Ann E. White

EXTRACTS OF FEVERFEW INHIBIT GRANULE SECRETION IN BLOOD PLATELETS AND POLYMORPHONUCLEAR LEUCOCYTES

Extracts of feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium) inhibited secretory activity in blood platelets and polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMNs). Release of serotonin from platelets induced by various aggregating agents (adenosine diphosphate, adrenaline, sodium arachidonate, collagen, and U46619) was inhibited. Platelet aggregation was consistently inhibited but thromboxane synthesis was not. Feverfew also inhibited release of vitamin B12-binding protein from PMNs induced by the secretagogues formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine, sodium arachidonate, and zymosan-activated serum. Feverfew did not inhibit the secretion induced in platelets or PMNs by the calcium ionophore A23187. The pattern of the effects of the feverfew extracts on platelets is different from that obtained with other inhibitors of platelet aggregation and the effect on PMNs is more pronounced than has been obtained with very high concentrations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents.

Adenine nucleotide metabolism in human blood – important roles for leukocytes and erythrocytes

Summary.  Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) released into blood induces platelet aggregation and contributes to hemostasis and thrombosis. Released ATP can also induce platelet aggregation and there is evidence that blood leukocytes and also erythrocytes play important roles in this. Rapid metabolism of ADP and ATP by endothelial cells is important in protecting platelets from their effects. Here we have performed a systematic investigation of adenine nucleotide metabolism in human blood and the involvement of blood cells. Conversion of ATP to ADP in blood was due almost exclusively to the presence of leukocytes; plasma, platelets and erythrocytes made little or no contribution. Mononuclear leukocytes (MNLs) and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNLs) were equally effective. Conversion of ADP to AMP was also promoted by leukocytes, with no involvement of platelets or erythrocytes. Some ADP was also converted to ATP in blood, apparently via an enzyme present in plasma, but ATP was then rapidly removed by the leukocytes. Conversion of AMP to adenosine occurred via a plasma enzyme with little or no contribution from any cellular element. As expected, in blood the adenosine produced was removed very rapidly by erythrocytes and then converted to inosine and then hypoxanthine. In the absence of erythrocytes plasma supported only a slow conversion of adenosine to inosine and hypoxanthine, which was not influenced by platelets or leukocytes. This study has demonstrated that leukocytes and erythrocytes play a major role in adenine nucleotide metabolism in blood and that these cells, as well as endothelial cells, may be important determinants of the effects of ATP and ADP on platelets.

Mechanisms Involved in Adenosine Triphosphate–Induced Platelet Aggregation in Whole Blood

Objective—Effects on platelet aggregation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) released from damaged cells and from platelets undergoing exocytosis have not been clearly established. In this study we report on the effects of ATP on platelet aggregation in whole blood. Methods and Results—Aggregation, measured using a platelet-counting technique, occurred in response to ATP and was maximal at 10 to 100 &mgr;mol/L. It was abolished by MRS2179, AR-C69931, and creatine phosphate/creatine phosphokinase, implying that conversion to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) is required. ATP did not induce aggregation in platelet-rich plasma, but aggregation did occur when apyrase or hexokinase was added. Aggregation also occurred after addition of leukocytes to platelet-rich plasma (as a source of ecto-ATPase), and this was potentiated on removal of adenosine by adenosine deaminase, indicating that adenosine production modulates the response. Dipyridamole, which inhibits adenosine uptake into erythrocytes, inhibited aggregation induced by ATP in whole blood, and adenosine deaminase reversed this. DN9693 and forskolin synergized with dipyridamole to inhibit ATP-induced aggregation. Conclusions—ATP induces aggregation in whole blood via conversion of ATP to ADP by ecto-ATPases on leukocytes. This is inhibited by agents that prevent adenosine removal. Reduced aggregation at high concentrations of ATP (>100 &mgr;mol/L) may be a consequence of inhibition by ATP of ADP action at ADP receptors.

DG-041 inhibits the EP3 prostanoid receptor--a new target for inhibition of platelet function in atherothrombotic disease.

