Angela Granelli-Piperno
Rockefeller University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Angela Granelli-Piperno.
Journal of Experimental Medicine | 2003
Boonrat Tassaneetrithep; Timothy Burgess; Angela Granelli-Piperno; Christine Trumpfheller; Jennifer S. Finke; Wellington Sun; Michael A. Eller; Kovit Pattanapanyasat; Suttipant Sarasombath; Deborah L. Birx; Ralph M. Steinman; Sarah J. Schlesinger; Mary Marovich
Dengue virus is a single-stranded, enveloped RNA virus that productively infects human dendritic cells (DCs) primarily at the immature stage of their differentiation. We now find that all four serotypes of dengue use DC-SIGN (CD209), a C-type lectin, to infect dendritic cells. THP-1 cells become susceptible to dengue infection after transfection of DC-specific ICAM-3 grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN), or its homologue L-SIGN, whereas the infection of dendritic cells is blocked by anti–DC-SIGN antibodies and not by antibodies to other molecules on these cells. Viruses produced by dendritic cells are infectious for DC-SIGN– and L-SIGN–bearing THP-1 cells and other permissive cell lines. Therefore, DC-SIGN may be considered as a new target for designing therapies that block dengue infection.
European Journal of Immunology | 1999
Lei Zhong; Angela Granelli-Piperno; Yongwon Choi; Ralph M. Steinman
Recombinant adenoviral vectors have promise for human gene therapy because of efficient transgene expression in nondividing primary cell types. Dendritic cells (DC) have potential as adjuvants for immune therapy, since they are specialized to capture antigens to form MHC‐peptide complexes, migrate to T cell areas in the lymph node, and activate T cells including CD4+ helpers and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). We show that several current chemical and physical transfection methods allow < 2 % of DC to express reporter genes but that recombinant adenoviruses, encoding the reporter genes green fluorescent protein and LacZ, efficiently transfect monocyte‐derived human DC. Immature DC, generated with IL‐4 and GM‐CSF, are transfected to 95 % efficiency, while mature DC show reduced transfection (50 %) and gene expression. Adenovirus‐transfected, immature DC exhibit several critical functions. The DC can differentiate in the presence of lipopolysaccharide or a monocyte‐conditioned medium to express the surface markers of mature, T cell stimulatory DC including CD25, CD83, and high levels of CD86 and HLA‐DR. Transfected DC can also secrete high levels of IL‐12 and are potent inducers of T cell growth. Transgene expression in DC is stable for at least 6 days in the presence of the DC survival factor, TRANCE. Therefore adenoviral infection does not perturb the maturation and function of DC. The efficiency of adenoviral‐mediated gene transfer prompts the evaluation of this vector in studies of DC biology, including the expression of antigens for active immune therapy.
Journal of Experimental Medicine | 2006
Christine Trumpfheller; Jennifer S. Finke; Carolina B. López; Thomas M. Moran; Bruno Moltedo; Helena Soares; Yaoxing Huang; Sarah J. Schlesinger; Chae Gyu Park; Michel C. Nussenzweig; Angela Granelli-Piperno; Ralph M. Steinman
Current human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine approaches emphasize prime boost strategies comprising multiple doses of DNA vaccine and recombinant viral vectors. We are developing a protein-based approach that directly harnesses principles for generating T cell immunity. Vaccine is delivered to maturing dendritic cells in lymphoid tissue by engineering protein antigen into an antibody to DEC-205, a receptor for antigen presentation. Here we characterize the CD4+ T cell immune response to HIV gag and compare efficacy with other vaccine strategies in a single dose. DEC-205–targeted HIV gag p24 or p41 induces stronger CD4+ T cell immunity relative to high doses of gag protein, HIV gag plasmid DNA, or recombinant adenovirus-gag. High frequencies of interferon (IFN)-γ– and interleukin 2–producing CD4+ T cells are elicited, including double cytokine-producing cells. In addition, the response is broad because the primed mice respond to an array of peptides in different major histocompatibility complex haplotypes. Long-lived T cell memory is observed. After subcutaneous vaccination, CD4+ and IFN-γ–dependent protection develops to a challenge with recombinant vaccinia-gag virus at a mucosal surface, the airway. We suggest that a DEC-targeted vaccine, in part because of an unusually strong and protective CD4+ T cell response, will improve vaccine efficacy as a stand-alone approach or with other modalities.
