Anja Rinke

Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Study on the Effect of Octreotide LAR in the Control of Tumor Growth in Patients With Metastatic Neuroendocrine Midgut Tumors: A Report From the PROMID Study Group

4508 Background: Octreotide is currently used for the control of symptoms in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, the ability of long-acting somatostatin analogues to control the growth of well-differentiated metastatic NETs is a matter of debate. The analysis of the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase IIIb study of octreotide LAR in patients with metastatic NETs of the midgut is presented. METHODS Treatment-naïve patients with histologically confirmed locally inoperable or metastasized well-differentiated NETs and a Karnofsky index >60 were randomized to receive either octreotide LAR 30 mg/month (mo) or placebo for 18 mos, or until tumor progression or death. The primary endpoint was median time to tumor progression. Secondary endpoints included objective tumor response rate (WHO criteria), measured every 3 mos, as well as symptom control and overall survival. This was a planned interim analysis using the Lan-DeMets error spending approach. RESULTS Eighty-five patients (n=43 octreotide LAR; n=42 placebo) have been enrolled to date and data from 67 patients with tumor progressions and 16 deaths (n=7 octreotide LAR; n=9 placebo) are included here. Median time to tumor progression in the octreotide LAR and placebo groups were 14.3 mos and 6 mos, respectively (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.20-0.59; P=0.000072). After 6 mos of treatment, stable disease was seen in 67% and 37.2% of patients treated with octreotide LAR and placebo, respectively. Due to the low number of observed deaths, median survival time could not be estimated. CONCLUSIONS Octreotide LAR significantly lengthens median time to tumor progression compared with placebo in patients with metastatic NETs of the midgut. Patients treated with octreotide LAR had a 66% risk reduction of tumor progression compared with patients receiving placebo. Octreotide LAR demonstrates substantial tumor control and shows a more favorable antiproliferative response than placebo as two-thirds of patients treated with octreotide LAR achieved stable disease at 6 mos. [Table: see text].PURPOSE Somatostatin analogs are indicated for symptom control in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The ability of somatostatin analogs to control the growth of well-differentiated metastatic NETs is a matter of debate. We performed a placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase IIIB study in patients with well-differentiated metastatic midgut NETs. The hypothesis was that octreotide LAR prolongs time to tumor progression and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Treatment-naive patients were randomly assigned to either placebo or octreotide LAR 30 mg intramuscularly in monthly intervals until tumor progression or death. The primary efficacy end point was time to tumor progression. Secondary end points were survival time and tumor response. This report is based on 67 tumor progressions and 16 observed deaths in 85 patients at the time of the planned interim analysis. RESULTS Median time to tumor progression in the octreotide LAR and placebo groups was 14.3 and 6 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.59; P = .000072). After 6 months of treatment, stable disease was observed in 66.7% of patients in the octreotide LAR group and 37.2% of patients in the placebo group. Functionally active and inactive tumors responded similarly. The most favorable effect was observed in patients with low hepatic tumor load and resected primary tumor. Seven and nine deaths were observed in the octreotide LAR and placebo groups, respectively. The HR for overall survival was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.30 to 2.18). CONCLUSION Octreotide LAR significantly lengthens time to tumor progression compared with placebo in patients with functionally active and inactive metastatic midgut NETs. Because of the low number of observed deaths, survival analysis was not confirmatory.

Octreotide Versus Octreotide Plus Interferon-Alpha in Endocrine Gastroenteropancreatic Tumors: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS The effect of octreotide plus interferon-alpha versus octreotide monotherapy on the primary study end points of time to treatment failure (progression, death, stop of study treatment) and long-term survival was investigated in patients with progressive metastatic neuroendocrine foregut (mainly pancreatic) and midgut tumors. METHODS One hundred nine of 125 registered patients were randomized starting in January 1995, and 105 patients (51 monotherapy, 54 combination treatment) were finally analyzed in March 2000. Tumor growth was assessed at 3-month intervals by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Long-term survival was studied up to April 2004 in all analyzed patients and in 9 patients not randomized because of stable disease. RESULTS Partial tumor regression occurred in 2.9%, 1.9%, and 5.7% and stabilization of tumor growth in 44.8%, 27.6%, and 15.2% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively, with no significant differences between both treatment arms. In March 2000, 9.5% of patients were in treatment. Time to treatment failure and long-term survival did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, with a median survival of 32 and 54 months for the octreotide and the combination groups, respectively. Survival was longer in patients not randomized because of stable disease (median, 68 months) and in those with low nuclear Ki-67. A trend toward longer survival was shown for patients with slow spontaneous tumor growth before randomization. Patients responding to treatment lived longer than unresponsive patients. CONCLUSIONS Combination treatment was not superior to monotherapy concerning progression-free and long-term survival. Patients responding to treatment and those with slow spontaneous tumor growth had a survival advantage.

