Anna Gronkowska

NOD2/CARD15 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism 13 (3020insC) is Associated with Risk of Sepsis and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism 8 (2104C>T) with Herpes Viruses Reactivation in Patients after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Three NOD2 polymorphisms (single nucleotide polymorphism [SNP]8 [2104C>T, Arg702Trp], SNP12 [2722G>C, Gly908Arg], and SNP13 [3020insC, Leu1007 fsins C]), identified as disease-associated variants in Crohns disease, have recently been suggested as gene markers of the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In the present multicenter study of 464 donor-recipient pairs, we focused on the effect of NOD2 mutation(s) on the risk of infections and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). The presence of SNP13 in recipients, donors, or both was more frequently seen in patients having sepsis than in those lacking sepsis (9 of 48 versus 33 of 386, P = .046). The presence of SNP8 (recipient and/or donor positive) was associated with a higher rate of Herpes viruses reactivation (17 of 21 versus 86 of 173, P = .007). In the SNP8-positive group, a trend for a higher rate of bacteremia well controlled by antibiotics was found (9 of 10 versus 47 of 81, P = .106). In contrast, the presence of SNP13 in recipient and/or donor resulted in a poor response to antibiotics (5 of 11 versus 9 of 10, P = .042). A statistically significant association between the presence of NOD2 SNPs and acute grade > II GVHD was found in a subgroup of HSCT patients who received transplants from unrelated donors with a myeloablative conditioning regimen that included antithymocyte globulin (ATG). In this subgroup of patients, donor positivity for any SNPs investigated (7 of 18 versus 17 of 113, P = .036) and, independently, only the presence of SNP8 (4 of 8 versus 20 of 123, P = .055) were associated with severe grade ≥ II aGVHD. In conclusion, SNP8 positivity in donors or recipients makes patients more prone to Herpes viruses reactivation and bacteremia but not to sepsis. Septic complications were associated with SNP13 polymorphism. SNP8 in donors constitutes a risk factor of severe aGVHD, but only if patients received transplants from unrelated donors and received ATG as part of a conditioning regimen.

CCR5 gene polymorphism affects the risk of GvHD after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation from an unrelated donor.

The main barrier to successful haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the development of post-transplant complications. Although human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-matching is critical in both HLA-matched familial and matched unrelated donor transplants to deter acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) and rejection, recently functional non-HLA immune associated genes have also been considered in attempts to evaluate their potential prediction values and uncover novel factors that may optimize donor selection processes. Mutations and polymorphisms within these non-HLA encoded genes affect, for example, the amount of cytokine/chemokine produced in response to alloantigen or infection. Knowledge of both patient and donor non-HLA genotype may therefore aid the development of new preventative and therapeutic strategies by taking the degree of ‘risk-associated’ genotype into account. The results of our present work contribute to these studies and strongly suggest that the 32-nucleotide deletion within the CCR5 gene (CCR5D32 polymorphism; rs333) is of prognostic value for the outcome of HSCT from unrelated donors. The present study investigated the CCR5 polymorphism in relation to transplant outcome in 360 patients (Table I) transplanted in seven Polish institutions and their unrelated donors. The CCR5D32 polymorphism was analysed by polymerase chain reaction as described previously (BoguniaKubik et al, 2006, 2007). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical University in Wroclaw. In univariate analyses, recipients homozygous for the 32 bp deletion suffered more frequently from severe aGvHD than patients lacking this mutation (5/10 vs. 34/313, P = 0 001 and 2/10 vs. 15/313, P = 0 034, for grade III–IV and IV aGvHD, respectively). Also patients grafted from CCR5D32 homozygous donors were more likely to develop aGvHD (3/8 vs. 37/ 318, P = 0 028 and 3/8 vs. 15/318, P = 0 001 for grade III–IV and grade IV aGvHD, respectively). The CCR5D32 polymorphism was not found to affect the development of other complications except for observed worse overall survival of patients homozygous for this deletion (12% vs. 52%, P = 0 145). However this latter relationship did not reach statistical significance. CCR5 heterozygosity was not associated with the risk of aGvHD. The incidence of aGvHD was similar in patients with different conditioning regimens, stem cell sources, GvHD prophylaxis or various loci HLA mismatches (data not shown). Logistic regression analysis (Table II) considering recipient age, donor-recipient gender, 10/10 HLA match and the recipient and donor CCR5 polymorphism confirmed the role of

Role of Donor Activating KIR–HLA Ligand–Mediated NK Cell Education Status in Control of Malignancy in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients

Some cancers treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are sensitive to natural killer cell (NK) reactivity. NK function depends on activating and inhibitory receptors and is modified by NK education/licensing effect and mediated by coexpression of inhibitory killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) and its corresponding HLA I ligand. We assessed activating KIR (aKIR)-based HLA I-dependent education capacity in donor NKs in 285 patients with hematological malignancies after HSCT from unrelated donors. We found significantly adverse progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression (TTP) in patients who received transplant from donors with NKs educated by C1:KIR2DS2/3, C2:KIR2DS1, or Bw4:KIR3DS1 pairs (for PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.70; P = .0020, Pcorr = .0039; HR, 1.54; P = .020, Pcorr = .039; HR, 1.51; P = .020, Pcorr = .040; and for TTP: HR, 1.82; P = .049, Pcorr = .096; HR, 1.72; P = .096, Pcorr = .18; and HR, 1.65; P = .11, Pcorr = .20, respectively). Reduced PFS and TTP were significantly dependent on the number of aKIR-based education systems in donors (HR, 1.36; P = .00031, Pcorr = .00062; and HR, 1.43; P = .019, Pcorr = .038). Furthermore, the PFS and TTP were strongly adverse in patients with missing HLA ligand cognate with educating aKIR-HLA pair in donor (HR, 3.25; P = .00022, Pcorr = .00045; and HR, 3.82; P = .027, Pcorr = .054). Together, these data suggest important qualitative and quantitative role of donor NK education via aKIR-cognate HLA ligand pairs in the outcome of HSCT. Avoiding the selection of transplant donors with high numbers of aKIR-HLA-based education systems, especially for recipients with missing cognate ligand, is advisable.

