Ann Efthimiadis

Mepolizumab for Prednisone-Dependent Asthma with Sputum Eosinophilia

BACKGROUND Eosinophilic inflammation, which may be a consequence of interleukin-5 action, is a characteristic feature of some forms of asthma. However, in three previous clinical trials involving patients with asthma, blockade of this cytokine did not result in a significant improvement in outcomes. We studied the prednisone-sparing effect of mepolizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-5, in a rare subgroup of patients who have sputum eosinophilia and airway symptoms despite continued treatment with prednisone. Secondary objectives were to examine its effect on the number of eosinophils in sputum and blood, symptoms, and airflow limitation. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial involving patients with persistent sputum eosinophilia and symptoms despite prednisone treatment, we assigned 9 patients to receive mepolizumab (administered in five monthly infusions of 750 mg each) and 11 patients to receive placebo. RESULTS There were 12 asthma exacerbations in 10 patients who received placebo, 9 of whom had sputum eosinophilia at the time of exacerbation. In comparison, only one patient who received mepolizumab had an asthma exacerbation, and this episode was not associated with sputum eosinophilia (P=0.002). Patients who received mepolizumab were able to reduce their prednisone dose by a mean (+/-SD) of 83.8+/-33.4% of their maximum possible dose, as compared with 47.7+/-40.5% in the placebo group (P=0.04). The use of mepolizumab was associated with a significant decrease in the number of sputum and blood eosinophils. Improvements in eosinophil numbers, asthma control, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second were maintained for 8 weeks after the last infusion. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Mepolizumab reduced the number of blood and sputum eosinophils and allowed prednisone sparing in patients who had asthma with sputum eosinophilia despite prednisone treatment. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00292877.)

Measurement of inflammatory indices in induced sputum: effects of selection of sputum to minimize salivary contamination

Sputum examination is being used increasingly as a noninvasive method to assess airway inflammation. Expectorated sputum has variable contamination with saliva. Methods of processing have included the selection of portions of the sample considered to be representative of pulmonary origin versus use of the whole specimen, which is confounded by varying volumes of saliva. We compared cell profiles and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) concentration in sputum selected from the expectorate and in the usually discarded residual portion to determine to what degree salivary contamination is minimized and if the results are representative of lower respiratory secretions. Sputum was induced with hypertonic saline in six healthy and nine asthmatic subjects. All portions considered to be of pure lower respiratory tract origin were selected from the residual. The selected and residual portions were treated with dithiothreitol, total cell counts and cell viability were obtained, cytospins were made for differential cell counts and supernatant was collected for ECP assay. Selected portions of the specimens, in comparison with the residual portion showed: little squamous cell contamination (median 1.2 vs 70%; p < 0.001); higher total cell counts.mL-1 (5.1 vs 0.5 x 10(6) cells.mL-1; p < 0.001); higher number of viable nonsquamous cells per sample (1.9 vs 0.6 x 10(6) cells; p < 0.001); higher slide quality score (7 vs 4; p < 0.001); and higher levels of ECP (768 vs 136 micrograms.L-1; p < 0.001). There were no differences in the differential cell counts of eosinophils (1.3 vs 3.8%), neutrophils (44 vs 32%), and lymphocytes (0.6 vs 0.6%). While the proportion of macrophages was lower (36 vs 54%; p < 0.05), the absolute number (41 vs 19 x 10(4) cells; p < 0.05) was higher in the selected portion. In summary, selection of all portions of induced sputum from the expectorate minimized the confounding influence of saliva. Loss of nonsquamous cells in the residual portion was variable but usually less than one third of those in the selected portion. With one exception, this loss had little influence on the differential counts of inflammatory cells. Similar observations apply to eosinophilic cationic protein levels. We conclude that, in healthy subjects and treated asthmatics, inflammatory markers in the selected portion of the expectorate can be used to represent those in the lower respiratory tract in general.

