Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Angela B. Edgar is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Angela B. Edgar.


Endocrine development | 2009

Long-term follow-up of survivors of childhood cancer.

Angela B. Edgar; Elizabeth M.M. Morris; C.J.H. Kelnar; Hamish B. Wallace

Today more than 75% of children treated for cancer will be cured, and attention is focusing on the late effects of treatments for these long-term survivors. Treatment-related morbidity is diverse, with potential effects on the endocrine system (growth, puberty, fertility, pituitary, thyroid and other disorders), cardiovascular, pulmonary and renal complications, second tumours, cognitive, education, neuropsychological and social manifestations. Multi-disciplinary long-term follow-up of these patients is essential to monitor, treat, and prevent morbidity. Depending on the nature of the treatment delivered, long-term follow-up of the survivor of childhood cancer can be individualised and delivered by a wide range of health professionals either in hospital or in primary care. In this review we describe the chronic health problems encountered by survivors and discuss the development of a long-term follow-up service for childhood cancer survivors.


The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology | 2015

Screening and management of adverse endocrine outcomes in adult survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer

Emily S. Tonorezos; Melissa M. Hudson; Angela B. Edgar; Leontien C. M. Kremer; Charles A. Sklar; W. Hamish B. Wallace; Kevin C. Oeffinger

5 year survival for childhood and adolescent cancer in developed countries is now in excess of 80% and the number of survivors of cancer continues to increase worldwide. After completion of therapy, many of these survivors will face a lifelong risk of endocrine late effects. We summarise the available evidence related to the prevalence and risk factors for endocrine late effects among adult survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer. Present screening, surveillance, and treatment recommendations differ by country and region, so we also highlight the continued effort to harmonise the international guidelines for this population.


Circulation | 2016

Cardiac Mortality Among 200 000 Five-Year Survivors of Cancer Diagnosed at 15 to 39 Years of Age: The Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Survivor Study

Katherine E. Henson; Raoul C. Reulen; David L. Winter; Chloe J. Bright; Miranda M Fidler; Clare Frobisher; Joyeeta Guha; Kwok F. Wong; Julie Kelly; Angela B. Edgar; Martin McCabe; Jeremy Whelan; David J. Cutter; Sarah C. Darby; Mike Hawkins

Background: Survivors of teenage and young adult cancer are acknowledged as understudied. Little is known about their long-term adverse health risks, particularly of cardiac disease that is increased in other cancer populations where cardiotoxic treatments have been used. Methods: The Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Survivor Study cohort comprises 200 945 5-year survivors of cancer diagnosed at 15 to 39 years of age in England and Wales from 1971 to 2006, and followed to 2014. Standardized mortality ratios, absolute excess risks, and cumulative risks were calculated. Results: Two thousand sixteen survivors died of cardiac disease. For all cancers combined, the standardized mortality ratios for all cardiac diseases combined was greatest for individuals diagnosed at 15 to 19 years of age (4.2; 95% confidence interval, 3.4–5.2) decreasing to 1.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.1–1.3) for individuals aged 35 to 39 years (2P for trend <0.0001). Similar patterns were observed for both standardized mortality ratios and absolute excess risks for ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma, acute myeloid leukaemia, genitourinary cancers other than bladder cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, lung cancer, leukaemia other than acute myeloid, central nervous system tumour, cervical cancer, and breast cancer experienced 3.8, 2.7, 2.0, 1.7, 1.7, 1.6, 1.4, 1.3 and 1.2 times the number of cardiac deaths expected from the general population, respectively. Among survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma aged over 60 years, almost 30% of the total excess number of deaths observed were due to heart disease. Conclusions: This study of over 200 000 cancer survivors shows that age at cancer diagnosis was critical in determining subsequent cardiac mortality risk. For the first time, risk estimates of cardiac death after each cancer diagnosed between the ages of 15 and 39 years have been derived from a large population-based cohort with prolonged follow-up. The evidence here provides an initial basis for developing evidence-based follow-up guidelines.


