Anke M Nieuwesteeg
Tilburg University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anke M Nieuwesteeg.
Current Diabetes Reviews | 2012
Anke M Nieuwesteeg; Frans Pouwer; Rozemarijn van der Kamp; Hedwig J. A. van Bakel; H.J. Aanstoot; Esther E. Hartman
INTRODUCTION Children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) have to deal with a complex and demanding daily treatment regime which can have a negative impact on the quality of life (QoL) of these patients. The objective of the present study is to review studies that have compared generic quality of life of children and adolescents with T1DM with that of healthy peers. In addition, we will examine whether QoL differs between boys and girls, and across different developmental stages. METHODS A systematic literature search using PubMed was conducted for the years 2000 through May 2012. 17 studies were eligible for the current review. Effect sizes were computed to estimate the effects of having T1DM on QoL in children and adolescents. RESULTS Although individual studies reported small to moderate effect sizes on the distinct QoL-domains, the weighted effect sizes across all studies indicated no differences in QoL-domains between children and adolescents with T1DM and healthy controls. However, disease-specific problems were certainly present. Girls with T1DM reported lower generic and disease-specific QoL than boys with T1DM. Relationships between age and generic or disease-specific QoL remained unclear. CONCLUSIONS Although children and adolescents with T1DM have to live with a demanding treatment regime, overall results revealed that their generic QoL is not impaired compared to healthy peers. However, disease-specific QoL problems, including a negative impact of diabetes on daily functioning, and diabetes-related worries were certainly present. Longitudinal research is needed in order to provide tailored care for children of all ages with T1DM.
Diabetic Medicine | 2017
Anke M Nieuwesteeg; Esther E. Hartman; Wilco H. M. Emons; H.J.A. van Bakel; H.J. Aanstoot; E. van Mil; F. Pouwer
To compare levels of paediatric parenting stress in the fathers and mothers of young children with Type 1 diabetes and study the variation in this stress over time.
BMC Pediatrics | 2011
Anke M Nieuwesteeg; Frans Pouwer; Hedwig J. A. van Bakel; Wilco H. M. Emons; H.J. Aanstoot; Roelof Odink; Esther E. Hartman
BackgroundIn young children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) parents have full responsibility for the diabetes-management of their child (e.g. blood glucose monitoring, and administering insulin). Behavioral tasks in childhood, such as developing autonomy, and oppositional behavior (e.g. refusing food) may interfere with the diabetes-management to achieve an optimal blood glucose control. Furthermore, higher blood glucose levels are related to more behavioral problems. So parents might need to negotiate with their child on the diabetes-management to avoid this direct negative effect. This interference, the negotiations, and the parents responsibility for diabetes may negatively affect the quality of parent-child interaction. Nevertheless, there is little knowledge about the quality of interaction between parents and young children with T1DM, and the possible impact this may have on glycemic control and psychosocial functioning of the child. While widely used global parent-child interaction observational methods are available, there is a need for an observational tool specifically tailored to the interaction patterns of parents and children with T1DM. The main aim of this study is to construct a disease-specific observational method to assess diabetes-specific parent-child interaction. Additional aim is to explore whether the quality of parent-child interactions is associated with the glycemic control, and psychosocial functioning (resilience, behavioral problems, and quality of life).Methods/DesignFirst, we will examine which situations are most suitable for observing diabetes-specific interactions. Then, these situations will be video-taped in a pilot study (N = 15). Observed behaviors are described into rating scales, with each scale describing characteristics of parent-child interactional behaviors. Next, we apply the observational tool on a larger scale for further evaluation of the instrument (N = 120). The parents are asked twice (with two years in between) to fill out questionnaires about psychosocial functioning of their child with T1DM. Furthermore, glycemic control (HbA1c) will be obtained from their medical records.DiscussionA disease-specific observational tool will enable the detailed assessment of the quality of diabetes-specific parent-child interactions. The availability of such a tool will facilitate future (intervention) studies that will yield more knowledge about impact of parent-child interactions on psychosocial functioning, and glycemic control of children with T1DM.
