Annalisa Iervasi

Cardiac natriuretic hormones, neuro-hormones, thyroid hormones and cytokines in normal subjects and patients with heart failure

Abstract The derangement of neuro-endocrine control of circulation influences both disease evolution and response to treatment in patients with heart failure, but little data are available about the complex relationships between the degree of neuro-hormonal activation and clinical severity. We studied the relationships between cardiac natriuretic hormones (CNHs) and several neuro-hormones and immunological markers in a prospective cohort of 105 consecutive patients with cardiomyopathy (77 men and 28 women, mean age 66.7±12.4 years, range 33–89 years). We assayed the circulating levels of CNHs (atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)), plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone, cortisol, adrenaline, noradrenaline, thyroid hormones and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). The concentrations of all CNHs and neuro-hormones were higher in patients with heart failure compared to normal subjects, except for free triiodothyronine (FT3), which was below normal values. ANP was positively related to NYHA class, IL-6, adrenaline, noradrenaline and cortisol, while negatively with ejection fraction and FT3. BNP was positively related to age, NYHA class, IL-6, TNF-α, adrenaline, noradrenaline and cortisol, while negatively with ejection fraction and FT3. A stepwise multiple linear regression indicated that plasma ANP depended only on ejection fraction, adrenaline and noradrenaline values, while for plasma BNP variation NYHA class contributed too. Our data confirm a progressive activation of hormonal and immunological systems in patients with heart failure. Furthermore, CNH circulating levels in heart failure are affected not only by cardiac function and disease severity, but also by activation of neuro-hormonal and stress-related cytokine systems, as well as by the thyroid hormones, even on usual medical treatment.

Prognostic Value of Plasma Renin Activity in Heart Failure

The prognostic role of specific biomarkers of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and sympathetic activation pathways in heart failure has never been investigated in populations with current evidence-weighted treatment. To establish whether the plasma renin activity (PRA), among several neurohormonal biomarkers, is able to predict cardiac events in a population of patients with heart failure on up-to-date treatment, we selected 996 consecutive patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <50%, mean age 65 ± 13 years), who underwent a complete clinical and humoral characterization and were then followed up (median 36 months, range 0 to 72) for cardiac death and appropriate implantable cardioverter device shock. We recorded 170 cardiac deaths and 27 shocks. On Cox multivariate analysis, only ejection fraction (hazard ratio 0.962, 95% confidence interval 0.938 to 0.986), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; hazard ratio 1.729, 95% confidence interval 1.383 to 2.161) and PRA (hazard ratio 1.201, 95% confidence interval 1.024 to 1.408) were independent predictors of cardiac death. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a cutoff value for PRA of 2.30 ng/ml/hour that best predicted cardiac mortality. Independent predictors of PRA were ejection fraction, functional class, sodium, potassium, NT-proBNP, norepinephrine, aldosterone, C-reactive protein, and medical therapy. The association of high NT-proBNP and high PRA identified a subgroup (22% of the study population) with the greatest risk of cardiac death. In conclusion, PRA resulted an independent prognostic marker in patients with systolic heart failure additive to NT-proBNP level and ejection fraction. PRA might help to select those patients needing an enhanced therapeutic effort, possibly targeting incomplete renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade.

The ovarian cycle as a factor of variability in the laboratory screening for primary aldosteronism in women

Primary aldosteronism is increasingly investigated in hypertension being associated with an elevated cardiovascular risk. Aldosterone has been reported to increase in the luteal phase in normal women but to our knowledge the influence of the ovarian cycle on the first screening for primary aldosteronism (that is, on the levels of plasma aldosterone and its relationship to PRA levels) was never investigated. We measured hormonal levels during one cycle in 26 low-renin mild hypertensive outpatients. LH, FSH, 17 β-estradiol, progesterone, aldosterone and PRA were assayed at the seventh, fourteenth, twenty-first and twenty-eighth days of the cycle after 30 min of recumbency. Aldosterone and PRA increased from the seventh (follicular phase) to twenty-first day (luteal phase) from 11.2 to 17.8 ng 100 ml−1 and from 0.23 to 0.35 ng ml−1 h−1, respectively (both P=0.004) The proportion of patients with aldosterone >15 ng 100 ml−1 significantly increased from the follicular to the luteal phase, (8/26 vs 19/25, P=0.018); a similar increase was found for Aldosterone-PRA Ratio >30 combined with either a minimum PRA value of 0.5 ng ml−1 h−1 or aldosterone >15 ng 100 ml−1 (7/26 vs 16/25 and 7/26 vs 17/25 respectively, P<0.05). Aldosterone was positively related to PRA and progesterone. Higher aldosterone levels may be frequently encountered in the second part of the ovarian cycle in low-renin hypertensive women. This variability appears to be an important factor to be taken into account in the first-step laboratory screening for primary aldosteronism and should be considered in the process of standardization of the diagnostic work-up for this disease.

Increased levels of C-type natriuretic peptide in patients with idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction

C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) is expressed in the vascular endothelium. It is not known whether CNP is specifically increased in patients with idiopathic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ILVDys) with or without overt heart failure, and whether in these patients it is related with indicators of myocardial and/or endothelial/microvascular impairment. We determined plasma CNP levels in 51 ILVDys and in 60 controls. We observed a significant increase in patients with (7.0+/-0.9 pg/ml) or without (6.1+/-0.53 pg/ml) overt heart failure (p<0.001) in respect to controls (2.5+/-0.12 pg/ml). CNP was significantly correlated with LVEF (p<0.001), end-diastolic dimension (p<0.05), ANP (p<0.001) and BNP (p<0.001), interleukin-6 (p<0.001), total cholesterol (p<0.05), low-density lipoprotein (p=0.05), ratio total cholesterol/ high-density lipoprotein (p=0.05) and, in a subgroup of patients, with abnormal vasodilating capacity of the coronary microcirculation. In conclusion, CNP is activated in patients with LV dysfunction but without coronary artery disease, independently of the presence of overt heart failure and in tune with the extent of myocardial functional involvement. In these patients CNP is also related with both systemic and coronary indicators of endothelial/microvascular damage.

Multicentre comparison of free thyroid hormones immunoassays: the Immunocheck study

Abstract Background: In order to evaluate whether there is still present a very large variability in measured values and analytical performance among different free thyroid (FT) hormone immunoassays, we considered the results derived from an External Quality Assessment (EQA) scheme, named Immunocheck. Methods: The EQA Immonocheck study enrolled about 1000 participant laboratories, which measured the 54 quality control samples distributed in the three annual cycles (2007, 2008 and 2009). Participant laboratories produced a total of 30,476 results for FT3 and 31,351 for FT4, respectively. Results: The results recovered during the EQA cycles allowed the estimation of assay imprecision (i.e., within-method and between-laboratories variability). On average, control samples with lower free triiodothyronine (FT3) and free thyroxine (FT4) concentrations showed higher imprecision values (CV%) than those with levels within or above the normal range. The agreement among the results produced by different methods was estimated by computing the percent differences (i.e., percent bias values) between the concentrations measured by the methods and the mean of all collected results (i.e., consensus mean). Conclusions: The results of our study demonstrate that a large variability in measured values is still present among different free thyroid hormone immunoassays. Indeed, some immunoassays for both FT3 and FT4 measurement showed percent bias values compared to the consensus mean >20%. Laboratories should inform the clinicians about analytical performance and reference limits of the method used. Furthermore, the clinicians should avoid the use of different methods in the follow-up of patients.

Increased plasma levels of osteopontin are associated with activation of the renin-aldosterone system and with myocardial and coronary microvascular damage in dilated cardiomyopathy.

In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) abnormal myocardial blood flow (MBF) has been associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that osteopontin (OPN) plasma levels could be associated with the activation of the renin-aldosterone system (RAS) in these patients and be involved in mediating myocardial and coronary damage. In 66 patients with idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction of variable severity the plasma levels of OPN were correlated with biomarkers of systemic metabolism, RAS activation, myocardial dysfunction and with clinical indexes of left ventricle (LV) function and perfusion obtained by 2D-echocardiography and PET. As compared to controls, patients showed a significant increase of inflammatory markers (OPN: 508+/-30.8ng/ml vs. 426.9+/-16.4, p<0.05 and interleukin (IL)-6: 1.71+/-0.29pg/ml vs. 0.38+/-0.03pg/ml, p<0.001) and of indexes of cardiac damage. OPN levels were significantly correlated with the extent of microvascular dysfunction (MBF at rest: p=0.01; during dipyridamole: p=0.0003) and with plasma renin activity (PRA) (r=0.26, p=0.04). Both in patients with milder or more severe LV dysfunction lower MBF values were associated with higher OPN levels and PRA. These results suggest a interdependent role of RAS and vascular inflammation in cardiomyopathy.

Evaluation of the analytical performance of the advanced method for cardiac troponin I for the AxSYM platform: comparison with the old method and the Access system

Abstract Background: The determination of cardiac troponins is routinely used for rule in/out, risk stratification, and follow-up of patients with acute coronary artery syndrome. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the advanced immunoassay for troponin I (cTnI) carried out on an AxSYM platform (Abbott Diagnostic Division) and compared these characteristics to those of the previous version of this assay and to cTnI on the Access 2 immunoassay system (Beckman Coulter, Inc.). Methods: We assayed plasma samples from healthy subjects (n=66) and cardiac patients (n=132) using AxSYM Plus system assays called the old (OLD AxSYM) and advanced TnI (ADV AxSYM) methods and using an Access system. Results: An improvement in analytical sensitivity (detection limit) was observed for the advanced cTnI AxSYM compared to the previous method (0.014 vs. 0.31μg/L), while the cTnI value for the 10% CV (i.e., functional sensitivity) was 0.41μg/L for the ADV and 1.9μg/L for the OLD method. The kinetics of cTnI release was similar, as evaluated in 25 patients with typical acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A close linear relationship was found between the two methods on the AxSYM system (OLD cTnI=7.436+6.858 ADV cTnI; R=0.968, n=214) and with the Access system (OLD AxSYM=7.154+7.9 Access, R=0.876, n=158; ADV AxSYM=0.23+1.209 Access, R=0.927, n=160). However, wide bias was found between the OLD and ADV AxSYM methods (mean difference 118.4μg/L, p<0.0001), while more similar results were found between the ADV AxSYM and Access methods (mean difference 2.6μg/L, corresponding to a mean percentage difference of 17%, p<0.0001). In 106 patients with symptomatic rheumatoid arthritis with high rheumatoid factor (RF) concentration, the mean cTnI measured by the ADV AxSYM method was 0.009±0.031μg/L (range 0–0.23μg/L) with a significant correlation (R=0.316, p=0.001) between cTnI and RF values. Furthermore, in 60 of these serum samples the cTnI concentration was also measured using the Access method; significant correlation with the values found by the ADV AxSYM method was observed (R=0.468, p=0.0002). Conclusions: The present study indicates that the AxSYM Troponin-I ADV immunoassay shows improved analytical sensitivity compared to the OLD AxSYM method, as well as very similar clinical results to those determined using the Access method. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:1022–9.