Andries M. Bergman

In vivo Induction of Resistance to Gemcitabine Results in Increased Expression of Ribonucleotide Reductase Subunit M1 as the Major Determinant

Gemcitabine is a deoxycytidine (dCyd) analogue with activity against several solid cancers. Gemcitabine is activated by dCyd kinase (dCK) and interferes, as its triphosphate dFdCTP, with tumor growth through incorporation into DNA. Alternatively, the metabolite gemcitabine diphosphate (dFdCDP) can interfere with DNA synthesis and thus tumor growth through inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase. Gemcitabine can be inactivated by the enzyme dCyd deaminase (dCDA). In most in vitro models, resistance to gemcitabine was associated with a decreased dCK activity. In all these models, resistance was established using continuous exposure to gemcitabine with increasing concentrations; however, these in vitro models have limited clinical relevance. To develop in vivo resistance to gemcitabine, we treated mice bearing a moderately sensitive tumor Colon 26-A (T/C = 0.25) with a clinically relevant schedule (120 mg/kg every 3 days). By repeated transplant of the most resistant tumor and continuation of gemcitabine treatment for >1 year, the completely resistant tumor Colon 26-G (T/C = 0.96) was created. Initial studies focused on resistance mechanisms known from in vitro studies. In Colon 26-G, dCK activity was 1.7-fold decreased; dCDA and DNA polymerase were not changed; and Colon 26-G accumulated 1.5-fold less dFdCTP, 6 hours after a gemcitabine injection, than the parental tumor. Based on in vitro studies, these relative minor changes were considered insufficient to explain the completely resistant phenotype. Therefore, an expression microarray was done with Colon 26-A versus Colon 26-G. Using independently grown nonresistant and resistant tumors, a striking increase in expression of the RRM1 subunit gene was found in Colon 26-G. The expression of RRM1 mRNA was 25-fold increased in the resistant tumor, as measured by real-time PCR, which was confirmed by Western blotting. In contrast, RRM2 mRNA was 2-fold decreased. However, ribonucleotide reductase enzyme activity was only moderately increased in Colon 26-G. In conclusion, this is the first model with in vivo induced resistance to gemcitabine. In contrast to most in vitro studies, dCK activity was not the most important determinant of gemcitabine resistance. Expression microarray identified RRM1 as the gene with the highest increase in expression in the Colon 26-G, which might clarify its complete gemcitabine-resistant phenotype. This study is the first in vivo evidence for a key role for RRM1 in acquired gemcitabine resistance.

Antiproliferative activity, mechanism of action and oral antitumor activity of CP-4126, a fatty acid derivative of gemcitabine, in in vitro and in vivo tumor models

SummaryGemcitabine is a deoxycytidine (dCyd) analog with activity in leukemia and solid tumors, which requires phosphorylation by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK). Decreased membrane transport is a mechanism of resistance to gemcitabine. In order to facilitate gemcitabine uptake and prolong retention in the cell, a lipophilic pro-drug was synthesized (CP-4126), with an elaidic fatty acid esterified at the 5′position. CP-4126 was tested in cell lines resistant to cytarabine, another dCyd analog or gemcitabine. Activity of gemcitabine and the derivative was comparable in the parent cell lines, while in dCK deficient cells all compounds were inactive. However, inhibition of nucleoside transport increased the IC50 for gemcitabine up to 200-fold, but not for CP-4126, underlining the independence of a nucleoside transporter. For in vivo evaluation, nude mice bearing a human xenograft were treated intraperitoneally every third day for five doses at the maximal tolerated dose. In melanoma, sarcoma, lung, prostate, pancreatic and breast cancer xenografts, gemcitabine and CP-4126 were equally and highly effective; in four other xenografts moderately but equally active. In contrast to gemcitabine, CP-4126 could be administered orally, with a schedule and dose dependent toxicity and antitumor activity. In a colon cancer xenograft, antitumor activity of orally administered CP-4126 was equal to the intraperitoneally administered drug. In conclusion, CP-4126 is membrane transporter independent. Intraperitoneally administered CP-4126 was as effective as gemcitabine in several xenografts and CP-4126 is tolerated when orally administered. CP-4126 seems to be a promising new anticancer drug.