Receptors for prostanoids on platelets include the EP3 receptor for which the natural agonist is the inflammatory mediator prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) produced in atherosclerotic plaques. EP3 is implicated in atherothrombosis and an EP3 antagonist might provide atherosclerotic lesion-specific antithrombotic therapy. DG-041 (2,3-dichlorothiophene-5-sulfonic acid, 3-[1-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)-5-fluoro-3-methyl-1H-indol-7-yl]acryloylamide) is a direct-acting EP3 antagonist currently being evaluated in Phase 2 clinical trials. We have examined the contributions of EP3 to platelet function using the selective EP3 agonist sulprostone and also PGE2, and determined the effects of DG-041 on these. Studies were in human platelet-rich plasma or whole blood and included aggregometry and flow cytometry. Sulprostone enhanced aggregation induced by primary agonists including collagen, TRAP, platelet activating factor, U46619, serotonin and adenosine diphosphate, and enhanced P-selectin expression and platelet–leukocyte conjugate formation. It inhibited adenylate cyclase (measured by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation) and enhanced Ca2+ mobilization. It potentiated platelet function even in the presence of aspirin and/or AR-C69931 (a P2Y12 antagonist). DG-041 antagonized the effects of sulprostone on platelet function. The effect of PGE2 on platelet aggregation depended on the nature of the agonist and the concentration of PGE2 used as a consequence of both pro-aggregatory effects via EP3 and anti-aggregatory effects via other receptors. DG-041 potentiated the protective effects of PGE2 on platelet aggregation by inhibiting the pro-aggregatory effect via EP3 stimulation. DG-041 remained effective in the presence of a P2Y12 antagonist and aspirin. DG-041 warrants continued investigation as a potential agent for the treatment of atherothrombosis without inducing unwanted bleeding risk.

The role of prostanoid receptors in mediating the effects of PGE2 on human platelet function

The effects of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) on platelet function are believed to be the result of opposing mechanisms that lead to both enhancement and inhibition of platelet function. Enhancement of platelet function is known to be via EP3 receptors linked to Gi and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. However, the receptors involved in inhibition of platelet function have not been fully defined. Here we have used measurements of platelet aggregation, calcium signaling and P-selectin expression to assess platelet function induced by platelet activating factor (PAF), thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP-6) and the thromboxane A2 mimetic U46619 respectively, to determine the effects of PGE2 and of selective prostanoid receptor agonists on platelet function. Their effects on vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation were also determined. We also assessed the ability of selective prostanoid receptor antagonists to modify the effects of PGE2. The agonists and antagonists used were iloprost (IP agonist), ONO-DI-004 (EP1 agonist), ONO-AE1-259 (EP2 agonist), sulprostone (EP3 agonist), ONO-AE1-329 (EP4 agonist), CAY10441 (IP antagonist), ONO-8713 (EP1 antagonist), DG-041 (EP3 antagonist) and ONO-AE3-208 (EP4 antagonist). Using the agonists available to us we demonstrated that EP3, EP4 and IP receptors elicit functional responses in platelets. The EP3 receptor agonist promoted platelet aggregation, calcium signaling and P-selectin expression and this was associated with a reduction in VASP phosphorylation. Conversely agonists acting at IP and EP4 receptors inhibited platelet function and this was associated with an increase in VASP phosphorylation. The effects on platelet function and VASP phosphorylation of the selective prostanoid receptor antagonists used in conjunction with PGE2 were consistent with PGE2 interacting with EP3 receptors to enhance platelet function and with EP4 receptors (but not IP receptors) to inhibit platelet function. This is the first demonstration of the involvement of EP4 receptors in platelet responses to PGE2.

Enhanced platelet aggregation and activation under conditions of hypothermia

The effects on platelet function of temperatures attained during hypothermia used in cardiac surgery are controversial. Here we have performed studies on platelet aggregation in whole blood and platelet-rich plasma after stimulation with a range of concentrations of ADP, TRAP, U46619 and PAF at both 28 degrees C and 37 degrees C. Spontaneous aggregation was also measured after addition of saline alone. In citrated blood, spontaneous aggregation was markedly enhanced at 28 degrees C compared with 37 degrees C. Aggregation induced by ADP was also enhanced. Similar results were obtained in hirudinised blood. There was no spontaneous aggregation in PRP but ADP-induced aggregation was enhanced at 28 degrees C. The P2Y12 antagonist AR-C69931 inhibited all spontaneous aggregation at 28 degrees C and reduced all ADP-induced aggregation responses to small, reversible responses. Aspirin had no effect. Aggregation was also enhanced at 28 degrees C compared with 37 degrees C with low but not high concentrations of TRAP and U46619. PAF-induced aggregation was maximal at all concentrations when measured at 28 degrees C, but reversal of aggregation was seen at 37 degrees C. Baseline levels of platelet CD62P and CD63 were significantly enhanced at 28 degrees C compared with 37 degrees C. Expression was significantly increased at 28 degrees C after stimulation with ADP, PAF and TRAP but not after stimulation with U46619. Overall, our results demonstrate an enhancement of platelet function at 28 degrees C compared with 37 degrees C, particularly in the presence of ADP.

PGE1 and PGE2 modify platelet function through different prostanoid receptors.

There is evidence that the overall effects of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) on human platelet function are the consequence of a balance between promotory effects of PGE(2) acting at the EP3 receptor and inhibitory effects acting at the EP4 receptor, with no role for the IP receptor. Another prostaglandin that has been reported to affect platelet function is prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)), however the receptors that mediate its actions on platelet function have not been fully defined. Here we have used measurements of platelet aggregation and P-selectin expression induced by the thromboxane A(2) mimetic U46619 to compare the effects of PGE(1) and PGE(2) on platelet function. Their effects on vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation, as a marker of cAMP, were also determined. We also investigated the ability of the selective prostanoid receptor antagonists CAY10441 (IP antagonist), DG-041 (EP3 antagonist) and ONO-AE3-208 (EP4 antagonist) to modify the effects of the prostaglandins on platelet function. The results obtained confirm that PGE(2) interacts with EP3 and EP4 receptors, but not IP receptors. In contrast PGE(1) interacts with EP3 and IP receptors, but not EP4 receptors. In both cases the overall effects on platelet function reflect the balance between promotory and inhibitory effects at receptors that have opposite effects on adenylate cyclase.

Adenosine Derived From ADP Can Contribute to Inhibition of Platelet Aggregation in the Presence of a P2Y12 Antagonist

Objective—To investigate whether adenosine diphosphate (ADP)–derived adenosine might inhibit platelet aggregation, especially in the presence of a P2Y12 antagonist, where the effects of ADP at the P2Y12 receptor would be prevented. Methods and Results—Platelet aggregation was measured in response to thrombin receptor activator peptide by platelet counting in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and whole blood in the presence of ADP and the P2Y12 antagonists cangrelor, prasugrel active metabolite, and ticagrelor. In the presence of a P2Y12 antagonist, preincubation of PRP with ADP inhibited aggregation; this effect was abolished by adenosine deaminase. No inhibition of aggregation occurred in whole blood except when dipyridamole was added to inhibit adenosine uptake into erythrocytes. The effects of ADP in PRP and whole blood were replicated using adenosine and were directly related to changes in cAMP (assessed by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation). All results were the same irrespective of the P2Y12 antagonist used. Conclusion—ADP inhibits platelet aggregation in the presence of a P2Y12 antagonist through conversion to adenosine. Inhibition occurs in PRP but not in whole blood except when adenosine uptake is inhibited. None of the P2Y12 antagonists studied replicated the effects of dipyridamole in the experiments that were performed.

Mode of action of P2Y12 antagonists as inhibitors of platelet function

P2Y(12) receptor antagonists are antithrombotic agents that inhibit platelet function by blocking the effects of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) at P2Y (12)receptors. However, some P2Y(12) receptor antagonists may affect platelet function through additional mechanisms. It was the objective of this study to investigate the possibility that P2Y(12) antagonists inhibit platelet function through interaction with G-protein-coupled receptors other than P2Y(12) receptors. We compared the effects of cangrelor, ticagrelor and the prasugrel active metabolite on platelet aggregation and on phosphorylation of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP). We compared their effects with those of selective IP, EP4 and A2A agonists, which act at Gs-coupled receptors. All three P2Y(12) antagonists were strong inhibitors of ADP-induced platelet aggregation but only partial inhibitors of aggregation induced by thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) or the thromboxane A2 mimetic U46619. Further, after removing ADP and its metabolites using apyrase and adenosine deaminase, the P2Y(12) antagonists produced only minor additional inhibition of TRAP or U46619-induced aggregation. Conversely, the Gs-coupled receptor agonists always produced strong inhibition of aggregation irrespective of whether ADP was removed. Other experiments using selective receptor agonists and antagonists provided no evidence of any of the P2Y(12) antagonists acting through PAR1, TP, IP, EP4, A2A or EP3 receptors. All three P2Y (12)antagonists enhanced VASP-phosphorylation to a small and equal extent but the effects were much smaller than those of the IP, EP4 and A2A agonists. The effects of cangrelor, ticagrelor and prasugrel on platelet function are mediated mainly through P2Y(12)receptors and not through another G-protein-coupled receptor.

Differential effects of three radiographic contrast media on platelet aggregation and degranulation: implications for clinical practice?

We have determined the effects of three radiographic contrast media on platelet aggregation and degranulation in vitro. Aggregation was measured as loss of single platelets, and degranulation was measured as P‐selectin expression using flow cytometry. Iopamidol added to hirudinized blood induced aggregation directly and also potentiated that induced by weak platelet agonists such as adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Iodixanol also potentiated platelet aggregation, but ioxaglate inhibited it. Iopamidol also caused marked platelet degranulation. The pro‐aggregatory effect of iopamidol was evident in non‐anticoagulated blood as well as in hirudinized blood, but not in citrated blood. In platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) prepared from hirudinized blood neither iopamidol nor iodixanol directly induced platelet aggregation, but they rendered platelets hypersensitive to ADP. ADP antagonists inhibited the platelet aggregation and degranulation induced by iopamidol in whole blood, whereas aspirin, an inhibitor of thromborane A2 synthesis, did not. These data are consistent with clinical reports of increased thromboembolic risk with non‐ionic low‐osmolar media, and raise concerns about the routine use of these contrast media during diagnostic and interventional arteriographic procedures. Routine use of citrate in previous experiments may have masked a pro‐aggregatory effect of some contrast media.