Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Angelo Pompucci is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Angelo Pompucci.


Journal of Neurotrauma | 2010

Post-Traumatic Hydrocephalus after Decompressive Craniectomy: An Underestimated Risk Factor

Pasquale De Bonis; Angelo Pompucci; Annunziato Mangiola; Luigi Rigante; Carmelo Anile

The incidence of post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) has been reported to be 0.7-51.4%, and we have frequently observed the development of PTH in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy (DC). For this reason we performed a retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients undergoing DC after traumatic brain injury (TBI). From January 2006 to December 2009, 41 patients underwent DC after closed head injury. Study outcomes focused specifically on the development of hydrocephalus after DC. Variables described by other authors to be associated with PTH were studied, including advanced age, the timing of cranioplasty, higher score on the Fisher grading system, low post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) infection. We also analyzed the influence of the area of craniotomy and the distance of craniotomy from the midline. Logistic regression was used with hydrocephalus as the primary outcome measure. Of the nine patients who developed hydrocephalus, eight patients (89%) had undergone craniotomy with the superior limit <25 mm from the midline. This association was statistically significant (p = 0.01 - Fishers exact test). Logistic regression analysis showed that the only factor independently associated with the development of hydrocephalus was the distance from the midline. Patients with craniotomy whose superior limit was <25 mm from the midline had a markedly increased risk of developing hydrocephalus (OR = 17). Craniectomy with a superior limit too close to the midline can predispose patients undergoing DC to the development of hydrocephalus. We therefore suggest performing wide DCs with the superior limit >25 mm from the midline.


Journal of Neurotrauma | 2012

Cranial repair: how complicated is filling a "hole"?

Pasquale De Bonis; Paolo Frassanito; Annunziato Mangiola; Carlotta Ginevra Nucci; Carmelo Anile; Angelo Pompucci

In general, cranioplasty is viewed as a straightforward surgical procedure, and for many years the complications associated with the procedure have been underestimated. We reviewed our 5-year experience consisting of 218 cranioplasties. Study outcomes focused specifically on the occurrence of complications after cranioplasty. Autologous bone-assisted and prosthetic cranioplasties were considered. Variables described by other authors to be associated with complications were studied, including history of previous cranioplasty, wider craniectomy size, bifrontal craniectomy, and delayed cranioplasty. We also analyzed the influence of material used for craniectomy on the occurrence of complications. The overall complication rate was 19.7%. Nineteen cases of infection (8.7%), 5 cases of postoperative wound dehiscence (2.3%), 6 cases of epidural hemorrhage (2.8%), and 13 cases of cranioplasty dislocation (5.9%) were observed. Bifrontal cranioplasties were more frequently associated with complications (p=0.01; Fishers exact test) and infection (p<0.0001; Fishers exact test). Postoperative wound dehiscence was more frequently observed with hand-made or custom-made cranioplasties compared with autologous cranioplasties (p=0.02). Early cranioplasty (<3 months from craniectomy) was significantly associated with cranioplasty dislocation (p=0.03). Logistical regression analysis showed that the only factor independently associated with complication was the site of cranioplasty (p=0.01). In particular, patients with a bifrontal cranioplasty had a 2-fold increased risk of complication (CI 95 1.1-3.6, p=0.017) and a 2.5-fold increased risk of developing infection (CI 95 1.3-4.9, p=0.009) compared with hemispheric/bihemispheric cranioplasty. Our analysis confirms that cranioplasty is burdened by a significant complication rate. In this context, bifrontal cranioplasty is related to a higher risk of complication and, in particular, infection.


