Angela Buonadonna

Initial Therapy with FOLFOXIRI and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND A fluoropyrimidine plus irinotecan or oxaliplatin, combined with bevacizumab (a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor), is standard first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Before the introduction of bevacizumab, chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) showed superior efficacy as compared with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). In a phase 2 study, FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab showed promising activity and an acceptable rate of adverse effects. METHODS We randomly assigned 508 patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer to receive either FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (control group) or FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (experimental group). Up to 12 cycles of treatment were administered, followed by fluorouracil plus bevacizumab until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS The median progression-free survival was 12.1 months in the experimental group, as compared with 9.7 months in the control group (hazard ratio for progression, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.90; P=0.003). The objective response rate was 65% in the experimental group and 53% in the control group (P=0.006). Overall survival was longer, but not significantly so, in the experimental group (31.0 vs. 25.8 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.00; P=0.054). The incidences of grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity, stomatitis, diarrhea, and neutropenia were significantly higher in the experimental group. CONCLUSIONS FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab, as compared with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab, improved the outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and increased the incidence of some adverse events. (Funded by the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00719797.).

The role of UGT1A1*28 polymorphism in the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE UGT1A1*28 polymorphism has been associated with decreased glucuronidation of SN38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. This could increase toxicity with this agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a prospective study, 250 metastatic colorectal cancer patients were treated with irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment. UGT1A1*28 polymorphism was investigated with respect to the distribution of hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity, objective response rate, and survival. Pharmacokinetics was investigated in a subgroup of patients (71 of 250) who had been analyzed with respect to toxicity and efficacy. RESULTS UGT1A1*28 polymorphism was associated with a higher risk of grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity (odds ratio [OR], 8.63; 95% CI, 1.31 to 56.55), which was only relevant for the first cycle, and was not seen throughout the whole treatment period for patients with both variant alleles TA7/TA7 compared with wild-type TA6/TA6. The response rate was also higher in TA7/TA7 patients (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.86) compared with TA6/TA6. A nonsignificant survival advantage was observed for TA7/TA7 when compared with TA6/TA6 patients (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.44). Higher response rates were explained by a different pharmacokinetics with higher biliary index [irinotecan area under the curve (AUC)x(SN38 AUC/SN38G AUC)] and lower glucuronidation ratio (SN38G AUC/SN38 AUC) associated with the TA7/TA7 genotype and a higher response rate, indicating that the polymorphism is functionally relevant. CONCLUSION The results indicate that UGT1A1*28 polymorphism is of some relevance to toxicity; however, it is less important than discussed in previous smaller trials. In particular, the possibility of a dose reduction for irinotecan in patients with a UGT1A1*28 polymorphism is not supported by the result of this analysis.

Predictive Role of the UGT1A1, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9 Genetic Variants and Their Haplotypes on the Outcome of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan

PURPOSE UGT1A1*28 is considered the main pharmacogenetic predictor of the toxicity outcome of irinotecan-treated patients. We evaluated the effect of other UGT1A variants and haplotypes involved in 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) glucuronidation on severe toxicity and efficacy of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). PATIENTS AND METHODS In addition to UGT1A1*28, UGT1A1*60, UGT1A1*93, UGT1A7*3, and UGT1A9*22 were genotyped in 250 metastatic colorectal cancer patients, and associations with severe hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity, objective response, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival were evaluated. In a subset of 71 patients, pharmacokinetic data were also available. RESULTS UGT1A7*3 was the only marker of severe hematologic toxicity after the first cycle (odds ratio [OR], 3.94; 95% CI, 1.05 to 14.82; P = .04) in a multivariate analysis. It was also associated with glucuronidation ratio (SN-38G area under the curve [AUC]/SN-38 AUC) and biliary index (irinotecan AUC) x (SN-38 AUC/SN-38G AUC). Haplotype I (all the reference sequence alleles but UGT1A9*22) was a predictor of severe hematologic toxicity during the entire course of therapy (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.82; P = .01), together with sex (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.01 to 4.28; P = .05). In addition to UGT1A1*28, haplotype II (all the variant alleles but UGT1A9*22) was associated with a response rate (OR, 8.61; 95% CI, 1.75 to 42.38; P = .01). UGT1A1*28 was the only marker associated with TTP. CONCLUSION We propose that UGT1A variants additional to UGT1A1*28 might improve the prediction of the outcome of colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRI. A UGT1A haplotype-based approach might be an efficacious strategy to achieve treatment individualization of FOLFIRI.

