Anicet Chaslerie

Pharmacoepidemiological characterisation of zolpidem and zopiclone usage

PurposeZolpidem and zopiclone are two widely used non-benzodiazepine hypnotics whose usage seems to be associated to pharmacodependence. However, to our knowledge, there has as yet been no published epidemiological study which has compared their abuse or dependence potential. We used a pharmacoepidemiological approach to identify and characterise zolpidem and zopiclone users in real life situations.MethodsRegular users of zolpidem or zopiclone were identified in the database of a French regional health insurance organisation. A latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify different subgroups of users of these two hypnotics.ResultsThe study cohort comprised 25,168 patients who regularly used zolpidem and 21,860 who regularly used zopiclone. The results of the latent class analysis, which enables subgroups with similar patterns of response to be identified, revealed four clinical subtypes of users of zolpidem: non-problematic users, users with associations with hypnotics/anxiolytics or with associated mental disorders, and problematic users. Only three subgroups were identified for zopiclone, and LCA did not discriminate a special class of problematic users for this drug.ConclusionOur analysis indicates that there is a subclass of zolpidem user suggestive of abuse; this was not the case for zopiclone. This methodology is very interesting because it allows analysis of databases and determination of a specific signature of drugs potentially leading to abuse or dependence.

Pharmacoepidemiological characterization of psychotropic drugs consumption using a latent class analysis.

France has one of the highest recorded rates of psychotropic use of drugs compared with other European countries, especially for anxiolytics, hypnotics and antidepressants. The aim of this study was to characterize the use of three psychotropic drugs among the most prescribed in France (bromazepam, paroxetine, zolpidem) using reimbursement databases in real-life conditions. Individuals from a region affiliated to the French General Health Insurance Scheme, who had received at least two dispensings of bromazepam, paroxetine or zolpidem reimbursed between 1 January and 30 June 2008, were included. We used a latent class analysis to identify different subgroups of users for these three psychotropic drugs. A total of 40 644 patients were included for bromazepam, 36 264 for zolpidem and 31 235 for paroxetine. Using latent class analysis, four clinical subtypes of users of bromazepam and zolpidem were identified: nonproblematic users, at-risk users, users with a probable mental disorder and compulsive users. Three subgroups were identified for paroxetine that differed rather by the prescription patterns. Users of anxiolytics and hypnotics with at-risk behaviours represented a significant proportion in the studied population. This original method could be extended to other prescription databases to identify populations at risk of abuse or dependence to psychotropic drugs.

Diuretic drug therapy monitoring in the elderly: a cohort study

BackgroundBecause the elderly are often treated by multiple-drug regimens, their iatrogenic risks are considerably raised. However, despite the serious side-effects that diuretic agents may have in this population, SPCs (summary of product characteristics) do not specify how often serum chemistry should be monitored. This study of long-term diuretic therapy prescription and monitoring in elderly patients was conducted by the Department of Clinical Pharmacology of the Nantes teaching hospital in collaboration with the medical department of the French national health insurance scheme.MethodsData were extracted from the French national health insurance database. Patients were 75 years old or more and had been receiving a diuretic agent for 1 year or longer. The patients were classified into two groups: one group included those patients whose serum chemistry had been monitored at least once (electrolyte levels and/or urea and creatinine blood levels); the other group included the non-monitored patients.ResultsMean patient age was 80 ± 4.6 (SD) years. The non-monitored patients represented 22.8% of the cohort. The at-risk patients were mainly women suffering from no severe disease, treated by a single practitioner (often a general practitioner) and/or always receiving the same type of diuretic agent.ConclusionMany elderly patients receiving diuretic agents do not benefit from regular serum chemistry monitoring. The prescription of serum chemistry assays is correlated to the presence of various patient-related risk factors. Recommendations should be made to help practitioners to ensure a minimal serum chemistry monitoring in all elderly patients receiving diuretics.

Inclusion of populations at risk of advanced melanoma in an opportunistic targeted screening project involving general practitioners.

Abstract Objective: The study objective was to measure the rates of inclusion of populations at risk of advanced melanoma in a pilot targeted screening project involving general practitioners. Design: This cross-sectional database study compared the inclusion rates of patients who signed inclusion in a targeted screening project with those of patients who did not, during a period in which both groups of patients consulted investigators. Setting: Data were extracted from the national healthcare insurance records in western France from 11 April to 30 October 2011. Patients: Patients, older than 18, considered for the data extraction had consulted one of the 78 participating GPs during the study period, and were affiliated with the national healthcare insurance. Main outcome measures: Inclusion in the screening was the main outcome measure. Patients at risk of advanced melanoma were characterized by male gender, age over 50, low income, rural residence, farmer, and presence of chronic disease. Results: A total of 57,279 patients consulted GPs during the inclusion period and 2711 (4.73%) were included in the targeted screening. Populations at risk of advanced melanoma were less included: men (OR = 0.67; 95%CI [0.61–0.73]; p < 0.001), older than 50 (OR = 0.67; 95%CI [0.60–0.74]; p < 0.001), low income (OR = 0.65; 95%CI [0.55–0.77]; p < 0.001), farmer (OR = 0.23; 95%CI [0.17–0.30]; p < 0.001) and presence of a chronic disease (OR = 0.87; 95%CI [0.77–0.98]; p < 0.028). Conclusion: This study demonstrated inequalities in the inclusion of patients in a melanoma screening. Patients at risk of advanced cancer were screened less often. Further studies should focus on GPs ability to identify and screen these patients. KEY POINTS Advanced melanoma is more frequently diagnosed in men, older patients and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations, which leads to survival inequalities. • Despite the involvement of general practitioners, the implementation of targeted melanoma screening did not avoid inclusion inequalities. • Men, older patients, patients suffering from chronic diseases, and low-income patients were less likely to benefit from screening. • The display of a conventional or an alarmist poster in the waiting room did not statistically reduce these inclusion inequalities.

Interaction between CYP2D6 inhibitor antidepressants and codeine: is this relevant?

ABSTRACT Introduction: Co-occurring pain impairs depression’s prognosis. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are first-line pharmacotherapies for depression and inhibit many cytochrome 2D6 enzymes. Codeine is a first-line treatment for pain and needs to be metabolized into morphine by cytochrome 2D6 to exert its analgesic effect. Concomitant prescription of both pharmacotherapies leads to inadequate analgesia. Areas covered: We performed a systematic review of the literature to amalgamate the current knowledge regarding the clinical effect of this association and quantified its prevalence in clinical practice in the French Pays de la Loire area using a retrospective observational cohort study design. Expert opinion: The literature review highlighted that antidepressants with moderate-to-strong inhibition of CYP2D6 should be avoided in patients receiving codeine. However, 0.44% of the 12,296 sampled patients received concomitant codeine and CYP2D6 inhibitor between January 2015 and June 2015. Switching drugs in both painful and depressive patients depends on the pain and depression subtypes. Promising drugs that both show an effect on pain and depression are currently being studied but are not usable in clinical practice. Until then, tailored communication reinforcement toward health-care professionals is needed to prevent these problematic occurrences of concomitant prescription administration.