Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Anirudh K. Gowd is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Anirudh K. Gowd.


Orthopedics | 2018

The Shoulder Self-Administered Motion Evaluation Has Excellent Patient Reliability and Reproducibility on Both Physician and Repeat Follow-up Testing

Grant H. Garcia; Joseph N. Liu; Alexandra C. Wong; Anirudh K. Gowd; Anthony A. Romeo; Joshua S. Dines; Lawrence V. Gulotta

Long-term clinical evaluation is becoming more important, yet difficulties exist because there are substantial patient costs for extended follow-up. The goal of this study was to validate whether a new shoulder motion evaluation is reproducible and reliable with physician examination. Consecutive patients were administered a shoulder motion assessment during their clinic visit. Patients completed the same evaluation 2 weeks after their visit to determine test-retest reliability. Exact and approximate (within 20° or 4 spinal levels) agreements between patient and physician measurements were calculated. A total of 112 patients (224 shoulders) with an average age of 56.7 years were evaluated. The most common diagnoses were osteoarthritis (33.0%) and rotator cuff tear (32.1%). All motion questions had greater than 50% exact patient-physician agreement and greater than 70% approximate agreement. When agreement was off, patients more often underestimated their motion. There was substantial clinician-patient agreement for all questions and almost perfect agreement for forward elevation (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.78) and internal rotation (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.77). On test-retest reliability testing, patient-patient agreement was substantial for external rotation at the side (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.71). There was near perfect agreement for internal rotation (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.83) and abduction (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.81) testing. This shoulder assessment tool had both good agreement to physician examination and substantial agreement on correlation testing. There was substantial agreement between follow-up visits, suggesting excellent reproducibility. This motion assessment shows effectiveness with most shoulder pathologies. It is recommended as a good screening tool for both clinical and research purposes requiring long-term follow-up in which in-person clinical examinations may be costly and time consuming. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(6):e820-e826.].


Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine | 2018

Radiographic Predictors of Elbow Injury and Surgery in Major League Baseball Pitchers

Grant H. Garcia; Anirudh K. Gowd; Brandon C. Cabarcas; Joseph N. Liu; Anthony A. Romeo; Nikhil N. Verma

