Anne E. Hagey
Children's National Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anne E. Hagey.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2006
Kenneth R. Hande; Anne E. Hagey; Jordan Berlin; Yingna Cai; Kysa A. Meek; Hiro Kobayashi; A. Craig Lockhart; Diane Medina; Jeffrey A. Sosman; Gary Gordon; Mace L. Rothenberg
Purpose: Microtubules play a critical role in many cellular functions, including cell division and mitosis. ABT-751 is a novel sulfonamide antimitotic that binds to the colchicine site on β-tubulin that leads to a block in the cell cycle at the G2M phase, resulting in cellular apoptosis. ABT-751 was investigated in this phase 1 trial designed to assess its maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. Experimental Design: ABT-751 was administered on a daily (q.d.) or twice daily (b.i.d.) oral schedule for 7 days every 3 weeks to 39 patients with refractory solid tumors. Toxicity was monitored weekly. Plasma and urine ABT-751 and metabolite pharmacokinetics were determined. Results: The MTD for the q.d. schedule was 250 mg/d. DLTs during cycle 1 were abdominal pain, constipation, and fatigue. The MTD on the b.i.d. schedule was 150 mg. Cycle 1 of therapy with the 175 mg b.i.d. schedule was tolerated without DLT. However, six of seven patients reported grade 3 toxicity (ileus, constipation, abdominal pain, or fatigue), which occurred in cycle 2 or 3. ABT-751 was absorbed after oral administration with an overall mean Tmax of about 2 hours. The pharmacokinetics of ABT-751 were dose-proportional and time-independent. There was minimal accumulation of ABT-751 after multiple q.d. and b.i.d. doses. Efficacious concentrations, as determined from preclinical models (0.5-1.5 μg/mL), were achieved in all subjects. ABT-751 metabolism occurred primarily by glucuronidation and sulfation. No complete or partial tumor responses were noted, but one patient had a minor response, and four patients had stable disease lasting at least 6 months. Conclusions: The MTD and recommended phase 2 doses for ABT-751 were 250 mg q.d. and 150 mg b.i.d. on a 7-day schedule given every 3 weeks, due to subsequent cycle toxicities at 175 mg b.i.d. dosing. Toxicities were abdominal pain, constipation, and neuropathy.
Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2008
Ann M. Mauer; Ezra E.W. Cohen; Patrick C. Ma; Mark Kozloff; Lee Schwartzberg; Andrew Coates; Jiang Qian; Anne E. Hagey; Gary Gordon
Purpose: To determine the tolerability and efficacy of ABT-751, an oral antimitotic agent that inhibits polymerization of microtubules, in patients with advanced taxane-refractory non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: Eligibility was limited to patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC who had received one to two cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, had a performance status of zero to one, and adequate organ function. Treatment included ABT-751 200 mg daily for 21 consecutive days, followed by 7 days off drug. Objectives were to determine response rate, time to tumor progression, survival, and tolerability of ABT-751. Results: All 35 enrolled patients were assessable for survival, response, and tolerability. Median time to tumor progression and overall survival were 2.1 and 8.4 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 2.9%. One patient achieved a partial response that was ongoing 567 days after initial documentation. Treatment was well tolerated; fatigue, constipation, and dehydration were the only treatment related, grade three adverse events occurring in more than one patient. Incidence of grade 3/4 hematologic and blood chemistry toxicities was acceptable, and ABT-751 was not associated with myelosuppression. Conclusions: ABT-751 associated toxicity was acceptable. The median time to progression and overall survival as demonstrated for ABT-751 were comparable to other agents considered active in this patient population and to current treatments approved for second-line NSCLC. The novel antimitotic targeting of ABT-751 in combination with the compound’s acceptable nonmyelosuppressive toxicity profile and efficacy similar to agents currently in use in this setting, warrant further evaluation of this compound in combination with other cytotoxic agents in advanced NSCLC.
Chemotherapy | 2012
Tian Ma; Alexander Fuld; James R. Rigas; Anne E. Hagey; Gary Gordon; Ethan Dmitrovsky; Konstantin H. Dragnev
Background: ABT-751 is a novel antimitotic agent that exerted cytotoxic effects in preclinical studies. Carboplatin has efficacy in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in combination with other drugs. Methods: Lung cancer cell lines were treated with ABT-751 and/or carboplatin to investigate their impact on cell growth. A phase I study with an expansion cohort was conducted in previously treated NSCLC patients. The primary objective was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); secondary objectives were objective response rates, median survival, time to tumor progression, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacodynamic evaluation of buccal swabs. Results: Combining ABT-751 with carboplatin significantly reduced growth and induced apoptosis of lung cancer cell lines. Twenty advanced NSCLC patients were enrolled. MTD was ABT-751 125 mg orally twice daily for 7 days with carboplatin AUC 6. DLTs included fatigue, ileus, neutropenia and pneumonitis. Two patients had confirmed partial responses. Median overall survival was 11.7 months (95% CI 5.9–27.0). Time to tumor progression was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.0–2.7). Four of 6 patients showed decreased cyclin D1 protein in posttreatment versus pretreatment buccal swabs. Conclusion: Combining ABT-751 with carboplatin suppressed growth of lung cancer cell lines and had modest clinical antitumor activity in advanced NSCLC previously treated predominantly with carboplatin. Further studies of this combination are not recommended while investigations of biomarkers in different patient populations, alternative schedules and combinations may be pursued.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2006
Elizabeth Fox; John M. Maris; Brigitte C. Widemann; Kysa A. Meek; Anne Goodwin; Wendy Goodspeed; Marie Kromplewski; Molly Fouts; Diane Medina; Steve Y. Cho; Susan L. Cohn; Andrew Krivoshik; Anne E. Hagey; Peter C. Adamson; Frank M. Balis
Blood | 2007
Wyndham H. Wilson; Anil Tulpule; Alexandra M. Levine; Kieron Dunleavy; Andrew Krivoshik; Anne E. Hagey; Margaret Shovlin; Melanie A. Gloria; Renee Greco; Hao Xiong; Yi-Lin Chiu; Steven W. Elmore; Owen A. O’Connor
Archive | 2005
Gary Gordon; Anne E. Hagey; Kysa A. Meek; Saul H. Rosenberg
Archive | 2006
Gary Gordon; Anne E. Hagey; Kysa A. Meek; Saul H. Rosenberg
Blood | 2011
Anne E. Hagey; Jeffrey E. Lancet; Varghese Palath; Andrew Wei; Martin Lackmann; Jorge Cortes; Andrew W. Boyd; Dan Shochat; Geoffrey T. Yarranton; Christopher Bebbington; Jonathan A. Leff
Archive | 2004
Gary Gordon; Anne E. Hagey; Saul H. Rosenberg
Blood | 2010
Susan O'Brien; Deborah A. Thomas; Leonard T. Heffner; Wendy Stock; Gerald L. Messerschmidt; Anne E. Hagey; Steven R. Deitcher; Hagop M. Kantarjian