Anna Kramvis

Epidemiology of hepatitis B virus in Africa, its genotypes and clinical associations of genotypes

Of approximately 360 million people in the world chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), 65 million reside in Africa. Thus, Africa, with 12% of the worlds population, carries approximately 18% of the global burden of HBV infection, with hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis accounting for 2% of the continents annual deaths. Despite HBV being endemic or hyperendemic in Africa, there is a paucity of data on the genotypes and their distribution. Genotype A is found mainly in southern, eastern and central Africa. Most African genotype A strains belong to subgenotype A1, with subgenotype A3 found in western Africa. Genotype D prevails in northern countries and genotype E in western and central Africa. Ithas become increasingly evident that heterogeneity in the global distribution of HBV genotypes may be responsible for differences in the clinical outcomes of HBV infections and the response to antiviral treatment and vaccination. A limited number of studies have been published relating genotypes to clinical outcomes in African countries. Because observations from other regions of the world can not be extrapolated from one locale to another, the HBV strains circulating in Africa should be studied and related to clinical outcomes.

Influence of hepatitis B virus genotypes on the intra-and extracellular expression of viral DNA and antigens

Various genotypes of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) induce liver disease of distinct severity, but the underlying virological differences are not well defined. Huh7 cells were transfected with plasmids carrying 1.24‐fold the HBV genome of different genotypes/subgenotypes (2 strains each for Aa/A1, Ae/A2, Ba/B2 and D; 3 each for Bj/B1 and C). HBV DNA levels in cell lysates, determined by Southern hybridization, were the highest for C followed by Bj/Ba and D/Ae (P < .01), and the lowest for Aa (P < .01), whereas in culture media, they were the highest for Bj, distantly followed by Ba/C/D and further by Ae/Aa (P < .01). The intracellular expression of core protein was more than 3‐fold lower for Ae/Aa than the others. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) was excreted in a trend similar to that of HBV DNA with smaller differences. Secretion of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was most abundant for Ae followed by Aa, Ba, Bj/C and remotely by D, which was consistent with mRNA levels. Cellular stress determined by the reporter assay for Grp78 promoter was higher for C and Ba than the other genotypes/subgenotypes (P < .01). Severe combined immunodeficiency mice transgenic for urokinase‐type plasminogen activator (uPA/SCID), with the liver replaced for human hepatocytes, were inoculated with virions passed in mouse and recovered from culture supernatants. HBV DNA levels in their sera were higher for C than Ae by 2 logs during 4–7 weeks after inoculation. In conclusion, virological differences among HBV genotypes were demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo. These differences may influence HBV infections with distinct genotypes in clinical and epidemiological settings. (HEPATOLOGY 2006;44:915–924.)

A case‐control study for differences among hepatitis B virus infections of genotypes A (subtypes Aa and Ae) and D

There are two subtypes of hepatitis B virus genotype A (HBV/A) and they are provisionally designated Aa (“a” standing for Africa/Asia) and Ae (“e” for Europe). In a case‐control study, 78 HBV/Aa, 78HBV/Ae, and 78HBV/D carriers from several countries were compared. The prevalence of HBe antigen (HBeAg) in serum was significantly lower in carriers of HBV/Aa than in carriers of HBV/Ae (31% vs. 49%; P = .033), with a difference more obvious in the carriers aged 30 years or younger (34% vs. 67%; P = .029). HBV DNA levels in the carriers of HBV/Aa (median, 3.46 log copies/mL; 95% CI, 2.93–3.95) were significantly lower than those of carriers of HBV/Ae (6.09 log copies/mL; 95% CI, 4.24–7.64) or of carriers of HBV/D (5.48 log copies/mL; 95% CI, 4.06–7.02), regardless of the HBeAg status (P < .001). The most specific and frequent substitutions in 54 HBV/Aa isolates were double substitutions for T1809 (100%) and T1812 (96%) immediately upstream of the precore initiation codon, which would interfere with the translation of HBeAg in HBV/Aa infections. They were not detected in 57 HBV/Ae or 61 HBV/D isolates examined. The double mutation in the core promoter (T1762/A1764) was more frequent in both HBV/Aa (50%) and HBV/Ae (44%) than in HBV/D isolates (25%; P < .01), whereas the precore mutation (A1896) occurred in HBV/D isolates only (48%; P < .0001). In conclusion, the clearance of HBeAg from serum may occur by different mechanisms in HBV/Aa, HBV/Ae, and HBV/D infections, which may influence clinical manifestations in the Western countries where both genotypes A and D are prevalent. (HEPATOLOGY 2004;40:747–755.)

Hepatitis B virus precore mutants in serum and liver of Southern African Blacks with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIM The aim of this study was to sequence the precore region of HBV isolated from serum and tumorous and non-tumorous liver tissue from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma to identify mutations that might play a role in malignant transformation. METHODS HBV DNA was extracted from 62 sera, 14 tumorous and 12 non-tumorous liver tissue samples of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, amplified by the polymerase chain reaction and sequenced directly. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients were HBeAg-negative and 23 HBeAg-positive. Missense mutations were present predominantly in HBeAg-negative sera. The most common missense mutation, a guanine to thymine transversion, occurred at nucleotide 1862 in the bulge of the encapsidation signal; it was more prevalent in HBeAg-negative (10/39) than in HBeAg-positive patients (1/23) (p = 0.03). Mutations known to prevent HBeAg synthesis were detected in seven sera; five with an 1896 stop-codon mutation, one with an 1817 nonsense mutation, and one with a frameshift mutation caused by an insertion between 1838 and 1839. Missense mutations and deletions were present more often in tumorous tissue derived from HBsAg-negative patients. In the tumours missense mutations occurred at position 1862 and 1899, and the deletions affected direct repeat 1 and/or the encapsidation signal and included the x gene stop-codon. CONCLUSIONS The 1862 mutation, and other missense mutations and deletions detected in the precore gene, may disrupt HBV DNA replication and/or signal peptide cleavage leading to HBeAg-negativity. Disruption of viral replication may promote integration of unencapsidated replicative intermediates and hence contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis.

When Should “I” Consider a New Hepatitis B Virus Genotype?

Recently, Huy et al. described a new hepatitis B virus (HBV) strain isolated in Vietnam ([3][1]) and claimed it to be a “new genotype,” “HBV genotype I,” with a complex recombination involving genotypes C, A, and G. We refute both claims. Using complete genome sequence analysis of their

Hepatitis B virus transmission by blood transfusion during 4 years of individual-donation nucleic acid testing in South Africa: estimated and observed window period risk

BACKGROUND: Since October 2005, a total of 2,921,561 blood donations have been screened by the South African National Blood Service for hepatitis B virus (HBV) by individual‐donation nucleic acid testing (ID‐NAT). Over 4 years, 149 hepatitis B surface antigen–negative acute‐phase HBV NAT–positive donations were identified (1:19,608). The lookback program identified one probable HBV transmission.

Molecular characterization of subgenotype A1 (subgroup Aa) of hepatitis B virus

Subgenotypes of hepatitis B virus (HBV) were first recognized after a unique segment of genotype A was identified when sequencing the preS2/S region of southern African HBV isolates. Originally named subgroup A′, subsequently called subgroup Aa (for Africa) or subgenotype A1, this subgenotype is found in South Africa, Malawi, Uganda, Tanzania, Somalia, Yemen, India, Nepal, the Philippines and Brazil. The relatively higher mean nucleotide divergence of subgenotype A1 suggests that it has been endemic and has a long evolutionary history in the populations where it prevails. Distinctive sequence characteristics could account for the high hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) negativity and low HBV DNA levels in carriers of this subgenotype. Substitutions or mutations can reduce HBeAg expression at three levels: (i) 1762T1764A atthe transcriptional level; (ii) substitutions at nt 1809–1812 at the translational level; and (iii) 1862T at the post‐translational level. Co‐existence of 1762T1764A and nt 1809–1812 mutations reduces HBeAg expression in an additive manner. In addition, subgenotype A1 has unique sequence alterations in the transcriptional regulatory elements and the polymerase coding region. The distinct sequence characteristics of subgenotype A1 may contribute to the 4.5‐fold increased risk of heptocellular carcinoma in HBV carriers infected with genotype A, which is entirely attributable to subgenotype A1.

Genotype D of hepatitis B virus and its subgenotypes: An update

The aim of the present study was to systematically and comparatively analyze the subgenotypes of genotype D of hepatitis B virus.

Immune Suppression Uncovers Endogenous Cytopathic Effects of the Hepatitis B Virus

ABSTRACT It is generally accepted that the hosts immune response rather than the virus itself is causing the hepatocellular damage seen in acute and chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections. However, in situations of severe immune suppression, chronic HBV patients may develop a considerable degree of liver disease. To examine whether HBV has direct cytopathic effects in severely immune compromised hosts, we have infected severe combined immune deficient mice (uPA-SCID), harboring human liver cells, with HBV. Serologic analysis of the plasma of HBV-infected animals revealed the presence of extremely high amounts of viral genomes and proteins. Histological analysis of the livers of uPA-SCID chimeras infected with HBV for more than 2 months showed that the majority of human hepatocytes had a ground-glass appearance, stained intensely for viral proteins, and showed signs of considerable damage and cell death. This histopathologic pattern closely resembles the picture observed in the livers of immunosuppressed HBV patients. These lesions were not observed in animals infected with HBV for less than 1 month. Ultrastructural analysis of long-term-infected hepatocytes showed a highly increased presence of cylindrical HBsAg structures, core particles, and Dane particles compared to short-term-infected hepatocytes. These long-term-infected hepatocytes also contained elevated amounts of HBV cccDNA. In conclusion, HBV causes dramatic intracellular changes and hepatocellular damage in the human hepatocytes that reside in a severely immune deficient mouse. These lesions show much resemblance to the ones encountered in immunosuppressed chronic HBV patients. Our observations indicate that HBV may be directly cytopathic in conditions of severe immune suppression.

Frequent coinfection with hepatitis B virus strains of distinct genotypes detected by hybridization with type-specific probes immobilized on a solid-phase support

A genotype-specific probes assay (GSPA) was developed for distinguishing the seven genotypes (A-G) of hepatitis B virus (HBV). Nucleotide (nt) sequences corresponding to preS1 region were amplified by PCR with a primer labeled with biotin, and delivered to eight wells on which complementary sequences specific to one or other genotype had been immobilized. Thereafter, hybridization of HBV DNA sequences amplified from the test serum was detected by colorimetry. When 256 sera from HBV carriers in Bangladesh, Cameroon, Japan, South Africa, USA and Uzbekistan were subjected to GSPA, genotypes were concordant with those of ELISA with monoclonal antibodies to epitopes on preS2-region products in 242 (94.6%) of them; 8 sera (3.1%) were not genotypeable by either method. Cloning analysis confirmed the presence of two distinct HBV genotypes in the seven selected sera with coinfection. There were 7 (2.7%) sera with discordant genotyping results between GSPA and ELISA. When HBV DNA clones propagated from these sera were sequenced and analyzed phylogenetically, the genotypes determined by GSPA were verified. Coinfection with HBV strains of two distinct genotypes was identified by GSPA in 28 (10.9%) sera, while it was suggested by ELISA in only 2 (0.8%) sera. The GSPA method would be particularly useful for detecting the coinfection with distinct HBV genotypes of any clinical relevance, which seems to be more frequent than reported previously.