Objectives: To evaluate predictive ability of asymptomatic screening MRI’s of Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers and compare associated findings with future DL placement, pitching statistics, and elbow surgery. Methods: A total of 40 consecutive asymptomatic elbow MRI’s in MLB pitchers at a single organization were analyzed from 2005 - 2017. Asymptomatic MRI was defined as a screening MRI at time of contract signing having been performed at least 6 months prior to DL placement for any elbow-related injury. Publicly available DL data, career innings pitched, career games started, career pitch count, and career max velocity of pitch were obtained. A blinded investigator examined each MRI for pathological signals. Data was analyzed on players that were eventually placed on the DL compared to those with no DL placement. Results: 40 consecutive elbow MRIs of MLB players were reviewed. The average age of the injured cohort was 28.3 ± 3.2 years (16 players) and 28.8 ± 5.5 years (24 players) for the non-injured cohort. There was no statistical difference in age, handedness, height, weight, or pitching stats between the injured and non-injured cohorts. Abnormal radiographic signal intensity in the UCL (p<0.001) and humeral elevation of the UCL (p=0.01) were significantly associated with future DL placement. Those injured spent an average of 200.7 days and 191.7 days in the DL with signal in the UCL and those with humeral elevation of the UCL, respectively. Ulnar elevation/signal of the UCL (p=0.06), and posteromedial impingement (p=0.08) were approaching statistical significance. Of those injured 68.8% (11/16) underwent elbow surgery. Findings of ligament signal intensity (p<0.001), ulnar-sided UCL elevation (p=0.018), humeral-sided UCL elevation (p=0.002), and posteromedial impingement (p=0.042) were all significantly associated with future surgery. There was no significant correlation between injury and radiocapitellar or ulnohumeral chondral lesion, bone edema, loose bodies, or flexor-pronator mass muscle defect. The presence of a flexor-pronator mass muscle defect was associated with a significantly reduced number of innings pitched (53.7 ± 74.3 vs. 304.4 ± 305.5 innings, p=0.0317), games started (5 ± 7.1 vs. 40.1 ± 49.0 games, p=0.004), and pitch count (680.5 ± 919.9 vs. 40.1 ± 49.0 pitches, p=0.022). The presence of ligament signal (26.2 ± 37.1 vs. 51.7 ± 56.5 games, p=0.036) and ulnar elevation (6.3 ± 9.3 vs. 41.2 ± 9.3 games, p=0.003) was associated with significantly fewer games started. The presence of bone edema was associated with significantly decreased pitch count (1451.2 ± 1746.8 vs. 4128.0 ± 4718.0 pitches, p=0.023). There was no association between humeral UCL elevation, flexor-pronator mass tendon, or posteromedial impingement with innings pitched, games started, or pitch count. Conclusion: The heavy demand placed on the elbow joint in professional pitching produces degenerative changes visible on MRI prior to any symptoms, as demonstrated in previous studies. Specific degenerative changes in the UCL Ligament, particularly humeral sided elevation of the UCL, are significantly associated with future injury. Radiographic Findings on Elbow MRI as Related to Placement on Disabled List and Pitching Stats N (%): Injury vs. Non-Injury Relation to Injury (p) Relation to DL days (p) Relation to Future Surgery (p) Relation to inningsPitched (p) Relation to GamesStarted (p) Relation to Pitch Count (p) Relation to Max Pitching Velocity (p) Radiocapitellar Chondral Lesion Diffuse: 1 (6.25%)0 (0%) Focal: 2 (12.5%)3 (12.5%) None: 13 (81.3%)21 (87.5%) N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. Ulnohumeral Chondral Lesion Diffuse: 0 (0%)0(0%) Focal: 1 (6.25%)0 (0%) None: 15 (93.8%)24 (100%) N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. ArticularCartilage Bone Edema 3 (18.8%)3 (12.5%) 0.6678 0.5961 1 0.5661 0.9471 0.0227 0.0788 UCL Ligament Signal Heterogeneity/Hyperintensity 15 (93.8%)1 (4.2%) p < 0.001 N.S. p < 0.001 0.0563 0.1487 0.0357 0.8186 Ulnar-Sided Elevation/Signal 3 (18.8%)0 (0%) 0.06373 0.3591 0.0177 0.1010 0.0032 0.1829 0.8683 Humeral-Sided Elevation/Signal 9 (56.3%)3 (12.5%) 0.0103 0.7240 0.0018 0.7778 0.7134 0.2167 0.9052 Frank UCL Tear 0 (0%)0 (0%) N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. Flexor-Pronator Mass Defect 1 (6.3%)1 (4.2%) 1 N.S. 1 0.0317 0.0035 0.0223 N.S. Flexor-Pronator Mass Tendon Signal 8 (50%)2 (29.2%) 0.2046 0.0261 1 0.8311 0.7951 0.9657 0.7875


Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine | 2018

Randomized Prospective Trial of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff With or Without Acromioplasty: No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes at Long-term Follow-up

Brian R. Waterman; Jonathan Newgren; Anirudh K. Gowd; Brandon C. Cabarcas; Bernard R. Bach; Brian J. Cole; Anthony A. Romeo; Nikhil N. Verma

Objectives: To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty. Methods: Between 2007-2011, prospectively-enrolled patients undergoing arthroscopic repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears were previously randomized into either acromioplasty or non-acromioplasty groups. Patients with death, advanced neurologic conditions, or subsequent shoulder arthroplasty were excluded. Baseline and long-term follow-up questionnaires, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and Constant scores were obtained. Rates of revision rotator cuff surgery, or secondary reoperation were recorded. Averages with standard deviation (SD) were calculated, and t-tests were utilized to compare outcomes of interest between cohorts. Results: After exclusion of 5 additional patients from the short-term follow-up study, 66 of 90 patients (73.3%) were available at 92.4 months (±10.5). Comparison of baseline demographics and intraoperative information revealed no significant differences, including age, gender, workers compensation, acute mechanism of injury, tear size, degree of retraction, and surgical technique (e.g. single- vs. double-row). At final follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences according to ASES (p=0.33), VAS pain (p=0.79), Constant (p=0.17), SST (p=0.05), UCLA (p=0.19), and SF-12 (p=0.79) in patients with and without acromioplasty (Figure 1). One patient with acromioplasty (2.9%) and two patients without acromioplasty (6.3%) sustained atraumatic recurrent rotator cuff tear with secondary repair (p=0.99). Conclusion: Combined acromioplasty and rotator cuff repair offer no significant long-term benefits in patient-reported outcomes or secondary surgery when compared to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair alone. Figure 1


Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine | 2018

Analysis of Publication Trends for the 2011-2015 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts

Anirudh K. Gowd; Joseph N. Liu; Brandon C. Cabarcas; Gregory L. Cvetanovich; Grant H. Garcia; Nikhil N. Verma

Background: Academic conferences are sources of novel research that can influence clinical decision making. Orthopaedic surgery maintains a relatively high rate of publication compared with other surgical subspecialties, and sports medicine conferences hold an even higher rate within the subspecialty. The American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM) annual meetings have been shown to have among the highest rates of publication for accepted abstracts. Purpose: To determine differences between 2-year publication rates of poster and podium abstracts accepted into the AOSSM annual meetings and identify factors associated with publication. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The AOSSM archives were queried for all accepted poster and podium presentations for annual meetings from 2011 through 2015. Google Scholar and MEDLINE databases were used to determine which abstracts transitioned into journal articles. Publication rates were compared based on publication 2 years following presentation. Logistic regression was performed to demonstrate which variables were most correlated with successful publication. Data on publication impact factor and number of citations were collected by use of the InCites database. Results: Of 628 abstracts accepted during this period, 265 were poster presentations and 363 were podium presentations. Overall, 44.7% of abstracts presented were accepted into peer-reviewed journals within 2 years of presentation. No statistical difference was found between poster and podium presentations for journal publication (P = .328). Poster presentations were published in journals with statistically lower impact factor (P = .005) and had a statistically lower number of citations (P < .001) compared with podium presentations. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that only number of authors was correlated with publication (P = .003). Conclusion: Podium and poster presentations accepted into AOSSM conferences had equal rates of publication within 2 years and should influence decision making equally. The relative impact of podium presentations appeared to be greater, which suggests that the AOSSM selects podium presentations that will have greater clinical impact. Increasing number of coauthors was the only factor found to be correlated with publication.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2018

How many innings can we throw: does workload influence injury risk in Major League Baseball? An analysis of professional starting pitchers between 2010 and 2015

Bryan M. Saltzman; Benjamin C. Mayo; John D. Higgins; Anirudh K. Gowd; Brandon C. Cabarcas; Timothy Leroux; Bryce A. Basques; Gregory P. Nicholson; Anthony A. Romeo; Nikhil N. Verma

BACKGROUNDnThere has been increasing interest regarding the association between pitch counts, as well as total workload per season, and the risk of injury among Major League Baseball (MLB) starting pitchers.nnnMETHODSnWe used publicly available databases to identify all MLB starting pitchers eligible for play who made at least 5 starts in seasons between 2010 and 2015. For all included pitchers, annual pitching statistics (number of starts, total season pitch counts, total season inning counts, and average pitch count per game started) and annual disabled list (DL) information (time on DL for any reason and time on DL related to upper extremity, lower extremity, or axial body injury) were collected. A multiple logistic regression analyzed games started, pitch counts, innings pitched, and pitches per start during all previous seasons as a risk factor for injury in the current season, controlling for previous injury.nnnRESULTSnA total of 161 starting MLB pitchers met the inclusion criteria. With the exception of total innings pitched from 2010-2011 being significantly associated with DL placement in 2012 (no DL, 310.5u2009±u200997.5 innings; DL, 344.7u2009±u200985.9 innings; Pu2009=u2009.040), no other finding for starts, pitch counts, innings, or pitches per start in the cumulative years from 2010-2014 had a significant association with pitcher placement on the DL for any musculoskeletal reason or for an upper extremity reason between 2011 and 2015.nnnCONCLUSIONSnIn this study, we demonstrate that there is no association between preceding years of cumulative pitches, starts, innings pitched, or average pitches per start and being placed on the DL for any musculoskeletal reason.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2018

A simple method to directly evaluate the lateral extension of the acromion: an anatomic study of 128 cadaveric scapulae

Trifon Totlis; Anirudh K. Gowd; Eamon Bernardoni; Brian J. Cole; Nikhil N. Verma; Konstantinos Natsis

