Anna Vasilaki
University of Crete
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anna Vasilaki.
European Journal of Neuroscience | 1999
Andy N. Mead; Anna Vasilaki; Christina Spyraki; Theodora Duka; David N. Stephens
Exposure to an environment, previously conditioned to amphetamine (1 mg/kg, i.p.), induced locomotor activity and c‐fos expression (a marker for neuronal activation) in the mouse medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and amygdala; acute or repeated amphetamine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) administration induced c‐fos expression additionally in the nucleus accumbens. An α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazole propionate (AMPA)‐receptor antagonist, 2,3‐dihydroxy‐6‐nitro‐7‐sulphamoyl‐benzo(f)quinoxaline (NBQX), blocked expression of conditioned activity, and prevented the increase in c‐fos expression in mPFC, implicating mPFC AMPAergic transmission in the conditioned component of behavioural sensitization to amphetamine. NBQX failed to block the expression of amphetamine‐conditioned place preference, a measure of conditioned reward, or conditioned c‐fos expression in the amygdala, an area implicated in the expression of conditioned place preference. These findings indicate that the conditioned components of behavioural sensitization depend on AMPA‐receptor‐mediated activation in mPFC, but that conditioned reward does not.
Neuropharmacology | 2003
Massimo Dal Monte; Cristina Petrucci; Anna Vasilaki; Davide Cervia; Dominique Grouselle; Jacques Epelbaum; Hans-Jürgen Kreienkamp; Dietmar Richter; Daniel Hoyer; Paola Bagnoli
In the mammalian retina, sparse amacrine cells contain somatostatin-14 (SRIF) which acts at multiple levels of neuronal circuitry through distinct SRIF receptors (sst(1-5)). Among them, the sst1 receptor has been localised to SRIF-containing amacrine cells in the rat and rabbit retina. Little is known about sst1 receptor localisation and function in the mouse retina. We have addressed this question in the retina of mice with deletion of sst1 receptors (sst1 KO mice). In the retina of wild type (WT) mice, sst1 receptors are localised to SRIF-containing amacrine cells, whereas in the retina of sst1 KO mice, sst1 receptors are absent. sst1 receptor loss causes a significant increase in retinal levels of SRIF, whereas it does not affect SRIF messenger RNA indicating that sst1 receptors play a role in limiting retinal SRIF at the post-transcriptional level. As another consequence of sst1 receptor loss, levels of expression of sst2 receptors are significantly higher than in control retinas. Together, these findings provide the first demonstration of prominent compensatory regulation in the mouse retina as a consequence of a distinct SRIF receptor deletion. The fact that in the absence of the sst1 receptor, retinal SRIF increases in concomitance with an increase in sst2 receptors suggests that SRIF may regulate sst2 receptor expression and that this regulatory process is controlled upstream by the sst1 receptor. This finding can be important in the design of drugs affecting SRIF function, not only in the retina, but also elsewhere in the brain.
Neuropharmacology | 2002
Anna Vasilaki; M Mouratidou; Stefan Schulz; Kyriaki Thermos
Somatostatin and its receptors (ssts) are found in the retina. Recent evidence suggested the involvement of sst(2A) and sst(2B) receptors in the regulation of nitric oxide (NO) (). In this study, we investigated further the localization of sst(1), sst(3)-sst(5), and the possible involvement of all subtypes, present in the rat retina, in the regulation of NO production. Polyclonal antibodies raised against sst(1), sst(3-5) were applied to 10-14 micro m cryostat sections of rat retinas fixed in paraformaldehyde. NADPH-diaphorase reactivity was assessed histochemically. The levels of NO in rat retinal explants were assessed by the production of its stable metabolites NO(2)(-) and NO(3)(-). sst(1) immunofluorescence was detected mainly in the retinal pigment epithelium, blood vessels of the inner retina, where it was colocalized with NADPH-diaphorase, and in processes of the inner plexiform layer (IPL). sst(4) immunohistochemistry was found in ganglion cell bodies, where it was colocalized with NADPH-diaphorase, processes of the IPL and ganglion cell layer, and optic nerve fibers. sst(3) or sst(5) immunostain was not detected. Somatostatin increased NO production and this effect was mimicked only by the sst(2) specific analog L-779976. The sst(2) antagonist CYN-154806 blocked the L-779976 increase of NO production. These results present conclusive evidence that somatostatins role in the retina involves the regulation of NO by an sst(2) mechanism.
