Ann Spangler

Results of the Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs (ADROP) Survey of Radiation Oncology Residency Program Directors

PURPOSE To survey the radiation oncology residency program directors on the topics of departmental and institutional support systems, residency program structure, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements, and challenges as program director. METHODS A survey was developed and distributed by the leadership of the Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs to all radiation oncology program directors. Summary statistics, medians, and ranges were collated from responses. RESULTS Radiation oncology program directors had implemented all current required aspects of the ACGME Outcome Project into their training curriculum. Didactic curricula were similar across programs nationally, but research requirements and resources varied widely. Program directors responded that implementation of the ACGME Outcome Project and the external review process were among their greatest challenges. Protected time was the top priority for program directors. CONCLUSIONS The Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs recommends that all radiation oncology program directors have protected time and an administrative stipend to support their important administrative and educational role. Departments and institutions should provide adequate and equitable resources to the program directors and residents to meet increasingly demanding training program requirements.

Radiation practice patterns among United States radiation oncologists for postmastectomy breast reconstruction and oncoplastic breast reduction

BACKGROUND For patients requiring radiation therapy following mastectomy or breast reconstruction, there often exist much heterogeneity among practitioners with respect to radiation technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS A 14-question survey was sent nationwide to 1000 active email addresses from the American Society for Radiation Oncology member directory; 271 radiation oncologists completed the survey. RESULTS A total of 75.2% of respondents indicate that they do not routinely deflate the ipsilateral tissue expander (TE) prior to radiation, while 11.5% do routinely deflate (P ≤ .01); 52.2% indicate that they typically use bolus when treating their patients with TEs following mastectomy, 36.7% do not, and 11.1% on a case by case basis (P ≤ .01). Of respondents indicating bolus utilization, 32.8% use a bolus of 0.5 cm every other day; 31.4% indicate a bolus of 0.5 cm every day until tolerated; 20.4% use a bolus of 1 cm every other day; 5.8% indicate a bolus of 1 cm every day until tolerated; and 9.5% indicate a customized bolus approach (P ≤ .01). A total of 22.9% of respondents deliver boost to all patients with TE while 42.9% deliver boost only to select patients, and 33.5% indicate no utilization of boost (P ≤ .01). A total of 33.1% indicate that collaborating surgeons routinely place clips at the lumpectomy cavity at the time of breast reduction or complex tissue rearrangement, while 38.3% indicate that clips are occasionally placed, and 28.6% stated clips are not routinely placed (P = .15); 38.7% of respondents routinely deliver a boost for patients undergoing breast reduction only if clips have been placed in the tumor cavity, while 34.6% indicate that a boost is used regardless of clip placement. CONCLUSIONS Radiation treatments with tissue expanders have become common practice, but details of radiation treatment vary widely. Radiation oncologist and breast surgeons should continue to work to optimize radiation techniques and allow proper localization for radiation boost.

Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Gold Fiducial Markers for Stereotactic Partial-Breast Irradiation

OBJECTIVE A novel technique of placing gold fiducial markers in the breast using ultrasound guidance was developed and performed in 51 of 55 consecutive postlumpectomy patients enrolled in a phase I dose escalation trial of accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) using robotic-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). CONCLUSION All 51 postoperative patients underwent successful fiducial placement without complications. Our technique of placing gold fiducial markers in proximity to the seroma cavity is considered safe and effective for breast cancer patients being treated with APBI using robotic-based SBRT.

Deep inspiration breathhold for left-sided breast cancer patients with unfavorable cardiac anatomy requiring internal mammary nodal irradiation

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of moderate deep inspiration breathhold (mDIBH) in reducing heart exposure in left breast cancer patients who have unfavorable cardiac anatomy and need internal mammary lymph node (IMLN) radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS We used maximum heart distance (MHD), defined as the maximum distance of the heart within the treatment field, >1 cm as a surrogate for unfavorable cardiac anatomy. Twenty-two left breast cancer patients with unfavorable cardiac anatomy requiring IMLN-RT underwent free-breathing (FB) and mDIBH computed tomography simulation and planning. Three-dimensional partially wide tangents (3D-PWTs) and intensity modulated RT plans were generated. Dose-volume histograms were used to compare heart and lung dosimetric parameters. Duration of treatment delivery was recorded for all fractions. RESULTS MHD decreased significantly in mDIBH scans. mDIBH significantly reduced mean heart dose (222.7 vs 578.4 cGy; P < .0001) and percentage of left lung receiving doses ≥20 Gy (V20; 31.93 vs 38.41%; P = .0006) in both 3D-PWT and intensity modulated RT plans. The change in MHD after breathhold reliably predicted mean heart dose reduction after mDIBH. Radiation was effectively delivered in 11.31 ± 3.40 minutes with an average of 10.06 ± 2.74 breathholds per fraction. CONCLUSIONS mDIBH is efficient and can effectively decrease mean heart dose in patients with unfavorable cardiac anatomy who need IMLN-RT, thus simplifying planning and delivery for them. The reduction in mean heart dose is proportional to the reduction in maximum heart distance.

Electronic Medical Record–Based Radiation Oncology Toxicity Recording Instrument Aids Benchmarking and Quality Improvement in the Clinic

PURPOSE The on-treatment visit (OTV) for radiation oncology is essential for patient management. Radiation toxicities recorded during the OTV may be inconsistent because of the use of free text and the lack of treatment site-specific templates. We developed a radiation oncology toxicity recording instrument (ROTOX) in a health system electronic medical record (EMR). Our aims were to assess improvement in documentation of toxicities and to develop clinic toxicity benchmarks. METHODS A ROTOX that was based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) with flow-sheet functionality was developed in the EMR. Improvement in documentation was assessed at various time intervals. High-grade toxicities (ie, grade ≥ 3 by CTCAE) by site were audited to develop benchmarks and to track nursing and physician actions taken in response to these. RESULTS A random sample of OTV notes from each clinic physician before ROTOX implementation was reviewed and assigned a numerical document quality score (DQS) that was based on completeness and comprehensiveness of toxicity grading. The mean DQS improved from an initial level of 41% to 99% (of the maximum possible DQS) when resampled at 6 months post-ROTOX. This high-level DQS was maintained 3 years after ROTOX implementation at 96% of the maximum. For months 7 to 9 after implementation (during a 3-month period), toxicity grading was recorded in 4,443 OTVs for 698 unique patients; 107 episodes of high-grade toxicity were identified during this period, and toxicity-specific intervention was documented in 95%. CONCLUSION An EMR-based ROTOX enables consistent recording of treatment toxicity. In a uniform sample of patients, local population toxicity benchmarks can be developed, and clinic response can be tracked.