Ángeles García-Criado

Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for treatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patients.

Background: Current therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIV co-infected patients have a low success rate and are poorly tolerated. We have evaluated the efficacy and safety of interferon alfa-2b (IFN) + ribavirin (RBV) versus pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PEG-INF) + RBV. Methods: Randomized, single-centre, open-label clinical trial including patients with: detectable HCV-RNA, alanine aminotransferase > 1.5-fold upper limit of normal, abnormal liver histology, CD4 cell count > 250 × 106/l and HIV RNA < 10 000 copies/ml. Patients were assigned to INF (3 × 106 units three times/week) or PEG-IFN (100–150 μg/week) plus RBV (800–1200 mg/day). Duration of treatment was 48 weeks (only 24 weeks for HCV genotypes 2 or 3 and baseline HCV RNA < 800 000 IU/ml). The primary endpoint was a sustained virological response (SVR). Results: Ninety-five patients were randomized (43 INF + RBV, 52 PEG-INF + RBV), 68% males, 82% injecting drug users; 63% genotypes 1 or 4 and 36% genotypes 2 or 3; 62% fibrosis index grade ⩾2 and 30% bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis. SVR was significantly higher in the PEG-INF + RBV arm, 44% versus 21% (intent to treat; P = 0.017). Among patients with genotypes 1 or 4, SVR were 38% versus 7% (P = 0.007) and 53% versus 47% (P = 0.730) for genotypes 2 or 3. CD4 cell count but not its percentage dropped in both arms and HIV RNA viral load did not change from baseline. Side effects were very frequent in both arms leading to treatment discontinuation in 14 patients without statistical differences between arms (P = 0.565). Conclusion: PEG-INF + RBV was significantly more effective than INF + RBV for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV co-infected patients, mainly of genotype 1 or 4.

Intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis patients may display a vascular pattern similar to hepatocellular carcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

The aim of this study was to describe the imaging features by contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in cirrhosis patients. We registered the CEUS images of cirrhosis patients with histologically confirmed ICC. In all cases magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done to confirm the diagnosis and/or staging purposes. A total of 21 patients met all the criteria to be included in the study. The median nodule size was 32 mm. All nodules showed contrast enhancement at arterial phase; in 10 cases it was homogeneous and in 11 cases peripheral (rim‐like). All nodules displayed washout during the venous phases; it appeared during the first 60 seconds in 10 nodules, between 60‐120 seconds in five cases, and in six cases after 2 minutes. Ten nodules (five larger than 2 cm) displayed homogeneous contrast uptake followed by washout and they correspond to the specific pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria. However, none of these lesions displayed washout on MRI. Conclusion: CEUS should not be used as the sole imaging technique for conclusive hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and if the MRI does not display the diagnostic vascular pattern, a confirmatory biopsy is mandatory. Hepatology 2010;51:2020–2029

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System with MR Imaging: Evaluation in Nodules 20 mm or Smaller Detected in Cirrhosis at Screening US

PURPOSE To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller detected during ultrasonographic (US) surveillance in patients with cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between November 2003 and January 2010, patients with cirrhosis with a newly US-detected solitary hepatic nodule 20 mm or smaller were included in this institutional ethics committee-approved study. All patients provided written informed consent before the study; the need to obtain consent for reanalysis of the data was waived. Patients underwent MR imaging and fine-needle biopsy (the reference standard). Nodules without pathologic confirmation were followed up with MR imaging every 6 months. A LI-RADS category was retrospectively assigned to nodules seen at MR imaging. The diagnostic accuracy for each LI-RADS category was described by sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Final diagnoses of 133 nodules in 159 patients were as follows: 102 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), three intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICCs), one neuroendocrine metastasis, and 27 benign lesions (median MR imaging follow-up, 95 months). None (0%) of five LI-RADS category 1 lesions, three (25%) of 12 category 2 lesions, 29 (69%) of 42 category 3 lesions, 24 (96%) of 25 category 4 lesions, and 44 (98%) of 45 category 5 lesions were HCCs. One category 3 lesion was ICC, one category 5 lesion was a neuroendocrine metastasis, and two (50%) of four lesions categorized as other malignancies were HCCs. In patients with nodules detected at surveillance US, LI-RADS category 4 criteria were as effective as category 5 criteria for HCC diagnosis. Combining both categories would improve sensitivity without impairing specificity or positive or negative predictive value for HCC diagnosis (42.3%, 98.2%, 97.8%, and 47.4% vs 65.4%, 96.4%, 97.1%, and 59.6%, respectively). CONCLUSION In patients with cirrhosis with US-detected nodules 20 mm or smaller, both LI-RADS category 4 and category 5 have high specificity for HCC. In addition, a relevant proportion of lesions categorized as LI-RADS category 2 or 3 or as other malignancies were HCCs. Thus, active diagnostic work-up, including biopsy to allow prompt treatment, is recommended in such patients. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Doppler Ultrasound Findings in the Hepatic Artery Shortly After Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to describe the Doppler waveform findings in the hepatic artery in the early posttransplantation period, both in the absence and presence of arterial complications. CONCLUSION The presence of transient high-resistance Doppler waveforms in normal hepatic arteries is a common finding after grafting. Hepatic artery thrombosis and stenosis, and arterial steal syndromes can be diagnosed by Doppler in the early liver transplantation period.

Early detection of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation by Doppler ultrasonography: prognostic implications.

