Anna Berkenblit

Phase III Study to Evaluate Temsirolimus Compared With Investigator's Choice Therapy for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

PURPOSE Temsirolimus, a specific inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin kinase, has shown clinical activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We evaluated two dose regimens of temsirolimus in comparison with investigators choice single-agent therapy in relapsed or refractory disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this multicenter, open-label, phase III study, 162 patients with relapsed or refractory MCL were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive one of two temsirolimus regimens: 175 mg weekly for 3 weeks followed by either 75 mg (175/75-mg) or 25 mg (175/25-mg) weekly, or investigators choice therapy from prospectively approved options. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent assessment. RESULTS Median PFS was 4.8, 3.4, and 1.9 months for the temsirolimus 175/75-mg, 175/25-mg, and investigators choice groups, respectively. Patients treated with temsirolimus 175/75-mg had significantly longer PFS than those treated with investigators choice therapy (P = .0009; hazard ratio = 0.44); those treated with temsirolimus 175/25-mg showed a trend toward longer PFS (P = .0618; hazard ratio = 0.65). Objective response rate was significantly higher in the 175/75-mg group (22%) compared with the investigators choice group (2%; P = .0019). Median overall survival for the temsirolimus 175/75-mg group and the investigators choice group was 12.8 months and 9.7 months, respectively (P = .3519). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the temsirolimus groups were thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, and asthenia. CONCLUSION Temsirolimus 175 mg weekly for 3 weeks followed by 75 mg weekly significantly improved PFS and objective response rate compared with investigators choice therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL.

Cediranib, an Oral Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Kinases, Is an Active Drug in Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancer

PURPOSE Angiogenesis is important for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) growth, and blocking angiogenesis can lead to EOC regression. Cediranib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) -1, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, and c-kit. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a phase II study of cediranib for recurrent EOC or peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer; cediranib was administered as a daily oral dose, and the original dose was 45 mg daily. Because of toxicities observed in the first 11 patients, the dose was lowered to 30 mg. Eligibility included <or= two lines of chemotherapy for recurrence. End points included response rate (via Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] or modified Gynecological Cancer Intergroup CA-125), toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Forty-seven patients were enrolled; 46 were treated. Clinical benefit rate (defined as complete response [CR] or partial response [PR], stable disease [SD] > 16 weeks, or CA-125 nonprogression > 16 weeks), which was the primary end point, was 30%; eight patients (17%; 95% CI, 7.6% to 30.8%) had a PR, six patients (13%; 95% CI, 4.8% to 25.7%) had SD, and there were no CRs. Eleven patients (23%) were removed from study because of toxicities before two cycles. Grade 3 toxicities (> 20% of patients) included hypertension (46%), fatigue (24%), and diarrhea (13%). Grade 2 hypothyroidism occurred in 43% of patients. Grade 4 toxicities included CNS hemorrhage (n = 1), hypertriglyceridemia/hypercholesterolemia/elevated lipase (n = 1), and dehydration/elevated creatinine (n = 1). No bowel perforations or fistulas occurred. Median PFS was 5.2 months, and median OS has not been reached; median follow-up time is 10.7 months. CONCLUSION Cediranib has activity in recurrent EOC, tubal cancer, and peritoneal cancer with predictable toxicities observed with other TKIs.

Tivozanib Versus Sorafenib As Initial Targeted Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From a Phase III Trial

PURPOSE Tivozanib is a potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR1), -2, and -3. This phase III trial compared tivozanib with sorafenib as initial targeted therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic RCC, with a clear cell component, prior nephrectomy, measurable disease, and 0 or 1 prior therapies for metastatic RCC were randomly assigned to tivozanib or sorafenib. Prior VEGF-targeted therapy and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor were not permitted. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent review. RESULTS A total of 517 patients were randomly assigned to tivozanib (n = 260) or sorafenib (n = 257). PFS was longer with tivozanib than with sorafenib in the overall population (median, 11.9 v 9.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.797; 95% CI, 0.639 to 0.993; P = .042). One hundred fifty-six patients (61%) who progressed on sorafenib crossed over to receive tivozanib. The final overall survival (OS) analysis showed a trend toward longer survival on the sorafenib arm than on the tivozanib arm (median, 29.3 v 28.8 months; HR, 1.245; 95% CI, 0.954 to 1.624; P = .105). Adverse events (AEs) more common with tivozanib than with sorafenib were hypertension (44% v 34%) and dysphonia (21% v 5%). AEs more common with sorafenib than with tivozanib were hand-foot skin reaction (54% v 14%) and diarrhea (33% v 23%). CONCLUSION Tivozanib demonstrated improved PFS, but not OS, and a differentiated safety profile, compared with sorafenib, as initial targeted therapy for metastatic RCC.