Donor NK cell licensing in control of malignancy in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Among cancers treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem‐cell transplantation (HSCT), some are sensitive to natural killer (NK) cell reactivity, described as the “missing self” recognition effect. However, this model disregarded the NK cell licensing effect, which highly increases the NK cell reactivity against tumor and is dependent on the coexpression of inhibitory killer cell immunoglobulin‐like receptor (iKIR) and its corresponding HLA Class I ligand. We assessed clinical data, HLA and donor iKIR genotyping in 283 patients with myelo‐ and lymphoproliferative malignancies who underwent HSCT from unrelated donors. We found dramatically reduced overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and time to progression (TTP) among patients with malignant diseases with the lack of HLA ligand cognate with this iKIR involved in NK cell licensing in corresponding donor (events 83.3% vs. 39.8%, P = 0.0010; 91.6% vs. 47.7%, P = 0.00010; and 30.0% vs. 17.3%, P = 0.013, for OS, PFS, and TTP, respectively). The extremely adverse PFS have withstand the correction when patient group was restricted to HLA mismatched donor‐recipient pairs. The incidence of aGvHD was comparable in two groups of patients. In malignant patients after HSCT the missing HLA ligand for iKIR involved in NK cell licensing in corresponding donor (“missing licensing proof”) induced extremely adverse survival of the patients due to the progression of malignancy and not to the aGvHD. Avoiding the selection of HSCT donors with the “missing licensing proof” in the malignant patient is strongly advisable.Am. J. Hematol. 89:E176–E183, 2014.

IL-10 promoter polymorphisms influence susceptibility to aGvHD and are associated with proportions of CD4+FoxP3+ lymphocytes in blood after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Four hundred and ninety-five patients (390 and 105 grafted from unrelated and sibling (SIB) donors, respectively) and their donors were analyzed for the impact of interleukin-10 (IL-10) promoter genotype [rs18000896 (-1082 G/A), rs18000871 (-819 C/T) and rs18000872 (-592 C/A)] on the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients having ACC haplotype were at a lower risk of acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD, grade > I) if transplanted from human leukocyte antigen (HLA) well-matched (10/10) unrelated donors (20/135 vs 39/117, P < 0.001, Pcorr = 0.002), which was not seen if patients were transplanted from either sibling (SIB) or poorly matched (<10/10) unrelated donors (MUD). In addition, GCC haplotype positive recipients of unrelated donor transplants tended to be more susceptible to aGvHD (68/199 vs 39/169, P = 0.019, Pcorr = 0.057). Multivariate logistic regression analysis in the MUD transplanted group showed that donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch [odds ratio (OR) = 3.937, P = 0.001] and a lack of ACC haplotype in recipients (OR = 0.417, P = 0.013) played a significant role as independent risk factors of aGvHD grade > I. ACC carriers had higher proportions of FoxP3+ lymphocytes gated in CD4+ lymphocytes as compared with patients with other IL-10 haplotypes. It was seen at the time of hematological recovery (mean ± SEM: 3.80 ± 0.91% vs 2.06 ± 0.98%, P = 0.012) and 2 weeks later (5.32 ± 0.87% vs 2.50 ± 0.83%, P = 0.013); -592 C/A polymorphism was separately analyzed and it was found that AA homozygotes tended to have a higher incidence of aGvHD (8/15 vs 116/456, P = 0.034) and low proportions of FoxP3 CD4+ lymphocytes in blood (0.43 ± 0.22% vs 4.32 ± 0.71%, P = 0.051) measured 2 weeks after hematological recovery. Functional IL-10 polymorphism associated features influenced the risk of aGvHD with a positive effect of ACC on the pool of Treg in blood.

HLA-inferred extended haplotype disparity level is more relevant than the level of HLA mismatch alone for the patients survival and GvHD in T cell-replate hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donor

Serious risks in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) including graft versus host disease (GvHD) and mortality are associated with HLA disparity between donor and recipient. The increased risks might be dependent on disparity in not-routinely-tested multiple polymorphisms in genetically dense MHC region, being organized in combinations of two extended MHC haplotypes (Ehp). We assessed the clinical role of donor-recipient Ehp disparity levels in N = 889 patients by the population-based detection of HLA allele phase mismatch. We found increased GvHD incidences and mortality rates with increasing Ehp mismatch level even with the same HLA mismatch level. In multivariate analysis HLA mismatch levels were excluded from models and Ehp disparity level remained independent prognostic factor for high grade acute GvHD (p = 0.000037, HR = 10.68, 95%CI 5.50-32.5) and extended chronic GvHD (p < 0.000001, HR = 15.51, CI95% 5.36-44.8). In group with single HLA mismatch, patients with double Ehp disparity had worse 5-year overall survival (45% vs. 56%, p = 0.00065, HR = 4.05, CI95% 1.69-9.71) and non-relapse mortality (40% vs. 31%, p = 0.00037, HR = 5.63, CI95% 2.04-15.5) than patients with single Ehp disparity. We conclude that Ehp-linked factors contribute to the high morbidity and mortality in recipients given HLA-mismatched unrelated transplant and Ehp matching should be considered in clinical HSCT.