European Journal of Cancer | 2012

Survivors of childhood cancer lost to follow-up can be re-engaged into active long-term follow-up by a postal health questionnaire intervention

Angela B. Edgar; S. Borthwick; K. Duffin; P. Marciniak-Stepak; W.H.B. Wallace

UNLABELLED Lifelong long-term follow-up (LTFU) is recommended for all survivors of childhood cancer. National guidelines recommend risk-stratified levels of follow-up by a multidisciplinary team, in an age-appropriate environment. Many survivors do not participate in long-term follow-up. OBJECTIVE To re-engage childhood cancer survivors lost to follow-up in late effects programmes by means of postal questionnaire. POPULATION AND METHODS Retrospective cohort study of all children (<19 years) diagnosed with cancer in a single institution in the UK between 1971 and 2003. All lost to follow-up survivors (not seen in clinic >2 years) were sent a postal health and well-being questionnaire. RESULTS 831 patients were diagnosed with childhood cancer between 1971 and 2003, with 575 long-term survivors (overall survival rate 69%). Information was available on 550 survivors (males 290 (53%), median age (range) at review 18.8 (5.4-44.2) years and at diagnosis 5.0 (0.0-18.8) years, and disease free survival (range) was 10.8 (1.0-37.4) years. Of the 550 survivors, 256 (46%) were lost to follow-up. 99 (39%) of lost to follow-up survivors returned completed postal questionnaires (58% female). 45% of responders reported at least one late effect, 36% mild-moderate, and 8% severe-life threatening. 19% reported two or more late effects. 74% of all childhood cancer survivors are now in active follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Almost half (46%) of all long-term survivors of childhood cancer are lost to follow-up, Postal follow-up is an effective means of re-engaging more than one third of survivors of childhood cancer in active long-term follow-up, half of whom had at least one late effect.


BMJ Open | 2013

Can intensity of long-term follow-up for survivors of childhood and teenage cancer be determined by therapy-based risk stratification?

Angela B. Edgar; K Duffin; S Borthwick; P. Marciniak-Stepak; W.H.B. Wallace

Objective To determine the feasibility of therapy-based, risk-stratified follow-up guidelines for childhood and teenage cancer survivors by evaluating adverse health outcomes in a survivor cohort retrospectively assigned a risk category. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary level, single centre, paediatric cancer unit in South East Scotland. Participants All children and teenagers diagnosed with cancer (<19 years) between 1 January 1971 and 31 July 2004, who were alive more than 5 years from diagnosis formed the study cohort. Each survivor was retrospectively assigned a level of follow-up, based on their predicted risk of developing treatment-related late effects (LEs; levels 1, 2 and 3 for low, medium and high risk, respectively). Adverse health outcomes were determined from review of medical records and postal questionnaires. LEs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event, V.3. Results 607 5-year survivors were identified. Risk stratification identified 86 (14.2%), 271 (44.6%) and 250 (41.2%) as levels 1, 2 and 3 survivors, respectively. The prevalence of LEs for level 1 survivors was 11.6% with only one patient with grade 3 or above toxicity. 35.8% of level 2 survivors had an LE, of whom 9.3%, 58.8%, 18.5%, 10.3% and 3% had grades 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 toxicity, respectively. 65.2% of level 3 survivors had LE, of whom 5.5% (n=9), 34.4% (n=56), 36.2% (n=59), 22.1% (n=36) and 1.8% (n=3) had grades 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 toxicity, respectively. Conclusions Therapy-based risk stratification of survivors can predict which patients are at significant risk of developing moderate-to-severe LEs and require high-intensity long-term follow-up. Our findings will need confirmation in a prospective cohort study that has the power to adjust for all potentially confounding variables.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2017

Pregnancy and Labor Complications in Female Survivors of Childhood Cancer: The British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Raoul C. Reulen; Chloe J. Bright; David L. Winter; Miranda M Fidler; Kwok F. Wong; Joyeeta Guha; Julie Kelly; Clare Frobisher; Angela B. Edgar; Roderick Skinner; W. Hamish B. Wallace; Mike Hawkins

