Anna Heino
National Institute for Health and Welfare
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anna Heino.
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2011
Elina Hemminki; Anna Heino; Mika Gissler
Please cite this paper as: Hemminki E, Heino A, Gissler M. Should births be centralised in higher level hospitals? Experiences from regionalised health care in Finland. BJOG 2011; DOI: 10.1111/j.1471‐0528.2011.02977.x.
The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care | 2013
Anna Heino; Mika Gissler; Dan Apter; Christian Fiala
ABSTRACT The issue of conscientious objection (CO) arises in healthcare when doctors and nurses refuse to have any involvement in the provision of treatment of certain patients due to their religious or moral beliefs. Most commonly CO is invoked when it comes to induced abortion. Of the EU member states where induced abortion is legal, invoking CO is granted by law in 21 countries. The same applies to the non-EU countries Norway and Switzerland. CO is not legally granted in the EU member states Sweden, Finland, Bulgaria and the Czech Republic. The Icelandic legislation provides no right to CO either. European examples prove that the recommendation that CO should not prevent women from accessing services fails in a number of cases. CO puts women in an unequal position depending on their place of residence, socio-economic status and income. CO should not be presented as a question that relates only to health professionals and their rights. CO mainly concerns women as it has very real consequences for their reproductive health and rights. European countries should assess the laws governing CO and its effects on womens rights. CO should not be used as a subtle method for limiting the legal right to healthcare.
PLOS ONE | 2016
Anna Heino; Mika Gissler; Ashna D. Hindori-Mohangoo; Béatrice Blondel; Kari Klungsøyr; Ivan Verdenik; Ewa J. Mierzejewska; Petr Velebil; Helga Sól Ólafsdóttir; Alison Macfarlane; Jennifer Zeitlin
Objective Infants from multiple pregnancies have higher rates of preterm birth, stillbirth and neonatal death and differences in multiple birth rates (MBR) exist between countries. We aimed to describe differences in MBR in Europe and to investigate the impact of these differences on adverse perinatal outcomes at a population level. Methods We used national aggregate birth data on multiple pregnancies, maternal age, gestational age (GA), stillbirth and neonatal death collected in the Euro-Peristat project (29 countries in 2010, N = 5 074 643 births). We also used European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) data on assisted conception and single embryo transfer (SET). The impact of MBR on outcomes was studied using meta-analysis techniques with random-effects models to derive pooled risk ratios (pRR) overall and for four groups of country defined by their MBR. We computed population attributable risks (PAR) for these groups. Results In 2010, the average MBR was 16.8 per 1000 women giving birth, ranging from 9.1 (Romania) to 26.5 (Cyprus). Compared to singletons, multiples had a nine-fold increased risk (pRR 9.4, 95% Cl 9.1–9.8) of preterm birth (<37 weeks GA), an almost 12-fold increased risk (pRR 11.7, 95% CI 11.0–12.4) of very preterm birth (<32 weeks GA). Pooled RR were 2.4 (95% Cl 1.5–3.6) for fetal mortality at or after 28 weeks GA and 7.0 (95% Cl 6.1–8.0) for neonatal mortality. PAR of neonatal death and very preterm birth were higher in countries with high MBR compared to low MBR (17.1% (95% CI 13.8–20.2) versus 9.8% (95% Cl 9.6–11.0) for neonatal death and 29.6% (96% CI 28.5–30.6) versus 17.5% (95% CI 15.7–18.3) for very preterm births, respectively). Conclusions Wide variations in MBR and their impact on population outcomes imply that efforts by countries to reduce MBR could improve perinatal outcomes, enabling better long-term child health.
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2018
Béatrice Blondel; Marina Cuttini; Ashna D. Hindori-Mohangoo; Mika Gissler; M. Loghi; C. Prunet; Anna Heino; Lucy K. Smith; K.M. van der Pal-de Bruin; Alison Macfarlane; Jennifer Zeitlin
To describe how terminations of pregnancy at gestational ages at or above the limit for stillbirth registration are recorded in routine statistics and to assess their impact on comparability of stillbirth rates in Europe.
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2017
Ewa Jokinen; Anna Heino; Tuula Karipohja; Mika Gissler; Ritva Hurskainen
To determine the safety and effectiveness of female sterilisation in the Finnish population.
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2018
Ewa Jokinen; Anna Heino; Tuula Karipohja; Mika Gissler; Ritva Hurskainen
More intensive research including parameters of ICER and productivity costs is eagerly awaited, as the safety, efficacy and noninvasive properties of HIFU ablation make this option a popular alternative. Until a more patient-friendly integrative health model and framework is available, HIFU ablation will continue to be an elusive therapy in many countries. Success will depend on the economic, social, political and academic imperatives of the host country and institution. In a superpower like China, the state-funded programme will assist the escalation of HIFU centres and procedures on a domestic and international level.&
WOS | 2018
Anna Heino; Maarit Niinimäki; Maarit Mentula; Mika Gissler
WOS | 2018
Jacqueline M. Cohen; Carolyn E. Cesta; Kari Furu; Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Mika Gissler; Anna Heino; Vidar Hjellvik; Jiong Li; Johan Reutfors; Randi Selmer; Yongfu Yu; Helga Zoega; Øystein Karlstad
WOS | 2018
Carolyn E. Cesta; Jacqueline M. Cohen; Laura Pazzagli; Brian T. Bateman; Gabriella Bröms; Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Kari Furu; Mika Gissler; Anna Heino; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Krista F. Huybrechts; Øystein Karlstad; Jiong Li; Johan Reutfors; Randi Selmer; Yongfu Yu; Helga Zoega; Ingvild Odsbu
European Journal of Public Health | 2016
Anna Heino; M Mentula; M Niinimäki; Mika Gissler