Mindfulness | 2016
Inge J. P. Serkel-Schrama; Jolanda De Vries; Anke M Nieuwesteeg; Frans Pouwer; Ivan Nyklíček; Jane Speight; Esther I. de Bruin; Susan M. Bögels; Esther E. Hartman
The objective of this study was to examine associations between the mindful parenting style of parents of adolescents (aged 12–18) with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and the glycaemic control and quality of life (QoL) of the adolescents. Chronic health conditions, such as T1DM, that require demanding treatment regimens, can negatively impact adolescents’ quality of life. Therefore, it is important to determine whether mindful parenting may have a positive impact in these adolescents. Age, sex and duration of T1DM were examined as potential moderators. Parents (N = 215) reported on their own mindful parenting style (IM-P-NL) and the adolescents’ glycaemic control. Parents and the adolescents with T1DM (N = 129) both reported on adolescents’ generic and diabetes-specific QoL (PedsQL™). The results showed that a more mindful parenting style was associated with more optimal hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values for boys. For girls, a more mindful parenting style was associated with not having been hospitalized for ketoacidosis. For both boys and girls, a more mindful parenting style was associated with better generic and diabetes-specific proxy-reported QoL. In conclusion, mindful parenting style may be a factor in helping adolescents manage their T1DM. Mindful parenting intervention studies for parents of adolescents with T1DM are needed to examine the effects on adolescents’ glycaemic control and their quality of life.
BMC Pediatrics | 2014
Anke M Nieuwesteeg; Esther E. Hartman; Frans Pouwer; Wilco H. M. Emons; H.J. Aanstoot; Edgar van Mil; Hedwig J. A. van Bakel
BackgroundIn young children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), parents have complete responsibility for the diabetes-management. In toddlers and (pre)schoolers, the tasks needed to achieve optimal blood glucose control may interfere with normal developmental processes and could negatively affect the quality of parent–child interaction. Several observational instruments are available to measure the quality of the parent–child interaction. However, no observational instrument for diabetes-specific situations is available. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop a qualitative observation instrument, to be able to assess parent–child interaction during diabetes-specific situations.MethodsFirst, in a pilot study (n = 15), the observation instrument was developed in four steps: (a) defining relevant diabetes-specific situations; (b) videotaping these situations; (c) describing all behaviors in a qualitative observation instrument; (d) evaluating usability and reliability. Next, we examined preliminary validity (total n = 77) by testing hypotheses about correlations between the observation instrument for diabetes-specific situations, a generic observation instrument and a behavioral questionnaire.ResultsThe observation instrument to assess parent–child interaction during diabetes-specific situations, which consists of ten domains: “emotional involvement”, “limit setting”, “respect for autonomy”, “quality of instruction”, “negative behavior”, “avoidance”, “cooperative behavior”, “child’s response to injection”, “emphasis on diabetes”, and “mealtime structure”, was developed for use during a mealtime situation (including glucose monitoring and insulin administration).ConclusionsThe present study showed encouraging indications for the usability and inter-rater reliability (weighted kappa was 0.73) of the qualitative observation instrument. Furthermore, promising indications for the preliminary validity of the observation instrument for diabetes-specific situations were found (r ranged between |.24| and |.45| for significant correlations and between |.10| and |.23| for non-significant trends). This observation instrument could be used in future research to (a) test whether parent–child interactions are associated with outcomes (like HbA1c levels and psychosocial functioning), and (b) evaluate interventions, aimed at optimizing the quality of parent–child interactions in families with a young child with T1DM.
Diabetic Medicine | 2018
J. Aalders; Esther E. Hartman; Giesje Nefs; Anke M Nieuwesteeg; Christel Hendrieckx; H.J. Aanstoot; P. Winterdijk; E. van Mil; Jane Speight; F. Pouwer
To identify the sociodemographic and clinical correlates of fear of hypoglycaemia among parents of children (aged 4–18 years) with Type 1 diabetes and to examine the relationships between parental fear of hypoglycaemia, mindfulness and mindful parenting.
Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Diabetologie | 2013
Anke M Nieuwesteeg; Frans Pouwer; Henk-Jan Aanstoot; Hedwig J. A. van Bakel; Wilco H. M. Emons; Edgar van Mil; Esther E. Hartman
Research has shown that taking care of a child with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) can be stressful for parents and could have a negative effect on the parent-child interaction. It is currently unclear whether this leads to suboptimal HbA1c levels and decreased quality of life (QoL).
Mindfulness | 2014
Esther I. de Bruin; Bonne J. H. Zijlstra; Naline Geurtzen; Rinka M. P. Van Zundert; Eva van de Weijer-Bergsma; Esther E. Hartman; Anke M Nieuwesteeg; Larissa G. Duncan; Susan M. Bögels
European Journal of Pediatrics | 2016
Anke M Nieuwesteeg; Esther E. Hartman; Henk-Jan Aanstoot; Hedwig J. A. van Bakel; Wilco H. M. Emons; Edgar van Mil; Frans Pouwer
Canadian Journal of Diabetes | 2013
Annika Van Bussel; Anke M Nieuwesteeg; Eef Janssen; Hedwig J. A. van Bakel; Bea Van den Bergh; Nienke Maas-van Schaaijk; Roelof Odink; Kathinka Rijk; Esther E. Hartman