Abstract Background: Female survivors of childhood cancer treated with abdominal radiotherapy who manage to conceive are at risk of delivering premature and low-birthweight offspring, but little is known about whether abdominal radiotherapy may also be associated with additional complications during pregnancy and labor. We investigated the risk of developing pregnancy and labor complications among female survivors of childhood cancer in the British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (BCCSS). Methods: Pregnancy and labor complications were identified by linking the BCCSS cohort (n = 17 980) to the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) for England. Relative risks (RRs) of pregnancy and labor complications were calculated by site of radiotherapy treatment (none/abdominal/cranial/other) and other cancer-related factors using log-binomial regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: A total of 2783 singleton pregnancies among 1712 female survivors of childhood cancer were identified in HES. Wilms tumor survivors treated with abdominal radiotherapy were at threefold risk of hypertension complicating pregnancy (relative risk = 3.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.29 to 4.71), while all survivors treated with abdominal radiotherapy were at risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (RR = 3.35, 95% CI = 1.41 to 7.93) and anemia complicating pregnancy (RR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.27 to 3.46) compared with survivors treated without radiotherapy. Survivors treated without radiotherapy had similar risks of pregnancy and labor complications as the general population, except survivors were more likely to opt for an elective cesarean section (RR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.70). Conclusions: Treatment with abdominal radiotherapy increases the risk of developing hypertension complicating pregnancy in Wilms tumor survivors, and diabetes mellitus and anemia complicating pregnancy in all survivors. These patients may require extra vigilance during pregnancy.


European Journal of Cancer | 2013

Subsequent mortality experience in five-year survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer in Scotland: A population based, retrospective cohort study

David H. Brewster; David E. Clark; Leanne Hopkins; Jacqui Bauer; Sarah H. Wild; Angela B. Edgar; W. Hamish B. Wallace

AIM To assess the risk of death in patients who survive at least 5 years after diagnosis of childhood, adolescent or young adult cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked national cancer registry and mortality records in Scotland. The study population consisted of 5229 individuals who were diagnosed with cancer before the age of 25 years between 1981 and 2003, and who survived at least 5 years after the date of diagnosis of their primary cancer. Indirect standardisation was used to calculate mortality ratios standardised for age and sex and absolute excess risks (AERs) compared to the general Scottish population. RESULTS During 58,358 person-years of follow-up, there were 359 deaths among the cohort of cancer survivors. The overall SMR was 6.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.5-6.7) and AER 51 (45-58) per 10,000 person-years. Largely because of age- and sex-related differences in background mortality, SMRs were higher in patients diagnosed at 0-14 years (SMR 11.0, 95% CI 9.3-12.9) than 15-24 years (4.7, 4.1-5.3), and in females (9.2, 7.8-10.8) than males (4.8, 4.2-5.5). SMRs and AERs varied substantially by primary cancer and by underlying cause of death. In general, SMRs were little altered by standardisation for an area-based indicator of socio-economic deprivation. Adjusted for age and sex, the risk of death was significantly lower in five-year survivors diagnosed during 1998-2003 compared to those diagnosed during 1981-1985 (Relative hazard ratio, 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.81). CONCLUSION Long-term survivors of cancer in childhood and young adulthood remain at higher risk of mortality than the general population, although the absolute risk of death is low and the excess risk has decreased over time.


The Lancet | 2012

Leukocoria and retinoblastoma—pitfalls of the digital age?

Dermot Murphy; Hugh Bishop; Angela B. Edgar

Retinoblastoma is a childhood cancer that is now highly curable. Parents may be alerted to the disease when photographs of their child reveal a white pupil (leukocoria). In our case of a 15-month-old girl, one of her parents was a keen photographer and immediately noticed pupilliary abnormalities on digital photography (fi gure A). Application of red-eye reduction software improved the abnormal right pupil but the diseased left pupil remained white (fi gure B). Although the abnormal white refl ection from the retina was detected in this case, it is of note that the parent was easily able to


Circulation | 2017

Risk of Cerebrovascular Events in 178,962 5-Year Survivors of Cancer Diagnosed Aged 15-39 Years: The Teenage and Young Adults Cancer Survivors Study (TYACSS)

Chloe J. Bright; Mike Hawkins; Joyeeta Guha; Katherine E. Henson; David L. Winter; Julie Kelly; Richard G. Feltbower; Marlous Hall; David J. Cutter; Angela B. Edgar; Clare Frobisher; Raoul C. Reulen

Background: Survivors of teenage and young adult cancer are at risk of cerebrovascular events, but the magnitude of and extent to which this risk varies by cancer type, decade of diagnosis, age at diagnosis, and attained age remains uncertain. This is the largest-ever cohort study to evaluate the risks of hospitalization for a cerebrovascular event among long-term survivors of teenage and young adult cancer. Methods: The population-based TYACSS (Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Survivor Study) (N=178,962) was linked to Hospital Episode Statistics data for England to investigate the risks of hospitalization for a cerebrovascular event among 5-year survivors of cancer diagnosed when 15 to 39 years of age. Observed numbers of first hospitalizations for cerebrovascular events were compared with that expected from the general population using standardized hospitalization ratios (SHRs) and absolute excess risks per 10 000 person-years. Cumulative incidence was calculated with death considered a competing risk. Results: Overall, 2782 cancer survivors were hospitalized for a cerebrovascular event—40% higher than expected (SHR=1.4, 95% confidence interval, 1.3–1.4). Survivors of central nervous system (CNS) tumors (SHR=4.6, 95% confidence interval, 4.3–5.0), head and neck tumors (SHR=2.6, 95% confidence interval, 2.2–3.1), and leukemia (SHR=2.5, 95% confidence interval, 1.9–3.1) were at greatest risk. Males had significantly higher absolute excess risks than females (absolute excess risks =7 versus 3), especially among head and neck tumor survivors (absolute excess risks =30 versus 11). By 60 years of age, 9%, 6%, and 5% of CNS tumor, head and neck tumor, and leukemia survivors, respectively, had been hospitalized for a cerebrovascular event. Beyond 60 years of age, every year, 0.4% of CNS tumor survivors were hospitalized for a cerebral infarction (versus 0.1% expected), whereas at any age, every year, 0.2% of head and neck tumor survivors were hospitalized for a cerebral infarction (versus 0.06% expected). Conclusions: Survivors of a CNS tumor, head and neck tumor, and leukemia are particularly at risk of hospitalization for a cerebrovascular event. The excess risk of cerebral infarction among CNS tumor survivors increases with attained age. For head and neck tumor survivors, this excess risk remains high across all ages. These groups of survivors, particularly males, should be considered for surveillance of cerebrovascular risk factors and potential pharmacological interventions for cerebral infarction prevention.


PLOS ONE | 2017

Follicle Stimulating Hormone is an accurate predictor of azoospermia in childhood cancer survivors

Tom Kelsey; Lauren McConville; Angela B. Edgar; Alex I Ungurianu; Roderick Mitchell; Richard A. Anderson; W. Hamish B. Wallace

The accuracy of Follicle Stimulating Hormone as a predictor of azoospermia in adult survivors of childhood cancer is unclear, with conflicting results in the published literature. A systematic review and post hoc analysis of combined data (n = 367) were performed on all published studies containing extractable data on both serum Follicle Stimulating Hormone concentration and semen concentration in survivors of childhood cancer. PubMed and Medline databases were searched up to March 2017 by two blind investigators. Articles were included if they contained both serum FSH concentration and semen concentration, used World Health Organisation certified methods for semen analysis, and the study participants were all childhood cancer survivors. There was no evidence for either publication bias or heterogeneity for the five studies. For the combined data (n = 367) the optimal Follicle Stimulating Hormone threshold was 10.4 IU/L with specificity 81% (95% CI 76%–86%) and sensitivity 83% (95% CI 76%–89%). The AUC was 0.89 (95%CI 0.86–0.93). A range of threshold FSH values for the diagnosis of azoospermia with their associated sensitivities and specificities were calculated. This study provides strong supporting evidence for the use of serum Follicle Stimulating Hormone as a surrogate biomarker for azoospermia in adult males who have been treated for childhood cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the Angela B. Edgar's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joyeeta Guha

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julie Kelly

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mike Hawkins

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W. Hamish B. Wallace

Royal Hospital for Sick Children

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge