Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ann-Christine Andersson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ann-Christine Andersson.


Journal of Clinical Nursing | 2012

Patient participation in quality improvement: managers’ opinions of patients as resources

Ann-Christine Andersson; Anna Olheden

The aim of this study was to investigate managers’ opinions of how to take advantage of patients as resources in quality improvement work in the Swedish healthcare sector.


Journal of Nursing Care Quality | 2014

Evaluating a breakthrough series collaborative in a Swedish health care context.

Ann-Christine Andersson; Ewa Idvall; Kent-Inge Perseius; Mattias Elg

This study evaluated the use of the Breakthrough Series Collaborative methodology in a Swedish county council improvement program, comparing measurements at the beginning and after 6 months. A questionnaire was used, and improvement processes and outcomes were analyzed. The results showed an overall large engagement in improvements, although the methodology and facilitators were seen as only moderately supportive.


Quality management in health care | 2011

Five Types of Practice-Based Improvement Ideas in Health Care Services : An Empirically Defined Typology

Ann-Christine Andersson; Mattias Elg; Ewa Idvall; Kent-Inge Perseius

The aim of this study is to empirically identify and present different kinds of practice-based improvement ideas developed in health care services. The focus is on individual placement needs, problems/issues, and the ability to organize work on the development, implementation, and institutionalization of ideas for the health care sector. This study is based on a Swedish county council improvement program. Health care departments and primary health care centers in the Kalmar County Council were invited to apply for money to accomplish improvement projects. A qualitative content analysis was done of 183 proposed applications from various health care departments and primary health care centers. The following 5 types of improvement projects were identified: organizational process, evidence and quality, competence development, process technology, and proactive patient work. This illustrates the range of strategies that encourage letting individual units define their own improvement needs. These projects point to the various problems and experiences health care professionals encounter in their day-to-day work. To generalize beyond this improvement program and to validate the typology, we applied it to all articles found when searching for quality improvement projects in the journal Quality Management in Health Care during the last 2 years and found that all of them could be fitted into at least 1 of those 5 categories. This article provides valuable insights into the current state of improvement work in Swedish health care, and will serve as a foundation for further investigations in this quality improvement program.


BMC Health Services Research | 2013

Evaluating a questionnaire to measure improvement initiatives in Swedish healthcare

Ann-Christine Andersson; Mattias Elg; Kent-Inge Perseius; Ewa Idvall

BackgroundQuality improvement initiatives have expanded recently within the healthcare sector. Studies have shown that less than 40% of these initiatives are successful, indicating the need for an instrument that can measure the progress and results of quality improvement initiatives and answer questions about how quality initiatives are conducted. The aim of the present study was to develop and test an instrument to measure improvement process and outcome in Swedish healthcare.MethodsA questionnaire, founded on the Minnesota Innovation Survey (MIS), was developed in several steps. Items were merged and answer alternatives were revised. Employees participating in a county council improvement program received the web-based questionnaire. Data was analysed by descriptive statistics and correlation analysis. The questionnaire psychometric properties were investigated and an exploratory factor analysis was conducted.ResultsThe Swedish Improvement Measurement Questionnaire consists of 27 items. The Improvement Effectiveness Outcome dimension consists of three items and has a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.67. The Internal Improvement Processes dimension consists of eight sub-dimensions with a total of 24 items. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the complete dimension was 0.72. Three significant item correlations were found. A large involvement in the improvement initiative was shown and the majority of the respondents were satisfied with their work.ConclusionsThe psychometric property tests suggest initial support for the questionnaire to study and evaluate quality improvement initiatives in Swedish healthcare settings. The overall satisfaction with the quality improvement initiative correlates positively to the awareness of individual responsibilities.


International journal of healthcare management | 2017

Learning through networking in healthcare and welfare : The use of a breakthrough collaborative in the Swedish context

Ann-Christine Andersson; Marie Golsäter; Boel Andersson Gäre; Anna Melke

ABSTRACT Breakthrough Collaborative (BC) aims at learning through networking, mainly at micro level, and is used as a tool to improve care and welfare organizations. The aim of this study was to explore and illuminate the challenges when applying BC model at meso and macro level. In 2010, the Swedish Health and Medical Services Act stated the responsibility of healthcare professionals to consider children’s needs as relatives. This study uses an interactive collaborative research model. To support healthcare organizations in the implementation of the regulation, county councils/regions in Sweden were invited to take part in a BC during 2015. Six teams from different county councils/regions participated. Team members were interviewed several times during the project time. Data were analyzed with an explorative and descriptive qualitative content analysis. The result illuminates the challenges faced when applying BC at meso and macro level. Most challenges concern preparation, support structures and system connections. There are similarities with the challenges met at micro level when BC is used at meso and macro level. But it seems even more important to consider how the team is constituted at meso and macro level to make use of the learnings and achieve long-term impact in the home organization.


International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance | 2017

Applying adult development theories to improvement science

Sofia Kjellström; Ann-Christine Andersson

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to address how adult development (AD) theories can contribute to quality improvement (QI). Design/methodology/approach A theoretical analysis and discussion on how personal development empirical findings can relate to QI and Demings four improvement knowledge domains. Findings AD research shows that professionals have qualitatively diverse ways of meaning-making and ways to approach possibilities in improvement efforts. Therefore, professionals with more complex meaning-making capacities are needed to create successful transformational changes and learning, with the recognition that system knowledge is a developmental capacity. Practical implications In QI and improvement science there is an assumption that professionals have the skills and competence needed for improvement efforts, but AD theories show that this is not always the case, which suggests a need for facilitating improvement initiatives, so that everyone can contribute based on their capacity. Originality/value This study illustrates that some competences in QI efforts are a developmental challenge to professionals, and should be considered in practice and research.


Journal of general practice | 2017

How to Reach Effective Health Service Delivery

Ann-Christine Andersson

This means that health care need to get back to a more holistic view on what care is. It also includes more co-production [1], not only between care givers and their patient, but also between different caregivers across organizational boundaries. The biggest challenge to health care and social services today is how to produce the best and most effective and efficient care to all people in need. Public organizations are put under hard finical pressure, and new technology is good, but costly. Therefore, it would be even more important to cooperate in the future.


International Archives of Nursing and Health Care | 2017

Using quality improvement methods to implement guidelines to decrease the proportion of urinary retention in orthopaedic care

Ann-Christine Andersson; Rose-Marie Johansson; Mattias Elg; Boel Andersson-Gäre; Lennart Christensson

In patients treated with indwelling urethral catheter (IUC), complications such as catheter associated urinary tract infections are common, while underuse of IUC may cause harmful urinary retention ...


Global advances in health and medicine : improving healthcare outcomes worldwide | 2014

Two Different Strategies to Facilitate Involvement in Healthcare Improvements : A Swedish County Council Initiative

Ann-Christine Andersson; Ewa Idvall; Kent-Inge Perseius; Mattias Elg

Background: From a management point of view, there are many different approaches from which to choose to engage staff members in initiatives to improve performance. Objective: The present study evaluated how two different types of improvement strategies facilitate and encourage involvement of different professional groups in healthcare organizations. Methods/Design: Empirical data of two different types of strategies were collected within an improvement project in a County Council in Sweden. The data analysis was carried out through classifying the participants’ profession, position, gender, and the organizational administration of which they were a part, in relation to their participation. Setting: An improvement project in a County Council in Sweden. Participants: Designed Improvement Processes consisted of n=105 teams and Intrapreneurship Projects of n=202 projects. Intervention: Two different types of improvement strategies Designed Improvement Processes and Intrapreneurship Projects. Main Outcome Measures: How two different types of improvement strategies facilitate and encourage involvement of different professional groups in healthcare organizations. Results: Nurses were the largest group participating in both improvement initiatives. Physicians were also well represented, although they seemed to prefer the less structured Intrapreneurship Projects approach. Assistant nurses, being the second largest staff group, were poorly represented in both initiatives. This indicates that the benefits and support for one group may push another group aside. Conclusions: Managers need to give prerequisites and incentives for staff who do not participate in improvements to do so. Comparisons of different types of improvement initiatives are an underused research strategy that yields interesting and thoughtful results.


Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice | 2010

The importance of organizational climate and implementation strategy at the introduction of a new working tool in primary health care.

Siw Carlfjord; Ann-Christine Andersson; Per Nilsen; Preben Bendtsen; Malou Lindberg

Collaboration


Dive into the Ann-Christine Andersson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Agneta Berg

Kristianstad University College

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ann-Christin Janlöv

Kristianstad University College

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Johan Thor

Jönköping University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge