Ann L. Beyer

A large nucleolar U3 ribonucleoprotein required for 18S ribosomal RNA biogenesis

Although the U3 small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA), a member of the box C/D class of snoRNAs, was identified with the spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) over 30 years ago, its function and its associated protein components have remained more elusive. The U3 snoRNA is ubiquitous in eukaryotes and is required for nucleolar processing of pre-18S ribosomal RNA in all organisms where it has been tested. Biochemical and genetic analyses suggest that U3–pre-rRNA base-pairing interactions mediate endonucleolytic pre-rRNA cleavages. Here we have purified a large ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae that contains the U3 snoRNA and 28 proteins. Seventeen new proteins (Utp1–17) and Rrp5 were present, as were ten known components. The Utp proteins are nucleolar and specifically associated with the U3 snoRNA. Depletion of the Utp proteins impedes production of the 18S rRNA, indicating that they are part of the active pre-rRNA processing complex. On the basis of its large size (80S; calculated relative molecular mass of at least 2,200,000) and function, this complex may correspond to the terminal knobs present at the 5′ ends of nascent pre-rRNAs. We have termed this large RNP the small subunit (SSU) processome.

In Exponentially Growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cells, rRNA Synthesis Is Determined by the Summed RNA Polymerase I Loading Rate Rather than by the Number of Active Genes

ABSTRACT Genes encoding rRNA are multicopy and thus could be regulated by changing the number of active genes or by changing the transcription rate per gene. We tested the hypothesis that the number of open genes is limiting rRNA synthesis by using an electron microscopy method that allows direct counting of the number of active genes per nucleolus and the number of polymerases per active gene. Two strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae were analyzed during exponential growth: a control strain with a typical number of rRNA genes (∼143 in this case) and a strain in which the rRNA gene number was reduced to ∼42 but which grows as well as controls. In control strains, somewhat more than half of the genes were active and the mean number of polymerases/gene was ∼50 ± 20. In the 42-copy strain, all rRNA genes were active with a mean number of 100 ± 29 polymerases/gene. Thus, an equivalent number of polymerases was active per nucleolus in the two strains, though the number of active genes varied by twofold, showing that overall initiation rate, and not the number of active genes, determines rRNA transcription rate during exponential growth in yeast. Results also allow an estimate of elongation rate of ∼60 nucleotides/s for yeast Pol I and a reinitiation rate of less than 1 s on the most heavily transcribed genes.

RNP particles at splice junction sequences on Drosophila chorion transcripts

HnRNP particles are located at specific sites on nascent transcripts when chromatin is spread for electron microscopic visualization. To determine if the sequences bound by the particles play a role in RNA processing, we have correlated the nascent transcript morphology of Drosophila chorion s36-1 and s38-1 genes with their nucleotide sequences. We find that RNP particles about 25 nm in diameter are at the splice junctions of the introns in these two transcripts. On the more mature chorion transcripts, a single larger (40 nm) particle is occasionally seen in the same vicinity, which probably results from the coalescence of the two smaller particles. This RNP structure may be involved in bringing splice junctions into close proximity and in maintaining this proximity during the bipartite splicing intermediate stage.

RPD3 is required for the inactivation of yeast ribosomal DNA genes in stationary phase

rRNA transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is performed by RNA polymerase I and regulated by changes in growth conditions. During log phase, ∼50% of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) genes in each cell are transcribed and maintained in an open, psoralen‐accessible conformation. During stationary phase, the percentage of open rDNA genes is greatly reduced. In this study we found that the Rpd3 histone deacetylase was required to inactivate (close) individual rDNA genes as cells entered stationary phase. Even though ∼50% of the rDNA genes remained open during stationary phase in rpd3Δ mutants, overall rRNA synthesis was still reduced. Using electron microscopy of Miller chromatin spreads, we found that the number of RNA polymerases transcribing each open gene in the rpd3Δ mutant was significantly reduced when cells grew past log phase. Bulk levels of histone H3 and H4 acetylation were reduced during stationary phase in an RPD3‐dependent manner. However, histone H3 and H4 acetylation was not significantly altered at the rDNA locus in an rpd3Δ mutant. Rpd3 therefore regulates the number of open rDNA repeats.

Sch9 regulates ribosome biogenesis via Stb3, Dot6 and Tod6 and the histone deacetylase complex RPD3L

TORC1 is a conserved multisubunit kinase complex that regulates many aspects of eukaryotic growth including the biosynthesis of ribosomes. The TOR protein kinase resident in TORC1 is responsive to environmental cues and is potently inhibited by the natural product rapamycin. Recent characterization of the rapamycin‐sensitive phosphoproteome in yeast has yielded insights into how TORC1 regulates growth. Here, we show that Sch9, an AGC family kinase and direct substrate of TORC1, promotes ribosome biogenesis (Ribi) and ribosomal protein (RP) gene expression via direct inhibitory phosphorylation of the transcriptional repressors Stb3, Dot6 and Tod6. Deletion of STB3, DOT6 and TOD6 partially bypasses the growth and cell size defects of an sch9 strain and reveals interdependent regulation of both Ribi and RP gene expression, and other aspects of Ribi. Dephosphorylation of Stb3, Dot6 and Tod6 enables recruitment of the RPD3L histone deacetylase complex to repress Ribi/RP gene promoters. Taken together with previous studies, these results suggest that Sch9 is a master regulator of ribosome biogenesis through the control of Ribi, RP, ribosomal RNA and tRNA gene transcription.