Phase I Study of Neratinib in Combination With Temsirolimus in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Dependent and Other Solid Tumors

PURPOSE Human epidermal growth factor (HER) -mediated signaling is critical in many cancers, including subsets of breast and lung cancer. HER family members signal via the phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) -AKT/protein kinase B-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) cascade; mTOR activation is critical for the expression of multiple contributors to tumor growth and invasion. On the basis of preclinical data suggesting synergy of HER2 inhibition and mTOR inhibition in breast and lung cancer models, we conducted a phase I combination study of neratinib, a small-molecule irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study enrolled patients to dosing combinations of neratinib and temsirolimus. The primary objective was to estimate the toxicity contour of the combination and establish recommended phase II doses. RESULTS Sixty patients were treated on 12 of 16 possible dosing combinations. Diarrhea was the most common drug-related (93%) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), constituting four of 10 DLTs. Dose-limiting grade 3 metabolic abnormalities were also observed. Other frequent drug-related toxicities included nausea, stomatitis (both 53%), and anemia (48%). Two maximum-tolerated dose combinations were identified: 200 mg of neratinib/25 mg of temsirolimus and 160 mg of neratinib/50 mg of temsirolimus. Responses were noted in patients with HER2-amplified breast cancer resistant to trastuzumab, HER2-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer, and tumor types without identified mutations in the HER-PI3K-mTOR pathway. CONCLUSION The combination of neratinib and temsirolimus was tolerable and demonstrated antitumor activity in multiple tumor types, warranting further evaluation.

Phase I Clinical Trial of STA-4783 in Combination with Paclitaxel in Patients with Refractory Solid Tumors

Purpose: STA-4783 is a new compound that markedly enhances the therapeutic index of paclitaxel against human tumor xenograft models. A phase I clinical trial was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics of STA-4783 in combination with paclitaxel. Experimental Design: Adults with refractory solid tumors concurrently received STA-4783 and paclitaxel as a 3-h i.v. infusion at starting doses of 44 and 135 mg/m2, respectively. After increasing paclitaxel to 175 mg/m2, the STA-4783 dose was escalated as permitted by dose-limiting toxicity during the first 21-day cycle. Results: Thirty-five patients were treated with eight dose levels of STA-4783/paclitaxel. In patients receiving 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel, the incidence of severe toxicity increased with escalation of the STA-4783 dose above 263 mg/m2, and 438 mg/m2 was the maximum tolerated dose. All toxicities were typical of paclitaxel, with neutropenia, mucositis, and myalgia/arthralgia being dose limiting. Partial responses were achieved in one patient with Kaposis sarcoma and another with ovarian cancer that progressed during prior treatment with paclitaxel. STA-4783 exhibited linear pharmacokinetics characterized by rapid elimination from plasma (biological half-life, 1.06 ± 0.24 h) and a low steady-state apparent volume of distribution (25.1 ± 8.1 L/m2). The total body clearance of paclitaxel decreased significantly with escalation of the STA-4783 dose. Conclusions: The STA-4783/paclitaxel combination was well tolerated with a toxicity profile similar to single-agent paclitaxel. Enhanced systemic exposure to paclitaxel resulting from a dose-dependent interaction with STA-4783 was associated with increased toxicity. Objective responses in two heavily pretreated patients, both with taxane exposure, have encouraged further clinical evaluation of this regimen.

Q-TWiST Analysis of Patients Receiving Temsirolimus or Interferon Alpha for Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

AbstractBackground and Objective: For patients with advanced cancers, it is important that treatment improves the quality as well as the quantity of survival. This quality-adjusted time without symptoms of progression or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis provides a combined measure of both the overall survival interval and the quality of survival for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) receiving temsirolimus, interferon (IFN)-α or the combination of these agents, using data from a phase III clinical trial. Methods: Overall survival was partitioned into three distinct health states: time with serious toxicity (TOX), time after progression (REL) and time without symptoms of progression or toxicity (TWiST). Health states were quality weighted by patient-reported EQ-5D measures collected while receiving treatment. Results: All 626 patients from the trial were included in computation of health-state durations. EQ-5D questionnaires were obtained from 260 patients upon progression and from 230 after a grade 3 or 4 adverse event, and from 278 patients in the TWiST state. Patients receiving temsirolimus had 38% longer TWiST than those receiving IFNα (6.5 vs 4.7 months, respectively; p = 0.0005). Patients receiving temsirolimus had 25% longer qualityadjusted survival in terms of Q-TWiST than those receiving IFNa (7.0 vs 5.6 months, respectively; p = 0.0015). Differences between the combination (temsirolimus + IFNα) and IFNα groups were not statistically significant.Threshold utility analysis indicated that temsirolimus was the preferred alternative for all possible utility weights for REL and TOX health states. Conclusion: Temsirolimus resulted in significantly longer Q-TWiST (qualityadjusted survival) in patients with advanced RCC than IFNα therapy.

