Anna Smed-Sörensen

Myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells transfer HIV-1 preferentially to antigen- specific CD4 T cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) are essential antigen-presenting cells for the induction of T cell immunity against pathogens such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1. At the same time, HIV-1 replication is strongly enhanced in DC–T cell clusters, potentially undermining this process. We found that immature CD123+ plasmacytoid DCs (PDCs) and CD11c+ myeloid DCs (MDCs) were susceptible to both a CCR5- and a CXCR4-using HIV-1 isolate in vitro and were able to efficiently transfer that infection to autologous CD4+ T cells. Soon after HIV-1 exposure, both PDCs and MDCs were able to transfer the virus to T cells in the absence of a productive infection. However, once a productive infection was established in the DCs, newly synthesized virus was predominantly spread to T cells. HIV-1 exposure of the MDCs and PDCs did not inhibit their ability to present cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigens and activate CMV-specific memory T cells. As a result, both PDCs and MDCs preferentially transmitted HIV-1 to the responding CMV antigen–specific CD4+ T cells rather than to nonresponding T cells. This suggests that the induction of antigen-specific T cell responses by DCs, a process crucial to immune defense, can lead to preferential HIV-1 infection and the deletion of responding CD4+ T cells.

Differential susceptibility to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection of myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells.

ABSTRACT Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection of dendritic cells (DCs) plays an important role in HIV-1 transmission and pathogenesis. Here, we studied the susceptibility of ex vivo-isolated CD11c+ myeloid DCs (MDCs) and CD123+ plasmacytoid DCs (PDCs) to HIV-1 infection and the function of these cells early after infection. Both DC subsets were susceptible to CCR5- and CXCR4-using HIV-1 isolates (BaL and IIIB, respectively). However, MDCs were more susceptible to HIV-1BaL infection than donor-matched PDCs. In addition, HIV-1BaL infected MDCs more efficiently than HIV-1IIIB, whereas PDCs were equally susceptible to both isolates. While exposure to HIV-1 alone resulted in only weak maturation of DCs, Toll-like receptor 7/8 ligation induced full maturation in both infected and uninfected DCs. Maturation did not increase HIV-1 replication in infected DCs, and infected DCs retained their ability to produce tumor necrosis factor alpha after stimulation. Both HIV-1 isolates induced alpha interferon production exclusively in PDCs, irrespective of productive infection. In conclusion, PDCs and MDCs were susceptible to HIV-1 infection, but neither displayed functional defects as a consequence of infection. The difference in susceptibility of PDCs and MDCs to HIV-1 may have implications for HIV-1 transmission and DC-mediated transfer of HIV-1 to T cells.

The Functional Profile of Primary Human Antiviral CD8+ T Cell Effector Activity Is Dictated by Cognate Peptide Concentration

Antiviral CD8+ T cells can elaborate at least two effector functions, cytokine production and cytotoxicity. Which effector function is elaborated can determine whether the CD8+ T cell response is primarily inflammatory (cytokine producing) or antiviral (cytotoxic). In this study we demonstrate that cytotoxicity can be triggered at peptide concentrations 10- to 100-fold less than those required for cytokine production in primary HIV- and CMV-specific human CD8+ T cells. Cytolytic granule exocytosis occurs at peptide concentrations insufficient to cause substantial TCR down-regulation, providing a mechanism by which a CD8+ T cell could engage and lyse multiple target cells. TCR sequence analysis of virus-specific cells shows that individual T cell clones can degranulate or degranulate and produce cytokine depending on the Ag concentration, indicating that response heterogeneity exists within individual CD8+ T cell clonotypes. Thus, antiviral CD8+ T cell effector function is determined primarily by Ag concentration and is not an inherent characteristic of a virus-specific CD8+ T cell clonotype or the virus to which the response is generated. The inherent ability of viruses to induce high or low Ag states may be the primary determinant of the cytokine vs cytolytic nature of the virus-specific CD8+ T cell response.

Antigen delivery to early endosomes eliminates the superiority of human blood BDCA3+ dendritic cells at cross presentation

Human BDCA3 DCs are superior to BDCA1 DCs at antigen cross presentation when delivered to late endosomes and lysosomes but not when delivered to early endosomes.

Internalization and endosomal degradation of receptor-bound antigens regulate the efficiency of cross presentation by human dendritic cells.

Dendritic cells (DCs) can capture extracellular antigens and load resultant peptides on to MHC class I molecules, a process termed cross presentation. The mechanisms of cross presentation remain incompletely understood, particularly in primary human DCs. One unknown is the extent to which antigen delivery to distinct endocytic compartments determines cross presentation efficiency, possibly by influencing antigen egress to the cytosol. We addressed the problem directly and quantitatively by comparing the cross presentation of identical antigens conjugated with antibodies against different DC receptors that are targeted to early or late endosomes at distinct efficiencies. In human BDCA1+ and monocyte-derived DCs, CD40 and mannose receptor targeted antibody conjugates to early endosomes, whereas DEC205 targeted antigen primarily to late compartments. Surprisingly, the receptor least efficient at internalization, CD40, was the most efficient at cross presentation. This did not reflect DC activation by CD40, but rather its relatively poor uptake or intra-endosomal degradation compared with mannose receptor or DEC205. Thus, although both early and late endosomes appear to support cross presentation in human DCs, internalization efficiency, especially to late compartments, may be a negative predictor of activity when selecting receptors for vaccine development.

Human B Cell Responses to TLR Ligands Are Differentially Modulated by Myeloid and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells

Selected TLR ligands are under evaluation as vaccine adjuvants and are known to activate dendritic cells (DCs) and B cells to affect vaccine-induced Ab responses. However, the relative contribution of the two main human DC subsets, myeloid (MDCs) and plasmacytoid (PDCs), in supporting B cell responses to TLR ligands remains poorly understood. We found that PDCs but not MDCs markedly enhanced B cell proliferation in response to TLR7/8-L, an imidazoquinoline derivative, and to a lesser extent to TLR9 ligands (CpG ODN classes A, B, and C). PDCs strongly enhanced TLR7/8-L-induced proliferation of both memory and naive B cells but were only able to support memory cells to differentiate to CD27high plasmablasts. In response to TLR7/8 stimulation, PDCs mediated the up-regulation of transcription factors B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein 1 and X-box binding protein 1 and enhanced differentiation of B cells into IgM-, IgG-, and IgA-producing cells. Type I IFN produced to high levels by PDCs was the principal mediator of the effects on TLR7/8 stimulation. Although MDCs expressed higher levels of the known B cell growth factors IL-6, IL-10, and B cell-activating factor in response to TLR7/8 stimulation, they were unable to enhance B cell responses in this system. These data help decipher the different roles of PDCs and MDCs for modulating human B cell responses and can contribute to selection of specific TLR ligands as vaccine adjuvants.

IgG regulates the CD1 expression profile and lipid antigen-presenting function in human dendritic cells via FcγRIIa

Dendritic cells (DCs) process and present bacterial and endogenous lipid antigens in complex with CD1 molecules to T cells and invariant natural killer T (NKT) cells. However, different types of DCs, such as blood myeloid DCs and skin Langerhans cells, exhibit distinct patterns of CD1a, CD1b, CD1c, and CD1d expression. The regulation of such differences is incompletely understood. Here, we initially observed that monocyte-derived DCs cultured in an immunoglobulin-rich milieu expressed CD1d but not CD1a, CD1b, and CD1c, whereas DCs cultured in the presence of low levels of immunoglobulins had an opposite CD1 profile. Based on this, we tested the possibility that immunoglobulins play a central role in determining these differences. IgG depletion and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) add-in experiments strongly supported a role for IgG in directing the CD1 expression profile. Blocking experiments indicated that this effect was mediated by FcgammaRIIa (CD32a), and quantitative polymerase chain reaction data demonstrated that regulation of the CD1 profile occurred at the gene expression level. Finally, the ability of DCs to activate CD1-restricted NKT cells and T cells was determined by this regulatory effect of IgG. Our data demonstrate an important role for FcgammaRIIa in regulating the CD1 antigen presentation machinery of human DCs.