BACKGROUNDnThe lateral extension of the acromion from the glenohumeral joint is the critical variable that both the acromial index and critical shoulder angle reflect. The purpose of this study was to establish a simple and reproducible method to directly measure the lateral extension of the acromion that will be independent of patient demographic characteristics, scapular rotation, or other morphologic features of the shoulder.nnnMETHODSnThis study used 128 unpaired cadaveric scapulae with a mean age of 69.4u2009±u200911.1 years (66 right and 62 left scapulae, 65 female and 63 male cadaveric specimens). The lateral extension of the acromion was measured from the supraglenoid tubercle to the most lateral point of the acromion with a digital caliper placed perpendicular to the scapula long axis. This distance was called the lateral offset of the acromion.nnnRESULTSnThe lateral offset was 2.62u2009±u20090.72u2009cm in men and 2.69u2009±u20090.73u2009cm in women. The offset was 2.61u2009±u20090.66u2009cm in right and 2.70u2009±u20090.78u2009cm in left scapulae. The offset in the group aged 46-60 years was 2.85u2009±u20090.76u2009cm; in the group aged 61-75 years, it was 2.62u2009±u20090.76u2009cm; and in the group aged 76u2009years or older, it was 2.54u2009±u20090.60u2009cm. No significant difference was found between any of the groups.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThis study established a simple method to directly measure the lateral extension of the acromion based on the longitudinal axis of the scapula, which eliminates bias that may exist in the acromial index and critical shoulder angle from the position of the scapula and glenoid inclination. The lateral offset was found to be independent of sex, side, or age, limiting bias in a potential future clinical application.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2018

Establishing maximum medical improvement following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff deficiency

Brandon C. Cabarcas; Anirudh K. Gowd; Joseph N. Liu; Gregory L. Cvetanovich; Brandon J. Erickson; Anthony A. Romeo; Nikhil N. Verma

BACKGROUNDnSince US Food and Drug Administration approval of the reverse prosthesis in 2003, the incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States has risen dramatically. With increasing demand, efforts have shifted from traditional volume-based health care models to more patient-centered care. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to establish the time point of maximum medical improvement (MMI) following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnWe conducted a systematic review of studies reporting validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) across multiple postoperative time points following rTSA. Established minimal clinically important difference values for PROMs specific to shoulder arthroplasty were used to determine significant clinical improvement. The time point beyond which significant improvement did not occur was established as MMI.nnnRESULTSnMMI occurred at 1 postoperative year following rTSA. When preoperative measures were compared with 1-year postoperative outcomes, all but 1 PROM demonstrated significant clinical improvement (Pu2009<u2009.001). There were no significant improvements between any 2 subsequent time points beyond 1 year (Pu2009>u2009.050). Range of motion significantly improved between preoperative and 1-year levels (Pu2009<u2009.001). No PROMs or range-of-motion parameters significantly improved beyond 1 year (Pu2009>u2009.999).nnnCONCLUSIONSnPatients achieved MMI at 1 postoperative year following rTSA. Patients showed rapid improvements in subjective symptoms within the first 3 months and continued to gradually improve until 1 year. Surgeons should counsel patients with these evidence-based expectations for clinical recovery, particularly the time frame of expected improvements in pain, function, and range of motion, as well as risks of and plans of action for postoperative complications.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2018

Comparative analysis of work-related outcomes in hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming and total shoulder arthroplasty

Anirudh K. Gowd; Grant H. Garcia; Joseph N. Liu; Marissa R. Malaret; Brandon C. Cabarcas; Anthony A. Romeo

BACKGROUNDnAnatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) has demonstrated high levels of return to work, although there are fears of glenoid component loosening with higher work demand.nnnMETHODSnA retrospective query was performed of all patients who received hemiarthroplasty with ream-and-run resurfacing (Hemi RR) between 2005 and 2014. Included patients were matched to an aTSA cohort by age, body mass index, sex, and hand dominance. Preoperative and postoperative work status, by level of duty and occupation, was collected.nnnRESULTSnTwenty-five patients receiving Hemi RR and 28 patients receiving TSA completed this questionnaire (82.8% compliance). Mean follow-up was 69.1u2009±u200924.8 months. In total, 100% of Hemi RR patients returned to work, and 89.3% of TSA patients returned to work (Pu2009=u2009.091). The Hemi RR patients had higher rates of return to work for heavy-duty workers only (7 of 7 vs. 2 of 4, Pu2009=u2009.038), although only 1 patient in the TSA group reported failure to work was due to shoulder reasons. Mean duration of return to work was 2.5u2009±u20094.8 months for patients receiving Hemi RR and 1.98u2009±u20092.6 months for those receiving TSA (Pu2009=u2009.653).nnnCONCLUSIONSnHemi RR had a high return to heavy-duty work, likely due to fewer surgeon-imposed restrictions. The results of this study may help manage return to work expectations after Hemi RR according to the level of duty and suggest Hemi RR is a viable option for heavy-duty laborers with end-stage glenohumeral arthritis.


Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | 2018

Treatment of Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears in Overhead Athletes

Joseph N. Liu; Grant H. Garcia; Anirudh K. Gowd; Brandon C. Cabarcas; Michael D. Charles; Anthony A. Romeo; Nikhil N. Verma

Purpose of ReviewTo review the etiology, classification, presentation, evaluation, treatment strategy, and outcomes in overhead athletes with partial thickness rotator cuff tears.Recent FindingsDespite advances in surgical repair techniques, return to play following surgical repair of partial rotator cuff tears remains modest at best.SummaryOverhead athletes may be particularly prone to rotator cuff pathology due to the supraphysiological strains within the tendon during the throwing motion, as well as mechanical stress with contact between the undersurface of the rotator cuff and the glenoid. The true prevalence of partial tears may be underestimated given the high incidence of asymptomatic tears. Both dynamic ultrasound and enhanced contrast MRI have improved our understanding of this pathology. For most overhead athletes, nonoperative management is the most common course. Despite advances in imaging, diagnosis, and surgical techniques, our ability to return these patients to their elite level is modest at best when nonoperative management fails and surgical treatment is performed. If a surgical route is needed, debridement alone is the most frequent procedure given concerns of over constraint and poor return to play with surgical repair of the partial thickness rotator cuff tear.


Cartilage | 2018

Medical Comorbidities and Functional Dependent Living Are Independent Risk Factors for Short-Term Complications Following Osteotomy Procedures about the Knee

Eric J. Cotter; Anirudh K. Gowd; Daniel D. Bohl; Alan Getgood; Brian J. Cole; Rachel M. Frank

Objective To characterize rates and risk factors for adverse events following distal femoral osteotomy (DFO), high tibial osteotomy (HTO), and tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) procedures. Design Patients undergoing DFO, HTO, or TTO procedures during 2005 to 2016 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Rates of adverse events were characterized for each procedure. Demographic, comorbidity, and procedural factors were tested for association with occurrence of any adverse events. Results A total of 1,083 patients were identified. Of these, 305 (28%) underwent DFO, 273 (25%) underwent HTO, and 505 (47%) underwent TTO. Mean ages for patients undergoing each procedure were the following: DFO, 51 ± 23 years; HTO, 40 ± 13 years; and TTO, 31 ± 11 years. The most common comorbidities for DFO were hypertension (34%) and smoking (17%); for HTO, hypertension (22%) and smoking (21%); and for TTO, smoking (20%) and hypertension (11%). Independent risk factors for occurrence of any adverse event were age ⩾45 years for DFO (odds ratio [OR] = 3.1, P < 0.001) and HTO (OR = 2.3, P = 0.029), and body mass index >30 for HTO (OR = 2.5, 95% confidence interval = 1.1-5.7, P = 0.031). When all osteotomy procedures were analyzed collectively, additional variables including diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.2, P = 0.017), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 5.5, P = 0.003), and dependent functional status (OR = 3.0, P = 0.004) were associated with adverse events. Conclusions The total rate of adverse events was not independently associated with the type of osteotomy procedure. In addition, patients with age >45, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dependent functional status have greater odds for adverse events and should be counseled and monitored accordingly.

Collaboration


Dive into the Anirudh K. Gowd's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brandon C. Cabarcas

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joseph N. Liu

Loma Linda University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Grant H. Garcia

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nikhil N. Verma

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony A. Romeo

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gregory L. Cvetanovich

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian J. Cole

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rachel M. Frank

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexandra C. Wong

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bernard R. Bach

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge