Anna DuVal
Johns Hopkins University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anna DuVal.
Journal of Hiv\/aids & Social Services | 2013
Amanda E. Tanner; Morgan M. Philbin; Mary A. Ott; Anna DuVal; Jonathan M. Ellen; Bill G. Kapogiannis; J. Dennis Fortenberry
The fragmentation of HIV-related diagnostic and treatment services, especially for youth, is a significant barrier for engaging in care. The authors identified key elements that affected care linkage efforts and conducted 64 interviews across 15 clinical sites. The constant comparative method was used. Primary linkages to care processes are illustrated through three geographically diverse case studies. Factors included interagency relationships, data-sharing protocols, and service duplication concerns. Program improvement strategies were discussed. A strong, citywide network is helpful in coordinating care linkage services. These partnerships will be critical in effectively realizing the goals of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy.
Molecular Imaging and Biology | 2007
Una D. McCann; Zsolt Szabo; Melin Vranesic; Esen Seckin; Gary S. Wand; Anna DuVal; Robert F. Dannals; George A. Ricaurte
PurposeThe appetite suppressants fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine were widely prescribed before being withdrawn from the market in 1997. Both drugs are known to have the potential to damage brain serotonin (5-HT) axons and axon terminals in animals, including nonhuman primates. This study used quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) with [11C] McN5652, a serotonin transporter (SERT) ligand to determine whether humans previously exposed to fenfluramines showed reductions in SERT binding parameters.ProceduresSubjects previously treated with fenfluramines for weight loss (N = 15) and age-matched controls (N = 17) underwent PET studies with [11C] McN5652. Global and regional distribution volumes (DVs) of [11C] McN5652 were compared in the two subject groups using parametric statistical analyses.ResultsCompared to controls, subjects previously exposed to fenfluramines had significant reductions in [11C]McN5652 binding in 14 of 15 regions of interest, more than four years after drug discontinuation.ConclusionsThese results are the first to provide direct evidence for fenfluramine-induced 5-HT neurotoxicity in humans.
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes | 2016
Morgan M. Philbin; Amanda E. Tanner; Anna DuVal; Jonathan M. Ellen; Jiahong Xu; Bill G. Kapogiannis; Jim Bethel; J. D. Fortenberry
Objective: To examine how the time from HIV testing to care referral and from referral to care linkage influenced time to care engagement for newly diagnosed HIV-infected adolescents. Methods: We evaluated the Care Initiative, a care linkage and engagement program for HIV-infected adolescents in 15 US clinics. We analyzed client-level factors, provider type, and intervals from HIV testing to care referral and from referral to care linkage as predictors of care engagement. Engagement was defined as a second HIV-related medical visit within 16 weeks of initial HIV-related medical visit (linkage). Results: At 32 months, 2143 youth had been referred. Of these, 866 were linked to care through the Care Initiative within 42 days and thus eligible for study inclusion. Of the linked youth, 90.8% were ultimately engaged in care. Time from HIV testing to referral (eg, ⩽7 days versus >365 days) was associated with engagement [adjusted odds ratio = 2.91; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.43 to 5.94] and shorter time to engagement (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.79). Individuals with shorter care referral to linkage intervals (eg, ⩽7 days versus 22–42 days) engaged in care faster (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.90; 95% CI: 2.34 to 3.60) and more successfully (adjusted odds ratio = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.04 to 3.89). Conclusions: These data address a critical piece of the care continuum and can offer suggestions of where and with whom to intervene to best achieve the care engagement goals outlined in the US National HIV/AIDS Strategy. These results may also inform programs and policies that set concrete milestones and strategies for optimal care linkage timing for newly diagnosed adolescents.
AIDS | 2014
Jonathan M. Ellen; Bill G. Kapogiannis; J. Dennis Fortenberry; Jiahong Xu; Nancy Willard; Anna DuVal; Jill Pace; Jackie Loeb; Dina Monte; James Bethel
Objectives:To describe the HIV viral load and CD4+ cell counts of youth (12–24 years) in 14 cities from March 2010 through November 2011. Methods:Baseline HIV viral load and CD4+ cell count data were electronically abstracted in a central location and in an anonymous manner through a random computer-generated coding system without any ability to link codes to individual cases. Results:Among 1409 HIV reported cases, 852 participants had data on both viral load and CD4+ cell counts. Of these youth, 34% had CD4+ cell counts of 350 or less, 27% had cell counts from 351 to 500, and 39% had CD4+ cell counts greater than 500. Youth whose transmission risk was male-to-male sexual contact had higher viral loads compared with youth whose transmission risk was perinatal or heterosexual contact. Greater than 30% of those who reported male-to-male sexual contact had viral loads greater than 50 000 copies, whereas less than 20% of heterosexual contact youth had viral loads greater than 50 000 copies. There were no differences noted in viral load by type of testing site. Conclusion:Most HIV-infected youth have CD4+ cell counts and viral load levels associated with high rates of sexual transmission. Untreated, these youth may directly contribute to high rates of ongoing transmission. It is essential that any public health test and treat strategy place a strong emphasis on youth, particularly young MSM.