Measuring airway inflammation in asthma: Eosinophils and eosinophilic cationic protein in induced sputum compared with peripheral blood

BACKGROUND Airway eosinophilic inflammation is a characteristic feature of asthma. This can be assessed directly by measurement of eosinophils and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) in sputum or indirectly by measurement of the same markers in blood. We investigated the performance of these markers of airway eosinophilic inflammation in a population of patients with asthma compared with control subjects and the extent to which the markers differed. METHODS In a cross-sectional study, subject characteristics were documented on day 1 and induced sputum and blood samples were obtained on day 2. Nineteen patients with asthma and 20 control subjects (10 healthy subjects and 10 smokers with nonobstructive bronchitis) were consecutively enrolled in the study. Sputum (selected from saliva) and blood samples were processed by persons blind to the clinical details. Results are presented as median values (minimum-maximum); differences were measured by Mann-Whitney U test. The accuracy of the tests (sensitivity and specificity) was measured by plotting the data in receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and comparing the areas under the curve for each marker. RESULTS Patients with asthma in comparison with control subjects had a higher proportion of sputum eosinophils (5.2% [0.2% to 93%] vs 0.3% [0% to 1.7%], p < 0.001), higher numbers of blood eosinophils (350.0 x 10(6)/L [144.0 to 1520.0 x 10(6)/L] vs 155.0 x 10(6)/L [34.0 to 426.0 x 10(6)/L], p = 0.003), and higher levels of ECP in sputum (1040.0 micrograms/L [76.8 to 32,000.0 micrograms/L] vs 455.3 micrograms/L [54.4 to 1280.0 micrograms/L], p = 0.001) but not in serum (25.0 micrograms/L [5.6 to 52.4 micrograms/L] vs 16.5 micrograms/L [3.3 to 36.0 micrograms/L], p = 0.08). Markers of airway inflammation in induced sputum and blood samples were correlated with clinical and physiologic variables. The area under the ROC curve showed that eosinophils in sputum (0.90) are significantly more accurate markers than blood eosinophils (0.72) and serum ECP (0.67) (p = 0.02). Although the area under the ROC curve for sputum ECP was greater than those for blood eosinophils and serum ECP, the differences could have occurred by chance (p > or = 0.1). CONCLUSION We conclude that the proportion of eosinophils in sputum is a more accurate marker of asthmatic airway inflammation than the proportions of blood eosinophils or serum ECP.

Methods of sputum processing for cell counts, immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridisation

Since the first attempts to use standardised methods for sampling induced airways sputum, two methods for processing the expectorate have evolved. The first involves selecting all viscid or denser portions from the expectorated sample with the aid of an inverted microscope 1, 2. This method has been extensively evaluated and reported in detail 2–4. The second approach involves processing the entire expectorate, comprising sputum plus variable amounts of saliva 5. Recent modifications to this method include collecting saliva and sputum separately in order to reduce salivary contamination 6–8. Both methods have advantages and disadvantages. The advantages of using selected sputum are: squamous cell contamination is 20% of all recovered cells 4. There is conflicting data as to whether or not differential cell counts (DCCs) differ between the two methods. One study reported a higher percentage of eosinophils in sputum processed by the selection method compared to the entire expectorate 9 but this has not been confirmed in other studies 2, 6, 10. Although, both the selected …

Diagnosing occupational asthma: use of induced sputum

The diagnosis of occupational asthma (OA) needs to be made with as much objective evidence as possible. If there is airway inflammation, measurement of this should be an asset. The objective of this study was to investigate whether there is an increase in induced sputum and blood eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in OA after work exposure. Patients were assessed after a 2-4 week period at work and away from work with cell counts and ECP assays performed blind to the clinical data. They were considered to have OA if symptoms were worse at work and there was a fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) > or =20% or in the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) of four-fold or more compared with away from work. Patients whose symptoms were worse at work but had a change in FEV1 of <20% and in methacholine PC20 of less than four-fold were considered as controls. Sixteen patients were studied. Ten had OA and six were controls. Patients with OA had a significant increase in median (interquartile range) sputum eosinophils and ECP when at work compared with the periods out of work, 10.0 (17.05) versus 0.8 (1.6)% (p=0.007) and 3,840 (6,076) versus 116 (180) microg x L(-1) (p=0.01). They also had a higher blood eosinophil count, 0.3 (0.5) x 10(9) versus 0.2 (0.1) x 10(9) x L(-1) (p=0.013), and a trend towards higher serum ECP levels, 44.0 (20.0) versus 32.0 (18.5) microg x L(-1) (p=0.07). In conclusion, the proportion of eosinophils and levels of eosinophil cationic protein in sputum are particularly high at work in patients with occupational asthma, suggesting that the measurement of these factors can supplement other physiological outcomes in establishing the diagnosis of occupational asthma.

Induced sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage and blood from mild asthmatics: inflammatory cells, lymphocyte subsets and soluble markers compared

Airway inflammation in asthma can be measured directly by invasive bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), directly and relatively noninvasively by induced sputum and indirectly from peripheral blood. We compared cellular and fluid phase indices of inflammation in induced sputum, BAL and blood from 11 adults with mild stable asthma. On one day, induced sputum selected from saliva was collected and on the next, blood and BAL. Median results of sputum compared with BAL showed a higher number of nonsquamous cells (53 versus 0.8 x 10(6) cells x mL(-1), p=0.003), more neutrophils (34.3 versus 1.0%, p<0.001), CD4+ and CD19+ T-cells (76.5 versus 54.7%, p=0.01 and 5.2 versus 1.1%, p=0.03, respectively), fewer macrophages (603 versus 95.0%, p=0.002) and markedly higher levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) (264 versus 2.0 microg x L(-1), p<0.001), tryptase (17.6 versus 2.2 UI x L(-1), p<0.001) and fibrinogen (1,400 versus 150 microg x L(-1), p=0.001). Sputum and BAL neutrophils and CD4+ T-cells were strongly correlated. Sputum and BAL differed from blood by having higher proportions of T-cells (94.9 and 98.9% versus 87.7%, p=0.002) and lower proportions of CD19+ T-lymphocytes (p=0.04 and 0.006). Sputum also differed from blood by having higher proportions of CD4+ T-cells (76.5 versus 51.4%, p=0.001), lower proportions of CD8+ cells (24.0 versus 403%, p=0.04) and a higher CD4+/CD8+ ratio (3.3 versus 1.4, p=0.01). We conclude that in mild asthmatics, sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage and blood measure different compartments of inflammation. Induced selected sputum has the advantage over bronchoalveolar lavage of higher density of cell recovery and stronger signal for fluid-phase markers.

Induced sputum cell and fluid-phase indices of inflammation: comparison of treatment with dithiothreitol vs phosphate-buffered saline

Treatment of sputum with dithiothreitol (DTT) gives reliable measurements of cellular and fluid-phase markers of airway inflammation. We investigated the extent to which DTT treatment influences these measurements as compared with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Hypertonic saline-induced sputum, collected from 20 asthmatic subjects, was examined within 2 h. All portions which looked more solid (less fluid) than saliva were collected from the expectorate. The selected sputum was then divided into two portions: one treated with one volume of DTT and one volume of PBS, the other with two volumes of PBS. The filtrates were assessed blind for total and differential cell count, viability, and fluid-phase eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), fibrinogen, interleukin (IL)-5 and IL-8. Sputum treated with DTT compared with PBS had lower proportions of viable cells (median 66 versus 74%; p=0.003). In contrast, DTT-treated sputum had higher total cell counts (median 8.8 vs 2.8 x 10(6) mL(-1); p<0.001) and levels of ECP (median 1340 vs 584 mg x L(-1); p<0.001) The measurements were similar with respect to the proportion of eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, and fluid-phase fibrinogen, IL-5 and IL-8. We conclude that dithiothreitol disperses cells more effectively and that this might account for the higher levels of eosinophil cationic protein. Dithiothreitol may affect cell viability, but the changes are not relevant with respect to cell counts. Additionally, dithiothreitol does not seem to influence the other measurements performed.

Nonasthmatic chronic cough: No effect of treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid in patients without sputum eosinophilia.

BACKGROUND Inhaled corticosteroids are effective in suppressing a chronic cough without asthma associated with sputum eosinophilia. OBJECTIVE To investigate the inflammatory characteristics in the induced sputum of patients with a chronic cough without asthma or known cause and the effects of budesonide treatment on chronic cough in those patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-four adults (mean [minimu, maximum] age of 45 years [20,75], 28 women, 17 atopic subjects and 32 nonsmokers], with a daily bothersome cough for at least one year and who had no evidence of asthma or other known cause for the cough, were consecutively enrolled. The trial was a randomized, double-blind, controlled parallel group trial of budesonide 400 mg twice daily for two weeks versus placebo. Patients then received open administration of the same dose of budesonide for a further two weeks. Sputum was induced before and at the end of each treatment period. Cough severity was documented by a visual analogue scale. RESULTS Thirty-nine (89%) patients produced mucoid sputum after induction on at least one study visit. At baseline, the majority (59%) had a mild elevation in the median proportion of neutrophils (65%). All had elevated fluid phase levels of fibrinogen (3200 mg/L) and albumin (880 mg/L), and high levels of interleukin-8 and substance P. Interleukin-8 correlated with neutrophils (rho=0.72, P<0.001), fibrinogen (rho=0.65, P<0.001), albumin (rho=0.67, P=0. 001) and eosinophil cationic protein (rho=0.60, P=0.001). Substance P correlated with albumin (rho=0.60, P=0.006). No subject had an increase in eosinophils. Treatment with budesonide did not affect cough or sputum measurements. CONCLUSIONS Patients with nonasthmatic chronic cough enrolled in this study had evidence of a mild neutrophilia and/or microvascular leakage. Chronic cough did not respond to treatment with budesonide, perhaps because the cause was not associated with sputum eosinophilia.

Effect of salmeterol compared with beclomethasone on allergen-induced asthmatic and inflammatory responses

Salmeterol is a selective long-acting beta 2-agonist bronchodilator considered to have added anti-inflammatory effects, but this is controversial. We investigated the effects of a single dose of salmeterol, 100 micrograms, on the physiological and inflammatory responses to inhaled allergen and compared these with the effects of a single dose of beclomethasone, 500 micrograms, and of placebo. Eight atopic adults with mild stable asthma, treated only with inhaled short-acting beta 2-agonist when needed, attended the laboratory sequentially for screening tests, two single-blind control inhalation tests preceded 30 min by placebo or salmeterol and three allergen inhalation tests preceded by placebo, salmeterol or beclomethasone double-blind in random order. Airway responsiveness to methacholine (assessed as the provocative concentration of methacholine producing 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20)), induced sputum eosinophils, blood eosinophils and serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were examined before and 7-48 h after treatment. The statistical power to detect twofold changes in blood and sputum parameters was > or = 90%. Salmeterol inhaled before allergen challenge completely prevented the early asthmatic response, late asthmatic response and fall in methacholine PC20 at 24 h, and produced additional bronchodilatation. These effects were similar to those obtained by the inhalation of a single dose of salmeterol before the control inhalation test, and significantly better than those observed after a single dose of beclomethasone inhaled before the allergen test. Beclomethasone had no effect on the early asthmatic response or on the fall in methacholine PC20 at 24 h but partially inhibited the late asthmatic response. Neither salmeterol nor beclomethasone had any significant effect on sputum or blood inflammatory changes 7-48 h after allergen inhalation. In conclusion, whilst salmeterol had no demonstrable anti-inflammatory action in sputum after allergen challenge in asthma, neither did a single dose of the positive anti-inflammatory control, beclomethasone. The latter result excludes a more positive judgement on the possible anti-inflammatory action of salmeterol. However, the results do indicate that potent functional effects of a single dose of salmeterol can mask the airway inflammatory cell influx caused by inhaled allergen.

Occupational eosinophilic bronchitis without asthma: An unknown occupational airway disease

The introduction of reliable methods to measure inflammatory Cells in sputum has made it possible to identify the occurrence of eosinophilic bronchitis without asthma? Patients are first seen with a chronic cough without variable airflow limitation or airway hyperresponsiveness, and the condition Js reversed by glucocorticoid treatment. 2 For the first time, we descrlbe a case of eosinophilic bronchitis related to exposure to acrylates in the workplace. CASE REPORT A 50-year-old woman was employed for 2 years at a company that produced weather strips for vehicles. The job required her to use glue containing cyanoacrylate and methacrylate, which are known to induce occupational asthma. Three months after starting this work she noticed shortness of breath, chest tighthess, wheezing, and persistent dry cough, as well as nasal symptoms such as a runny, stuffy nose and sneezing when at work. These symptoms improved substantially on weekends. She was a 15 pack-year smoker and quit 20 years ago. Her family history was negative for allergies and asthma. Results of physical examination and chest radiography were normal. Allergy skin prick test responses to 19 common extracts were negative. Her treatment had consisted of albuterol inhaler as needed and budesonide nasal spray (200 ixg/day) for 1.5 months and Tegretol (200 mg/day) for petit mal epilepsy.