotective effect (IS 60+/-3%; P<0.001 vs. vehicle). L-NMMA did not affect IS per se (88+/-5%). Endothelium-dependent coronary vasodilation induced by substance P was significantly larger in the clevidipine group than in the other groups. CONCLUSION Local administration of a calcium antagonist during the late ischaemia and early reperfusion reduces IS and preserves coronary endothelial function. The cardioprotective effect of clevidipine is suggested to be dependent on maintained local bioavailability of NO.

Effect of remote ischemic conditioning on infarct size in patients with anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND Previous studies indicate that remote ischemic conditioning performed before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces infarct size in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). It remains unclear whether remote conditioning affords protection when performed in adjunct to primary PCI. We aimed to study whether remote ischemic per-postconditioning (RIperpostC) initiated after admission to the catheterization laboratory attenuates myocardial infarct size in patients with anterior STEMI. METHODS In this prospective multicenter trial 93 patients with anterior STEMI were randomized to RIperpostC or sham procedure as adjunct to primary PCI. RIperpostC was started on arrival in the catheterization laboratory by 5-minute cycles of inflation and deflation of a blood pressure cuff around the left thigh and continued throughout the PCI procedure. Infarct size and myocardium at risk were determined by cardiac magnetic resonance at day 4 to 7. The primary outcome was myocardial salvage index. RESULTS There was no significant difference in myocardial salvage index between the RIperpostC and control group (median 48.5% and interquartile range 30.9%-60.8% vs 49.2% [42.1%-58.8%]). Neither did absolute infarct size in relation to left ventricular myocardial volume differ significantly (RIperpostC 20.6% [14.1%-31.7%] vs control 17.9% [13.4%-25.0%]). The RIperpostC group had larger myocardial area at risk than the control group (43.1% (35.4%-49.7%) vs 37.0% (30.8%-44.1%) of the left ventricle, P=.03). Peak value and area under the curve for troponin T did not differ significantly between the study groups. CONCLUSIONS RIperpostC initiated after admission to the catheterization laboratory in patients with anterior STEMI did not confer protection against reperfusion injury.