Overall survival results from a phase III study of tivozanib hydrochloride versus sorafenib in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

350 Background: Tivozanib hydrochloride (tivozanib) is a potent, selective, tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting all three vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, with a long half-life. Tivozanib has shown tolerability and superior progression-free survival and overall response rate versus sorafenib in a phase III trial (TIVO-1) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Final overall survival (OS) data (August 27, 2012) from TIVO-1 and its open-label, multicenter extension study are reported. METHODS A total of 517 patients were randomized 1:1 to tivozanib 1.5 mg/d (3 weeks on, 1 week off) or sorafenib 400 mg/d (twice a day, continuously) (J Clin Oncol2012;30[suppl]:Abstract 4501). In the extension study, patients who progressed (PD) on sorafenib based on investigator assessment were eligible to receive tivozanib, and patients with PD on tivozanib received subsequent treatment according to regional standards of care. Final OS analysis was planned to be conducted after all patients had died or were lost to follow-up, or when all patients in follow-up had been on study for at least 2 years, whichever occurred first. OS was compared using the stratified log-rank test. OS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratio (HR) was estimated using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS At the time of final OS analysis (2 years after last patient was enrolled), 219 deaths had occurred (tivozanib, n=118 [45.4%]; sorafenib, n=101 [39.3%]) (stratified HR=1.245; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.954-1.624; p=0.105), trending in favor of the sorafenib arm. Median OS (95% CI) was 28.8 months (22.5-NA) for tivozanib and 29.3 months (29.3-NA) for sorafenib. Of the 257 patients on sorafenib, 155 (60.3%) had started next-line tivozanib at the time of the analysis. CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in OS between the two treatment arms. The high rate of utilization of second-line tivozanib in patients following PD on sorafenib may have affected the OS outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION NCT01030783.

Docetaxel, Capecitabine and Carboplatin in Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer: A Phase II Study

Purpose: A Phase I investigation of docetaxel, carboplatin, and capecitabine at our institution demonstrated the safety and tolerability of this regimen in patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer. The objectives of this Phase II study were to determine the response rate, toxicity, and survival for patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer treated with this regimen. Materials and Methods: Chemotherapy naïve patients with metastatic esophageal or gastric cancer received a regimen comprised of docetaxel 40 mg/m2, days 1 and 8, carboplatin AUC = 2, Days 1 and 8, and capecitabine 2000 mg/m2, Days 1–10 in 21-Day cycles. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Twenty-five patients were treated with a median of 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Twelve of 25 patients (48 percent) had a Grade 3/4 toxicity. There were no Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities, and 1 patient (4 percent) had neutropenic fever. There were 3 complete responses, and 9 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 48 percent. The median survival was 8 months (95% confidence interval, 5.5–13 months), and the 1-year survival was 36 percent. Conclusions: Weekly docetaxel and carboplatin with capecitabine was an easily administered outpatient regimen. The response rate and 1-year survival were similar to more complex regimens. Future trials may investigate the substitution of carboplatin with more active agents.

Phase I study of docetaxel, capecitabine, and carboplatin in metastatic esophagogastric cancer.

Objectives:A phase I trial was conducted to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of docetaxel, capecitabine, and carboplatin for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic esophageal and gastric cancers. Methods:Twenty-eight patients were treated over 5 dose levels in a 21-day cycle. Patients received carboplatin (AUC = 2) on days 1 and 8, docetaxel (35–40 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine (500–2000 mg/m2) on days 1 to 10. Results:There were no DLTs in the first cycle of treatment. Dose reductions were required in 10 of 15 patients at the final dose level due to neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, and hand/foot syndrome following a median of 3 cycles of treatment. Therefore, escalation beyond dose level 5 was not attempted. The MTD was docetaxel, 40 mg/m2 days 1 and 8; carboplatin, AUC = 2 days 1 and 8; and capecitabine, 1500 to 2000 mg/m2 days 1 to 10 in a 21-day cycle. Ten of 25 patients who could be evaluated (40%) responded and 8 of 14 patients treated at the final dose level responded (57%). Conclusions:Cumulative gastrointestinal toxicities and neutropenia were the DLTs of docetaxel, capecitabine, and carboplatin. This combination represents an easily administered, active regimen for patients with metastatic gastric and esophageal cancers. Further evaluation of this regimen is indicated.

Subgroup analyses of a phase III trial comparing tivozanib hydrochloride versus sorafenib as initial targeted therapy for patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

354 Background: Tivozanib hydrochloride (T) is a potent, selective, tyrosine kinase inhibitor of all 3 VEGF receptors with a long half-life. T has shown tolerability and has extended progression-free survival (PFS) compared with sorafenib (S; median 11.9 months vs. 9.1 months; p =0.042) in a phase III trial (TIVO-1) as initial targeted therapy for pts with mRCC. We report results of PFS subgroup analyses from TIVO-1. METHODS Pts with clear-cell mRCC, prior nephrectomy, and ≤1 prior treatment for mRCC were randomized to T (n=260) or S (n=257). Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate PFS. RESULTS Significant improvement in PFS by T vs. S was observed for the following prespecified subgroups: white, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, ≥1 year since diagnosis, no prior treatment, ≥2 metastatic sites, North America/Western Europe, baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤140 mm Hg, and baseline diastolic BP (DBP) ≤90 mm Hg. Exploratory subgroup analysis showed a similar significant improvement by T vs. S in Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) favorable prognostic group, and pts who developed hypertension on study had significantly longer PFS than pts with normal BP. The improvement in PFS by T vs S was more marked for the subgroups that developed hypertension (selected subgroups shown in the table). CONCLUSIONS PFS subgroup analyses showed a consistent advantage with T vs. S for mRCC. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION NCT01030783. [Table: see text].