Plasma Chromogranin A as Marker for Survival in Patients With Metastatic Endocrine Gastroenteropancreatic Tumors

BACKGROUND & AIMS The prognostic role of plasma chromogranin A in patients with neuroendocrine tumors is unclear. We investigated the role of chromogranin A in predicting survival and hypothesized that chromogranin A mirrors tumor burden and that a rapid increase after a phase of stable plasma chromogranin A levels might predict exploding tumor growth. METHODS Three hundred forty-four patients with metastatic, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors were included. A subsample of 102 patients was investigated to correlate radiologically classified tumor burden with plasma chromogranin A. Hepatic tumor burden (0%, 0%-25%, 25%-50%, >50%) was assessed from computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging scans. Follow-up information until death was generated in regular intervals. RESULTS Plasma chromogranin A levels (U/L) vary between tumor entities (Kruskal-Wallis, P < .001) and were associated with survival time (hazard ratio [hours], 2.14 per one unit in the log10 CgA level scale; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-2.62; P < .001). Chromogranin A levels correlated with hepatic tumor burden (Spearman P = .57; 95% CI, 0.44-0.70; P < .001). Additional extrahepatic tumor load did not relevantly affect plasma chromogranin A. A sudden increase observed in individual patients was paralleled by rapid tumor progress and short survival. CONCLUSIONS Increased plasma chromogranin A in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors is predictive for shorter survival. There was a modest correlation between chromogranin A levels and hepatic tumor burden. We hypothesized further that a sudden increase in individual chromogranin A levels indicates unfavorable outcome.

Somatostatin-producing neuroendocrine tumors of the duodenum and pancreas: incidence, types, biological behavior, association with inherited syndromes, and functional activity

Somatostatin-producing neuroendocrine tumors (SOM-NETs) of the duodenum and pancreas appear to be heterogeneous. To determine their clinicopathological profiles, respective data were analyzed on a series of 82 duodenal and 541 pancreatic NETs. In addition, the clinical records of 821 patients with duodenal or pancreatic NETs were reviewed for evidence of a somatostatinoma syndrome. Predominant or exclusive expression of somatostatin was found in 21 (26%) duodenal and 21 (4%) pancreatic NETs. They were classified as sporadic (n=31) or neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated duodenal NETs (n=3), gangliocytic paragangliomas (GCPGs; n=6), or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (pdNECs; n=2). In addition, five duodenal and four pancreatic SOM-NETs were found in five patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Metastases occurred in 13 (43%) patients with sporadic or NF1-associated SOM-NETs, but in none of the duodenal or pancreatic MEN1-associated SOM-NETs or GCPGs. Sporadic advanced (stage IV) SOM-NETs were more commonly detected in the pancreas than in the duodenum. None of the patients (including the 821 patients for whom only the clinical records were reviewed) fulfilled the criteria of a somatostatinoma syndrome. Our data show that somatostatin expression is not only seen in sporadic NETs but may also occur in GCPGs, pdNECs, and hereditary NETs. Surgical treatment is effective in most duodenal and many pancreatic SOM-NETs. MEN1-associated SOM-NETs and GCPGs follow a benign course, while somatostatin-producing pdNECs are aggressive neoplasms. The occurrence of the so-called somatostatinoma syndrome appears to be extremely uncommon.