Acta Neurochirurgica | 2012

Safety and efficacy of Gliadel wafers for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma

Pasquale De Bonis; Carmelo Anile; Angelo Pompucci; Alba Fiorentino; M. Balducci; S. Chiesa; Giulio Maira; Annunziato Mangiola

BackgroundCombining Gliadel wafers and radiochemotherapy with TMZ may carry the risk of increased adverse events (AE). We analyzed the efficacy and safety in patients with glioblastoma who underwent multimodal treatment with implantation of Gliadel wafers.MethodsOne hundred sixty-five consecutive patients with newly diagnosed (77 patients) or recurrent (88 patients) glioblastoma were studied. Forty-seven patients underwent surgery + Gliadel. The impact of age (≥65 vs. <65), resection extent (gross total vs. partial), use of Gliadel and adjuvant treatment (TMZ vs. other schemes/no adjuvant therapy) on overall survival (OS, for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma) and on recurrence-survival (for patients with recurrent glioblastoma) was analyzed with Cox regression. The impact of age, history (newly diagnosed vs. recurrent glioblastoma), number of Gliadel wafers implanted (0 vs. <8 vs. 8), resection extent (gross-total vs. partial) and adjuvant treatment (TMZ vs. other schemes/no adjuvant therapy) on the occurrence of AE and on the occurrence of implantation site-related AE (ISAE) was analyzed with the logistic regression model. Significance was set at p < 0.05.ResultsMultivariate analysis showed the only factor associated with longer survival, both for newly diagnosed and for recurrent GBM, was resection extent. Both patients with a higher number of wafers implanted and patients with recurrent tumors were significantly at risk for AE and ISAE. Patients with eight Gliadel wafers implanted had a 3-fold increased risk of AE and a 5.6-fold increased risk of ISAE, and patients with recurrent tumor had a 2.8-fold increased risk of AE and a 9.3-fold increased risk of ISAE.ConclusionsAdding Gliadel to standard treatment did not significantly improve the outcome. The toxicity after Gliadel use was significantly higher, both for patients with newly diagnosed and patients with recurrent glioblastoma.


Journal of Neuro-oncology | 2005

Rosette-forming glioneuronal tumour of the fourth ventricle: report of a case with clinical and surgical implications

Alessio Albanese; Annunziato Mangiola; Angelo Pompucci; Giovanni Sabatino; Marco Gessi; Libero Lauriola; Carmelo Anile

A 32-year-old woman presented with a 2-month history of episodic headache, cervical pain and neck rigidity. Neurological examination showed a moderate dysmetria. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a mass occupying the fourth ventricle. The patient underwent median sub-occipital craniotomy with total excision of the lesion well demarcated except for a portion infiltrating the right side of the IV ventricle wall. In the post-operative course the patient developed VI and VII right cranial nerves palsy and worsening of dysmetria. MRI confirmed the complete removal of the tumour without signs of recurrence. The pathological diagnosis was rosette forming glio-neuronal tumour (RGNT). At present this is the 13th RGNT reported in literature. These lesions are considered low-grade tumours (WHO I). Nevertheless, the case here reported, like in 6 of the 12 cases in literature, developed disabling post-operative deficits. To establish the therapeutic choice long-term follow-up studies are needed.


Acta Neurochirurgica | 1996

Callosotomy for severe epilepsies with generalized seizures: Outcome and prognostic factors

Gianfranco Rossi; Gabriella Colicchio; Enrico Marchese; Angelo Pompucci

SummaryThe purpose of the present study was to verify the effect of callosotomy on generalized seizures, to check the effect on other seizure types and to search for possible prognostic factors.Twenty patients with a minimum follow-up of one year (mean 3.5 years) were available for our analysis. In six of them the callosotomy was performed in two stages (total: 26 surgical procedures). Age ranged from 14 to 40 years (mean 23 years). Different aetiologies were known in 15 patients. Duration of epilepsy ranged from 6 to 23 years (mean 15 years). The frequency of seizures ranged between 19 and 750 per month.The most significant effect of surgery was the complete suppression of the generalized seizures associated with falling in 9/19 and their reduction of more than 80% in 7/19 patients (total “good results”: 16/19). The generalized tonic-clonic seizures were less affected. The surgical effect on the partial seizures was very variable, the partial simple seizures being the most affected. A positive statistical association with the outcome of the generalized seizures with fall was found for a presurgical seizure frequency below 90 per month, a prevalent bilateral EEG epileptic activity and, to a less extent, the absence of cerebral structural lesions. The role of age, aetiology, duration of the disease, single or more seizure types, mental impairment and extent of callosotomy remains uncertain. Disconnection syndrome does not appear if the splenium is spared.The present findings confirm that the main indication for callosotomy is the occurrence of generalized seizures with fall. Surgery can be initially limited to the anterior 2/3 of the corpus callosum; further posterior section of the corpus, excluding the splenium, should be regarded as a second step, when necessary.


Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics | 2010

Glioblastoma therapy: going beyond Hercules Columns

Annunziato Mangiola; Carmelo Anile; Angelo Pompucci; Gennaro Capone; Luigi Rigante; Pasquale De Bonis

Glioblastoma multiforme is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. Median survival from the time of diagnosis is 14 months, with less than 5% of patients surviving 5 years. Despite advances in deciphering the complex biology of these tumors, the overall prognosis has only slightly improved in the past three decades. The clinical failure of many therapeutic approaches can be explained by the following considerations: the location of tumors within the brain presents a special set of challenges, including ability of drugs to cross the BBB; cancer cells have unstable genetic structures, very susceptible to mutations; cancer cells have an amalgam of different genetic defects that respond in different ways to any given treatment agent; and, infiltrating and apparently normal but ‘activated’ cells are evident in the brain surrounding the main tumor. In this way, the biologic phenomena of the ‘normal brain’ adjacent to the enhanced tumor could allow us to understand the first steps of cancerogenesis and, consequently, to interfere with the pathways responsible for tumor growth and recurrence.


PLOS ONE | 2013

Antiplatelet/Anticoagulant Agents and Chronic Subdural Hematoma in the Elderly

Pasquale De Bonis; Gianluca Trevisi; Chiara De Waure; Antonella Sferrazza; Massimo Volpe; Angelo Pompucci; Carmelo Anile; Annunziato Mangiola

Background and Purpose In the last decade there has been an increasing use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents in the elderly. The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between exposure to anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy and chronic subdural haematoma-CSDH. Methods Single institution case-control study involving 138786 patients older than 60 years who visited our academic tertiary care Emergency Department from January 1st 2001 to December 31st 2010. 345 patients with CSDH (cases) were identified by review of ICD-9 codes 432.1 and 852.2x. Case and controls were matched with a 1∶3 ratio for gender, age (±5 years), year of admission and recent trauma. A conditional logistic model was built. A stratified analysis was performed with respect to the presence (842 patients) or absence (536 patients) of recent trauma. Results There were 345 cases and 1035 controls. Both anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents were associated with an increased risk of CSDH with an OR of 2.46 (CI 95% 1.66–3.64) and 1.42 (CI 95% 1.07–1.89), respectively. OR was 2.70 (CI 95% 1.75–4.15), 1.90 (CI 95% 1.13–3.20), and 1.37(CI 95% 0.99–1.90) for patients receiving oral anticoagulants, ADP-antagonists, or Cox-inhibitors, respectively. History of recent trauma was an effect modifier of the association between anticoagulants and CSDH, with an OR 1.71 (CI 95% 0.99–2.96) for patients with history of trauma and 4.30 (CI 95% 2.23–8.32) for patients without history of trauma. Conclusions Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy have a significant association with an increased risk of CSDH. This association, for patients under anticoagulant therapy, appears even stronger in those patients who develop a CSDH in the absence of a recent trauma.


