Anette M. Johansson

Central dopamine receptor agonist and antagonist actions of the enantiomers of 3-PPP

The two enantiomers of the putative centrally acting dopamine (DA) autoreceptor agonist 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine, 3-PPP (Hjorth et al. 1981), were pharmacologically evaluated. An extensive series of biochemical and behavioural experiments unexpectedly revealed that both (+)- and (-)-3-PPP showed clear, but differential, effects on the DA receptors. Thus, (+)-3-PPP is a DA agonist with autoreceptor as well as postsynaptic receptor stimulatory properties. In contrast, although (-)-3-PPP similarly activates DA autoreceptors it acts concomitantly as an antagonist at postsynaptic DA receptors. Moreover, both behavioural and biochemical data on motor activity and DA synthesis and turnover suggest a preferential limbic action for the (-)-enantiomer. These results are discussed in terms of the dual antidopaminergic action of (-)-3-PPP coupled with anatomical differences in the feedback organisation in central (viz, limbic vs striatal) DA systems. It is suggested that compounds like (-)-3-PPP may be of potential clinical utility in the treatment of psychotic disorders, whilst lacking the seriously incapacitating motor dysfunctions produced by current neuroleptic therapy.

(+)-AJ 76 and (+)-UH 232: Central stimulants acting as preferential dopamine autoreceptor antagonists

SummaryThe biochemical and behavioral effects of the putative dopamine autoreceptor antagonists cis-(+)-5-methoxy-1-methyl-2-(n-propylamino)tetralin, (+)-AJ 76 and cis-(+)-5-methoxy-1-methyl-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin, (+)-UH 232, were evaluated in various in vivo models in rats. Both compounds produced a marked elevation in brain dopamine synthesis and turnover with only slight effects on the synthesis and turnover of serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline being noted. (+)-AJ 76 and (+)-UH 232 also failed to antagonize the decrease in cortical noradrenaline synthesis rate caused by the alpha2 agonist clonidine. The apomorphine-induced decrease in dopamine synthesis rate in gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) treated animals was completely blocked by (+)-AJ 76 and (+)-UH 232 but not by d-amphetamine or methylphenidate. In activity experiments using habituated animals, (+)-AJ 76 and (+)-UH 232 produced locomotor stimulation and weak stereotypies and antagonized the sedative effects of low doses of apomorphine. Locomotor hyperactivity induced by apomorphine or the dopamine agonist DiPr-5,6-ADTN was antagonized by (+)-UH 232 and to a lesser degree by (+)-AJ 76. The locomotor hyperactivity produced by (+)-AJ 76, (+)-UH 232 and methylphenidate was completely prevented by reserpine pretreatment and partially blocked by the tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor alpha-methyl-para-tyrosine (alpha-MT), whereas d-amphetamine-induced hyperactivity was only antagonized by alpha-MT pretreatment. It is concluded that (+)-AJ 76 and (+)-UH 232 produce behavioral stimulation via a preferential antagonism on central dopamine autoreceptors, an action different from that of all known stimulants including apomorphine, d-amphetamine and methylphenidate. (+)-AJ 76 and (+)-UH 232 possess but weak antagonistic effects on postsynaptic dopamine receptors and only the latter compound is able to induce sedation in rats.

Active Immunization against Nicotine Prevents Reinstatement of Nicotine-Seeking Behavior in Rats

Background: The presently available pharmaceutical aids in smoking cessation possess a rather limited effectiveness. Therefore, we have synthesized a series of immunoconjugates that stimulate the induction of antibodies which may bind nicotine in the blood, thereby preventing it from passing the blood-brain barrier. Thus, the reinforcing action of nicotine in the brain, which is the driving force in tobacco smoking, should be abolished. Objective: The present study was undertaken to test this notion in a long-term relapse model in rats, measuring the reinstatement of nicotine-seeking behavior, following active immunization with IP18-KLH, one of our immunoconjugates. Methods: Male Wistar rats were immunized with a nicotine-KLH conjugate (nicotine immunogen) and Freund’s adjuvant after having been trained to meet the criteria of stable nicotine self-administration on a fixed ratio (FR3) schedule. The rats were subsequently extinguished from nicotine self-administration behavior and finally, as extinction was completed, they were exposed to small, priming doses of nicotine, which previously have been shown to reinstate the nicotine-seeking behavior. The antibody titers were measured by ELISA. Results: It was found that rats with high titers (>1:10,000) of antibodies against nicotine, in contrast to those with low/no nicotine selective antibodies, do not reinstate nicotine self-administration behavior when they are exposed to nicotine. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that active immunization against nicotine may effectively abolish the reinforcing action of nicotine in brain, an effect which is critical for relapse in nicotine dependence. These data suggest the potential utility of active immunization in smoking cessation programs.

