Anna Tortoriello

Phase I-II Study of Gemcitabine and Carboplatin in Stage IIIB-IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE Platinum-based chemotherapy currently represents standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Gemcitabine is one of the most interesting agents currently in use in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, and high response rates have been reported when it is administered in combination with cisplatin. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin in a phase I-II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cancer received carboplatin at area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL/min and gemcitabine at an initial dose of 800 mg/m2, subsequently escalated by 100 mg/m2 per step. Gemcitabine was administered on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin on day 8 of the 28-day cycle. Dose escalation proceeded up to dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which was defined as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia or grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. RESULTS Neutropenia was DLT, inasmuch as it occurred in three of five patients receiving gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. Gemcitabine 1,100 mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC 5 was recommended for phase II studies. An objective response was observed in 13 (50%) of 26 patients, including four complete responses (15%) and nine partial responses (35%). Median duration of response was 13 months (range, 3 to 23 months). Median overall survival was 16 months (range, 3 to 26 months). CONCLUSION The combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin is well tolerated and active. Neutropenia was DLT. The observed activity matches that observable in cisplatin-gemcitabine studies, whereas duration of response and survival are even higher. A phase II trial is under way.

Metronomic administration of zoledronic acid and taxotere combination in castration resistant prostate cancer patients: phase I ZANTE trial.

Background. Docetaxel (DTX) and zoledronic acid (ZOL) are effective in patients with hormone resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) with bone metastases. A phase I clinical trial of metronomic administration of Zoledronic Acid ANd TaxoterE combination (ZANTE trial) in 2 different sequences was conducted in HRPC. Patients and methods. Twenty-two patients enrolled into the study (median age: 73 years; range: 43-80) received one of three escalated doses of DTX (30, 40 and 50mg/m2) in combination with a fixed dose of ZOL (2mg), both administered every 14 days in two different sequences: DTX at the day 1 followed by ZOL at the day 2 (sequence A) or the reverse (sequence B). Patients were evaluated for adverse events and serum IL-8, MMP-2 and MMP-9 were evaluated prior and after therapy with the two sequences of administration of DTX and ZOL. Results. The maximum tolerated dose was not achieved with sequence A. Two patients at third level of sequence B developed dose limiting toxicity. A disease control was obtained in six out of nine patients treated with sequence A, where a decrease of biological markers and PSA were also observed. No evidence of anti-tumor activity was observed in patients treated with sequence B. Conclusions. The bi-weekly combination of DTX (50mg/m2) followed by ZOL was feasible and show promising anti-tumor activity.

Phase I/II study of paclitaxel and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer

Paclitaxel and vinorelbine are among the most active new agents in metastatic breast cancer. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that the combined administration of these two microtubule-targeting agents is feasible and worthwhile. Based on the promising preclinical data, patients with metastatic breast cancer no longer amenable to conventional treatment were entered into a phase I/II study in which the vinorelbine dose was fixed at 30 mg/sqm and paclitaxel was started at 90 mg/sqm and then subsequently escalated by 30 mg/sqm per step. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Hematopoietic growth factor support was provided from the 4th dose level onwards. Grade III neutropenia was observed only in 2 patients treated at the 5th dose level. Thrombocytopenia never reached grade 3. Neurotoxicity was considered dose-limiting, since grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occured in all three patients treated at the 6th dose level. Other toxicities were mild. Paclitaxel 210 mg/sqm and vinorelbine 30 mg/sqm was the selected combination for phase II. Overall response rate in 34 evaluable patients was 38% (95% confidence interval (C.I.), 22% to 54%). In particular, 3 complete responses (9%) and 10 partial responses (29%) were observed. The observed level of antitumor activity, with an overall response rate of 38% and a median duration of response of 12 months, is of interest, since the study was targeted only to anthracycline-pretreated patients, most of whom had adverse prognostic features. The evaluation of a combination of vinorelbine and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer seems worthwhile and is currently undergoing.

Phase I–II study of gemcitabine and paclitaxel in pretreated patients with stage IIIB–IV non-small cell lung cancer

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel are among the most active new agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are worth considering for second-line chemotherapy. In this phase I-II study, we combined gemcitabine and paclitaxel for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Gemcitabine doses were kept fixed at 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, and paclitaxel doses were escalated from 90 mg/m2 on day 1 of the 21-day cycle. Thirty-seven patients were treated at six different dose levels. Grade 4 neutropenia was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), since it occurred in two out of six patients treated at paclitaxel 240 mg/m2; the paclitaxel dose level just below (210 mg/m2) was selected for phase Il evaluation. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild. One complete response (CR) (3%) and 13 partial responses (PR) (36%) were observed in 36 evaluable patients for an overall response rate of 39% (95% C.I., 23-57%). Median duration of response was 35 weeks (range, 8-102). All of the observed objective responses occurred in the 19 patients who had previously responded to the first-line therapy. Median survival was 40 weeks (range, 8-108 weeks). The combination of gemcitabine and paclitaxel is a feasible, well-tolerated, and active scheme for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC; further evaluation, at least in selected patients, such as those previously responding to first-line chemotherapy, is definitely warranted.