Journal of Neurochemistry | 2003
Anna Vasilaki; Zafiroula Georgoussi; Kyriaki Thermos
The role of somatostatin and its mechanism of action in the retina remains an important target for investigation. Biochemical and pharmacological studies were engaged to characterize the somatostatin receptors in the rabbit retina, and their coupling to G‐proteins. The ability of selective ligands to inhibit [125I]Tyr11‐somatostatin‐14 binding to rabbit retinal membranes was examined. The sst2 analogues SMS201–995, MK678, and BIM23014, displayed IC50 values of 0.28 ± 0.12, 0.04 ± 0.01 and 1.57 ± 0.39 nm, respectively. The sst1 analogue CH275 moderately displaced the [125I]Tyr11‐somatostatin‐14 binding, while selective analogues for sst3, sst4 and sst5 had minimal effect. Immunoblotting and/or immunohistochemistry studies revealed the presence of the pertussis toxin sensitive Gi1/2, and Go proteins, as well as Gs. Somatostatin‐14 and MK678 stimulated GTPase activity in a concentration‐dependent manner with EC50 values of 42.8 ± 16.8 and 70.0 ± 16.5 nm, respectively, thus supporting the functional coupling between the receptor and the G‐proteins. CH275 stimulated the GTPase activity moderately, in agreement with its binding profile. The antisera raised against Goα and Gi1/2α inhibited the somatostatin‐induced high‐affinity GTPase activity, but only anti‐Goα inhibited the MK678 stimulation of the enzyme. These results suggest that somatostatin mediates its actions in the rabbit retina by interacting mainly with sst2 receptors that couple to Goα.
Neuropharmacology | 2004
Anna Vasilaki; Despina Papasava; Daniel Hoyer; Kyriaki Thermos
The aim of the present study was to examine the function of the somatostatin receptor (sst(1)) in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) of the basal ganglia. Radioligand binding studies were performed in rats to assess the presence of the receptor, while in vivo microdialysis studies were performed to examine its role in somatostatin release. CH-275, which is selective for sst(1), MK-678, selective for sst(2) and L-803,087, selective for sst(4) receptors displaced [(125)I]-Tyr(11)-somatostatin specific binding in a concentration-dependent manner with IC(50) values of 75, 0.21 and 11 nM, respectively. Infusion of CH-275 (10(-5), 10(-6) or 10(-7) M) in the NAc of freely moving rats resulted in a decrease in somatostatin levels only at the concentration of 10(-5) M. This effect was reversed by 10(-5) M of the selective sst(1) antagonist SRA-880. The sst(1) agonist L-797,591 (10(-5) M) mimicked the effect of CH-275, while MK-678 and L-803,087 at the same concentration were unable to influence somatostatin levels. These results provide functional evidence to demonstrate that the sst(1) receptor modulates somatostatin release in the basal ganglia.
Neuropsychopharmacology | 2009
Eleftherios G. Pallis; Anna Vasilaki; Dominique Fehlmann; Andreas Kastellakis; Daniel Hoyer; Christina Spyraki; Kyriaki Thermos
This study investigated how the administration (acute and chronic) of the antidepressants citalopram and desmethylimipramine (DMI) influences somatostatin (somatotropin release inhibitory factor, SRIF) levels and SRIF receptor density (sst1–5) in rat brain. Animals received either of the following treatments: (1) saline for 21 days (control group), (2) saline for 20 days and citalopram or DMI for 1 day (citalopram or DMI acute groups), (3) citalopram or DMI for 21 days (citalopram or DMI chronic groups). Somatostatin levels were determined by radioimmunoassay. [125I]LTT SRIF-28 binding in the absence (labeling of sst1–5) or presence of 3 nM MK678 (labeling of sst1/4) and [125I]Tyr3 octreotide (labeling of sst2/5) binding with subsequent autoradiography was performed in brains of rats treated with both antidepressants. Somatostatin levels were increased after citalopram, but not DMI administration, in the caudate-putamen, hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, and prefrontal cortex. Autoradiography studies illustrated a significant decrease in receptor density in the superficial and deep layers of frontal cortex (sst2), as well as a significant increase in the CA1 (sst1/4) hippocampal field in brains of chronically citalopram-treated animals. DMI administration increased sst1/4 receptors levels in the CA1 hippocampal region. These results suggest that citalopram and to a lesser extent DMI influence the function of the somatostatin system in brain regions involved in the emotional, motivational, and cognitive aspects of behavior.
Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2009
Anna Vasilaki; Kyriaki Thermos
Despite the rapid development of new pharmacological and surgical modalities, the treatment of retinal disease all too often results in poor final visual acuity. The primary pathologic mechanism underlying suboptimal visual acuity following retinal disease is cell death. It is induced by a variety of stimuli including ischemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress. New neuroprotective strategies have recently being examined for the prevention of retinal cell death, yet there is still a need for pharmacological agents that are efficacious and lack adverse effects. These could possibly be employed alone or in combination with disease-specific treatments. The neuropeptide somatostatin and its sst(2) receptor selective analogues have been shown to inhibit the ischemia-induced neovascularization in models of retinal ischemia, and to protect from ischemia-induced cell death. The aim of this review is threefold: a) to address the functional role of somatostatin and its receptors in retinal circuitry, b) to present recent evidence supporting the neuroprotective role of somatostatin in experimental models of retinal disease and c) to present the clinical studies that have been performed to date and support the use of somatostatin and its analogues as therapeutics in ophthalmology.
