Anne C. Mosenthal

Isolated traumatic brain injury: age is an independent predictor of mortality and early outcome.

BACKGROUND Geriatric trauma patients have a worse outcome than the young with comparable injuries. The contribution of traumatic brain injury (TBI) to this increased mortality is unknown and has been confounded by the presence of other injuries. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of age in the mortality and early outcome from isolated TBI. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of all adult patients with isolated TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale score > or = 3) admitted during a 5-year period to two Level I trauma centers. Mortality, Glasgow Outcome Scale score at discharge, therapy, and complications were compared for elderly (age > or = 65 years) and younger patients. RESULTS Of 694 patients, 22% were defined as elderly. The mortality for the elderly group was twice that of their younger counterparts (30% vs. 14%, p < 0.001), even for those with mild to moderate TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 9-15). Thirteen percent of elderly survivors had a poor functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 2 or 3) at hospital discharge versus 5% in the young group (p < 0.01). Independent factors associated with a high mortality were age and Glasgow Coma Scale score. CONCLUSION The mortality from TBI is higher in the geriatric population at all levels of head injury. In addition, functional outcome at hospital discharge is worse. Although some of this increased mortality may be explained by complications or type of head injury, age itself is an independent predictor for mortality in TBI.

The effect of age on functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: 6-month report of a prospective multicenter trial

OBJECTIVE Elderly patients (aged 60 years and older) have been demonstrated to have an increased mortality after isolated traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, the prognosis of those patients surviving their hospitalization is unknown. We hypothesized that surviving elderly patients would also have decreased functional outcome, and this study examined the functional outcome of patients with isolated TBI at discharge and at 6 months posthospitalization. METHODS This was a multicenter prospective study of all patients with isolated moderate to severe TBI defined as Head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 with an Abbreviated Injury Scale score in any other body area of 1. Patients surviving to discharge gave their consent and were enrolled. Data collected included demographics, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission, and neurosurgical interventions. Outcome data included discharge disposition and Glasgow Outcome Scale score and modified Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score at discharge and at 6 months. RESULTS Two hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled, with 44 (19%) aged greater than or equal to 65 years. Mechanisms of injury were falls (34%), assaults (28%), motor vehicle collisions (14%), pedestrian (11%), and other (12%). Falls were more common in the older patients and assaults in the younger group. The mean admitting GCS score was 12.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.4-13.3), with older patients having a higher mean GCS score, 14.1 (95% CI, 13.6-14.6) versus 12.5 (95% CI, 12.0-13.1; p = 0.03). There were no differences in the percentage of patients admitted to the intensive care unit or requiring neurosurgical intervention between younger and older patients. Because there were few elderly patients with low GCS scores who survived to discharge, outcome measures focused on those patients with GCS scores of 13 to 15. A greater percentage of elderly were discharged to rehabilitation (28% vs. 16%, p =0.08). The mean discharge FIM score was 10.4 (95% CI, 9.8-11.0) for the elderly versus 11.4 (95% CI, 11.1-11.7) for the young (p =0.001), with 68% elderly and 89% young discharged with total independent scores of 11 to 12. At 6 months, the difference narrowed, but the mean FIM score was still greater for the young group, 11.7 (95% CI, 11.6-11.9) versus 11.0 (95% CI, 10.6-11.4; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Functional outcome after isolated mild TBI as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale and modified FIM is generally good to excellent for both elderly and younger patients. Older patients required more inpatient rehabilitation and lagged behind their younger counterparts but continued to recover and improve after discharge. Although there were statistically significant differences in the FIM score at both discharge and 6 months, the clinical importance of these small differences in the mean FIM score to the patients quality of life is less clear. Measurable improvement in functional status during the first 6 months after injury is observed in both groups. Aggressive management and care of older patients with TBI is warranted, and efforts should be made to decrease inpatient mortality. Continued follow-up is ongoing to determine whether these outcomes persist at 12 months.

Proposed quality measures for palliative care in the critically ill: a consensus from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Critical Care Workgroup.

For critically ill patients and their loved ones, high-quality health care includes the provision of excellent palliative care. To achieve this goal, the healthcare system needs to identify, measure, and report specific targets for quality palliative care for critically ill or injured patients. Our objective was to use a consensus process to develop a preliminary set of quality measures to assess palliative care in the critically ill. We built on earlier and ongoing efforts of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Critical Care End-of-Life Peer Workgroup to propose specific measures of the structure and process of palliative care. We used an informal iterative consensus process to identify and refine a set of candidate quality measures. These candidate measures were developed by reviewing previous literature reviews, supplementing the evidence base with recently published systematic reviews and consensus statements, identifying existing indicators and measures, and adapting indicators from related fields for our objective. Among our primary sources, we identified existing measures from the Voluntary Hospital Associations Transformation of the ICU program and a government-sponsored systematic review performed by RAND Health to identify palliative care quality measures for cancer care. Our consensus group proposes 18 quality measures to assess the quality of palliative care for the critically ill and injured. A total of 14 of the proposed measures assess processes of care at the patient level, and four measures explore structural aspects of critical care delivery. Future research is needed to assess the relationship of these measures to desired health outcomes. Subsequent measure sets should also attempt to include outcome measures, such as patient or surrogate satisfaction, as the field develops the means to rigorously measure such outcomes. The proposed measures are intended to stimulate further discussion, testing, and refinement for quality of care measurement and enhancement.

Choosing and using screening criteria for palliative care consultation in the ICU: A report from the improving palliative care in the ICU (IPAL-ICU) advisory board

Objective:To review the use of screening criteria (also known as “triggers”) as a mechanism for engaging palliative care consultants to assist with care of critically ill patients and their families in the ICU. Data Sources:We searched the MEDLINE database from inception to December 2012 for all English-language articles using the terms “trigger,” “screen,” “referral,” “tool,” “triage,” “case-finding,” “assessment,” “checklist,” “proactive,” or “consultation,” together with “intensive care” or “critical care” and “palliative care,” “supportive care,” “end-of-life care,” or “ethics.” We also hand-searched reference lists and author files and relevant tools on the Center to Advance Palliative Care website. Study SelectionTwo members (a physician and a nurse with expertise in clinical research, intensive care, and palliative care) of the interdisciplinary Improving Palliative Care in the ICU Project Advisory Board presented studies and tools to the full Board, which made final selections by consensus. Data ExtractionWe critically reviewed the existing data and tools to identify screening criteria for palliative care consultation, to describe methods for selecting, implementing, and evaluating such criteria, and to consider alternative strategies for increasing access of ICU patients and families to high-quality palliative care. Data SynthesisThe Improving Palliative Care in the ICU Advisory Board used data and experience to address key questions relating to: existing screening criteria; optimal methods for selection, implementation, and evaluation of such criteria; and appropriateness of the screening approach for a particular ICU. Conclusions:Use of specific criteria to prompt proactive referral for palliative care consultation seems to help reduce utilization of ICU resources without changing mortality, while increasing involvement of palliative care specialists for critically ill patients and families in need. Existing data and resources can be used in developing such criteria, which should be tailored for a specific ICU, implemented through an organized process involving key stakeholders, and evaluated by appropriate measures. In some settings, other strategies for increasing access to palliative care may be more appropriate.

Integrating Palliative Care in the ICU: The Nurse in a Leading Role.

Palliative care is increasingly recognized as an integral component of comprehensive intensive care for all critically ill patients, regardless of prognosis, and for their families. Here we discuss the key role that nurses can and must continue to play in making this evidence-based paradigm a clinical reality across a broad range of ICUs. We review the contributions of nurses to implementation of ICU safety initiatives as a model that can be applied to ICU palliative care integration. We focus on the importance of nursing involvement in design and application of work processes that facilitate this integration in a systematic way, including processes that ensure the participation of nurses in discussions and decision making with families about care goals. We suggest ways that nurses can help to operationalize an integrated approach to palliative care in the ICU and to define their own essential role in a successful, sustainable ICU palliative care improvement effort. Finally, we identify resources including The IPAL-ICU ProjectTM, a new initiative by the Center to Advance Palliative Care that can assist nurses and other healthcare professionals to move such efforts forward in diverse critical care settings.

Integrating Palliative Care in the Surgical and Trauma Intensive Care Unit: A Report From the Improving Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit (IPAL-ICU) Project Advisory Board and the Center to Advance Palliative Care

Objective:Although successful models for palliative care delivery and quality improvement in the intensive care unit have been described, their applicability in surgical intensive care unit settings has not been fully addressed. We undertook to define specific challenges, strategies, and solutions for integration of palliative care in the surgical intensive care unit. Data Sources:We searched the MEDLINE database from inception to May 2011 for all English language articles using the term “surgical palliative care” or the terms “surgical critical care,” “surgical ICU,” “surgeon,” “trauma” or “transplant,” and “palliative care” or “end-of- life care” and hand-searched our personal files for additional articles. Based on review of these articles and the experiences of our interdisciplinary expert Advisory Board, we prepared this report. Data Extraction and Synthesis:We critically reviewed the existing literature on delivery of palliative care in the surgical intensive care unit setting focusing on challenges, strategies, models, and interventions to promote effective integration of palliative care for patients receiving surgical critical care and their families. Conclusions:Characteristics of patients with surgical disease and practices, attitudes, and interactions of different disciplines on the surgical critical care team present distinctive issues for intensive care unit palliative care integration and improvement. Physicians, nurses, and other team members in surgery, critical care and palliative care (if available) should be engaged collaboratively to identify challenges and develop strategies. “Consultative,” “integrative,” and combined models can be used to improve intensive care unit palliative care, although optimal use of trigger criteria for palliative care consultation has not yet been demonstrated. Important components of an improvement effort include attention to efficient work systems and practical tools and to attitudinal factors and “culture” in the unit and institution. Approaches that emphasize delivery of palliative care together with surgical critical care hold promise to better integrate palliative care into the surgical intensive care unit. (Crit Care Med 2012; 40:–1206)

Elemental and intravenous total parenteral nutrition diet-induced gut barrier failure is intestinal site specific and can be prevented by feeding nonfermentable fiber.

Objective Parenteral nutrition and elemental diets both cause bacterial translocation, immune dysfunction, and increased infection in laboratory animals, whereas elemental diets, with or without fiber, ameliorate some, but not all gut barrier failure. The purpose of this study is to investigate, in an Ussing chamber system, whether elemental vs. parenteral diets induce gut barrier failure in specific anatomical sites in the intestine and whether fiber can ameliorate this phenomenon. Design Controlled study in laboratory animals. Setting University laboratory. Subjects Male Sprague-Dawley rats. Interventions Nutritional support was provided to rats for 7 days by oral total parenteral nutrition (TPN; elemental diet) 307 kcal/kg/day, intravenous TPN (parenteral diet) 307 kcal/kg/day via jugular venous catheters, or rodent chow (controls). Measurements and Main Results Permeability to bacteria in intestinal segments of ileum, jejunum, and colon was evaluated in an Ussing chamber. Results were correlated with bacterial translocation to the mesenteric lymph nodes. Intravenous TPN caused greater bacterial translocation in all small intestinal segments and the cecum when compared with chow (p < .05). Oral TPN caused gut barrier failure only in the ileal segment, but not in the remainder of the small intestine (p < .001). Addition of cellulose provided a greater protection of the ileum to permeability than did pectin (p < .01). Conclusions TPN causes global intestinal barrier failure, but elemental diet prevents barrier failure in parts of the small intestine other than the ileum. The addition of cellulose fiber to elemental diet can ameliorate further barrier failure in the ileum.

Palliative care in the ICU: relief of pain, dyspnea, and thirst—A report from the IPAL-ICU Advisory Board

AbstractPurposePain, dyspnea, and thirst are three of the most prevalent, intense, and distressing symptoms of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. In this report, the interdisciplinary Advisory Board of the Improving Palliative Care in the ICU (IPAL-ICU) Project brings together expertise in both critical care and palliative care along with current information to address challenges in assessment and management.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive review of literature focusing on intensive care and palliative care research related to palliation of pain, dyspnea, and thirst.ResultsEvidence-based methods to assess pain are the enlarged 0–10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for ICU patients able to self-report and the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool or Behavior Pain Scale for patients who cannot report symptoms verbally or non-verbally. The Respiratory Distress Observation Scale is the only known behavioral scale for assessment of dyspnea, and thirst is evaluated by patient self-report using an 0–10 NRS. Opioids remain the mainstay for pain management, and all available intravenous opioids, when titrated to similar pain intensity end points, are equally effective. Dyspnea is treated (with or without invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation) by optimizing the underlying etiological condition, patient positioning and, sometimes, supplemental oxygen. Several oral interventions are recommended to alleviate thirst. Systematized improvement efforts addressing symptom management and assessment can be implemented in ICUs.ConclusionsRelief of symptom distress is a key component of critical care for all ICU patients, regardless of condition or prognosis. Evidence-based approaches for assessment and treatment together with well-designed work systems can help ensure comfort and related favorable outcomes for the critically ill.

Postsurgical reduction of serum lipoproteins: interleukin-6 and the acute-phase response.

In a previous retrospective study, we reported a significant reduction in serum cholesterol levels following major surgery, and speculated on the possible role of cytokines in this reduction. The purpose of this article is to report a prospective study of the association of cytokines with postoperative changes in serum lipoprotein levels. Serum samples were obtained from 11 male patients before and at intervals for up to 10 days after surgery, and were assayed for total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), cortisol, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma). LDL-C was calculated. The TC showed a 27.9% decrease, from a mean of 4.27 mmol/L to 3.08 mmol/L (p < 0.001) after surgery, reaching a nadir at 24 hours and returning to preoperative values in 7 to 10 days. A similar decrease was noted in the HDL-C and LDL-C levels. IL-6 levels increased from a mean baseline value of 6 pg/ml to a peak of 143 pg/ml at 24 hours (p < 0.0006). There was an inverse relationship between TC and IL-6 levels, with r = -0.51 for the entire curve and r = -0.90 for the cholesterol nadir with the IL-6 peak. The other cytokines did not show significant changes. We conclude that TC and its fractions decrease to a nadir and that IL-6 increases to a peak approximately 24 hours after major surgery. There is a significant inverse correlation between TC and IL-6, suggesting a possible role of IL-6 in postoperative changes in serum lipoproteins.

Beyond 30-day mortality: Aligning surgical quality with outcomes that patients value

Because of their strong sense of responsibility for the lives of patients, surgeons frequently struggle to withdraw postoperative life supporting treatments when patients or their families request it.1 Although surgeons experience this as therapeutic optimism or the emotional pull of error and responsibility, these forces are accentuated by the increasing emphasis on 30-day mortality reporting. Recent expansion of outcomes profiling imposes an unconscious bias in these critical decisions: surgeons who report concern about physician profiling are more likely to decline to operate on a patient who prefers to limit life support, or refuse to withdraw life support postoperatively, than surgeons who perceive less pressure from outcomes reporting.2,3 Public reporting of 30-day mortality may motivate surgeons and hospitals to improve outcomes and theoretically empowers patients to make informed choices.4 However, use of this single metric unintentionally fails to accommodate patients who might benefit from palliative surgery, or patients who would prefer death to prolonged postoperative treatment in the intensive care unit or long-term chronic care after a major complication. Surgeons should be able to offer informed patients a risky but potentially beneficial surgical option and then allow patients to refuse aggressive treatments if they have become overly burdensome or when patients’ goals for surgery are no longer possible. Reconciling the effects of an approach designed to ensure high quality surgical care with the needs of vulnerable patients is challenging, particularly for high-risk operations where hard outcomes like mortality are easily observed and other important outcomes are more difficult to assess. Strategies to mitigate the impact of 30-day mortality reporting through consideration of alternative quality metrics are required to protect the needs of surgical patients and the practices of surgeons who could make a valuable contribution to their patients’ quality of life.