Selective Internal Radiotherapy with Yttrium-90 Microspheres for Hepatic Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Single Center Study

Background: To assess prospectively the safety and efficacy of Yttrium-90 microspheres in patients with unresectable liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors. Materials and Methods: Microspheres were administered via a temporarily placed hepatic catheter. Patients were monitored prospectively. All patients were followed with laboratory and imaging studies at regular intervals to determine response rates. Toxicity and quality of life scores were measured. Results: Nine patients (7 female) with a mean age of 58.8 years were enrolled in this prospective trial. The mean tumor load was 58.8%. The estimated percentage shunting to the lungs on MAA scans was 5.04 ± 2.4%. Visceral artery embolization of extrahepatic arteries before treatment was performed in 6 patients. The median dose of microspheres was 2.1 ± 0.4 GBq. A total of 12 therapy sessions was performed. The mean follow-up was 21.7 months. Technical success was 100%. No major complications occurred. Survival rates were 100, 57 and 57% for 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Three months after SIRT therapy partial response (PR) was seen in 6 patients (66%). Calculated reduction of liver metastasis volume was 49%. In 3 patients (33%) stable disease was seen with a calculated tumor reduction of 13%. The estimated time to progression was 11.1 months. Conclusion: Radioembolization with 90Y microspheres is safe and produces high response rates even with extensive tumor replacement for up to 1 year. Acute and late toxicity was very low. Further investigations compared with other local ablative techniques is warranted.

Antitumor Effects of Somatostatin Analogs in Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND For decades, somatostatin analogs (including octreotide and lanreotide) have been indicated for relief of the symptoms of flushing, diarrhea, and wheezing associated with secretory neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Recently, it has been suggested that somatostatin analogs may provide direct and indirect antitumor effects in secretory and nonsecretory NETs in addition to symptom control in secretory NETs. METHODS A systematic review of MEDLINE was conducted to identify studies that investigated the antitumor effects of octreotide or lanreotide for patients with NETs. Additional studies not published in the peer-reviewed literature were identified by searching online abstracts. Results. In all, 17 octreotide trials and 11 lanreotide trials that included antitumor effects were identified. Partial response rates were between 0% and 31%, and stable disease rates were between 15% and 89%. Octreotide was the only somatostatin analog for which results of a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that investigated antitumor effects were published. After 6 months of treatment in this randomized phase III trial, stable disease was observed in 67% of patients (hazard ratio for time to disease progression: 0.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.59; p = .000072). CONCLUSIONS In addition to symptom control for NETs, the data support an antitumor effect of somatostatin analogs and suggest that they may slow tumor growth. Long-acting repeatable octreotide has been shown to have an antitumor effect in a randomized phase III trial in midgut NETs, whereas results are pending in a corresponding controlled trial with lanreotide for patients with intestinal and pancreatic primary NETs.

Influence of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT/MRI on the clinical management of patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: an analysis in 188 patients.

Aim: Many studies describe the sensitivities and specificities of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) in patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GNT). We performed a study to evaluate the influence of these techniques on the therapeutic management of patients with advanced stages of GNT. Patients and Methods: The results of either CT/MRI scans or SRS were reviewed by two independent observers who decided on the therapy of a patient. They then had to determine whether the results of the complementary imaging modality would change the decision. The study design was a matched cross-over study with two groups matching in respect to tumor type, imaging modality known first to the observer, and number of patients. For further analysis, patients were divided into three subgroups dependent on tumor stage (group 1, without metastases, group 2, liver metastases, group 3, recurrent disease/extrahepatic metastases). Results: 188 patients were included into the study. If SRS was known to the observers first, CT/MRI changed the therapeutic management in 16.2, 13.9 and 11.4% of the patients (subgroups 1–3). SRS changed the therapeutic management in 13.5, 12.5 and 10.3%. Overall, CT/MRI would have changed the management in 13.3% and SRS in 11.7% of the patients. Conclusion: Though the patients studied mainly suffered from already advanced stages of the disease, all imaging techniques change the therapeutic management to a comparable extent. Our results support the importance of combined imaging in the management of patients with GNT.