Journal of Immunology | 2005
Angela Granelli-Piperno; Alla Pritsker; Maggi Pack; Irina Shimeliovich; Jean-François Arrighi; Chae Gyu Park; Christine Trumpfheller; Vincent Piguet; Thomas M. Moran; Ralph M. Steinman
The C-type lectin dendritic cell-specific ICAM 3-grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN)/CD209 efficiently binds several pathogens, including HIV-1. DC-SIGN is expressed on monocyte-derived DCs in culture, and importantly, it is able to sequester HIV-1 within cells and facilitate transmission of virus to CD4+ T cells. To investigate DC-SIGN function, we have generated new mAbs. We report in this study that these and prior anti-DC-SIGN mAbs primarily label macrophages in the medullary sinuses of noninflamed human lymph node. In contrast, expression is not detected on most DCs in the T cell area, except for occasional cells. We also noted that IL-4 alone can induce expression of DC-SIGN in CD14+ monocytes and circulating blood DCs. However, blockade of DC-SIGN with Abs and DC-SIGN small interfering RNA did not result in a major reduction in the capacity of these DCs to transfer HIV to T cells, confirming significant DC-SIGN-independent mechanisms. The blocking approaches did reduce HIV-1 transmission by DC-SIGN-transfected cells by >90%. DC-SIGN blockade also did not reduce the ability of DCs to stimulate T cell proliferation in the MLR. These results indicate that DC-SIGN has the potential to contribute to macrophage function in normal human lymph node, and that DCs do not require DC-SIGN to transmit HIV or to initiate T cell responses.
Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology | 2003
Ralph M. Steinman; Angela Granelli-Piperno; Melissa Pope; Christine Trumpfheller; R. Ignatius; G. Arrode; P. Racz; K. Tenner-Racz
Dendritic cells (DCs) can influence HIV-1 and SIV pathogenesis and protective mechanisms at several levels. First, HIV-1 productively infects select populations of DCs in culture, particularly immature DCs derived from blood monocytes and skin (Langerhans cells). However, there exist only a few instances in which HIV-1- or SIV-infected DCs have been identified in vivo in tissue sections. Second, different types of DCs reliably sequester and transmit infectious HIV-1 and SIV in culture, setting up a productive infection in T cells interacting with the DCs. This stimulation of infection in T cells may explain the observation that CD4+ T lymphocytes are the principal cell type observed to be infected with HIV-1 in lymphoid tissues in vivo. DCs express a C-type lectin, DC-SIGN/CD209, that functions to bind HIV-1 (and other infectious agents) and transmit virus to T cells. When transfected into the THP-1 cell line, the cytosolic domain of DC-SIGN is needed for HIV-1 sequestration and transmission. However, DCs lacking DC-SIGN (Langerhans cells) or expressing very low levels of DC-SIGN (rhesus macaque monocyte-derived DCs) may use additional molecules to bind and transmit immunodeficiency viruses to T cells. Third, DCs are efficient antigen-presenting cells for HIV-1 and SIV antigens. Infection with several recombinant viral vectors as well as attenuated virus is followed by antigen presentation to CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. An intriguing pathway that is well developed in DCs is the exogenous pathway for nonreplicating viral antigens to be presented on class I MHC products. This should allow DCs to stimulate CD8+ T cells after uptake of antibody-coated HIV-1 and dying infected T cells. It has been proposed that DCs, in addition to expanding effector helper and killer T cells, induce tolerance through T cell deletion and suppressor T cell formation, but this must be evaluated directly. Fourth, DCs are likely to be valuable in improving vaccine design. Increasing DC uptake of a vaccine, as well as increasing their numbers and maturation, should enhance efficacy. However, DCs can also capture antigens from other cells that are initially transduced with a DNA vaccine or a recombinant viral vector. The interaction of HIV-1 and SIV with DCs is therefore intricate but pertinent to understanding how these viruses disrupt immune function and elicit immune responses.