We assessed the usefulness of routine Doppler ultrasonography for early detection of hepatic artery thrombosis after orthotopic liver transplantation and repercussions in patient prognosis. Seventeen confirmed cases of early hepatic artery thrombosis initially diagnosed by Doppler ultrasonography (10 of them before clinical indication) were reviewed. All patients underwent Doppler ultrasonographic studies in the first 3 days after orthotopic liver transplantation. Twelve cases of hepatic artery thrombosis (70.6%) were detected by this early Doppler ultrasonography. All 10 unsuspected cases of hepatic artery thrombosis and 5 of the 7 cases diagnosed after clinical indication were treated by revascularization. Grafts were salvaged in 80% of asymptomatic patients and in 42.8% of symptomatic patients. Furthermore, biliary complications were less serious in the first group. In conclusion, Doppler ultrasonography performed routinely in the first 3 days after orthotopic liver transplantation may permit early detection of hepatic artery thrombosis, even before clinical indications. This allows hepatic artery repermeabilization before liver function damage, improving graft rescue and patient prognosis.

Idiopathic portal hypertension: Natural history and long-term outcome

Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) is a rare cause of intrahepatic portal hypertension. Data on natural history and prognosis of IPH are limited. We sought to describe the complications and long‐tem outcome of IPH by retrospectively studying 69 biopsy‐proven cases of IPH. Mean duration of follow‐up was 6.7 ± 4.6 years. All patients had evidence of portal hypertension (PH) at diagnosis, and 42% were symptomatic. Variceal bleeding (VB) was the most common manifestation. In those without bleeding at diagnosis, 74% had varices at first endoscopy. In those with large varices, the 1‐year probability of first bleeding despite primary prophylaxis was 9%. The 1‐year probability of rebleeding was 22%. Ascites and hepatic encephalopathy was documented in 26% and 7% of patients, respectively, at least once during the clinical course. The 1‐year probability of developing portal vein thrombosis (PVT) was 9%, and 53% of patients receiving anticoagulation achieved recanalization. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and VB at diagnosis were the independent predictors of PVT. Seven patients died (6 as a result of an IPH‐related cause) and 2 were transplanted. Probability of liver transplantation–free survival was 82% at 10 years. Presence of a severe associated disorder and ascites as a presenting symptom were associated with poor survival. Conclusion: Variceal bleeding is a major complication of IPH. Using, in IPH patients, the same management approach for PH as in cirrhosis is safe and maintains a low incidence of first bleeding and rebleeding in IPH patients. PVT is a frequent complication, particularly in those with HIV infection. Despite several complications, overall survival of patients with IPH is considerably good. (Hepatology 2014;59:2276–2285)

Value of Doppler Sonography for Predicting Clinical Outcome After Renal Artery Revascularization in Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the usefulness of Doppler sonography for predicting blood pressure and renal function improvement after percutaneous renal angioplasty in patients with unilateral atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis.

Radiology in liver transplantation

Imaging studies are becoming essential in the management of orthotopic liver transplantation (LT). They have a very important role in the preoperative evaluation and selection of suitable candidates. At the same time, they are essential in the early detection of postoperative complications, the recognition of which allows the prompt institution of appropriate therapeutic measures. Timely recognition of complications improves the success of LT; furthermore, some complications can be treated with interventional radiologic procedures, avoiding additional surgery. This article reviews the current application of diagnostic and interventional imaging in liver transplantation, both for cadaveric and living donor transplants.

Imaging in clinical decision-making for portal vein thrombosis

Thrombosis of the portal venous system is a frequent and potentially life-threatening condition that can take place in a number of different clinical settings including liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, other solid tumours, abdominal septic foci, acute pancreatitis, haematological malignancies and congenital or acquired prothrombotic disorders. Clinical decision-making in patients with thrombosis of the portal venous system is a particularly complex process owing to the heterogeneity of the population affected by this condition and the lack of high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials for the use of anticoagulation therapy in these patients. This Review discusses the available data regarding how imaging can provide assistance to physicians involved in this decision-making process in different clinical settings. A flowchart illustrating how to use imaging in this setting, based on current evidence and on the experience of the Vascular Liver Diseases Group of the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona, is also presented.

Nontumoral portal vein thrombosis in patients awaiting liver transplantation.

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) occurs in approximately 2%‐26% of the patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT) and is no longer an absolute contraindication for LT. Nearly half of PVT cases are accidentally found during the LT procedure. The most important risk factor for PVT development in cirrhosis may be the severity of liver disease and reduced portal blood flow. Whether other inherited or acquired coagulation disorders also play a role is not yet clear. The development of PVT may have no effect on the liver disease progression, especially when it is nonocclusive. PVT may not increase the risk of wait‐list mortality, but it is a risk factor for poor early post‐LT mortality. Anticoagulation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are 2 major treatment strategies for patients with PVT on the waiting list. The complete recanalization rate after anticoagulation is approximately 40%. The role of TIPS to maintain PV patency for LT as the primary indication has been reported, but the safety and efficacy should be further evaluated. PVT extension and degree may determine the surgical technique to be used during LT. If a “conventional” end‐to‐end portal anastomotic technique is used, there is not a major impact on post‐LT survival. Post‐LT PVT can significantly reduce both graft and patient survival after LT and can preclude future options for re‐LT. Liver Transpl 22:352‐365, 2016.