Angeline M. Carlson

Home use of rectal diazepam for cluster and prolonged seizures: efficacy, adverse reactions, quality of life, and cost analysis

From 1982 through 1987, 128 families, who were instructed in the use of rectally administered diazepam (R-DZP) for the treatment of severe epileptic seizures, were surveyed. Sixty-seven families returned questionnaires and met inclusion/exclusion criteria; the results were used to analyze the medical, psychosocial, and economic impact of this program during the first year following instruction. Twenty-six families did not use R-DZP, primarily because of patient improvement. Among families using R-DZP, a total of 428 doses were administered to 41 children. R-DZP was effective in controlling seizures in 85% of patients. Adverse reactions usually were mild, consisting of drowsiness and/or behavioral changes. Compared to the year prior to instruction, emergency room visits decreased in both R-DZP-treated and -nontreated children; however, cost-savings were greater for the R-DZP group (

Optimal Diabetes Care Outcomes Following Face-to-Face Medication Therapy Management Services

1,039.00 vs

Validating pharmaceutical product claims: questions a formulary committee should ask.

420.00 per patient per year). Improvements in quality of life associated with the availability of R-DZP were observed by 58% of users and 27% of nonusers which included improved management of their childrens seizures, increased flexibility in family activities, and greater peace of mind. R-DZP appears to be a practical method in the effective treatment of severe seizures at home.

Physicians, Guidelines, and Cognitive Tasks

Pharmacists play an integral role in influencing resolution of drug-related problems. This study examines the relationship between a pharmacist-led and delivered medication therapy management (MTM) program and achievement of Optimal Diabetes Care benchmarks. Data within Fairview Pharmacy Services were used to identify a group of patients with diabetes who received MTM services during a 2007 demonstration project (n=121) and a control group who were invited to receive MTM services but opted out (n=103). Rates of achieving optimal diabetes clinical management for both groups were compared using the D5 diabetes measure for years 2006, 2007, and 2008. The D5 components are: glycosolated hemoglobin (HbA1c<7%); low-density lipoprotein (<100 mg/dl); blood pressure (<130/80 mmHg); tobacco free; and daily aspirin use. Multivariate difference-in-differences (DID) estimation was used to determine the impact of 1 year of MTM services on each care component. Patients who opted in for MTM had higher Charlson scores, more complex medication regimens, and a higher percentage of diabetes with complications (P<0.05). In 2007, the percentage of diabetes patients optimally managed was significantly higher for MTM patients compared to 2006 values (21.49% vs. 45.45%, P<0.01). Nonlinear DID models showed that MTM patients were more likely to meet the HbA1c criterion in 2007 (odds ratio: 2.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-5.85, P=0.038). Linear DID models for HbA1c showed a mean reduction of 0.54% (95% CI: 0.091%-0.98%, P=0.018) for MTM patients. An MTM program contributed to improved optimal diabetes management in a population of patients with complex diabetes clinical profiles.

Comprehensive Medication Management and Medication Adherence for Chronic Conditions

Abstract Claims, justifying the acceptance and placement of new products on health system formularies, are all too often presented in terms that are either unverifiable or only verifiable in a timeframe that is of no practical benefit to formulary committees. One solution is for formulary committees to request that (i) all predictive claims made should be capable of empirical testing and (ii) manufacturers in making submissions should be asked to submit a protocol that details how their claims are to be assessed. Evaluation of claims can provide not only a significant input to ongoing disease area and therapeutic reviews, but can also provide a needed link to comparative effectiveness research and value-based healthcare. This paper presents a set of protocol standards (PROST) together will questions that should be addressed in a protocol review.

Patient Characteristics Predicting the Frequency of Medication Therapy Management Visits for Patients With Diabetes

Using a case study analysis of the Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3): Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Asthma, this article compares the workflows and knowledge requirements of primary care practice to the structure and content of a well-respected set of clinical guidelines. The authors show that there are discrepancies between physician workflow and the structure of the EPR-3, as well as between physicians’ knowledge requirements and the content of the EPR-3. The analysis suggests that closing the gap between medical knowledge and practice will require alternative ways to represent guidelines’ knowledge and recommendations.