Journal of Neurotrauma | 2011

Decompressive craniectomy for elderly patients with traumatic brain injury: it's probably not worth the while

Pasquale De Bonis; Angelo Pompucci; Annunziato Mangiola; Giovanna Paternoster; Rossano Festa; Carlotta Ginevra Nucci; Riccardo Maviglia; Massimo Antonelli; Carmelo Anile

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) has been regarded as an ultima ratio measure in the treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension after brain injury. Most discussion about its benefits is based on studies performed in patients who are <65 years of age. The aim of this study was to identify patients aged ≥66 years who underwent DC after traumatic brain injury (TBI), in order to assess patient outcome and to correlate the values of potential predictors of survival on prognosis. From January 2002 to December 2009, 44 patients aged ≥66 underwent DC (follow-up, 12-102 months). Potential predictors of outcome were analyzed, including age, post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, presence of mass lesion, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and timing of surgical decompression. Mortality was 48% at discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU), 57% at hospital discharge, and 77% at 1-year follow-up and at last follow-up. A bad outcome Glasgow Outcome Scale Dead-Vegetative State-Severely Disabled (GOS D-VS-SD) was observed in 36/44 patients both at hospital discharge and at 1-year follow-up. Mean SAPS II was 45.2 for patients who survived and 57.3 for patients who had died (p=0.0022). Patients who survived had a higher mean post-resuscitation GCS score (p=0.02). Logistical regression analysis indicated post-resuscitation GCS score as the only independent predictive factor for outcome. None of the 22 patients with a post-resuscitation GCS score of 3-5 had a good outcome, 2/10 (20%) patients with a post-resuscitation GCS score of 6-8 and 6/12 patients (50%) with a post-resuscitation GCS score ≥9 had a good outcome.


Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery | 2013

The impact of repeated surgery and adjuvant therapy on survival for patients with recurrent glioblastoma

Pasquale De Bonis; Alba Fiorentino; Carmelo Anile; M. Balducci; Angelo Pompucci; S. Chiesa; Gigliola Sica; Gina Lama; Giulio Maira; Annunziato Mangiola

OBJECTIVE Treatment of glioblastoma recurrence can have a palliative aim, after considering risks and potential benefits. The aim of this study is to verify the impact of surgery and of palliative adjuvant treatments on survival after recurrence. METHODS From January 2002 to June 2008, we treated 76 consecutive patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Treatment was: 1-surgery alone--17 patients; 2-adjuvant-therapy alone--24 patients; 3-surgery and adjuvant therapy--16 patients; no treatment--19 patients. The impact on median overall-survival (OS-time between recurrence and death/last follow-up) of age, Karnofsky performance scale (KPS), resection extent and adjuvant treatment scheme (Temozolomide alone vs low-dose fractionated radiotherapy vs others) was determined. Survival curves were obtained through the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional-hazards was used for multivariate analyses. Significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS Median OS was 7 months. At univariate analysis, patients with a KPS≥70 had a longer OS (9 months vs 5 months--p<0.0001). OS was 6 months for patients treated with surgery alone, 5 months for patients that received no treatment, 8 months for patients treated with chemotherapy alone, 14 months for patients treated with surgery and adjuvant therapy--p=0.01. Patients with a KPS<70 were significantly at risk for death - HR 2.8 - p=0.001. Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences between patients receiving gross total or partial tumor resection and among patients receiving different adjuvant therapy schemes. Major surgical morbidity at tumor recurrence occurred in 16 out of 33 patients (48%). CONCLUSION It is fundamental, before deciding to operate patients for recurrence, to carefully consider the impact of surgical morbidity on outcome.