Antiproliferative activity and mechanism of action of fatty acid derivatives of arabinosylcytosine (ara-C) in leukemia and solid tumor cell lines.

Resistance to, the hydrophilic drug ara‐C, might be meditated by decreased membrane transport. Lipophillic prodrugs were synthesized to facilitate uptake. These compounds were equally active as ara‐C, while the compounds with the shortest fatty‐acid group and highest number of double bonds were the more active. These compounds also show a better retention profile, their effect is retained longer than for ara‐C.

Antiproliferative Activity and Mechanism of Action of Fatty Acid Derivatives of Gemcitabine in Leukemia and Solid Tumor Cell Lines and in Human Xenografts

Gemcitabine is a deoxycytidine analog, which can be inactivated by deamination catalyzed by deoxycytidine deaminase (dCDA). Altered transport over the cell membrane is a mechanism of resistance to gemcitabine. To facilitate accumulation, the fatty acid derivative CP‐4125 was synthesized. Since, the fatty acid is acylated at the site of action of dCDA, a decreased deamination was expected. CP‐4125 was equally active as gemcitabine in a panel of rodent and human cell lines and in human melanoma xenografts bearing mice. In contrast to gemcitabine, CP‐4125 was not deaminated but inhibited deamination of deoxycytidine and gemcitabine. Pools of the active triphosphate of gemcitabine increased for over 20 hr after CP‐4125 exposure, while these pools decreased directly after removal of gemcitabine. In conclusion: CP‐4125 is an interesting new gemcitabine derivative.

Expression Microarray Analysis and Oligo Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization of Acquired Gemcitabine Resistance in Mouse Colon Reveals Selection for Chromosomal Aberrations

Gemcitabine is a commonly used therapy for many solid tumors. Acquired resistance to this nucleoside analogue, however, diminishes the long-term effectiveness in a majority of patients. To better define the molecular background of gemcitabine resistance, a mouse colon tumor was selected during successive rounds of transplantation with continued treatment of gemcitabine. Expression microarray analysis was applied to determine which genes are consistently and highly overexpressed or underexpressed in the resistant versus the nonresistant tumor. For the statistical interpretation of the microarray data, a parametric model was implemented, which returns model-based differential gene expression (log-) ratios and their uncertainties. This defined a set of 13 genes, putatively responsible for the gemcitabine resistance in solid tumors. One of these, RRM1, was previously identified as an important marker for gemcitabine resistance in human cell lines. Five of the 13 genes, including RRM1, are located within a 3 Mb region at chromosome 7E1 of which four are highly overexpressed, suggesting a chromosomal amplification. Therefore, chromosomal copy number changes were measured, using oligo array comparative genomic hybridization. A narrow and high amplification area was identified on 7E1 that encompassed all five genes. In addition, reduced RNA expression of two other genes at 8E1 encoding COX4I1 and RPL13 could be explained by a decrease in chromosomal copy number on chromosome 8. In conclusion, the array comparative genomic hybridization biologically validates our statistical approach and shows that gemcitabine is capable to select for chromosomally aberrant tumor cells, where changed gene expression levels lead to drug resistance.

Steroids affect collateral sensitivity to gemcitabine of multidrug-resistant human lung cancer cells

Gemcitabine is phosphorylated by deoxycytidine kinase and thymidine kinase 2 and during S-phase incorporated into DNA. The steroids cortisol and dexamethasone, which regulate cell proliferation and gene expression, are pumped out of the cell by the membrane efflux pumps P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP), which are blocked by verapamil. In parental non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells (SW1573), 5 microM cortisol and 100 nM dexamethasone decreased sensitivity to gemcitabine. However, both cortisol and dexamethasone only decreased sensitivity with verapamil in MRP (2R120) and P-glycoprotein (2R160) overexpressing variants. Cortisol decreased deoxycytidine kinase activity in SW1573 cells and cortisol with verapamil in 2R120 and 2R160 cells. Dexamethasone with verapamil decreased deoxycytidine kinase activity in 2R160. Cortisol decreased thymidine kinase 2 activity in 2R120 and 2R160 cells. Dexamethasone decreased thymidine kinase 2 activity in SW1573, 2R120 and 2R160 cells. In conclusion, since dexamethasone is frequently used to treat side effects of oncolytic therapy, a decrease of sensitivity to gemcitabine by steroids might be clinically relevant.

