Anna Morgando

Digestive Endoscopy Is Not a Major Risk Factor for Transmitting Hepatitis C Virus

Context Controversy persists regarding the risk for transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) as a result of digestive-tract endoscopy. Contribution This prospective study of HCV-negative patients who underwent gastroscopy with the same endoscopes as HCV-positive patients showed no transmission of infection on follow-up 6 months later. Biopsy with reusable or disposable forceps did not increase the risk for HCV infection. Blood donors who were HCV negative without endoscopic exposure showed a few conversions to infected status an average of 2.5 years later. Implications The risk for HCV transmission by endoscopy is extremely low when standard instrument-cleaning techniques are used. The Editors Health carerelated procedures have been implicated in the transmission of a consistent proportion of contemporary hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. The role of major surgical operations, such as cardiovascular, gynecologic, and orthopedic procedures, is well established. However, the role of less invasive procedures, such as digestive endoscopy, remains a matter of debate. A claim from a retrospective French study (1) that digestive endoscopic procedures are a major cause of HCV transmission among blood donors has not been substantiated by other authors (2, 3); acquisition of HCV through endoscopy has in fact been rarely reported in recent years (4, 5). Nevertheless, endoscopy as a vehicle for HCV transmission has been suspected since 1996, when blood banks in France and Italy suspended donors who reported a history of recent digestive endoscopy from donating blood for 6 months and up to 1 year, respectively. It is therefore important to establish whether digestive endoscopy represents a real risk and, if so, to define its magnitude. We conducted a prospective study among outpatients referred to 3 endoscopic units in northwestern Italy from 1999 to 2002. The patients entering the study were tested for antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) at baseline and 6 months after endoscopy. The incidence of HCV infection in this cohort was compared with that in blood donors recruited in the same area and during the same time period; these donors had not undergone any digestive endoscopic procedure. Methods Endoscopy Cohort Between January 1999 and December 2002, all of the outpatients referred for upper digestive endoscopy to 3 endoscopic units in northwestern Italy (1 secondary referral center and 2 tertiary referral centers) were asked to participate in this study. Eligibility criteria were age older than 18 years and indication for gastroscopy. We restricted the procedure to gastroscopy in order to obtain a high rate of invasive procedures (for example, gastric biopsy). We excluded patients if they were hospitalized, had previously undergone endoscopic procedures, were known anti-HCV carriers, or had to undergo additional endoscopic procedures other than gastroscopy. However, to identify the potentially infective population, we retrospectively looked for known HCV carriers who underwent gastroscopy in the 3 centers between January 1999 and December 2002. Of 11348 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 9188 (81.0%) agreed to participate and gave written consent. They completed a questionnaire about risk factors for HCV infection during the past 6 months, and a serum sample was obtained from each immediately before endoscopy. Mild sedation with midazolam and hyoscine butylbromide was administered to each patient by using disposable syringes and vials. Gastroscopies were done by using various types of endoscopes, including fiberscopes and video endoscopes (Olympus GIF-Q20, GIF-Q30, GIF-IT30, GIF-IT140, Olympus Europe, Hamburg, Germany). Biopsies were performed with disposable biopsy forceps (Radial Jaw 3, Boston Scientific Microvasive, Natick, Massachusetts) in one center and reusable biopsy forceps (FB-24U-1, Olympus Europe) in another center; the third center used reusable forceps (EN-62143, Pescetto, Genova, Italy) in 1999 and disposable forceps (Max Capacity, Boston Scientific Microvasive) after 1999. Each patient was invited to attend a follow-up visit 6 months after endoscopy in order to obtain a serum sample for determining anti-HCV; at this visit, the patient was asked to complete the HCV questionnaire again. To reduce the risk for false-negative results, potentially immunodeficient patients (those undergoing hemodialysis or receiving immunosuppressive treatment) were also tested for HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All patients who did not attend the follow-up visit were recontacted by telephone. Among patients in the endoscopy cohort, we identified an at-risk subset of patients: Overall, 912 endoscopic procedures (732 gastroscopies performed on known HCV carriers and 180 gastroscopies performed on newly discovered HCV carriers) were considered potentially infective. When we considered that each endoscope was used 3 times during the endoscopic session and