Combination of Cross-Sectional and Molecular Imaging Studies in the Localization of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Molecular imaging modalities exploit aspects of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) pathophysiology for both diagnostic imaging and therapeutic purposes. The characteristic metabolic pathways of NET determine which tracers are useful for their visualization. In this review, we summarize the diagnostic value of all available molecular imaging studies, present data about their use in daily practice in NET centers globally, and finally make recommendations about the appropriate use of those modalities in specific clinical scenarios. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) continues to have a central role in the diagnostic workup of patients with NET, as it is also widely available. However, and despite the lack of prospective randomized studies, many NET experts predict that Gallium-68 (68Ga)-DOTA positron emission tomography (PET) techniques may replace SRS in the future, not only because of their technical advantages, but also because they are superior in patients with small-volume disease, in patients with skeletal metastases, and in those with occult primary tumors. Carbon-11 (11C)-5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan (5-HTP) PET and 18F-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-DOPA) PET are new molecular imaging techniques of limited availability, and based on retrospective data, their sensitivities seem to be inferior to that of 68Ga-DOTA PET. Glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor imaging seems promising for localization of the primary in benign insulinomas, but is currently available only in a few centers. Fluorine-18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET was initially thought to be of limited value in NET, due to their usually slow-growing nature. However, according to subsequent data, 18F-FDG PET is particularly helpful for visualizing the more aggressive NET, such as poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and well-differentiated tumors with Ki67 values >10%. According to limited data, 18F-FDG-avid tumor lesions, even in slow-growing NET, may indicate a more aggressive disease course. When a secondary malignancy has already been established or is strongly suspected, combining molecular imaging techniques (e.g. 18F-FDG PET and 68Ga-DOTA PET) takes advantage of the diverse avidities of different tumor types to differentiate lesions of different origins. All the above-mentioned molecular imaging studies should always be reviewed and interpreted in a multidisciplinary (tumor board) meeting in combination with the conventional cross-sectional imaging, as the latter remains the imaging of choice for the evaluation of treatment response and disease follow-up.

Long-term outcomes of surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with synchronous liver metastases

Background: The value of surgical resection in the management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) with liver metastases (LM) is still debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of surgery of PNET with LM. Methods: Patients with PNET with synchronous LM between 2000 and 2011 from 4 high-volume institutions were included. The patients were divided into 3 groups: curative resection, palliative resection, and no resection. Results: Overall, 166 patients were included. Eighteen patients (11%) underwent curative resection, 73 patients (43%) underwent palliative resection, and 75 patients (46%) underwent conservative treatment. The median overall survival (OS) from the time of diagnosis was 73 months. Patients who underwent curative resection had a significantly better median OS from the initial diagnosis compared with those who underwent palliative resection and those who were conservatively treated (97 vs. 89 vs. 36 months, p = 0.0001). The median OS from the time of diagnosis in those patients who underwent radical or palliative resection was 97 months, with a 5-year survival rate of 76%. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with OS from the time of diagnosis were the presence of bilobar metastases, tumor grading, and curative resection in a first model. On a second model, curative or palliative surgery was an independent predictor of OS. Among 91 patients who underwent surgery, the presence of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma G3 was the only factor independently associated with a poorer survival after surgery (median OS: 35 vs. 97 months, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Patients with LM from PNET benefit from surgical resection, although surgery should be reserved to well- or moderately differentiated forms.

ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Systemic Therapy - Biotherapy and Novel Targeted Agents

Systemic therapies established in the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) include somatostatin analogs and interferon-α, also referred to as biotherapy. Recent randomized controlled studies have extended the knowledge on the frequency of side effects associated with biotherapy. More recently, novel targeted drugs, such as the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus and the multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib, have been introduced in the management of NETs. Although targeted drugs are generally well tolerated, with most adverse events being of mild to moderate severity and manageable, novel targeted drugs exhibit a distinct adverse event profile that warrants guidance for appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic management. This is particularly important given the widespread and potentially long-term use of everolimus in a broad spectrum of NETs and of sunitinib in pancreatic NETs. This review will focus on the most relevant toxicities associated with biotherapy and novel targeted drugs and on their management. For each drug class indication, administration and dosing schedule, most frequent adverse events, actions and dose adjustments for adverse events as well as their monitoring are presented. This review further covers the evaluation of treatment effect, patient information, drug interactions, and information on pregnancy.