EM Visualization of Transcription by RNA Polymerase II: Downstream Termination Requires a Poly(A) Signal but Not Transcript Cleavage

We have used EM visualization of active genes on plasmid vectors in Xenopus oocyte nuclei to investigate the relationship between poly(A) signals and RNA polymerase II transcription termination. Although a functional poly(A) signal is required for efficient termination, cotranscriptional RNA cleavage at the poly(A) site is not. Furthermore, the phenomena of termination and cotranscriptional RNA cleavage can be uncoupled, and the efficiency of both varies independently on different copies of the same plasmid template in the same oocyte nucleus. The combined observations are consistent with a scenario in which there is template-specific addition to Pol II (presumably at the promoter) of elongation and/or RNA processing factors, which are altered upon passage through a poly(A) signal, resulting in termination and, in some cases, cotranscriptional RNA cleavage.

Correlation of hnRNP structure and nascent transcript cleavage

Using electron microscopy of spread chromatin, we have observed nonnucleolar transcription units from Drosophila melanogaster and Calliphora erythrocephala that display specific cleavage of nascent transcripts. We have quantitatively analyzed 20 of these relatively long transcription units. The primary RNP structure of homologous transcripts is nonrandom with respect to both RNA sequence and the cleavage event. In general, released RNA fragments have a smooth fibrillar RNP morphology (approximately 50 A wide) and retained segments have a thicker particulate morphology (approximately 250 A diameter). A characteristic secondary structure formation also accompanies cleavage--that is, RNP fibril loops form by association of noncontiguous transcript sequences that correspond to the terminal regions of the segment to be released. RNP particles form at the loop base sequences prior to their association and apparently coalesce upon loop formation. These loops, and thus the released segments, range in length from 1 and 25 kb on the examples we have analyzed. Cleavage of nascent hnRNA transcripts appears to be a fairly common event in these organisms and occurs within 0.3-3 min after transcription of the cleavage site.

RNA polymerase II elongation factors Spt4p and Spt5p play roles in transcription elongation by RNA polymerase I and rRNA processing

Previous investigations into the mechanisms that control RNA Polymerase (Pol) I transcription have primarily focused on the process of transcription initiation, thus little is known regarding postinitiation steps in the transcription cycle. Spt4p and Spt5p are conserved throughout eukaryotes, and they affect elongation by Pol II. We have found that these two proteins copurify with Pol I and associate with the rDNA in vivo. Disruption of the gene for Spt4p resulted in a modest decrease in growth and rRNA synthesis rates at the permissive temperature, 30°C. Furthermore, biochemical and EM analyses showed clear defects in rRNA processing. These data suggest that Spt4p, Spt5p, and, potentially, other regulators of Pol I transcription elongation play important roles in coupling rRNA transcription to its processing and ribosome assembly.

Distinguishing the roles of Topoisomerases I and II in relief of transcription-induced torsional stress in yeast rRNA genes.

ABSTRACT To better understand the role of topoisomerase activity in relieving transcription-induced supercoiling, yeast genes encoding rRNA were visualized in cells deficient for either or both of the two major topoisomerases. In the absence of both topoisomerase I (Top1) and topoisomerase II (Top2) activity, processivity was severely impaired and polymerases were unable to transcribe through the 6.7-kb gene. Loss of Top1 resulted in increased negative superhelical density (two to six times the normal value) in a significant subset of rRNA genes, as manifested by regions of DNA template melting. The observed DNA bubbles were not R-loops and did not block polymerase movement, since genes with DNA template melting showed no evidence of slowed elongation. Inactivation of Top2, however, resulted in characteristic signs of slowed elongation in rRNA genes, suggesting that Top2 alleviates transcription-induced positive supercoiling. Together, the data indicate that torsion in front of and behind transcribing polymerase I has different consequences and different resolution. Positive torsion in front of the polymerase induces supercoiling (writhe) and is largely resolved by Top2. Negative torsion behind the polymerase induces DNA strand separation and is largely resolved by Top1.

The Paf1 complex is required for efficient transcription elongation by RNA polymerase I.

Regulation of RNA polymerase I (Pol I) transcription is critical for controlling ribosome synthesis. Most previous investigations into Pol I transcription regulation have focused on transcription initiation. To date, the factors involved in the control of Pol I transcription elongation are poorly understood. The Paf1 complex (Paf1C) is a well-defined factor that influences polymerase II (Pol II) transcription elongation. We found that Paf1C associates with rDNA. Deletion of genes for Paf1C subunits (CDC73, CTR9, or PAF1) reduces the rRNA synthesis rate; however, there is no significant alteration of rDNA copy number or Pol I occupancy of the rDNA. Furthermore, EM analysis revealed a substantial increase in the frequency of large gaps between transcribing polymerases in ctr9Δ mutant cells compared with WT. Together, these data indicate that Paf1C promotes Pol I transcription through the rDNA by increasing the net rate of elongation. Thus, the multifunctional, conserved transcription factor Paf1C plays an important role in transcription elongation by Pol I in vivo.