Ifosfamide in the adjuvant therapy of soft tissue sarcomas

Ifosfamide and anthracyclines are the only active agents in advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Doxorubicin was always used in sarcomas, whereas ifosfamide was reintroduced in the clinic after the discovery of mesna which prevents its typical dose-limiting toxicity: hemorrhagic cystitis. In the adjuvant setting, doxorubicin was used alone or in combination in the first-generation trials, whereas its parent compounds epirubicin and ifosfamide were employed in the second-generation adjuvant trials, which started in the early 90s. Other relevant aspects of the second-generation trials are the use of the hematopoietic growth factors and the increase of the dose intensity, the introduction of more restrictive selection criteria and the use of the two most active agents, ifosfamide and anthracyclines. Only the Italian cooperative trial has been concluded, and the results reported and updated. After a median follow-up of 89.6 months (range 56–119), the intention-to-treat analysis still reveals a difference in overall survival which, however, is not statistically significant. However, the 5-year overall survival estimate, which is a reasonable end point for the survival analysis of adjuvant treatment in soft tissue sarcomas, was 66.0 and 46.1% for the treatment and the control groups, respectively (p = 0.04).

Utility of combined use of plasma levels of chromogranin A and pancreatic polypeptide in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal and pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Background: Chromogranin A (CgA) is considered the most accurate marker in the diagnosis of gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) endocrine tumors. Pancreatic polypeptide (PP) has also been proposed to play this role, but then not used due to its low sensitivity. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the assessment of PP would improve the diagnostic reliability of CgA in patients with GEP tumors. Patients and methods: Both markers were assessed in 68 patients [28 functioning (F), 40 non functioning (NF)]. Twenty-seven patients disease-free (DF) after surgery, and 24 with non-endocrine tumors (non-ETs) were used as control groups. Results: CgA sensitivity was: 96% in F, 75% in NF, 74% in pancreatic, and 91% in gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. Specificity was 89% vs DF, and 63% vs non- ETs. PP sensitivity was: 54% in F, 57% in NF, 63% in pancreatic, and 53% in GI tumors. Specificity was 81% vs DF, and 67% vs non-ETs. By combining the two markers a significant gain in sensitivity vs CgA alone was obtained: overall in GEP tumors (96% vs 84%, p=0.04), in NF (95% vs 75%, p=0.02), and in pancreatic (94% vs 74%, p=0.04). More specifically, a 25% gain of sensitivity was obtained in the subgroup of NF pancreatic tumors (93% vs 68%, p=0.04). Conclusion: The combined assessment of PP and CgA leads to a significant increase in sensitivity in the diagnosis of GEP tumors, particularly in pancreatic NF.

Solid pseudopapillary tumour of the pancreas.

