Annamaria Maiorano

Sirolimus interferes with iron homeostasis in renal transplant recipients.

Background. Sirolimus is an immunosuppressive drug whose use is frequently associated with anemia. A pathogenic link between sirolimus-induced anemia and the appearance of an inflammatory state was recently suggested. Because inflammation-related anemia is characterized by a functional iron deficiency, we investigated whether sirolimus may influence iron homeostasis and serum levels of hepcidin, a key mediator of inflammation-related anemia. Methods. To this purpose, 42 consecutive transplanted patients with biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy were randomized (2:1 ratio) to receive either a 40% cyclosporine reduction (group A, 14 patients) or immediate cyclosporine withdrawal and sirolimus introduction (group B, 28 patients). Hemoglobin levels and iron status were evaluated 6 months before and after randomization. Results. The two groups had similar hemoglobin levels and iron status at baseline. We did not observe any significant change in hemoglobin and iron status in group A patients after randomization. On the contrary, we observed a significant reduction of hemoglobin without any change of red blood cell count after sirolimus introduction, with a significant reduction of mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular hemoglobin. Serum iron and transferrin saturation (TSAT) levels were markedly reduced after the switch, while ferritin serum concentrations remained stable. Although sirolimus-induced anemia was recently suggested to resemble inflammation-related anemia, hepcidin serum levels were similar in the two groups after randomization. None of group A and eight of group B patients presented a TSAT <20 and were given iron supplementation after randomization, in all of them oral iron therapy did not influence either hemoglobin or serum iron levels. Conclusion. We demonstrated that sirolimus-induced anemia is independent of the drug antiproliferative effect and does not present the features of inflammation-related anemia. This event may be due to the direct influence of sirolimus on iron homeostasis.

RAPAMYCIN INHIBITS PAI-1 EXPRESSION AND REDUCES INTERSTITIAL FIBROSIS AND GLOMERULOSCLEROSIS IN CHRONIC ALLOGRAFT NEPHROPATHY

Background. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is characterized by deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) in all renal compartments. PAI-1 seems to play a pivotal role in ECM turnover in CAN. Rapamycin has been shown to improve long-term graft survival in patients with CAN. The aim of the study was to evaluate the molecular mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of rapamycin on CAN progression at glomerular and tubulointerstitial level. Methods. After a biopsy-proven CAN diagnosis (T0), 18 patients on calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to continue CNI (6 patients) or to receive rapamycin (RAPA; 12 patients). After 2 years of treatment (T24), all patients underwent a second renal biopsy. Morphometric analysis was conducted at T0 and at T24. PAI-1 expression was evaluated at T0 and T24 by immunohistochemistry. We evaluated the effect of rapamycin on PAI-1 gene expression in cultured proximal tubular cells incubated with CD40L or thrombin, two potential CAN pathogenic mediators. Results. The RAPA group showed a significant regression of glomerulosclerotic lesions and only a 26% increase in interstitial fibrosis after 2 years compared to baseline, whereas the CNI group showed progression of glomerulosclerosis and 112% increase in fibrosis. Glomerular and tubulointerstitial PAI-1 expression was reduced compared to the baseline in the RAPA group, while they were unchanged in the CNI group. In vitro data showed that rapamycin significantly reduced PAI-1 gene expression induced by both CD40L and thrombin in proximal tubular epithelial cells. Conclusions. These data suggest that rapamycin may modulate ECM deposition in CAN reducing PAI-1 expression.

Immunohistochemical characterization of glomerular and tubulointerstitial infiltrates in renal transplant patients with chronic allograft dysfunction

BACKGROUND The term chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was deleted in the Eighth Banff Classification and two new categories were introduced: chronic T-cell-mediated rejection (CTMR) and chronic active humoral rejection (CAHR). The aim of this study was to revise our CAN cases diagnosed in the last 4 years, analyse allograft survival rates and identify types of infiltrating cells in the different settings. METHODS Seventy-nine patients with biopsy-proven CAN were examined and classified into four groups according to the Banff 2005 criteria: CTMR, CAHR, chronic calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (CNITOX) and interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy not otherwise specified (NOS). CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, CD103, Foxp3 and IL-17 protein expression and C4d deposits were investigated. RESULTS We diagnosed 20 CTMR, 13 CAHR, 28 CNITOX, and 18 NOS. Death-censored graft survival at 4 years from renal biopsy was worse in CAHR compared with the other types of chronic injury. Glomerular CD8(+) cells were increased in CTMR vs CNITOX and NOS. Interstitial CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells were increased in CTMR vs CNITOX. CD68(+) cells in glomerular and peritubular capillaries were higher in CAHR vs CNITOX, CTMR and NOS. CD103(+) cells were higher in cases with tubulitis than in those without. T regulatory and T helper 17 cells were rarely observed in the different settings. CONCLUSIONS Graft survival was worse in patients with CAHR. The presence of any grade transplant glomerulopathy and chronic allograft vasculopathy are poorer prognostic factors. Infiltrating CD8(+), CD103(+) and CD4(+) cells may help to differentiate CTMR from other types of chronic injury, thus improving diagnostic/prognostic features of biopsy in patients with chronic allograft dysfunction.

A single-center cohort study to define the role of pretransplant biopsy score in the long-term outcome of kidney transplantation.

Background The role of pretransplant biopsy in defining the quality of kidney grafts is still debated. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of pretransplant biopsy score on long-term graft outcome. Methods In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 372 recipients of single kidney transplantation (SKT) from deceased donors between 1997 and 2007, with an available pretransplant biopsy. We evaluated 5- and 10-year graft survival, incidence of delayed graft function, and estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 and 5 years. Results Graft survival at 5 and 10 years was significantly better for recipients with a score of 0 compared to transplants with a score of 1 to 5, whereas we did not observe any significant difference among transplants with a score of 1 through 4. Survival of kidneys with a score of 5 was significantly worse compared to grafts with a score of 1 to 4. In a multivariate Cox model, only pretransplant histological score was significantly associated with graft survival. Transplants with a score of 0 and 5 had the best and the worst graft function, respectively, both at 1 and 5 years, whereas we did not observe any difference among patients with a score of 1 through 4. In a multivariate logistic regression, pretransplant histological score was independently associated with the prevalence of an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL/min at 5 years. Finally, delayed graft function rate was significantly higher in recipients with a score of 5 compared to patients with a score of 1 to 4 and score of 0. Conclusions Our data suggest that 1) pretransplant histological score may predict long-term graft outcome and 2) allocation of kidneys with a score of 4 to SKT provides an acceptable long-term graft function and survival.

The dynamics of kidney donation: Viewpoints from the donor, the recipients, and the transplant team

Living kidney transplantation has become increasingly widespread to reduce organ shortage. Very few studies have prospectively investigated the donors long-term risks. Living donation is a complex medical decision in which different actors are involved. This therapeutic option needs educational programs for potential donors, recipients, and transplant professionals to make them aware of the possible risks and benefits. It is important to fully exploit living-donor kidney transplantation.