assumed that the anti-HCVpositive patient was the first, second, or third at random, the number of exposed patients per HCV-infectedpatient-day was 0, 1, or 2, with equal probability (the mean of those numbers is 1). Blood Donors Cohort Using a computerized database, we retrospectively identified all 51645 consecutive blood donors at 2 transfusion centers in Torino and Pinerolo between January 1999 and December 2002 who were negative for HCV. Of these, 415 (0.8%) reported previous digestive endoscopy; the blood bank database did not record invasive procedures performed during endoscopy (such as biopsy and polypectomy). These 415 donors were asked to repeat the serologic and virologic HCV tests: 329 (79.3%) agreed, and 86 declined. Of the 51230 blood donors who did not undergo endoscopic procedures during the observation period, 38 280 (74.7%) were tested again after a mean of 2.49 years (range, 6 months to 4 years); the remaining 12 950 blood donors could not be contacted by telephone for retesting or declined to be retested. Retested blood donors found to be newly positive for anti-HCV completed a structured questionnaire aimed at investigating risk factors for HCV infection, including endoscopic procedures, travel history, sexual activity, and potential parenteral exposures to blood or blood products (previous blood, platelet, or plasma transfusions; administration of coagulation factor concentrates; intravenous drug use; tattooing; acupuncture therapy; ear piercing; and major or minor surgery). Cleaning and Disinfection Method The instruments used for the known HCV carriers were not handled differently from those used for the HCV-negative patients; they were not removed from the general instrument pool, were disinfected in the same way as the others, and were then used promptly to perform endoscopy on the HCV-negative patients. Moreover, endoscopic procedures in known HCV carriers were not postponed at the end of the session but were performed according to the list of scheduled appointments. All units participating in this study adhered to the international guidelines for cleaning and disinfection practices in digestive endoscopy (6-10) and reprocessing endoscopic accessories (11); written protocols were available in each center. The staff involved in disinfection procedures consisted of trained nurses who were unaware of the ongoing study. At the end of the endoscopic procedure, the staff manually cleaned the instrument, including brushing the channels; each internal channel was flushed with detergent, rinsed with water, and blown through with air. The endoscopic units used 3 different automated washer-disinfectors (DSD-91E, Medivators, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Circlean MC-12, Shoei, Tokyo, Japan; and ETD2, Olympus Europe), but the reprocessing cycle was similar: 1) The units were immersed in 2% glutaraldehyde for 20 minutes, and internal channels were flushed with the same solution; 2) the units were rinsed internally and externally with drinking-quality water to remove all traces of disinfectant; and 3) the units were dried externally and each channel was flushed with air. Before the first endoscopy of each day, all endoscopes were disinfected in a washer-disinfector. After use, reusable biopsy forceps were immersed in enzymatic detergent solutions; next, they were cleaned first manually and then by a medical-grade ultrasonic cleaner. After rinsing and drying, the forceps were sterilized by autoclave at 134 C for at least 5 minutes. Finally, the sterilized devices were stored in sterile packaging in a closed cupboard where they were protected from dust, humidity, and temperature fluctuations. Laboratory Methods We tested for anti-HCV by using a third-generation enzyme immunoassay (Ortho HCV EIA-3, Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Raritan, New Jersey). Anti-HCV immunoreactivity was confirmed with a third-generation immunoblot assay (RIBA-3, Chiron Corp., Emeryville, California, and Ortho Diagnostic Systems). We measured HCV RNA by using PCR (Cobas Amplicor 2.0, Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg, New Jersey); the sensitivity of this assay was 1000 copies/mL. Statistical Analysis We estimated person-years of observation and incidence rates of anti-HCV seroconversion for both cohorts. We used the difference between the incidence rates to compare the 2 cohorts. For the endoscopy cohort, we also measured the risk for anti-HCV seroconversion 6 months after the procedure, using the number of persons as denominators. Further analyses were limited to subgroups of the endoscopy cohort: 1) 6132 patients who underwent biopsy (biopsy cohort) and 2) 912 patients who underwent endoscopy later in the same day as and with the same instruments used in HCV-positive patients (at-risk cohort). Because we could not identify with certainty each patient in the at-risk cohort, we estimated that number with a rough but conservative approach. If we assume that each endoscope was used approximately 3 times during an ordinary endoscopic session and that at least 1 HCV carrier would be seen at

Prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in cirrhosis: Standard vs half albumin doses. A prospective, randomized, unblinded pilot study

BACKGROUND Paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction is a well-known complication of large volume paracentesis. Albumin infusion (8g of albumin/L of ascites removed) is effective in preventing it, but high costs and scant availability limit its use. AIM To compare standard vs half albumin doses. METHODS Seventy cirrhotic patients treated with large volume paracentesis were randomized to receive intravenous albumin as prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction: group 1 (35 patients) received 4g/L of ascites removed, group 2 (35 patients) received 8g/L of ascites removed. RESULTS The incidence of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction (14% vs 20% in group 1 and group 2, respectively; p=ns), hyponatremia (9% vs 6%, p=ns) and renal impairment (0% in both groups) on the 6th day from paracentesis was similar between the two groups. After 6 months of follow-up, rates of survival and of recurrence of ascites requiring large volume paracentesis were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS This unblinded, randomized, pilot study suggests that treatment with half doses of albumin is effective in the prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction and its related clinical complications in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites treated by large volume paracentesis. If confirmed, these results could support a significant costs reduction in the management of ascites in cirrhotic patients.

Clinical impact of A/H1/N1/09 influenza in patients with cirrhosis: Experience from a nosocomial cluster of infection†‡

A/H1N1/09 influenza is associated with a high risk of complications in patients with chronic diseases, but data on morbidity and mortality in patients with cirrhosis are limited. A cluster of A/H1N1/09 infection in 48 patients admitted to a Gastro‐Hepatology Unit is reported. Nosocomial spread, clinical outcome, and viral characteristics of A/H1N1/09 strains from a study group of 48 inpatients (21 and 27 with and without cirrhosis, respectively) were compared with those from a control group of 44 outpatients with mild influenza‐like illness and without cirrhosis. A/H1N1/09 infection was confirmed in 8/48 (17%) inpatients. A/H1N1/09 infection rate did not differ in patients with and without cirrhosis (4/21, 19%; 4/27, 15%), but three patients with cirrhosis died of pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome, with fungal or bacterial superinfection in two cases, despite antiviral treatment. None of patients without cirrhosis died. Viral sequences showed the presence of hemagglutinin mutation D222G in two out of three fatal cases and S183P in seven out of eight infected patients. These mutants were not detected in the outpatients group. Even if A/H1N1/09 infection rate in hospitalized patients with and without cirrhosis was not significantly different, cirrhosis and D222G/S183P substitutions were significantly associated with severe disease and poor outcome, also suggesting fungal or bacterial superinfection and portal hypertension as risk factors for A/H1N1/09 disease severity in patients with cirrhosis. Vaccination, preventive and early treatment and a strict control of nosocomial spread should be activated carefully in patients with cirrhosis during epidemics influenza. J. Med. Virol. 85:1–7, 2012.

High-grade B-cell lymphoma arising in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue of the duodenum.

Duodenal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma is a rare neoplasm. We report a case of a 70-year-old man with non-Hodgkins lymphoma located in the descending duodenum that was not associated with Helicobacter pylori infection of the stomach. A surgical resection due to obstruction of the bowel lumen above the ligament of Treitz was performed. No invasion into the adjacent structure was confirmed at surgery. The pathological examination showed an infiltration of the duodenal mucosa and submucosa with B lymphocytes. Monoclonal proliferation of the lymphoid tissue was demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction. The histological appearance and the demonstration of monoclonality fulfilled the criteria for malignant high-grade B-cell lymphoma arising from mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue.

Adrenal function and microbial DNA in noninfected cirrhotic patients with ascites: Relationship and effect on survival.

BACKGROUND There are few data on clinical relevance of adrenal dysfunction and its relationship with occult microbial DNA in noninfected haemodynamically stable cirrhotic patients with ascites. AIMS The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic role of adrenal dysfunction, microbial DNA, and their relationship. METHODS Adrenal function was assessed in 93 consecutive patients following a corticotropin stimulation test. Adrenal dysfunction was defined as: basal cortisol <10 μg/dl, delta cortisol <9 μg/dl, or peak cortisol <18 μg/dl. Microbial DNA was assessed in blood and ascites of 54 consecutive patients. Patients were followed up until liver transplantation or death. RESULTS Adrenal dysfunction was not significantly associated with mortality, while the risk of death rose significantly with an increase in basal cortisol values (HR 1.13 per 1-μl/dl increase; 95% CI 1.01-1.26). Microbial DNA was independently associated with reduced survival (HR 8.05, 95% CI 1.57-41.2). In microbial DNA-positive patients a significant correlation was found between Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and basal cortisol values (Pearsons r=0.5107; p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS Microbial DNA and MELD score, but not adrenal function, were the best independent predictors of mortality in noninfected cirrhotic patients with ascites. High serum cortisol levels may be a systemic reaction to microbial translocation, increasing in parallel with deterioration of liver function.