Solid pseudopapillary tumour (Frantz’s tumour) is a rare benign or low-grade neoplasm of the pancreas with distinct clinicopathological features. The diagnosis may be difficult, but should be considered as a possibility in young women who present with a large abdominal mass involving the pancreas. In this report we describe the clinical and pathological characteristics of these lesions and discuss therapeutic options. A 27-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital in October 1999 with a 3-month history of mild asthenia, weight loss, and a feeling of heaviness localised to the left lumbar region. Routine laboratory analyses were all within the normal range; however, abdominal ultrasound revealed the presence of a mass in the superior abdomen, which was composed of high and low echoic areas. Computed tomography showed the mass to be solid, encapsulated, and about 9 cm in diameter (figure 1). It was composed of high and low density areas and was located close to the splenic hilum—above the pancreatic tail, behind the stomach, and between the spleen and the aorta (Albarran-Chatelin’s anatomosurgical quadrilateral). Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging revealed a posterior anastomosis between the mass drainage vessels and the diaphragmatic veins. The patient underwent a complete surgical resection of the tumour (enucleation) and a resection of the pancreatic tail. The spleen was removed because of vascular damage consisting of large patches of venous stasis and ischaemia which did not resolve over time or after application of warm, moist dressings. The pathological diagnosis was epithelial solid papillary cystic neoplasm with signs of incipient pseudocapsular invasion. Immunohistochemical studies established that the tumour cells were positive for cytokeratins and vimentin, and negative for S100 protein, CD34, chromogranin, neurone-specific enolase (NSE), and glial fibrillary acid protein. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged from hospital on day 7 and referred to the Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano for counselling. No residual tumour or metastases were found with clinical imaging, so no adjuvant therapy was recommended. In November 2001, routine work-up identified no signs of tumour relapse. This case is a typical example of solid pseudopapillary tumour of the pancreas or Frantz’s tumour. The diagnostic imaging techniques used were effective in defining the location of the tumour, although a nonfunctioning neoplasm of the left adrenal gland was initially suspected. In 1959, Frantz 1

Antithrombin III deficiency as a risk factor for catheter-related central vein thrombosis in cancer patients

The fibrin sleeve of venous catheters (VC) and parietal thrombi represent frequent and dangerous side-effects of central venous catheterization (CVC), due to the risk of embolism. Reduced levels of coagulation clotting factors inhibitors (such as Antithrombin III) are known to be associated with increased thrombogenic risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of Antithrombin III (AT III) deficiency as a risk factor for thrombosis in cancer patients undergoing CVC. The study groups included patients with a reduced AT III activity (< 70%, 20 consecutive patients) and with normal AT III values (> 70%, 20 randomly selected patients), requiring a VC for chemotherapy and/or total parenteral nutrition. The study protocol included evaluation of Hb, PLTs, PT (INR), aPTT, Fibrinogen and AT III at days 0, 1, 3 and 8 after CVC and upon VC removal. Peripheral and pullout phlebographies were performed in all patients on catheter withdrawal. A quantitative scale was developed to evaluate both VC and parietal thrombus degree in each catheter-containing venous segment (subclavian, innominate, superior vena cava); the sum of the mean values was defined as overall thrombus. The average VC dwelling time was similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in Hb, PLTs, PT (INR), aPTT, Fibrinogen and in the remaining parameters of the study between the two groups. The group with AT III deficiency presented a higher degree of both parietal (p < 0.05) and overall thrombus (p < 0.02). Data showed a higher severity of CVC-related thrombosis in patients with AT III deficiency than in the control group. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether the therapeutically-induced normalization of AT III levels can reduce the thrombosis degree.

Preoperative chemo-radiation therapy for localised retroperitoneal sarcoma: A phase I-II study from the Italian Sarcoma Group

BACKGROUND To study feasibility, safety and activity of the combination of high-dose long-infusion ifosfamide (HLI) and radiotherapy (RT) as preoperative treatment for resectable localised retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). METHODS Patients received three cycles of HLI (14 g/m2). RT was started in combination with second cycle and administered up to a total dose of 50.4 Gy. Surgery was scheduled 4-6 weeks after the end of RT. Primary end-point was 3-year relapse free survival (RFS). The trial is registered with ITASARC_∗II_2004_003. FINDINGS Between December 2003 and 2010, 83 patients were recruited. Main histological subtypes were well differentiated liposarcoma (19/83, 23%), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (26/83, 31%), leiomyosarcoma (14/83, 17%). Median tumour size was 120 mm (interquartile (IQ) range=82-160). The overall preoperative treatment was completed in 60 patients. Chemotherapy (CT) was completed in 65, while RT in 73. Four patients progressed before surgery and were not operated. 79 patients underwent surgery. At a median follow-up of 4.8 years (IQ range = 3-6.1), 23 and 15 patients developed local recurrence (LR) and distant metastases (DM); 30 patients died of disease. 3 and 5-year RFS and overall survival were 0.56 (90% confidence interval (CI): 0.45, 0.65) and 0.44 (90% CI: 0.27, 0.48), and 0.74 (90% CI: 0.62, 0.81) and 0.59 (90% CI: 0.33, 0.58). Crude cumulative incidence of LR and DM at 5 years were 0.37 (standard error (SE): 0.06) and 0.26 (SE: 0.06). INTERPRETATION The combination of preoperative HLI and RT was feasible in two thirds of patients, while preoperative RT could be completed in most (73/83). Although a systemic coverage can be added to RT when this is felt to be appropriate, the ongoing international phase III trial is exploring the role of RT alone. FUNDING This is a pure academic trial. No funding sources contributed to it.