Active Immunization against Nicotine Suppresses Nicotine-Induced Dopamine Release in the Rat Nucleus accumbens Shell

Background: Tobacco smoking is the largest preventable cause of morbidity and premature mortality in the world. Although its medical consequences are well documented, 20–50% of the population even in developed countries remain tobacco smokers. The drugs presently used in smoking cessation have limited efficiency and, therefore, there is a need for alternative and improved treatments. One novel approach in this regard may be provided by immunization against nicotine. Objective: The present study in male Wistar rats investigated if active immunization with a novel nicotine immunogen, IP18-KLH, may generate nicotine-selective antibodies and, furthermore, whether this treatment might prevent nicotine from exerting its stimulating effect on the mesolimbic, dopaminergic reward system in the brain. Methods: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to determine the titer of nicotine antibodies in plasma after immunization with IP18-KLH in Freund’s adjuvant. Competitive ELISA was used to assess the selectivity of the antibodies. Finally, we used in vivo voltammetry to investigate whether active immunization with IP18-KLH could prevent nicotine-induced dopamine release in the shell of nucleus accumbens (NACshell). Results: The present study shows that active immunization with IP18-KLH generates antibodies that are highly selective for nicotine. Furthermore, immunization with IP18-KLH prevented the nicotine-induced increase in dopamine release in the NACshell, a biochemical correlate to the rewarding properties of nicotine. Conclusions: Active immunization with IP18-KLH prevents a central effect of nicotine that is considered critical for the induction of nicotine dependence. Consequently, active immunization may provide long-term protection against initiation of tobacco dependence, an effect that may prove particularly advantageous in relapse prevention.

The Dopamine Stabilizers (S)-(-)-(3-Methanesulfonyl-phenyl)-1-propyl-piperidine [(-)-OSU6162] and 4-(3-Methanesulfonylphenyl)-1-propyl-piperidine (ACR16) Show High in Vivo D2 Receptor Occupancy, Antipsychotic-Like Efficacy, and Low Potential for Motor Side Effects in the Rat

“Dopamine stabilizers” are a new class of compounds that have the ability to reverse both hypo- as well as hyperdopaminergia in vivo. This class, exemplified by the phenylpiperidines (S)-(-)-3-(3-methanesulfonyl-phenyl)-1-propyl-piperidine [(-)-OSU6162] and 4-(3-methanesulfonyl-phenyl)-1-propyl)-piperidine [ACR16] although lacking high in vitro binding affinity for dopamine D2 receptor [(-)-OSU6162, Ki = 447 nM; ACR16, Ki > 1 μM], shows functional actions, suggestive of their interaction. Hence, we evaluated in vivo D2 occupancy of these agents in rats and correlated it to observed effects in a series of behavioral, neurochemical, and endocrine models relevant to the dopamine system and antipsychotic effect. Both (-)-OSU6162 and ACR16 showed robust dose-dependent striatal D2 occupancy with ED50 values of 5.27 and 18.99 mg/kg s.c., respectively, and functional assays showed no partial agonism. Over an occupancy range of 37 to 87% (3-60 mg/kg) for (-)-OSU6162 and 35 to 74% (10-60 mg/kg) for ACR16, we observed both inhibitory (amphetamine-induced locomotor activity) and stimulatory effects (in habituated rats). Haloperidol, over a similar occupancy range (33-78%), potently inhibited psychostimulant activity and induced catalepsy, but it failed to activate habituated animals. In the conditioned avoidance response assay, ACR16 was clearly more efficacious than (-)-OSU6162. In addition, both these compounds demonstrated significant preferential Fos induction in the nucleus accumbens compared with the dorsolateral striatum, a strong predictor of atypical antipsychotic efficacy. The results suggest that dopamine stabilizers exhibit locomotor stabilizing as well as antipsychotic-like effects, with low motor side effect liability, in a dose range that corresponds to high D2 in vivo occupancy.