Enhancing guideline-based asthma care processes through a multi-state, multi-center quality improvement program

BACKGROUND The beneficial clinical effects of medication adherence have been consistently reported across most chronic diseases. Medication nonadherence carries significant economic and clinical burden. Medication therapy management (MTM) services aim to optimize pharmacotherapy and improve medication adherence. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of exposure to face-to-face comprehensive medication management (CMM) services on medication adherence across 4 classes of chronic disease medications: oral diabetes medications, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and beta-blockers. METHODS Pharmacy claims of continuously enrolled employees of a large Midwest integrated health system were retrieved for the period 2007-2011. Retrospective analysis was used to compare medication adherence measured using proportion of days covered (PDC) in employees who received CMM with employees who did not (control group). The pharmacy MTM program used the Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative standard of care. The CMM groups index date was the date of the first CMM visit; the non-CMM groups index date was randomly chosen from all therapeutic class-specific prescription claims dates. For each therapeutic class, patients with at least 1 prescription fill in both the measurement period (365 days post-index) and the baseline period (365 days pre-index) were included. The primary outcome measure was the PDC. RESULTS The CMM group had consistently higher and statistically significant PDC levels across all the therapeutic classes in the measurement period (P < 0.05) when looking at the unadjusted comparison. In the multivariate models, CMM exposure was associated with higher PDC; the difference between groups was statistically significant in all therapeutic classes except for oral diabetes medications (oral diabetes medications: 0.0403, 95% confidence limits [CL] = -0.0050, 0.0850; statins: 0.0769, 95% CL = 0.0480, 0.1050; ACEIs/ARBs: 0.1083; 95% CL = 0.0710, 0.1450; and beta-blockers: 0.0484; 95% CL = 0.0060, 0.0910). Logistic regression showed that the CMM group had an increased probability of meeting the 80% PDC cut-point for statins (3.36, 95% CL = 0.048, 0.105); ACEIs/ARBs (3.57, 95% CL = 2.35, 5.42); and beta-blockers (2.56, 95% CL = 1.57, 4.18). CONCLUSIONS Exposure to face-to-face CMM services resulted in improvement of medication adherence. CMM is a powerful practice model that should be encouraged by insurers and health plan administrators to increase rates of medication adherence.

Population-Based Assessment of Asthma Symptom Burden in Children

BACKGROUND Patient characteristics associated with a higher exposure to medication therapy management (MTM) and the relationship between frequency of MTM visits and meeting clinically defined goals of therapy have not been documented. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to evaluate factors predicting frequency of MTM visits for patients with diabetes and the impact of these visits on diabetes clinical outcomes. METHODS All patients with diabetes participating in a 2007 MTM demonstration project (N = 121) were included in the analysis. A negative binomial regression controlling for age, sex, presence of diabetes complications, taking insulin, Charlson score Index, and hypertension and cholesterol medication regimen composition was used to assess predictors of the number of MTM visits. Optimal diabetes management differences between the 2 groups defined according to median number of MTM visits (low frequency, ≤4; high frequency, >4) was compared by using Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney and χ(2) tests. RESULTS Having diabetes complications (relative risk = 2.83 [95% CI, 1.3-6.17]; P = 0.0088) and taking insulin (relative risk = 1.43 [95% CI, 1.12-1.83]; P = 0.0038) were associated with a higher number of MTM visits. At baseline, the high-frequency group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with insulin therapy (P < 0.01), higher proportion with diabetes complications (P = 0.07), and higher mean Charlson score (P = 0.08). The rate of optimal diabetes care was significantly lower in the high-frequency group before MTM (P = 0.02) but not statistically different from the low-frequency group during and 1 year after the demonstration project. CONCLUSIONS Patients with diabetes complications and using regimens that include insulin received more frequent MTM visits. MTM services delivered to a diabetes population with more complex disease or taking insulin have a positive impact on optimal diabetes care.

Analysis of health care cost data: a cautionary tale.

Abstract Objective: This study investigated the effectiveness of Enhancing Care for Patients with Asthma (ECPA)—a collaborative quality improvement program implemented in 65 community health centers that serve asthma patients in four states—on clinic‐based asthma performance measures consistent with national guidelines. Methods: This study utilized a pretest‐posttest quasi‐experimental design. Six clinic‐based performance measures of each center were collected from a retrospective chart review at time points: before the ECPA implementation; at the end of the 12‐month long ECPA program; and 6 months after program completion. The effectiveness of the ECPA was assessed using generalized linear mixed models with a Poisson distribution and log link by evaluating the change in each measure from baseline to program completion, from baseline to 6‐month post‐program completion and from program completion to 6‐month post‐program completion. Results: The ECPA implementation was positively associated with improvement in all measures from baseline to program completion: documentation of asthma severity (rate ratio (RR) 1.314; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.206, 1.432); Asthma Control Test (RR 3.625; 95% CI 3.185, 4.124); pulmonary function testing (RR 1.771; 95% CI 1.527, 2.054), asthma education (RR 2.246; 95% CI 2.018, 2.501), asthma action plan (RR 2.335; 95% CI 2.070, 2.634) and controller medication (RR 1.961; 95% CI 1.504,2.556). Improvement was sustained for all six measures at the 6‐month post‐program completion time point. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the favorable effect of the ECPA program on evidence‐based asthma quality measures. This program could be considered a model worth replication on a broader scale.Objective: This study investigated the effectiveness of Enhancing Care for Patients with Asthma (ECPA)—a collaborative quality improvement program implemented in 65 community health centers that se...