Strahlentherapie Und Onkologie | 2011

Whole-brain radiotherapy combined with surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with brain oligometastases: Long-term analysis

G.R. D'Agostino; Rosa Autorino; Angelo Pompucci; Maria De Santis; S. Manfrida; Giuseppe Di Lella; Giovanna Mantini; V. Frascino; S. Chiesa; Alessio Albanese; N. Dinapoli; L. Azario; Alba Fiorentino; Vincenzo Valentini; Carmelo Anile; M. Balducci

Objective:To verify whether the treatment of brain oligometastases with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plus stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or surgical resection results in different outcomes.Methods:Files of patients affected by brain metastases submitted to surgical resection followed by WBRT (group A) or WBRT + SRT (group B) were retrospectively selected for this study. The two treatment groups were matched for the following potential prognostic factors: WBRT schedule, age, gender, performance status, tumor type, number of brain metastases, extra-cerebral metastases, and recursive partitioning analysis class (RPA). The outcomes of patients in both groups were evaluated in terms of toxicity, local control, and overall survival.Results:Total of 97 patients were selected (56 male; 42 female) who were respectively submitted to surgical resection followed by WBRT (group A, n = 50 patients) or WBRT + SRT (Group B, n = 47 patients). Median follow-up was 95 months (range, 8–171 months). The 1-year local control rates were 46.0% and 69.0% respectively. No significant difference in local tumor control was observed between group A and B (p = 0.10). Median overall survival was 15 and 19 months in group A and B, respectively. One-year survival was 56.0% and 62%, respectively. No difference was observed in the two groups (p = 0.40).Conclusion:Surgery remains the main therapeutic approach in symptomatic patients; nevertheless, our data support the use of WBRT plus SRT in one or two brain metastases smaller than 3 cm.Zielsetzung:Zu untersuchen, ob die Behandlung von Oligohirnmetastasen mit Ganzhirnbestrahlung (whole-brain radiotherapy, WBRT) plus stereotaktischer Radiotherapie (SRT) oder chirurgischer Resektion unterschiedliche Ergebnisse bringt.Methoden:Krankenakten von Patienten mit operativ entfernten Hirnmetastasen und anschließender WBRT (Gruppe A) oder WBRT + SRT (Gruppe B) wurden retrospektiv für diese Studie ausgewählt. Die zwei Beghandlungsarme wurden für folgende prognostische Parameter gematcht: WBRT-Schema. Alter, Geschlecht, Allgemeinzustand, Art des Primärtumors, Anzahl der Hirnmetastasen, extrazerebrale Metastasen, Recursive-Partioning-Analysis-(RPA-)Klasse. Das Behandlungsergebnis für beide Patientengruppen wurde im Hinblick auf Toxizität, lokale Tumorkontrolle und Gesamtüberleben bewertet.Ergebnisse:Insgesamt wurden 97 Patienten ausgewählt (56 m; 42 w), die entweder mit operativer Entfernung und anschließender WBRT (Gruppe A, n = 50 Pat.) oder mit WBRT + SRT (Gruppe B, n = 47 Pat.) behandelt wurden. Die mediane Beobachtungszeit betrug 95 Monate (Spanne 8–171). Die lokale Tumorkontrolle nach 1 Jahr betrug 46,0% (Gruppe A) und 69,0% (Gruppe B), ohne dass dieser Unterschied statistisch signifikant wäre (p = 0,10). Das mediane Gesamtüberleben betrug jeweils 15 und 19 Monate in Gruppe A and B. Die 1-Jahres-Überlebensrate betrug jeweils 56,0% and 62%. Es wurde kein Unterschied zwischen den beiden Gruppen gefunden (p = 0,40).Schlussfolgerung:Die chirurgische Entfernung bleibt die Behandlungsoption bei symptomatischen Patienten. Unsere Daten sprechen für eine Behandlung mit WBRT plus SRT bei Vorliegen von ein oder zwei Hirnmetastasen, die kleiner als 3 cm sind.

Collaboration


Dive into the Angelo Pompucci's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carmelo Anile

The Catholic University of America

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Annunziato Mangiola

The Catholic University of America

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pasquale De Bonis

The Catholic University of America

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alba Fiorentino

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Balducci

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Chiesa

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luigi Rigante

The Catholic University of America

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Manfrida

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giovanna Mantini

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

V. Frascino

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge