Anita Yeomans Kinney
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anita Yeomans Kinney.
Oncology Nursing Forum | 2002
Anita Yeomans Kinney; Gwyn Emery; William N. Dudley; Robert T. Croyle
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVESnTo examine the relationship between beliefs about God as a controlling force in health and adherence to breast cancer screening among high-risk African American women.nnnDESIGNnCross-sectional cohort.nnnSETTINGnIn-person interviews in rural, southeastern Louisiana and telephone interviews conducted at the University of Utah.nnnSAMPLEn52 females who were members of a large kindred with a BRCA1 mutation; no subjects had breast cancer.nnnMETHODSnSurvey through in-person or telephone interviews.nnnMAIN RESEARCH VARIABLESnBelief in God as a controlling agent over health measured by the God Locus of Health Control (GLHC) scale; screening behaviors measured by self-report. Adherence was based on consensus-approved recommendations for BRCA1 carriers or women at risk of being carriers.nnnFINDINGSnBivariate analysis indicated that presence of a primary care provider and low GLHC scores were associated with seeking clinical breast examination (CBE) and mammography. With the variable presence of a primary care provider excluded, GLHC scores were inversely associated with seeking CBE and mammography.nnnCONCLUSIONSnAfrican American women at increased risk for breast cancer and with high GLHC scores may have a decreased inclination to adhere to CBE and mammography recommendations.nnnIMPLICATIONS FOR NURSINGnAssessing religious and spiritual beliefs and incorporating belief systems into education and counseling sessions may improve understanding and acceptance of presented material.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2000
Anita Yeomans Kinney; Yeon Ah Choi; Brenda M. DeVellis; Erin Kobetz; Robert C. Millikan; Robert S. Sandler
PURPOSEnThe present study examined colorectal cancer screening behaviors, risk perceptions, and willingness to receive genetic testing to determine colorectal cancer susceptibility.nnnMETHODSnWe recruited 95 first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients, then conducted a brief telephone interview using a structured questionnaire that elicited information on sociodemographics, cancer screening behaviors, risk perceptions, and interest in genetic testing.nnnRESULTSnAmong these high-risk individuals who were aged 40 years or older, only 31% reported fecal occult blood testing within the past year and 59% reported undergoing sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy within the past 5 years. The majority of participants believed their relative risk of colorectal cancer was increased (68%). Eighty-four percent of the participants indicated that they would have a genetic test if one were available. Participants who believed that <50% of colorectal cancers were caused by heredity were more likely to be interested in genetic testing than were participants who believed that 50% or more of colorectal cancers were caused by heredity. Referral source, sociodemographic factors, clinical factors, and perceived personal risk were not significantly associated with interest in genetic testing.nnnCONCLUSIONnOur results suggest that the demand for colorectal cancer susceptibility testing may be high among individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer. We also observed that a substantial number of first-degree relatives were not adhering to colorectal cancer screening guidelines. Accurate information on the genetic aspects of colorectal cancer and the benefits and limitations of genetic testing may help relatives of colorectal cancer patients make informed decisions about whether to undergo enhanced screening and genetic testing.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2010
Jennifer Permuth-Wey; Susan T. Vadaparampil; Alnecia Rumphs; Anita Yeomans Kinney; Tuya Pal
Printed educational materials (PEM) can serve as important tools to enhance and reinforce information presented during genetic counseling (GC) for BRCA1/2 testing, yet few such materials have been specifically developed for the Black community. The goal of the current study was to develop a BRCA1/2 genetic education booklet for Black women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Investigators identified available PEM about BRCA1/2 targeted toward Blacks. To obtain possible perspectives of the target population regarding modified and newly developed materials, a Community Advisory Panel (CAP) comprising breast cancer survivors, advocates, and community leaders was convened. While the CAP felt PEM were an important adjunct to GC, the panel recommended developing materials that were more personalized and relevant to Black women. A 12‐page booklet that follows the flow of a standard GC session was developed; it includes a limited amount of technical information, incorporates familiar terms and images to describe key concepts, and contains vignettes and photographs of Black women. Upon review of the newly developed booklet, CAP members agreed their input had been well implemented, and only had minor suggestions. The booklet is currently being used in a population‐based study of BRCA1/2 mutations among Black women diagnosed with early‐onset breast cancer. Involving members of the target community is critical to the development of culturally tailored PEM. Further evaluation of the utility of our booklet in increasing awareness and understanding of HBOC and promoting informed decision‐making regarding genetic testing and medical management among Black women is needed.
Contemporary Clinical Trials | 2012
Jan T. Lowery; Al Marcus; Anita Yeomans Kinney; Deborah J. Bowen; Dianne M. Finkelstein; Nora Horick; Kathleen Garrett; Robert W. Haile; Robert S. Sandler; Dennis J. Ahnen
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States, much of which could be prevented through adequate screening. Consensus guidelines recommend that high-risk groups initiate screening earlier with colonoscopy and more frequently than average risk persons. However, a large proportion of high risk individuals do not receive regular colonoscopic screening. The Family Health Promotion Project (FHPP) is a randomized-controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a telephone-based counseling intervention to increase adherence to risk-appropriate colonoscopy screening in high risk individuals. Unaffected members of CRC families from two national cancer family registries were enrolled (n=632) and randomized to receive either a single session telephone counseling intervention using Motivational Interviewing techniques or a minimal mail-out intervention. The primary endpoint, rate of colonoscopy screening, was assessed at 6, 12 and 24 months post-enrollment. In this paper, we describe the research design and telephone counseling intervention of the FHPP trial, and report baseline data obtained from the two high risk cohorts recruited into this trial. Results obtained at baseline confirm the need for interventions to promote colonoscopy screening among these high risk individuals, as well as highlighting several key opportunities for intervention, including increasing knowledge about risk-appropriate screening guidelines, and providing both tailored risk information and barriers counseling.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars in Medical Genetics | 2009
Anita Yeomans Kinney; James E. Coxworth; Sara E. Simonson; Joseph B. Fanning
Elevated psychological distress has been observed among people at increased risk for familial cancer. Researchers consider religiosity and spirituality (RS) to be positive coping mechanisms associated with reduced psychological distress. Relatively little is known about the impact of RS on genomic health issues. The objectives of our study were: (1) describe the prevalence of RS and depressive symptoms and (2) explore how RS relates to psychological distress in a cohort of individuals with a ≥25% prior probability of a genetic predisposition to cancer. Participants (nu2009=u200999) were drawn from an African‐American, Louisiana‐based kindred with a mutation at the BRCA1 locus. This analysis reports findings from a survey assessing RS and the use of three types of religious coping styles: collaborative, self‐directing, and deferring. Clinically significant depressive symptoms were relatively high (27%); with females (33%) more likely than males (17%) to report symptoms (Pu2009<u20090.01). The majority of participants reported being highly religious. The most commonly employed religious problem solving style used by participants was collaborative (
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2012
Anne C. Kirchhoff; Echo L. Warner; Elyse R. Park; Roberto E. Montenegro; Jennifer Wright; Antoinette M. Stroup; Mark Fluchel; Anita Yeomans Kinney
{rm bar X = 22}{rm .9}
Preventive Medicine | 2001
Anita Yeomans Kinney; Robert T. Croyle; William N. Dudley; Christine A. Bailey; Mary Kay Pelias; Susan L. Neuhausen
; SDu2009=u20095.8) versus self‐directing (
Preventive Medicine | 2004
Marty L. Slattery; Anita Yeomans Kinney; T.R. Levin
{rm bar X = 12}{rm .8}
American Journal of Epidemiology | 2003
Anita Yeomans Kinney; Lindsey E. Bloor; William N. Dudley; Robert C. Millikan; Elizabeth Marshall; Christopher Martin; Robert S. Sandler
; SDu2009=u20095.1) and deferring (
Social Science & Medicine | 2007
Lee Ellington; Amiee Maxwel; Bonnie J. Baty; Debra L. Roter; William N. Dudley; Anita Yeomans Kinney
{rm bar X = 19}{rm .9}