A randomized, multicenter, phase II study of vandetanib monotherapy versus vandetanib in combination with gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus placebo in subjects with advanced biliary tract cancer: the VanGogh study.

BACKGROUND The management of biliary tract cancers (BTCs) is complex due to limited data on the optimal therapeutic approach. This phase II multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of vandetanib monotherapy compared with vandetanib plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced BTC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomized in a 1 : 1 : 1 ratio to three treatment groups: vandetanib 300 mg monotherapy (V), vandetanib 100 mg plus gemcitabine (V/G), gemcitabine plus placebo (G/P). Vandetanib (300 mg or 100 mg) or placebo was given in single oral daily doses. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) was i.v. infused on day 1 and day 8 of each 21-day cycle. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were: objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, overall survival, duration of response, performance status and safety outcomes. RESULTS A total of 173 patients (mean age 63.6 years) were recruited at 19 centers across Italy. Median (95% confidence intervals) PFS (days) were 105 (72-155), 114 (91-193) and 148 (71-225), respectively, for the V, V/G and G/P treatment groups, with no statistical difference among them (P = 0.18). No statistical difference between treatments was observed for secondary end points, except ORR, which slightly favored the V/G combination over other treatments. The proportion of patients reporting adverse events (AEs) was similar for the three groups (96.6% in V arm, 91.4% in the V/G arm and 89.3% in the G/P arm). CONCLUSIONS Vandetanib treatment did not improve PFS in patients with advanced BTC. The safety profile of vandetanib did not show any additional AEs or worsening of already known AEs. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER NCT00753675.

Neoplastic pericardial disease in lung cancer: Impact on outcomes of different treatment strategies. A multicenter study

BACKGROUND Local (intrapericardial) chemotherapy has been reported to be useful for the treatment of neoplastic pericardial disease, but it has never been compared to systemic chemotherapy, a combination of the two and simple pericardial drainage or sclerosis. METHODS We analyzed the clinical and echocardiographic data of 119 patients, suffering of neoplastic pericarditis due to lung cancer (97 with non-small-cell), comparing the outcomes of four different treatment strategies (extended catheter drainage/sclerosis, systemic chemotherapy, local chemotherapy, and combined - local plus systemic - chemotherapy) at the last available follow-up or at the change of therapy after a treatment failure. The outcomes (based on semiquantitative evaluation of pericardial disease) were classified as complete, partial, no response and progressing disease. RESULTS A complete response was achieved in 37/53 of patients with combined, in 12/22 with local, in 5/27 with systemic chemotherapy, respectively, and in 4/17 after drainage/sclerosis (p<0.001). Overall response was achieved in 51/53 with combined, 18/22 and 16/27 with local or systemic chemotherapy, respectively, and in 5/17 with drainage/sclerosis only (p<0.001). Survival was significantly better after combined chemotherapy (p<0.001) and 12/53 patients (23%) in this subgroup survived more than 1 year. The overall response rate was higher with intrapericardial cisplatinum than with other agents (98% vs 80%, χ(2)=7.69, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Local chemotherapy, alone or with systemic chemotherapy, is effective in treating pericardial metastases from lung carcinoma, leading to a good control of pericardial effusion in 92% of cases, and to complete disappearance of effusion and masses in 65%. Combined therapy is significantly better than any other treatment. Pericardiocentesis and intrapericardial chemotherapy should be used whenever possible in lung cancer neoplastic pericardial disease, not only in case of tamponade.