Influenza A virus infection of human primary dendritic cells impairs their ability to cross-present antigen to CD8 T cells.

Influenza A virus (IAV) infection is normally controlled by adaptive immune responses initiated by dendritic cells (DCs). We investigated the consequences of IAV infection of human primary DCs on their ability to function as antigen-presenting cells. IAV was internalized by both myeloid DCs (mDCs) and plasmacytoid DCs but only mDCs supported viral replication. Although infected mDCs efficiently presented endogenous IAV antigens on MHC class II, this was not the case for presentation on MHC class I. Indeed, cross-presentation by uninfected cells of minute amounts of endocytosed, exogenous IAV was -300-fold more efficient than presentation of IAV antigens synthesized by infected cells and resulted in a statistically significant increase in expansion of IAV-specific CD8 T cells. Furthermore, IAV infection also impaired cross-presentation of other exogenous antigens, indicating that IAV infection broadly attenuates presentation on MHC class I molecules. Our results suggest that cross-presentation by uninfected mDCs is a preferred mechanism of antigen-presentation for the activation and expansion of CD8 T cells during IAV infection.

Triggering of Dendritic Cell Responses after Exposure to Activated, but Not Resting, Apoptotic PBMCs

Dendritic cells (DCs) can be activated by signaling via pathogen receptors, by interaction with activated T cells or by exposure to inflammatory mediators. Clearance of apoptotic cells by DCs is generally considered a silent event that is not associated with an inflammatory response. Necrotic cell death, in contrast, leads to induction of inflammation. However, emerging data challenge the view of apoptotic cells as inherently nonimmunogenic. In this study, we report that the activation state of the apoptotic cell may determine whether the exposed DC becomes activated and rendered proficient in Ag presentation. We show that coculture with activated, but not resting, apoptotic PBMCs leads to up-regulation of surface expression of the costimulatory molecules CD80, CD83, and CD86 in human DCs as well as release of proinflammatory cytokines. Furthermore, we show that DCs exposed to allogeneic, activated apoptotic PBMCs induce proliferation and IFN-γ production in autologous T cells. Together, these findings show that activated apoptotic PBMCs per se provide an activation/maturation signal to DCs, suggesting that activated apoptotic PBMCs possess endogenous adjuvant properties.

IFN-α produced by human plasmacytoid dendritic cells enhances T cell-dependent naïve B cell differentiation.

The development and quality of a humoral immune response are largely influenced by the environment that supports the activation of naïve B cells. Human PDCs, through their unique capacity to produce high levels of IFN‐α, have been shown earlier to enhance B cell responses stimulated by selected TLR ligands. In this study, we investigated whether PDCs also promote B cell activation induced by Th cell interactions and BCR ligation. Sorted human naive CD19+ CD27– B cells were activated in vitro with anti‐Ig and irradiated CD4+ T cells. Under these conditions, the presence of supernatants from TLR‐stimulated PDCs increased B cell proliferation, the frequency of B cells that differentiated to CD27high CD38high cells, and secretion of IgM. Similar results were observed when the B cells were activated in the presence of purified IFN‐α. In contrast, supernatants from stimulated MDCs did not augment these functions. Also, IFN‐α treatment of B cells up‐regulated the expression of costimulatory molecule CD86 but not CD40, CD80, MHC class II, or CD25. Although direct IFN‐α exposure of T cells suppressed their proliferative capacity, IFN‐α treatment of B cells led to a small increase in their capacity to induce superantigen‐driven activation of autologous CD4+ T cells. In summary, PDCs, via their production of IFN‐α, may render B cells more responsive to T cell contact, which in turn, facilitates B cell proliferation and differentiation to antibody‐producing cells.