Behavioural Brain Research | 2013
Styliani Zisopoulou; Olga Asimaki; George Leondaritis; Anna Vasilaki; Nikos Sakellaridis; Nikolaos Pitsikas; Dimitra Mangoura
Activation of PKCɛ, an abundant and developmentally regulated PKC isoform in the brain, has been implicated in memory throughout life and across species. Yet, direct evidence for a mechanistic role for PKCɛ in memory is still lacking. Hence, we sought to evaluate this in rats, using short-term treatments with two PKCɛ-selective peptides, the inhibitory ɛV1-2 and the activating ψɛRACK, and the novel object recognition task (NORT). Our results show that the PKCɛ-selective activator ψɛRACK, did not have a significant effect on recognition memory. In the short time frames used, however, inhibition of PKCɛ activation with the peptide inhibitor ɛV1-2 significantly impaired recognition memory. Moreover, when we addressed at the molecular level the immediate proximal signalling events of PKCɛ activation in acutely dissected rat hippocampi, we found that ψɛRACK increased in a time-dependent manner phosphorylation of MARCKS and activation of Src, Raf, and finally ERK1/2, whereas ɛV1-2 inhibited all basal activity of this pathway. Taken together, these findings present the first direct evidence that PKCɛ activation is an essential molecular component of recognition memory and point toward the use of systemically administered PKCɛ-regulating peptides as memory study tools and putative therapeutic agents.
Neuropeptides | 2006
Niki Mastrodimou; Anna Vasilaki; A. Papadioti; M.J. Low; Daniel Hoyer; Kyriaki Thermos
The present study investigated the localization and density of somatostatin (SRIF) receptor subtypes (sst(1-5)) and SRIF-nitric oxide (NO()) interactions in the retina of wildtype [WT, (+/+)] and somatostatin deficient mice [SRIF (-/-)]. Immunohistochemistry and radioligand binding studies with subsequent autoradiography were performed. Monoclonal antibodies [SRIF, protein kinase C (rod bipolar cells marker), microtubule associated protein 1A (ganglion cell marker)] and polyclonal antibodies (anti-sst(1), sst(2A), sst(4) receptor) were applied to 10-14 microm sections of retinas fixed in paraformaldehyde. NADPH-diaphorase reactivity was assessed histochemically. [(125)I]LTT SRIF-28 alone or in the presence of MK678 (sst(2) agonist) and [(125)I]Tyr(3)-octreotide were employed to quantify sst(1-5), sst(1/4)and sst(2/5) receptor densities, respectively. sst(1), sst(2A), and sst(4) receptor immunoreactivities were observed in processes of the inner plexiform layer (IPL), rod bipolar, and in ganglion cells and processes, respectively, in WT and SRIF (-/-) mice. Specific [(125)I]LTT SRIF-28 and [(125)I]Tyr(3)-octreotide binding was increased significantly in SRIF (-/-) mice. NADPH-diaphorase staining was localized in photoreceptors and amacrine cells, but not rod bipolar and ganglion cells. Also, NADPH-diaphorase staining was not colocalized with sst(1), sst(2A) or sst(4) receptor immunoreactivity. These results demonstrate an upregulation of SRIF receptors in mice lacking SRIF, but no evident SRIF-NO(*) interaction was observed in the mouse retina.
Neuropharmacology | 2008
E. Kouvaras; Eftihia Asprodini; I. Asouchidou; Anna Vasilaki; T. Kilindris; D. Michaloudis; I. Koukoutianou; Costas Papatheodoropoulos; G. Kostopoulos
The effect of in vivo fentanyl treatment on synaptic transmission was studied in the CA1 area of the rat hippocampus. Animals were treated either with saline or fentanyl (4 x 80 microg/kg, s.c./15 min). Intracellular in vitro recordings were obtained, 24 h after treatment, from CA1 pyramidal neurons. No difference in pyramidal neuron basic membrane properties or postsynaptic membrane excitability was observed between neurons from saline- and fentanyl-treated animals. The peak amplitude of fast (f-) and slow (s-) components of IPSPs elicited in standard ACSF and the peak amplitude and rate of rise of isolated f- and s-IPSPs elicited in the presence of antagonists (CNQX, 10 microM; AP-5, 10 microM; CGP 55845, 1 microM; and bicuculline methochloride, 10 microM), in response to various stimulus intensities, was smaller in fentanyl-treated animals. Conversely, the rising slope of excitatory responses was similar in neurons from saline- and fentanyl-treated animals. Furthermore, in fentanyl-treated animals, lower stimulus strengths were required to elicit subthreshold excitatory responses of the same amplitude suggesting that acute exposure to fentanyl increases susceptibility of pyramidal neurons to presynaptic stimulation. GABA immunohistochemistry revealed lower GABA content in processes and neuronal somata suggesting diminished GABA release onto pyramidal neurons. We conclude that acute in vivo exposure to fentanyl is sufficient to induce long-lasting reduction in GABA-mediated transmission, rather, than enhanced excitatory transmission or modulation of the intrinsic excitability of pyramidal neurons. These findings provide evidence regarding the mechanisms involved in the early stages of tolerance development towards the analgesic effects of opioids.