Current Biology | 1999
Angela Granelli-Piperno; Victoria Finkel; Elena Delgado; Ralph M. Steinman
BACKGROUND To initiate immunity, dendritic cells (DCs) capture antigens or viruses at body surfaces, undergo maturation to express T-cell costimulatory molecules, and then migrate to lymphoid organs. DCs at body surfaces can capture human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1), but mature DCs do not support replication of the virus unless T cells are added. The initial site for HIV-1 replication remains unknown and it is unclear whether replication can take place in DCs or whether the virus must first be transmitted from DCs to T cells. RESULTS We generated mature DCs from monocyte precursors. Upon infection with HIV-1, reverse transcription was completed only when T cells were added. When the reverse transcriptase inhibitor azidothymidine was added to the DCs during exposure to HIV-1, the DCs remained fully infectious, as long as the drug was removed just before culturing the DCs with T cells. HIV-1 variants that were engineered to undergo only one cycle of replication were able to infect DCs and replicate once in these cells. When T cells were added, newly produced HIV-1 Gag protein was exclusively localized to the DCs. With wild-type virus, subsequent rounds of replication took place in T cells. Soluble CD40 ligand (CD40L) and CD40L-transfected fibroblasts stimulated HIV-1 replication in purified mature DCs. CONCLUSIONS Mature DCs provide a drug-resistant reservoir for HIV-1. This reservoir is activated within DCs by CD40L and upon interaction with T cells, and the virus then spreads rapidly to other T cells.
Immunobiology | 1998
Elena Delgado; Victoria Finkel; Marco Baggiolini; Charles R. Mackay; Ralph M. Steinman; Angela Granelli-Piperno
Immature dendritic cells (DCs) are highly motile, but after differentiation they stop migration. Chemokines are chemotactic cytokines that direct leukocyte trafficking, therefore we looked for the expression and function of chemokine receptors in immature and mature DCs. As a model, we used the human DCs that develop from CD14+ peripheral blood monocytes cultured with GM-CSF and IL-4. After 6-7 days in culture, these cells have the characteristics of immature DCs, but can be induced to mature further by inflammatory stimuli or by monocyte conditioned medium (MCM). Immature DCs express mRNA for CXCR4, CCR3 and CCR5. The receptors are expressed on the cell surface, as assessed with monoclonal antibodies, and are functional (with the exception of CCR3) as assessed by CA++ mobilization in response to specific chemokines. Further differentiation and maturation of DC in MCM causes a downregulation of expression and function of the beta-chemokine receptors, while CXCR4 still remains, and signals a calcium flux on mature DCs. We argue that the downregulation of beta-chemokine receptors during maturation helps to stop DC movement after T cells have been identified in lymphoid organs or at sites of delayed-type hypersensitivity.
Journal of Immunology | 2006
Angela Granelli-Piperno; Irina Shimeliovich; Maggi Pack; Christine Trumpfheller; Ralph M. Steinman
The infection of cultured monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) with HIV-1 involves CD4 and CCR5 receptors, while transmission to T cells is enhanced at least in part by the lectin DC-SIGN/CD209. In the present study, we studied BDCA-1+ myeloid DCs isolated directly from human blood. These cells express CD4 and low levels of CCR5 and CXCR4 coreceptors, but not DC-SIGN. The myeloid DCs replicate two R5 viruses, BaL and YU2, and transfer infection to activated T cells. The virus productively infects a small fraction of the blood DCs that fail to mature in culture, as indicated by the maturation markers CD83 and DC-LAMP/CD208, and the expression of high CD86 and MHC class II, in contrast to many noninfected DCs. A greater proportion of BDCA-1+ DCs are infected when the virus is pseudotyped with the vesicular stomatitis envelope VSV-G (5–15%), as compared with the R5 virus (0.3–3.5%), indicating that HIV-1 coreceptors may limit the susceptibility of DCs to become infected, or the endocytic route of viral entry used by HIV/vesicular stomatitis virus enhances infectivity. When infected and noninfected cells are purified by cell sorting, the former uniformly express HIV p24 gag and are virtually inactive as stimulators of the allogeneic MLR, in contrast to potent stimulation by noninfected DCs from the same cultures. These results point to two roles for a small fraction of blood DCs in HIV-1 pathogenesis: to support productive infection and to evade the direct induction of T cell-mediated immunity.