Micro-array analysis of resistance for gemcitabine results in increased expression of ribonucleotide reductase subunits.

To study in detail the relation between gene expression and resistance against gemcitabine, a cell line was isolated from a tumor for which gemcitabine resistance was induced in vivo. Similar to the in vivo tumor, resistance in this cell line, C 26-G, was not related to deficiency of deoxycytidine kinase (dCK). Micro-array analysis showed increased expression of ribonucleotide reductase (RR) subunits M1 and M2 as confirmed by real time PCR analysis (28- and 2.7-fold, respectively). In cell culture, moderate cross-resistance (about 2-fold) was observed to 1-ß-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C), 2-chloro-2’deoxyadenosine (CdA), LY231514 (ALIMTA), and cisplatin (CDDP), and pronounced cross-resistance (>23-fold) to 2′,2′-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) and 2′,2′-difluorodeoxyguanosine (dFdG). Culture in the absence of gemcitabine reduced resistance as well as RRM1 RNA expression, demonstrating a direct relationship of RRM1 RNA expression with acquired resistance to gemcitabine.

Staurosporine increases toxicity of gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer cells: role of protein kinase C, deoxycytidine kinase and ribonucleotide reductase

Gemcitabine, a deoxycytidine analog, active against non-small cell lung cancer, is phosphorylated by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) to active nucleotides. Earlier, we found increased sensitivity to gemcitabine in P-glycoprotein (SW-2R160) and multidrug resistance-associated protein (SW-2R120), overexpressing variants of the human SW1573 non-small cell lung cancer cells. This was related to increased dCK activity. As protein kinase C (PKC) is higher in 2R120 and 2R160 cells and may control the dCK activity, we investigated whether gemcitabine sensitivity was affected by the protein kinase C inhibitor, staurosporine, which also modulates the cell cycle. Ten nmol/l staurosporine enhanced the sensitivity of SW1573, 2R120 and 2R160 cells 10-fold, 50-fold and 270-fold, respectively. Staurosporine increased dCK activity about two-fold and the activity of thymidine kinase 2, which may also activate gemcitabine. Staurosporine also directly increased dCK in cell free extracts. Staurosporine decreased expression of the free transcription factor E2F and of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), a target for gemcitabine inhibition. In conclusion, staurosporine may potentiate gemcitabine by increasing dCK and decreasing E2F and RNR, which will lead to a more pronounced RNR inhibition.

CROSS-RESISTANCE OF THE GEMCITABINE RESISTANT HUMAN OVARIAN CANCER CELL LINE AG6000 TO STANDARD AND INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS

2′,2′-Difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine, dFdC) is a deoxycytidine (dCyd) analog with proven activity in solid tumors, including ovarian cancer, both in vitro and in vivo (1–3). In the cell dFdC is phosphorylated by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) to its monophos-phate and subsequently to its triphosphate dFdCTP, which can be incorporated into DNA and RNA (4,5). In the DNA, exonuclease activity is unable to excise dFdCMP (5). Resistance to cytostatic agents commonly occurs during cancer treatment and is often associated with cross-resistance to other related and unrelated drugs. AG6000 is a variant of the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780, which was made resistant to dFdC. This resistance was associated with a total absence of dCK activity (8). In the initial characterization of this cell line we not only observed cross-resistance to related compounds such as other deoxynucleoside analogs, but also to unrelated compounds used in the treatment of ovarian cancer (8). Therefore we extended this study to a panel of other drugs used in and of potential interest for treatment of ovarian cancer. Several parameters known to be important in the metabolism of the different drugs were determined in A2780 and AG6000.