Phase II study of high-dose epirubicin, lonidamine, alpha 2b interferon in advanced breast cancer

Summary44 patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with high-dose epirubicin (130 mg/sqm), because of its steep dose-response curve. Lonidamine and alpha interferon were administered as well with the aim of increasing epirubicin uptake and overcoming drug resistance. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support was provided. 14 complete responses and 22 partial responses were observed in 40 evaluable patients for a 90% overall response rate. Median duration of response was 12 months for complete responders, 7 months for partial responders. In two cases the complete response has lasted for more than two years. Myelosuppression, infection, and cardiac toxicity were the main treatment-related toxic effects.These results are encouraging enough to justify a randomized comparison of our chemotherapy program with standard regimens used in advanced breast cancer.

Phase I study of vinorelbine and paclitaxel in small-cell lung cancer

Background: Vinorelbine and paclitaxel interfere with mitotic spindle function through different mechanisms of action. Both of the drugs show antitumor activity in small-cell lung cancer when used as single agents; furthermore, in vitro and in vivo studies have shown a synergistic activity between the two drugs. Patients and methods: Patients with small-cell lung cancer no longer amenable to conventional treatment were entered into a phase I study in which vinorelbine was given at a fixed dose of 30 mg/m2 by 15-min intravenous infusion, whereas paclitaxel was given by 3-h infusion starting 1 h after vinorelbine at an initial dose of 90 mg/m2, which was subsequently escalated by 30-mg/m2 steps. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Results: Grade 3 neutropenia was observed only in three patients treated at the fifty dose level. Thrombocytopenia never reached grade 3. Neurotoxicity was considered dose-limiting, since grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in three of five patients treated at the fifth dose level (paclitaxel 210 mg/m2). Other side effects were generally mild. The overall response rate in 22 evaluable patients was 32% (95% CI 13–51%); in particular, 1 complete response (4.5%) and 6 partial responses (27.3%) were observed. The maximally tolerated doses recommended for phase II studies are 180 mg/m2 for paclitaxel and 30 mg/m2 for vinorelbine. The observed myelosuppression was less severe than anticipated on the basis of the effects of each drug alone. Conclusions: The promising activity of this drug combination warrants a phase II study in untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Accelerated split-course (type B) thoracic radiation therapy plus vinorelbine/carboplatin combination chemotherapy in stage III inoperable non-small cell lung cancer

43 patients with stage III NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer) entered a phase II study aimed at evaluating the toxicity and the activity of a combined modality programme including an accelerated split-course schedule (type B) of thoracic radiation therapy and a combination chemotherapy with vinorelbine and carboplatin. An objective response was achieved in 18/42 evaluable patients (5 complete and 13 partial responses), for an overall response rate of 43% (95% confidence interval, 28-58%). Four complete responses had a duration which exceeded 16 months. Treatment was well tolerated; grade III myelotoxicity occurred in only 14% of patients and treatment was delayed in only 2 cases because of grade 3 oesophagitis. Both tolerability and efficacy data suggest that this regimen holds promise for the treatment of patients with stage III NSCLC.

Phase I study of temozolomide and lomustine in the treatment of high grade malignant glioma.

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis have demonstrated an improved prognosis by chemotherapy of malignant glioma patients. The effects of clinical research therefore have the aim to find more active drugs or new combination therapies. The combination of Temozolomide (TMZ) and nitrosoureas was evaluated preclinically with an evidence of therapeutic synergy. Based on these findings, we have carried out a phase I study with TMZ administered in low, prolonged doses of 75 mg/m2 per day, once a day for 21 days, escalated in cohorts of 3 patients, in combination with a fixed dose of Lomustine (CCNU) 100 mg/m2 orally on day 1. MTD was evident. The treatment was generally well tolerated. We did not observe bleeding or severe infections, as described for several combination chemotherapies with TMZ and other agents. In this study, for the first time in high grade malignant glioma, two orally administrated drugs were associated .TMZ 75 mg/m2 for 28 consecutive days and CCNU 100 mg/m2 on day 1 of every 6 weeks could be recommended as a safe treatment dosage. One of the ten patients evaluated for clinical response showed a partial response, while nine showed stability of disease, with a median duration of from 5 to 6 months.

Phase I/II study of gemcitabine and epirubicine in stage IIIB-IV non small cell lung cancer.

Platinum-based chemotherapy currently represents standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gemcitabine is one of the most promising agents currently in use in advanced NSCLC. As a single-agent, epirubicin, showed tumour response rates ranging from 17% to 36% in NSCLC. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the combination of gemcitabine and epirubicin in a phase I-II study. Thirty chemotherapy-naive patients with stage III B-IV NSCLC received gemcitabine at a fixed dose of 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; epirubicin was administered every 21 days on day 1 at the initial dose of 80 mg/m2 which was subsequently escalated. Neutropenia was dose-limiting toxicity since it occurred in 3 out of five patients receiving epirubicin at the dose of 110 mg/m2. An objective response was observed in 14/30 patients, including 2 (7%) complete responses and 12 (40%) partial responses. Median duration of response was 12 months (range: 3 to 53 + months). Median overall survival was 16 months (range: 4 to 55 + months). The combination of gemcitabine and epirubicin is well tolerated. While the observed activity of this combinated treatment matches that of platinum-based regimens, the duration of response and survival have been sufficiently promising to initiate a phase II trial which is currently under way.