PLOS ONE | 2018
John H. Powers; Elizabeth D. Bacci; Nancy Kline Leidy; Jiat Ling Poon; Sonja Stringer; Matthew J. Memoli; Alison Han; Mary P. Fairchok; Christian Coles; Jackie Owens; Wei Ju Chen; John C. Arnold; Patrick Danaher; Tahaniyat Lalani; Timothy Burgess; Eugene V. Millar; Michelande Ridoré; Andres Hernandez; Patricia Rodríguez-Zulueta; Hilda Ortega-Gallegos; Arturo Galindo-Fraga; Guillermo M. Ruiz-Palacios; Sarah Pett; William A. Fischer; Daniel Gillor; Laura Moreno Macias; Anna DuVal; Richard B. Rothman; Andrea Freyer Dugas; M. Lourdes Guerrero
Background The inFLUenza Patient Reported Outcome (FLU-PRO) measure is a daily diary assessing signs/symptoms of influenza across six body systems: Nose, Throat, Eyes, Chest/Respiratory, Gastrointestinal, Body/Systemic, developed and tested in adults with influenza. Objectives This study tested the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of FLU-PRO scores in adults with influenza-like illness (ILI). Methods Data from the prospective, observational study used to develop and test the FLU-PRO in influenza virus positive patients were analyzed. Adults (≥18 years) presenting with influenza symptoms in outpatient settings in the US, UK, Mexico, and South America were enrolled, tested for influenza virus, and asked to complete the 37-item draft FLU-PRO daily for up to 14-days. Analyses were performed on data from patients testing negative. Reliability of the final, 32-item FLU-PRO was estimated using Cronbach’s alpha (α; Day 1) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC; 2-day reproducibility). Convergent and known-groups validity were assessed using patient global assessments of influenza severity (PGA). Patient report of return to usual health was used to assess responsiveness (Day 1–7). Results The analytical sample included 220 ILI patients (mean age = 39.3, 64.1% female, 88.6% white). Sixty-one (28%) were hospitalized at some point in their illness. Internal consistency reliability (α) of FLU-PRO Total score was 0.90 and ranged from 0.72–0.86 for domain scores. Reproducibility (Day 1–2) was 0.64 for Total, ranging from 0.46–0.78 for domain scores. Day 1 FLU-PRO scores correlated (≥0.30) with the PGA (except Gastrointestinal) and were significantly different across PGA severity groups (Total: F = 81.7, p<0.001; subscales: F = 6.9–62.2; p<0.01). Mean score improvements Day 1–7 were significantly greater in patients reporting return to usual health compared with those who did not (p<0.05, Total and subscales, except Gastrointestinal and Eyes). Conclusions Results suggest FLU-PRO scores are reliable, valid, and responsive in adults with influenza-like illness.
Value in Health | 2017
John H. Powers; Elizabeth D. Bacci; M. Lourdes Guerrero; Nancy Kline Leidy; Sonja Stringer; Katherine Kim; Matthew J. Memoli; Alison Han; Mary P. Fairchok; Wei Ju Chen; John C. Arnold; Patrick Danaher; Tahaniyat Lalani; Michelande Ridoré; Timothy Burgess; Eugene V. Millar; Andres Hernandez; Patricia Rodríguez-Zulueta; Mary Smolskis; Hilda Ortega-Gallegos; Sarah Pett; William A. Fischer; Daniel Gillor; Laura Moreno Macias; Anna DuVal; Richard E. Rothman; Andrea Freyer Dugas; Guillermo M. Ruiz-Palacios
OBJECTIVES To assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of InFLUenza Patient-Reported Outcome (FLU-PRO©) scores for quantifying the presence and severity of influenza symptoms. METHODS An observational prospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with influenza-like illness in the United States, the United Kingdom, Mexico, and South America was conducted. Participants completed the 37-item draft FLU-PRO daily for up to 14 days. Item-level and factor analyses were used to remove items and determine factor structure. Reliability of the final tool was estimated using Cronbach α and intraclass correlation coefficients (2-day reliability). Convergent and known-groups validity and responsiveness were assessed using global assessments of influenza severity and return to usual health. RESULTS Of the 536 patients enrolled, 221 influenza-positive subjects comprised the analytical sample. The mean age of the patients was 40.7 years, 60.2% were women, and 59.7% were white. The final 32-item measure has six factors/domains (nose, throat, eyes, chest/respiratory, gastrointestinal, and body/systemic), with a higher order factor representing symptom severity overall (comparative fit index = 0.92; root mean square error of approximation = 0.06). Cronbach α was high (total = 0.92; domain range = 0.71-0.87); test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, day 1-day 2) was 0.83 for total scores and 0.57 to 0.79 for domains. Day 1 FLU-PRO domain and total scores were moderately to highly correlated (≥0.30) with Patient Global Rating of Flu Severity (except nose and throat). Consistent with known-groups validity, scores differentiated severity groups on the basis of global rating (total: F = 57.2, P < 0.001; domains: F = 8.9-67.5, P < 0.001). Subjects reporting return to usual health showed significantly greater (P < 0.05) FLU-PRO score improvement by day 7 than did those who did not, suggesting score responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that FLU-PRO scores are reliable, valid, and responsive to change in influenza-positive adults.
Aids and Behavior | 2014
Morgan M. Philbin; Amanda E. Tanner; Anna DuVal; Jonathan M. Ellen; Jiahong Xu; Bill G. Kapogiannis; Jim Bethel; J. Dennis Fortenberry; Aids Interventions
Aids Care-psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of Aids\/hiv | 2014
Amanda E. Tanner; Morgan M. Philbin; Anna DuVal; Jonathan M. Ellen; Bill G. Kapogiannis; J. Dennis Fortenberry; Aids Interventions
Aids Care-psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of Aids\/hiv | 2014
Morgan M. Philbin; Amanda E. Tanner; Anna DuVal; Jonathan M. Ellen; Bill G. Kapogiannis; J. Dennis Fortenberry
Aids Education and Prevention | 2017
Morgan M. Philbin; Amanda E. Tanner; Anna DuVal; Jonathan M. Ellen; Bill G. Kapogiannis; J. Dennis Fortenberry; Aids Interventions