Anne-Catherine Dock-Bregeon

The structure of threonyl-tRNA synthetase-tRNA(Thr) complex enlightens its repressor activity and reveals an essential zinc ion in the active site

E. coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS) is a class II enzyme that represses the translation of its own mRNA. We report the crystal structure at 2.9 A resolution of the complex between tRNA(Thr) and ThrRS, whose structural features reveal novel strategies for providing specificity in tRNA selection. These include an amino-terminal domain containing a novel protein fold that makes minor groove contacts with the tRNA acceptor stem. The enzyme induces a large deformation of the anticodon loop, resulting in an interaction between two adjacent anticodon bases, which accounts for their prominent role in tRNA identity and translational regulation. A zinc ion found in the active site is implicated in amino acid recognition/discrimination.

Transfer RNA-mediated editing in threonyl-tRNA synthetase. The class II solution to the double discrimination problem.

Threonyl-tRNA synthetase, a class II synthetase, uses a unique zinc ion to discriminate against the isosteric valine at the activation step. The crystal structure of the enzyme with an analog of seryl adenylate shows that the noncognate serine cannot be fully discriminated at that step. We show that hydrolysis of the incorrectly formed ser-tRNA(Thr) is performed at a specific site in the N-terminal domain of the enzyme. The present study suggests that both classes of synthetases use effectively the ability of the CCA end of tRNA to switch between a hairpin and a helical conformation for aminoacylation and editing. As a consequence, the editing mechanism of both classes of synthetases can be described as mirror images, as already seen for tRNA binding and amino acid activation.

Synthesis of aspartyl-tRNA Asp in Escherichia coli—a snapshot of the second step

The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the Escherichia coli aspartyl‐tRNA synthetase (AspRS)–tRNAAsp–aspartyl‐adenylate complex shows the two substrates poised for the transfer of the aspartic acid moiety from the adenylate to the 3′‐hydroxyl of the terminal adenosine of the tRNA. A general molecular mechanism is proposed for the second step of the aspartylation reaction that accounts for the observed conformational changes, notably in the active site pocket. The stabilization of the transition state is mediated essentially by two amino acids: the class II invariant arginine of motif 2 and the eubacterial‐specific Gln231, which in eukaryotes and archaea is replaced by a structurally non‐homologous serine. Two archetypal RNA–protein modes of interactions are observed: the anticodon stem–loop, including the wobble base Q, binds to the N‐terminal β‐barrel domain through direct protein–RNA interactions, while the binding of the acceptor stem involves both direct and water‐mediated hydrogen bonds in an original recognition scheme.

Structural basis of translational control by Escherichia coli threonyl tRNA synthetase.

Escherichia coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS) represses the translation of its own messenger RNA by binding to an operator located upstream of the initiation codon. The crystal structure of the complex between the core of ThrRS and the essential domain of the operator shows that the mRNA uses the recognition mode of the tRNA anticodon loop to initiate binding. The final positioning of the operator, upon which the control mechanism is based, relies on a characteristic RNA motif adapted to the enzyme surface. The finding of other thrS operators that have this conserved motif leads to a generalization of this regulatory mechanism to a subset of Gram-negative bacteria.

Post-transfer editing mechanism of a D-aminoacyl-tRNA deacylase-like domain in threonyl-tRNA synthetase from archaea

To ensure a high fidelity during translation, threonyl‐tRNA synthetases (ThrRSs) harbor an editing domain that removes noncognate L‐serine attached to tRNAThr. Most archaeal ThrRSs possess a unique editing domain structurally similar to D‐aminoacyl‐tRNA deacylases (DTDs) found in eubacteria and eukaryotes that specifically removes D‐amino acids attached to tRNA. Here, we provide mechanistic insights into the removal of noncognate L‐serine from tRNAThr by a DTD‐like editing module from Pyrococcus abyssi ThrRS (Pab‐NTD). High‐resolution crystal structures of Pab‐NTD with pre‐ and post‐transfer substrate analogs and with L‐serine show mutually nonoverlapping binding sites for the seryl moiety. Although the pre‐transfer editing is excluded, the analysis reveals the importance of main chain atoms in proper positioning of the post‐transfer substrate for its hydrolysis. A single residue has been shown to play a pivotal role in the inversion of enantioselectivity both in Pab‐NTD and DTD. The study identifies an enantioselectivity checkpoint that filters opposite chiral molecules and thus provides a fascinating example of how nature has subtly engineered this domain for the selection of chiral molecules during translation.

Solution structure of a tRNA with a large variable region: Yeast tRNASer☆

Different chemical reagents were used to study the tertiary structure of yeast tRNASer, a tRNA with a large variable region: ethylnitrosourea, which alkylates the phosphate groups; dimethylsulphate, which methylates N-7 of guanosine and N-3 of cytosine; and diethylpyrocarbonate, which modifies N-7 of adenine. The non-reactivity of N-3 of cytidine 47:1, 47:6, 47:7 and 47:8 and the reactivity of cytidine 47:3 confirms the existence of a variable stem of four base-pairs and a short variable loop of three residues. For the N-7 positions in purines, accessible residues are G1, G10, Gm18, G19, G30, I34, G35, A36, i6A37, G45, G47, G47:5, G47:9 and G73. The protection of N-7 atoms of residues G9, G15, A21, A22 and G47:9 reflects the tertiary folding. Strong phosphate protection was observed for P8 to P11, P20:1 to P22, P48 to P50 and for P59 and P60. A model was built on a PS300 graphic system on the basis of these data and its stereochemistry refined. While trying to keep most tertiary interactions, we adapted the tertiary folding of the known structures of tRNAAsp and tRNAPhe to the present sequence and solution data. The resulting model has the variable arm not far from the plane of the common L-shaped structure. A generalization of this model to other tRNAs with large variable regions is discussed.