Journal of Immunology | 2000
Angela Granelli-Piperno; Lei Zhong; Patrick A. J. Haslett; Jeffrey M. Jacobson; Ralph M. Steinman
Nonreplicating vectors are being considered in HIV-1 vaccine design. However, nonreplicating viruses are typically weak immunogens, leading to efforts to target the vaccine to mature dendritic cells (DCs). We have studied a single-cycle form of HIV-1, prepared by pseudotyping envelope-defective HIV-1 plasmids with the envelope from vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G protein (VSV-G), to which most humans lack preexisting immunity. The nonreplicating, VSV/HIV-1 efficiently infected the immature stage of DC development, in this case represented by monocytes cultured with GM-CSF and IL-4. A majority of the cells reverse transcribed the HIV-1 RNA, and a minority expressed gag protein. The infected populations were further matured with CD40 ligand, leading to strong stimulation of autologous T cells from HIV-1-infected individuals, but not controls. Enriched CD8+ T cells from 12/12 donors released IFN-γ (50–300 enzyme-linked immunospots/200,000 T cells) and proliferated. Macrophages were much less efficient in expanding HIV-1-responsive T cells, and bulk mononuclear cells responded weakly to VSV/HIV-1. CD4+ T cells from at least half of the donors showed strong responses to VSV/HIV-1-infected DCs. Presentation to CD8+ T cells, but not to CD4+, was primarily through an endogenous pathway, because the responses were markedly reduced if envelope-defective virus particles or reverse transcriptase inhibitors were added. Therefore, nonreplicating vaccines can be targeted to immature DCs, which upon further maturation induce combined and robust CD4+ and CD8+ immunity.
Transplantation | 1988
Angela Granelli-Piperno; Michele Keane; Ralph M. Steinman
The inhibitory effects of CsA in cell‐mediated immunity are well known. There is controversy about whether CsA directly inhibits the function of accessory cells as well as T lymphocytes. We have used northern blotting to compare the effects of CsA on several human monocyte and T cell mRNAs, and we have performed “CsA‐pulsing” experiments to separately evaluate the effect of the drug on accessory and T cells during lymphocyte mitogenesis. CsA blocked the induction of several lymphokine mRNAs in stimulated T cells including IL‐2, IFN‐&ggr;, and IL‐4. CsF, an analog that is ten times less active than CsA as an immunosuppressant, was some ten times less active in inhibiting lymphokine gene expression in culture. CsA and CsF had little effect on the mRNA for the 55 KD low‐affinity IL‐2 receptor, but there was decreased expression of the TAC antigen. Exogenous IL‐2 reversed the CsA‐mediated suppression of cell proliferation and TAC expression. This indicates that the primary block with cyclosporines is at the level of lymphokines rather than lymphokine receptors. CsA did not reduce the levels of several monocyte mRNAs, however. These included c‐myc and IL‐1&agr;/&bgr; mRNAs, induced by PMA plus Con A, as well as HLA‐DR&agr; and &ggr;‐Ip10 mRNAs in monocytes treated with IFN‐&ggr;. When monocytes were pulsed with CsA, there was no reduction in their subsequent accessory function for anti‐CD3 and lectin responses. T lymphoblasts pulsed with CsA, however, did not proliferate or release growth factor. Likewise in the primary MLR between dendritic cells and T cells, dendritic cells were not impaired following pulsing with CsA, whereas treated T cells made 70% less IL‐2. The primary site of action of CsA therefore seems to be the production of lymphokines by T lymphocytes.