Andy Neely
University of Cambridge
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andy Neely.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management | 1995
Andy Neely; Mj Gregory; Kw Platts
The importance of performance measurement has long been recognized by academics and practitioners from a variety of functional disciplines. Seeks to bring together this diverse body of knowledge into a coherent whole. To ensure that the key issues are identified, focuses on the process of performance measurement system design, rather than the detail of specific measures. Following a comprehensive review of the literature, proposes a research agenda.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture | 2007
Tim Baines; Howard Lightfoot; Steve Evans; Andy Neely; Richard Greenough; Joe Peppard; Rajkumar Roy; Essam Shehab; A. Braganza; Ashutosh Tiwari; J.R. Alcock; J.P. Angus; Marko Bastl; A. Cousens; Phil E. Irving; Mark Johnson; Jennifer Kingston; Helen Lockett; Veronica Martinez; P. Michele; David Tranfield; I.M. Walton; Hugh Wilson
Abstract A Product-Service System (PSS) is an integrated combination of products and services. This Western concept embraces a service-led competitive strategy, environmental sustainability, and the basis to differentiate from competitors who simply offer lower priced products. This paper aims to report the state-of-the-art of PSS research by presenting a clinical review of literature currently available on this topic. The literature is classified and the major outcomes of each study are addressed and analysed. On this basis, this paper defines the PSS concept, reports on its origin and features, gives examples of applications along with potential benefits and barriers to adoption, summarizes available tools and methodologies, and identifies future research challenges.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management | 2000
Mike Bourne; Jf Mills; Mark Wilcox; Andy Neely; Kw Platts
This paper addresses issues met when designing, implementing, using and continuously updating performance measurement systems in manufacturing companies. The paper develops, from theory, a framework for analysing the implementation of a performance measurement system and uses this framework to interpret three longitudinal case studies. The paper concludes that specific processes are required to continuously align the performance measurement system with strategy. When these processes are combined with a well defined model of strategic success, the measurement system can enhance the strategic management process by challenging the assumptions and the strategy itself.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management | 1999
Andy Neely
Asks why business performance measurement has become so topical, so recently. Argues that there are seven main reasons: the changing nature of work; increasing competition; specific improvement initiatives; national and international quality awards; changing organisational roles; changing external demands; and the power of information technology. Evidence to support this assertion is drawn from the academic and practitioner literatures, interviews and discussions with people specialising in the field and a broad review of the current state‐of‐the‐art in business performance measurement. Presents a framework onto which current research in business performance measurement can be mapped and identifies areas which require further work.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management | 2000
Andy Neely; Jf Mills; Kw Platts; Huw Richards; Mj Gregory; Mike Bourne; Mike Kennerley
Describes the development and testing of a structured methodology for the design of performance measurement systems. Frameworks, such as the balanced scorecard and the performance prism, have been proposed, but until recently little attention has been devoted to the question of how these frameworks can be populated, i.e. how managers can decide specifically which measures to adopt. Following a wide ranging review of the performance measurement literature, a framework identifying the desirable characteristics of a performance measurement system design process is developed. This framework provided guidelines which were subsequently used to inform the development of a process‐based approach to performance measurement system design. The process was enhanced and refined during application in three action research projects, involving major UK automotive and aerospace companies. The revised process was then formally documented and tested through six further industrial applications. Finally the process was written up in the form of a workbook and made publicly available.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management | 2005
Andy Neely
Purpose – This paper provides an update of Neely et al.s (1995) literature review “Performance measurement system design”. It was commissioned to appear in a special issue of the International Journal of Operations & Production Management to celebrate the journals 25th anniversary.Design/methodology/approach – The paper employs a citation/co‐citation analysis of work in the field of performance measurement to explore developments in the field globally.Findings – The paper argues that scholars working in the field of performance measurement agree about the key research questions despite the fact that they come from different disciplinary backgrounds. The paper identifies the key contributors to the field based on a citation/co‐citation analysis and argues that the field is now entering a phase of empirical investigation and theoretical verification of some core concepts.Research limitations/implications – The research reported in the paper is limited to work that deals directly with performance measureme...
International Journal of Operations & Production Management | 1997
Andy Neely; Huw Richards; Jf Mills; Kw Platts; Mike Bourne
Describes the development and testing of a framework which can assist in the process of designing performance measures. Grounds the framework in the relevant literature and explains how it was developed and tested through a series of action research projects involving collaborators primarily from the aerospace and automotive industries. Notes that inadequately designed performance measures can result in dysfunctional behaviour often due to the method of calculation encouraging individuals to pursue inappropriate courses of action. The performance measure record sheet presented provides a structure which considers factors such as the purpose of the measure and the source of data. Notes the advantages of the record sheet, such as its use to audit existing measures of performance and to facilitate the process of designing new ones.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management | 2003
Mike Kennerley; Andy Neely
The design and use of performance measurement systems has received considerable attention in recent years. Many organisations have redesigned their measurement systems to ensure that they reflect their current environment and strategies. However, increasingly the environment in which organisations compete is dynamic and rapidly changing, requiring constant modification of strategies and operations to reflect these changing circumstances. Despite this, few organisations appear to have systematic processes in place to ensure that their performance measurement systems continue to reflect their environment and strategies. This paper presents case study research that investigates what actions organisations can take to ensure that their measurement systems evolve over time.
Measuring Business Excellence | 2001
Andy Neely; Chris Adams; Paul Crowe
This article describes and illustrates the practical application of a new measurement framework – The Performance Prism – which addresses the shortcomings of many of the traditional measurement frameworks being used by organisations today. The Performance Prism, with its comprehensive stakeholder orientation, encourages executives to consider the wants and needs of all the organisation’s stakeholders, rather than a subset, as well as the associated strategies, processes and capabilities. DHL’s board for the UK have used this framework to re‐engineer their corporate measurement and reporting system and the article explains DHL and other firms’ experiences with the Performance Prism.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management | 2002
Mike Kennerley; Andy Neely
The effectiveness of performance measurement is an issue of growing importance to industrialists and academics alike. Many organisations are investing considerable amounts of resource implementing measures that reflect all dimensions of their performance. Consideration is being given to what should be measured today, but little attention is being paid to the question of what should be measured tomorrow. Measurement systems should be dynamic. They have to be modified as circumstances change. Yet few organisations appear to have systematic processes in place for managing the evolution of their measurement systems and few researchers appear to have explored the question, what shapes the evolution of an organisation’s measurement system? The research reported in this paper seeks to address this gap in the literature by presenting data that describes the forces that shape the evolution of the measurement systems used by different organisations.