Conformational movements and cooperativity upon amino acid, ATP and tRNA binding in threonyl-tRNA synthetase

The crystal structures of threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS) from Staphylococcus aureus, with ATP and an analogue of threonyl adenylate, are described. Together with the previously determined structures of Escherichia coli ThrRS with different substrates, they allow a comprehensive analysis of the effect of binding of all the substrates: threonine, ATP and tRNA. The tRNA, by inserting its acceptor arm between the N-terminal domain and the catalytic domain, causes a large rotation of the former. Within the catalytic domain, four regions surrounding the active site display significant conformational changes upon binding of the different substrates. The binding of threonine induces the movement of as much as 50 consecutive amino acid residues. The binding of ATP triggers a displacement, as large as 8A at some C(alpha) positions, of a strand-loop-strand region of the core beta-sheet. Two other regions move in a cooperative way upon binding of threonine or ATP: the motif 2 loop, which plays an essential role in the first step of the aminoacylation reaction, and the ordering loop, which closes on the active site cavity when the substrates are in place. The tRNA interacts with all four mobile regions, several residues initially bound to threonine or ATP switching to a position in which they can contact the tRNA. Three such conformational switches could be identified, each of them in a different mobile region. The structural analysis suggests that, while the small substrates can bind in any order, they must be in place before productive tRNA binding can occur.

The modular structure of Escherichia coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase as both an enzyme and a regulator of gene expression

In addition to its role in tRNA aminoacylation, Escherichia coli threonyl‐tRNA synthetase is a regulatory protein which binds a site, called the operator, located in the leader of its own mRNA and inhibits translational initiation by competing with ribosome binding. This work shows that the two essential steps of regulation, operator recognition and inhibition of ribosome binding, are performed by different domains of the protein. The catalytic and the C‐terminal domain of the protein are involved in binding the two anticodon arm‐like structures in the operator whereas the N‐terminal domain of the enzyme is responsible for the competition with the ribosome. This is the first demonstration of a modular structure for a translational repressor and is reminiscent of that of transcriptional regulators. The mimicry between the operator and tRNA, suspected on the basis of previous experiments, is further supported by the fact that identical regions of the synthetase recognize both the operator and the tRNA anticodon arm. Based on these results, and recent structural data, we have constructed a computer‐derived molecular model for the operator‐threonyl‐tRNA synthetase complex, which sheds light on several essential aspects of the regulatory mechanism.

Structural insights into the polyphyletic origins of glycyl tRNA synthetases

Glycyl tRNA synthetase (GlyRS) provides a unique case among class II aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, with two clearly widespread types of enzymes: a dimeric (α2) species present in some bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes; and a heterotetrameric form (α2β2) present in most bacteria. Although the differences between both types of GlyRS at the anticodon binding domain level are evident, the extent and implications of the variations in the catalytic domain have not been described, and it is unclear whether the mechanism of amino acid recognition is also dissimilar. Here, we show that the α-subunit of the α2β2 GlyRS from the bacterium Aquifex aeolicus is able to perform the first step of the aminoacylation reaction, which involves the activation of the amino acid with ATP. The crystal structure of the α-subunit in the complex with an analog of glycyl adenylate at 2.8 Å resolution presents a conformational arrangement that properly positions the cognate amino acid. This work shows that glycine is recognized by a subset of different residues in the two types of GlyRS. A structural and sequence analysis of class II catalytic domains shows that bacterial GlyRS is closely related to alanyl tRNA synthetase, which led us to define a new subclassification of these ancient enzymes and to propose an evolutionary path of α2β2 GlyRS, convergent with α2 GlyRS and divergent from AlaRS, thus providing a possible explanation for the puzzling existence of two proteins sharing the same fold and function but not a common ancestor.

Aminoacylation at the Atomic Level in Class IIa Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases

Abstract The crystal structures of histidyl- (HisRS) and threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS) from E. coli and glycyl-tRNA synthetase (GlyRS) from T. thermophilus, all homodimeric class IIa enzymes, were determined in enzyme-substrate and enzyme-product states corresponding to the two steps of aminoacylation. HisRS was complexed with the histidine analog histidinol plus ATP and with histidyl-adenylate, while GlyRS was complexed with ATP and with glycyl-adenylate; these complexes represent the enzyme-substrate and enzyme-product states of the first step of aminoacylation, i.e. the amino acid activation. In both enzymes the ligands occupy the substrate-binding pocket of the N-terminal active site domain, which contains the classical class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase fold. HisRS interacts in the same fashion with the histidine, adenosine and α-phosphate moieties of the substrates and intermediate, and GlyRS interacts in the same way with the adenosine and α-phosphate moieties in both states. In addition to the amino acid recognition, there is one key mechanistic difference between the two enzymes: HisRS uses an arginine whereas GlyRS employs a magnesium ion to catalyze the activation of the amino acid. ThrRS was complexed with its cognate tRNA and ATP, which represents the enzyme-substrate state of the second step of aminoacylation, i.e. the transfer of the amino acid to the 3′-terminal ribose of the tRNA. All three enzymes utilize class II conserved residues to interact with the adenosine-phosphate. ThrRS binds tRNAThr so that the acceptor stem enters the active site pocket above the adenylate, with the 3′-terminal OH positioned to pick up the amino acid, and the anticodon loop interacts with the C-terminal domain whose fold is shared by all three enzymes. We can thus extend the principles of tRNA binding to the other two enzymes.