Angela J. Rosas
University of California, Davis
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Angela J. Rosas.
Clinical Pediatrics | 1999
Kumaravel Rajakumar; Martin E. Weisse; Angela J. Rosas; Erdogan Gunel; Lee A. Pyles; William A. Neal; Arpy Balian; Stanley Einzig
In a study to compare the clinical diagnostic skills of academic general pediatricians and academic pediatric cardiologists in the evaluation of heart murmurs, a total of 128 patients (aged 1 month to 18 years) newly referred to a university pediatric cardiology clinic were evaluated by one of three general pediatricians and one of four pediatric cardiologists. The murmurs were clinically classified as innocent, pathologic, or possibly pathologic. The classification was revised after the review of electrocardiogram (EKG) and chest radiograph (CXR), if indicated. The definitive diagnosis was ascertained by echocardiography (94 normal, 34 abnormal). The general pediatricians identified as many pathologic heart murmurs as the pediatric cardiologists (27/34 vs. 29/34), with no difference in sensitivity, 79% vs. 85% (p=0.53). The similarity in sensitivity could be because the general pediatricians were more cautious in the classification of heart murmurs and had classified more innocent heart murmurs as pathologic than the pediatric cardiologists (13/39 vs. 3/23), 41% vs. 13% (p=0.02). The pediatric cardiologists correctly identified more innocent murmurs than general pediatricians (52/94 vs.72/94), with a better specificity, 55% vs. 76% (p=0.001); however, the accuracy of prediction of innocence was similar for both groups (52/59 vs. 72/77), 88% vs. 93% (p=0.36). The revision of diagnosis with review of EKG and CXR was more often misleading than helpful for either group. Academic general pediatricians would identify most of the pathologic murmurs and are no more likely than an academic pediatric cardiologist to misclassify a pathologic heart murmur as innocent. Clin Pediatr. 1999;38:511-518
Child Abuse & Neglect | 2008
Sandra L. Wootton-Gorges; Rebecca Stein-Wexler; John Walton; Angela J. Rosas; Kevin P. Coulter; Kristen Rogers
PURPOSE Chest radiographs (CXR) are the standard method for evaluating rib fractures in abused infants. Computed tomography (CT) is a sensitive method to detect rib fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare CT and CXR in the evaluation of rib fractures in abused infants. METHODS This retrospective study included all 12 abused infants identified from 1999 to 2004 who had rib fractures and both CXR and CT (8 abdomen CTs, 4 chest CTs). CT exams had been performed for clinical indications, and were obtained within one day of the CXR. Studies were reviewed by two pediatric radiologists to determine the number, locations, and approximate ages of the rib fractures. A total of 225 ribs were completely (192) or partially (33) seen by CT, and the matched ribs on CXR were used for the analysis. RESULTS The mean patient age was 2.5 months (1.2-5.6), with seven females and five males. While 131 fractures were visualized by CT, only 79 were seen by CXR (p<.001). One patient had fractures only seen by CT. There were significantly (p<.05) more early subacute (24 vs. 4), subacute (47 vs. 26), and old fractures (4 vs. 0) seen by CT than by CXR. Anterior (42 vs. 11), anterolateral (21 vs. 12), posterolateral (9 vs. 3) and posterior (39 vs. 24) fractures were better seen by CT than by CXR (p<.01). Bilateral fractures were detected more often by CT (11) than by CXR (6). CONCLUSIONS While this study group is small, these findings suggest that CT is better than CXR in visualizing rib fractures in abused infants.
Clinical Pediatrics | 1997
Kathaleen Perkins; Norman D. Ferrari; Angela J. Rosas; Roxanne Bessette; Angela Williams; Hatim A. Omar
In order to impact morbidity and mortality of adolescents, the health care provider must not only determine the risk status of the teenager but also take time to provide appropriate guidance and interventions. We have developed the West Virginia University Adolescent Risk Score, which is more inclusive than similar screening techniques and requires an 3-minute interview. This format facilitates specific guidance, provides documentation of risk status, and is readily accessible on future visits. Our data provide the basis for planning and research regarding the effectiveness of interventions.
Pediatric Research | 1996
William J. Rodriguez; William C. Gruber; Jessie R. Groothuis; Angela J. Rosas; Martha L. Lepow; Val G. Hemming
RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS IMMUNE HUMAN GLOBULIN, (RSVIg) AS TREATMENT OF RSV LOWER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONS (LRI) IN CHILDREN. † 1085
Pediatric Research | 1996
Kumaravel Rajakumar; Martin E. Weisse; Angela J. Rosas; William A. Neal; Arpy Balian; Lee A. Pyles; Stanley Einzig
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLINICAL EVALUATION OF HEART MURMURS BY GENERAL PEDIATRICIANS AND PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGISTS. † 818
Pediatrics | 1997
William J. Rodriguez; William C. Gruber; R. C. Welliver; Jessie R. Groothuis; Eric A. F. Simões; H. C. Meissner; Val G. Hemming; C. B. Hall; Martha L. Lepow; Angela J. Rosas; C. Robertsen; Andrew Kramer
Pediatrics | 1997
William J. Rodriguez; William C. Gruber; Jessie R. Groothuis; Eric A. F. Simões; Angela J. Rosas; Martha L. Lepow; Andrew Kramer; Val G. Hemming
Pediatrics | 2003
Stephen C. Boos; Angela J. Rosas; Cathy Boyle; John McCann
Pediatrics | 2006
Hani Salehi-Had; James D. Brandt; Angela J. Rosas; Kristen Rogers
Pediatric Emergency Care | 2002
Jennifer W. Yang; Nathan Kuppermann; Angela J. Rosas