Effects of (−)-OSU6162 and ACR16 on motor activity in rats, indicating a unique mechanism of dopaminergic stabilization

Dopaminergic stabilizers can be defined as drugs that stimulate or inhibit dopaminergic signalling depending on the dopaminergic tone. (−)-OSU6162 and ACR16 appear to possess such a profile. They have been proposed to act as partial dopamine receptor agonists or as antagonists with preferential action on dopaminergic autoreceptors. Previous studies have shown either stimulation or inhibition of behaviour in response to (−)-OSU6162 and ACR16, which has been suggested to reflect their dual effects on dopaminergic signalling. The aims of the present work are to (1) examine the relation between behavioural response to these drugs and activity baseline, and (2) test the suggested mechanisms of action by means of close comparisons with the known partial D2-receptor agonists (−)-3-PPP and aripiprazole, and the D2 autoreceptor preferring antagonist amisulpride with respect to effects on behaviour. From the results of these experiments it can be concluded that: (1) The direction of the response to (−)-OSU6162 and ACR16 is dependent on activity baseline, which in turn, under physiological conditions, is determined primarily by test arena size of and degree of habituation to the environment. (2) The effects of (−)-OSU6162 and ACR16 cannot be explained on the basis of either partial dopamine receptor agonism or preferential dopamine autoreceptor antagonism. Nevertheless, the current data suggest at least two different D2-receptor-associated targets which mediate opposite effects on activity. This result fits in with a mechanism proposed from a recent in vitro study, according to which (−)-OSU6162 has a dual action on dopamine D2 receptors, (a) an allosteric effect causing an enhanced response to dopamine, and (b) the previously proposed orthosteric effect antagonizing the action of dopamine.

Nicotine hapten structure, antibody selectivity and effect relationships: Results from a nicotine vaccine screening procedure

The aim of the present study was to synthesise and screen a set of novel nicotine hapten immunogens used for the treatment of nicotine dependence. In the screening process we studied the amount of antibodies generated and their selectivity, using ELISA techniques, and their effects on nicotine-induced dopamine release in the NAC(shell) of the rat, assessed by in vivo voltammetry. We conclude that even small changes such as the linker attachment on the nicotine molecule as well as the structure of the linker may greatly influence the selectivity of the antibodies and the central neurobiological effects of nicotine that are considered critical for its dependence producing properties.

(+)-UH 232 and (+)-UH 242: novel stereoselective dopamine receptor antagonists with preferential action on autoreceptors.

The (+)- and (−)-enantiomers of the 2-aminotetralin derivatives cis-5-methoxy-1-methyl-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (UH 232) and cis-5-hydroxy-1-methyl-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (UH 242), were pharmacologically evaluated in rats in an extensive series ofin vivo biochemical and behavioral experiments. These studies showed that the (+)- and (−)-enantiomers have differential effects on central dopamine (DA) receptors. Thus, (−)-UH 242 is a DA-receptor agonist stimulating both pre- and postsynaptic receptors. (−)-UH 232 is also active as a DA receptor agonist, although with much lower potency than (−)-UH 242. In contrast, (+)-UH 242 and (+)-UH 232 are characterized as DA receptor antagonists. Both (+)-forms markedly accelerated DA synthesis and turnover and reversed the biochemical and behavioral effects of apomorphine. Locomotor activity was stimulated by the (+)-enantiomers over a wide dose range; hypomotility was induced only by high doses. The pharmacological profile of the (+)-enantiomers clearly differs from that of classical neuroleptics and suggests a preferential antagonistic action on DA autoreceptors. (+)-UH 232 and (+)-UH 242 may prove useful as experimental tools and as potential therapeutic agents (selectively increasing DA-ergic neurotransmission),e.g. in geriatric practice.

Mechanisms of ligand binding and efficacy at the human D2(short) dopamine receptor

Mechanisms of ligand binding and receptor activation for the human D2(short) dopamine receptor have been probed using two homologous series of monohydroxylated and dihydroxylated agonists (phenylethylamines and 2‐dipropylaminotetralins). In ligand binding studies, the majority of compounds exhibited competition curves versus [3H]spiperone that were best fitted using a two site binding model. The compounds had different abilities (potencies and maximal effects) to stimulate [35S]GTPγS binding and to inhibit forskolin‐stimulated cAMP accumulation. From the data it can be concluded that: (i) the ability of an agonist to stabilize receptor/G protein coupling can be used to predict agonist efficacy for some groups of compounds (2‐dipropylaminotetralins) but not for others (phenylethylamines); (ii) the receptor may be activated by unhydroxylated compounds; (iii) single hydroxyl groups or pairs of hydroxyl groups on the agonist may contribute tobinding affinity, potency and efficacy; and (iv) for the 2‐dipropylaminotetralin series two modes of agonist/receptor interaction have been identified associated with different relative efficacy.

Analysis of the actions of the novel dopamine receptor-directed compounds (S)-OSU6162 and ACR16 at the D2 dopamine receptor.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The two phenylpiperidines, OSU6162 and ACR16, have been proposed as novel drugs for the treatment of brain disorders, including schizophrenia and Huntingtons disease, because of their putative dopamine stabilizing effects. Here we evaluated the activities of these compounds in a range of assays for the D2 dopamine receptor in vitro.